I love the design, I think this airplane has been very well thought out. I am very broad (and heavy) so I need shoulder room and useful load. How is the ventilation in this? How does it compare to the L600?
Model CTLSi GT 2020 with full fuel ( 34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 296 lbs ( Qty 2 148 lb personell ) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctlsi/specification/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctlsi/ Model F2 with full fuel (34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 336 lbs ( Qty 2 168 lb persons ) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/specifications/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/f2-information-2/ Model CTSI with full fuel (34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 396 lbs ( Qty 2 198 lb persons) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctsw-super/specifications/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctsw-super/
Dan, You're going 'Hollywood' again, with your choice of aircraft to present! You're giving us HIGH DOLLAR models video after video! Just in case you haven't noticed, most of us are in the middle of a Finacial Crisis due to that nasty old Chinese Communist Party Wuhan virus, and the resultant complications therefrom presenting! We need to see AFFORDABLE planes in the Basic Classes: Part 103, ELSA Kits (Titan, Hummel, et al) with GREATER SPECIFICS pertaining to flying aspects: cruise speeds at contextual GPH, NON-STANDARD Engine Options (Aeromomentum, VW, Yamaha, Kawasaki, Snowmobile Conversions, etc.) and what those options can do for the AVERAGE (financially and skills wise) pilot! Further, though I believe that it's NOT in your wheelhouse, MANY of use Geezers are interested in OFF-ASPHALT use (fly fishing from Sandbars on rivers that are INACCESSIBLE via a road/physical ability) going places we CANNOT hike to, but still want to visit! This aspect would include 3 or 4 whee/tire options for Remote Landings, and the accompanying choices in brakes, suspension. Lastly, many of us are NOT big on 'state of the art' Screen Electronics: we LIKE the large round gauges (that are EASY to see with tired old eyes), that tend to NOT fail at the frequency of 'modern electronics'. There you have it. I still enjoy your videos, because occasionally you produce videos of aircraft that might meet my needs. Cheers from the Oil Patch in Central WY
I love the design, I think this airplane has been very well thought out. I am very broad (and heavy) so I need shoulder room and useful load. How is the ventilation in this? How does it compare to the L600?
Price?
Model CTLSi GT 2020 with full fuel ( 34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 296 lbs ( Qty 2 148 lb personell ) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctlsi/specification/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctlsi/
Model F2 with full fuel (34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 336 lbs ( Qty 2 168 lb persons ) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/specifications/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/f2-information-2/
Model CTSI with full fuel (34 gallons ) Useful load for personnel and baggage 396 lbs ( Qty 2 198 lb persons) flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctsw-super/specifications/ and flightdesignusa.com/aircraft/ctsw-super/
Dan,
You're going 'Hollywood' again, with your choice of aircraft to present!
You're giving us HIGH DOLLAR models video after video!
Just in case you haven't noticed, most of us are in the middle of a Finacial Crisis due to that nasty old Chinese Communist Party Wuhan virus, and the resultant complications therefrom presenting!
We need to see AFFORDABLE planes in the Basic Classes: Part 103, ELSA Kits (Titan, Hummel, et al) with GREATER SPECIFICS pertaining to flying aspects: cruise speeds at contextual GPH, NON-STANDARD Engine Options (Aeromomentum, VW, Yamaha, Kawasaki, Snowmobile Conversions, etc.) and what those options can do for the AVERAGE (financially and skills wise) pilot!
Further, though I believe that it's NOT in your wheelhouse, MANY of use Geezers are interested in OFF-ASPHALT use (fly fishing from Sandbars on rivers that are INACCESSIBLE via a road/physical ability) going places we CANNOT hike to, but still want to visit! This aspect would include 3 or 4 whee/tire options for Remote Landings, and the accompanying choices in brakes, suspension.
Lastly, many of us are NOT big on 'state of the art' Screen Electronics: we LIKE the large round gauges (that are EASY to see with tired old eyes), that tend to NOT fail at the frequency of 'modern electronics'.
There you have it. I still enjoy your videos, because occasionally you produce videos of aircraft that might meet my needs.
Cheers from the Oil Patch in Central WY