Many of you want to make complex sentences. I hope this video helps! Are you looking for PART 2? If so, click the link below! ua-cam.com/video/DSZPv2HWj7Q/v-deo.html GOOD NEWS! I have just opened a website where you can get MORE EXPLANATIONS and EXTRA ACTIVITIES to help you practice and improve even faster! It is 100% FREE! Here’s the link: Englishspeaking360.com
Teacher, we are having difficulty finding a way to contact you to help us with some of our pending questions. Could you please provide us with your WhatsApp number or your email address? Thank you.
This is a very good lesson of English 's grammar. It is able to understand easily. Because you can explain very clear.I have brushed up my English today. Thanks you so much.
What an incredible 👏 😍 ❤amazing useful lesson dear professor may God bless you 🙏 we will be waiting on pins and needles to your terrifically interesting video ❤
Thank you sir My exams are near and I didn't understand this topic, but because of this video now I understand this topic Once again Thank you Sir !!!!
Yes, in this case you would need commas. Commas show that the information they contain is not necessary. In this case: "The man that we saw at the restaurant is a famous actor." there are no commas because the information from the relative clause is necessary. Does that make sense?
Yes, I did the exercise well. Thanks for the clear explanation! But example #9 would be written like this: The girl John met at the party last night works in a bank. I hope that's correct!
HI About the sentence : A lawyer who specializes in labor law..... i can write: A lawyer who is specialised in labor law .... In fact , it is the verb : to be specialise ! thank a lot for your explainetions.
Teacher, thank you so much for these interesting lessons. Teacher I have two questions: 1)- in the video at 5.11, can we say : the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ? 2)- In the sentence (the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ), do we have to put commas after the word (chef) and after the word ( cooking) knowing that punctuation plays a big role in understanding ?? Thank you very much.
You have some great questions! Yes, you can switch the main clause and extra info around and make a different sentence. However, the focus of the sentence changes. As for commas, we use them when the information they contain is not necessary. In this example, the information is important, so commas shouldn't be used. Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
The correct sentence is: "The company that launches a new product specializes in tech gadgets." Here’s why: Use "the" when referring to a specific company already known to the speaker and listener. Since we're talking about a particular company that launches new tech products, "the" is the appropriate choice. If you’re introducing a company for the first time in a general sense, "a company" would also be correct.
@@englishspeaking360 15:10 I mean A company that specializes in tech gadgets is launching a new product. Or A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets. Here which one is correct? I think here both are correct.
You're almost correct. When You Cannot Use "That": Non-Defining Relative Clauses (extra information): My brother, who lives in Canada, is coming to visit. Her car, which is red, broke down yesterday. You must use "who" or "which" in non-defining clauses, not "that."
Thank you so much! Please can we say in the 8th sentence The girl whom John met at the party last night workes at a bank. All my answers were correct except this one. Amazing video as always ❤
You got all the other sentences right! That's excellent! 🤩🇨🇦 You DO have a partial right answer on that one. The only difference is that you switched the main clause and the relative clause around. As a result, you shifted the focus from John to the girl. In some contexts it might be ok, but in others it might make a big difference in meaning.
I have two problems. First, with reletive clause with proposition! I don't know what prepositions must be used and when to use those prepositions! Second When can't we replace which with that? I hope you make a video about them, too. Thank you for your informative video.
Those are excellent questions! 1. Using Prepositions in Relative Clauses: When a relative clause involves a preposition, the position of the preposition can change based on formality. For formal usage, the preposition goes before the relative pronoun (e.g., "the person to whom I was speaking"). In informal usage, it often appears at the end (e.g., "the person I was speaking to"). Common prepositions in relative clauses include to, with, for, and about. The choice depends on the verb or phrase used before the clause (e.g., “the person I am thinking of”). 2. When to Use "Which" vs. "That": "That" is typically used in defining (restrictive) relative clauses, where the information is essential to understand the noun (e.g., “The book that I borrowed is great.”). "Which" is preferred in non-defining (non-restrictive) clauses, where the information is additional but not essential (e.g., “The book, which I borrowed, is great.”). Note that in American English, "which" can also sometimes be used in defining clauses, but "that" cannot be used in non-defining ones.
Can you please find out gerunds in this paragraph? Hiking through the dense forest, we heard a twig snapping behind us. A deer was grazing nearby. The sun began setting, casting a warm glow on the tree tops. Being in the forest and listening to the sounds of nature calmed our souls. We enjoyed breathing in the fresh, earthy air.
Is this example from an online dictionary correct? 'They speak a language akin to French.' It omits 'that is' or 'which is' after the word 'language.' BTW, I enjoy watching your videos a lot!
Yes, you can remove "that is" or "which is" in this sentence without changing its meaning. It would simply become: "They speak a language akin to French." In this case, the meaning remains clear, and the sentence sounds more concise. Both "that is" and "which is" function as relative clauses here, but if they're not needed for clarification, omitting them is perfectly acceptable.
THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL! I have a questionWhy here we can omit "which is". Main: This is an opera in seven parts. Extra: It is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus. Can i change The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky. into The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky. ? THANKS SO MUCH
Yes, you can change "The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky" to "The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky." In English, relative clauses with "that" or "which" can sometimes be reduced by removing the relative pronoun (like "that" or "which") and the auxiliary verb (like "are"). This is known as a reduced relative clause. In this case: "The dogs that are rescued" becomes "The dogs rescued." This makes the sentence more concise while retaining the original meaning.
In the first example, "which is" can be omitted to form a reduced relative clause. When we say, "This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus," we can omit "which is" to create a more concise sentence: "This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus." The reason we can omit "which is" is because "based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus" is acting as an adjective phrase describing "an opera in seven parts." English allows us to reduce relative clauses in cases like this, especially when they describe or clarify the subject. This reduction often improves the sentence's flow and readability by avoiding unnecessary words without changing the meaning.
Hmmm... I'm not sure what you mean. If you have only a main clause like "Who did Jun meet?" then WHO can’t be omitted. You can only omit WHO when it is not the subject of a relative clause.
Could you please make a video on how get subtle difference between two words. Because english language has same words with subtle differences. I always find myself unable to understand this.
@indyanatureandpeace5694 Great! I have a playlist with a few similar videos. You might be interested. Here's the link. What is the difference? Words with similar meanings. Comparative grammar. English Speaking 360: ua-cam.com/play/PLdDArlpQeGSZ-4waDSqMDPo0HZZg4hCxW.html
@@englishspeaking360 Thanks 🙏. I want you to make more videos on this topic. Some more confusing words are neglect and ignore, begin, start, commence, terrible and horrible, big,huge, enormous, gigantic, massive and so on.
Good question! It's a little technical but here's the explanation. In relative clauses, "that" can sometimes substitute for "who" or "which", but there are rules and subtle differences to keep in mind. 1. Who vs. That "Who" is used when referring to people. Example: She is the teacher who inspired me. "That" can also refer to people in restrictive (defining) clauses, though "who" is more common and preferred in formal English. Example: She is the teacher that inspired me. However, "that" is not typically used in non-restrictive (non-essential) clauses, where additional information is added. Example: My sister, who lives in New York, is visiting. (Correct) My sister, that lives in New York, is visiting. (Incorrect) 2. Which vs. That "Which" is used to refer to animals or things and is common in both restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. Restrictive Example: This is the book which helped me the most. Non-restrictive Example: This book, which I bought last year, is amazing. "That" can replace "which" in restrictive (defining) clauses when referring to things, but not in non-restrictive clauses. Example: This is the book that helped me the most. (Correct) This book, that I bought last year, is amazing. (Incorrect) Summary "Who" is for people; "which" is for things; "that" can replace either in restrictive clauses. "That" is not used in non-restrictive clauses, where "who" and "which" are preferred.
I appreciate the love! I teach everything in my videos so I didn't think there was a need for a book. 😉 However, I have a website with easy explanations and extra activities. Check it out when you have time. Englishspeaking360.com
"The horse THAT BELONGS to my neighbor won the race". The other way we can express the rule is; When A VERB FOLLOWS "THAT" or "WHICH" it can't be removed, you just can't leave it out.
Hello! Yes, that's a great way to explain it. However, it doesn't work for all relative pronouns. I wish it did. It would be so much easier to explain. Thanks for chiming in! Have a great day! 🌞
When relative pronoun is a subject in the relative clause, it can´t be dropped, but if it functions as an object there, we could either keep it or spare it. I wonder that is WHY a noun ( adv, conj ) or a relative pronoun 😅? Thank you, teacher.
Hi! Nice try, but no cigar. A is the right article here because he is one of the lawyers with that specialty out of many. Using THE would mean that only one lawyer is specialized in labor law.
Many of you want to make complex sentences. I hope this video helps! Are you looking for PART 2? If so, click the link below! ua-cam.com/video/DSZPv2HWj7Q/v-deo.html
GOOD NEWS! I have just opened a website where you can get MORE EXPLANATIONS and EXTRA ACTIVITIES to help you practice and improve even faster! It is 100% FREE! Here’s the link: Englishspeaking360.com
Teacher, we are having difficulty finding a way to contact you to help us with some of our pending questions. Could you please provide us with your WhatsApp number or your email address?
Thank you.
@mustafmoallim You may contact me here. I usually reply to comments on my videos. 🤩
I can't wait for the second part!!!!! Thanks a lot.
Hello teacher, Please make a video with the compound sentence.
@srabonichy6666 Thanks for the suggestion!
This is a very good lesson of English 's grammar. It is able to understand easily. Because you can explain very clear.I have brushed up my English today. Thanks you so much.
Thanks for the kind words! 🤩🇨🇦 Keep up the good work!
This is exactly how I like to learn grammar! Thank you for creating such amazing videos. They are super helpful!
I'm so glad you found it helpful! 🤩 Sometimes it's hard to make grammar easy but I do my best. Thanks for watching!🤩🇨🇦
The teacher who makes
English speaking 360 video is the best.
The video that i am watching is very important to learn.
Thank u a lot, God bless you
Your examples are excellent! Keep it up! 🤩🇨🇦
Sir it is an excellent class. Thank you so much
Awesome! Glad you liked it! 🤩
you are the best among the teachers,Thanks for sharing.
I'm glad you like my videos! 🤩 Thanks for watching!
Thank you so much, handy grammar lesson 🎉🎉🎉
Glad to hear that! Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
The way you taught us is very effective. Thank you so much, dear English teacher who has musical voice (which / that ) I love mostly.❤
Happy to hear that! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩👍
Your explanation is easy to understand , l really enjoy watching your videos.
Awesome! I'm glad it's helpful! 🤩
I understand your explanation and I liked very well, and I thank you, teacher.
I'm glad you found it helpful! 🤩🇨🇦
What an incredible 👏 😍 ❤amazing useful lesson dear professor may God bless you 🙏 we will be waiting on pins and needles to your terrifically interesting video ❤
Thank you! 😃 Glad to have you as a fan! I've just opened my own website, so if you need more practice, drop by englishspeaking360.com 🤩🇨🇦
I am a big fan of you, lots of love and respect from India
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! I hope my videos help you improve. 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you sir for the detail information and explanation of relative clauses ..🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
I love your classes very clear and specific to the topic. Thank you so much. You are the best.
I'm glad you liked it! 🤩🇨🇦
Really you're great...
It was amazing lecture and explaining..
Thx a lot
Thanks for the kind words! 😊
Another good one, I really appreciate it! ; )
Tanks for guiding us through our English learning journey and keep uo the good job.
Thanks a lot! It's always a pleasure to hear from you! Have a great day! 🌞
nigh
this is the best video about relative clauses! thanks a lot!
Wow! Thank you so much! 🤩😇🤩Glad it was helpful!🤩🇨🇦
Wow! amazing! the best relative clauses on Yt! thanks a lot!
Thanks for watching! I'm happy to hear you liked the video! 🤩🇨🇦
Thanks for paying me atention when I asked you for this videos. Thanks my friend.
Thanks for the great idea! Sorry it took so long though 😰
@@englishspeaking360 It doesn't matter, the good things is you finally uploaded the video and even it's understandable.
Cheers! 🤩
Very useful course 👍.. thank you sir 👌👌
Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
I understood very well the usage of when the relative clauses can be omitted. In particular, it was very useful to know when "Whom" is used.
Excellent! I'm glad to help! Have a great day 🌞
Best teacher in the world 🙏
Wow! Thank you so much! 😇😇😇
Excellent explanation. I enjoyed it very much!
Glad to hear that! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩
Best teacher in work ❤
Thank you! 😃 Glad you like my videos! 🤩🇨🇦
Interesting! Good job 👏 👏 👏 👏 👍
Glad you liked it! Cheers! 🤩
❤
Thank you very much sir, your videos are really informative and thay are making change in people's lives.🙏
Thank you so much for the feedback! You made my day! 🤩🤩🤩
Thank you for this amaziing video😊
I'm glad you found it helpful! 👍
Great video, thank you so much!
Awesome! Thanks for watching!
Thank you sir
My exams are near and I didn't understand this topic, but because of this video now I understand this topic
Once again
Thank you Sir !!!!
That's awesome! Glad it was useful! Good luck with your exams! 🤩
ducky giraffe
can i have your roblux name
Thank you for this video.I learned a lot from it.
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
Good morning teacher!
Good morning! Ready for some grammar? 🤩
Superb sir 👌👍
Thanks so much! 🤩🇨🇦
This is very useful! Thank you so much ❤
Awesome! Thanks for the feedback! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you teacher
Have a blessing for everything
You're very welcome! Glad you liked it! 🤩
Nice information ❤
First comment! Congrats! Thanks for watching!
I love your explanations
Thanks for the positive feedback! 😃
❤❤ thanks teacher excellent video 🎉
Thanks for watching! 🎉
I have just learnt such a lesson at my English class!😊
Awesome! It's quite useful. I hope my video was easier to understand than your class. 😅
thank you so much .❤❤❤very useful video sir.
You're welcome! 🤩
Excellent sir
Thanks for watching! 🤩
GREAT, THANK YOU.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you for suspicious contents, please share and create this type of video daily basis.
You're welcome! Glad you found it helpful!🤩 By the way "suspicious" has a negative meaning. Maybe you had another word in mind.
Sir! I got nine out of ten, thank yu very much.
That's awesome! You're on the right track! 🤩
I am always present ✋
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! Keep up the good work! 🤩🇨🇦
Amazing explanation
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩
Thank you so much
Very useful video ❤
I'm glad it was helpful! 🤩🇨🇦
Thank you ,sir from Algeria 🇩🇿
Thanks for watching!
English Speaking 360 is my new English teacher. 😎👍 Greetz from Switzerland
Awesome! Thanks for being a fan! 🤩🇨🇦
@@englishspeaking360 My new English teacher from Canada who I am a huge fan of is great. 😎👍BTW: Don't you need commas in such sentences?
Yes, in this case you would need commas. Commas show that the information they contain is not necessary. In this case: "The man that we saw at the restaurant is a famous actor." there are no commas because the information from the relative clause is necessary.
Does that make sense?
@@englishspeaking360 Thank you! 😎👍
O love your explanatios
Super class 🙏
I'm glad you found it helpful! 🤩
Thank you! Great explanation!
Thanks for the visit! 🤩
shut up
Sir very good accent and believable ❤
I'm glad you like it! 👍
The lesson (that/which/ /) I saw this afternoon was important.
Excellent example! Keep up the good work! 🤩
Thanks for your lesson ❤
I'm glad you liked my video! 🤩🇨🇦
Yes, I did the exercise well. Thanks for the clear explanation! But example #9 would be written like this: The girl John met at the party last night works in a bank.
I hope that's correct!
Yes, you're right. In that sentence WHOM or WHO can be omitted because it is the object of the relative clause.
Keep up the good work!
👍❤wonderful!thank you
I'm glad you liked it! 🤩
This Chapter is 👌 🌲 SUGGESTIONS: (1) Lawler means Who is studing Law (2) Advocate means Who is Practising the Law
Hello! I'm from Canada 🇨🇦 and in American English, advocate is almost never used. Advocate is used in British English.
Thank you for your lesson.
Would you give us a detailed lesson about present and past modal verbs ?
Great suggestion! I will add it to my list. 🤩👍
Thank you very much.
Welcome 😊
You explain things so well woah!!! :D
I'm glad you're finding the videos helpful! 😎👍
Of course 😊
Now, I've learned the topic better.
Glad to help! 🤩
@@englishspeaking360 Yeah.
HI
About the sentence : A lawyer who specializes in labor law..... i can write: A lawyer who is specialised in labor law .... In fact , it is the verb : to be specialise !
thank a lot for your explainetions.
Yes, that works too! 🤩👍
THANK YOU
Super⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thanks for watching! 🤩
Thank you
You're welcome! 🤩
Yes,😊
Thank you 🙏
Thanks for watching! 🤩
❤❤❤❤❤
Thanks for watching! 🤩
Omg , I solved them all.
Awesome! Keep up the good work!
Teacher, thank you so much for these interesting lessons.
Teacher I have two questions:
1)- in the video at 5.11, can we say : the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ?
2)- In the sentence (the chef from whom I learned the cooking makes delicious food ), do we have to put commas after the word (chef) and after the word ( cooking) knowing that punctuation plays a big role in understanding ??
Thank you very much.
You have some great questions! Yes, you can switch the main clause and extra info around and make a different sentence. However, the focus of the sentence changes.
As for commas, we use them when the information they contain is not necessary. In this example, the information is important, so commas shouldn't be used.
Thanks for watching! 🤩🇨🇦
15:10
I think it's also correct.
A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets.
The correct sentence is:
"The company that launches a new product specializes in tech gadgets."
Here’s why:
Use "the" when referring to a specific company already known to the speaker and listener. Since we're talking about a particular company that launches new tech products, "the" is the appropriate choice.
If you’re introducing a company for the first time in a general sense, "a company" would also be correct.
@@englishspeaking360
15:10
I mean
A company that specializes in tech gadgets is launching a new product.
Or
A company that is launching a new product specializes in tech gadgets.
Here which one is correct?
I think here both are correct.
perfect lesson 👌 does it mean that I can use THAT for any relative clause? I think so 🙏
You're almost correct.
When You Cannot Use "That":
Non-Defining Relative Clauses (extra information):
My brother, who lives in Canada, is coming to visit.
Her car, which is red, broke down yesterday.
You must use "who" or "which" in non-defining clauses, not "that."
great! Would you carry on with subjunctive mood?
Thanks for the suggestion. The subjunctive is not used in English as much as in other languages, but I might make a video about it.
Thank you so much!
Please can we say in the 8th sentence
The girl whom John met at the party last night workes at a bank.
All my answers were correct except this one.
Amazing video as always ❤
You got all the other sentences right! That's excellent! 🤩🇨🇦 You DO have a partial right answer on that one. The only difference is that you switched the main clause and the relative clause around. As a result, you shifted the focus from John to the girl. In some contexts it might be ok, but in others it might make a big difference in meaning.
@englishspeaking360 Ok,thank you for your clarification, teacher .
@Naj_820 No worries! Enjoy your weekend!
Thank you ❤
Thanks for watching! 🤩
I got 9 out of 10
Thanks
That's great! Relative clauses are pretty difficult to master. Keep up the good work!
Sir could I request you to make videos on simple sentences, compound sentences, and complex sentences and differentiate them. Please
Thanks for the suggestion. Let me see what I can do. 🇨🇦🤩
I have two problems. First, with reletive clause with proposition! I don't know what prepositions must be used and when to use those prepositions!
Second
When can't we replace which with that?
I hope you make a video about them, too. Thank you for your informative video.
Those are excellent questions!
1. Using Prepositions in Relative Clauses:
When a relative clause involves a preposition, the position of the preposition can change based on formality. For formal usage, the preposition goes before the relative pronoun (e.g., "the person to whom I was speaking"). In informal usage, it often appears at the end (e.g., "the person I was speaking to").
Common prepositions in relative clauses include to, with, for, and about. The choice depends on the verb or phrase used before the clause (e.g., “the person I am thinking of”).
2. When to Use "Which" vs. "That":
"That" is typically used in defining (restrictive) relative clauses, where the information is essential to understand the noun (e.g., “The book that I borrowed is great.”).
"Which" is preferred in non-defining (non-restrictive) clauses, where the information is additional but not essential (e.g., “The book, which I borrowed, is great.”).
Note that in American English, "which" can also sometimes be used in defining clauses, but "that" cannot be used in non-defining ones.
Thank you i got high marks for exam
Glad to hear that! Congrats! Keep it up!🥳💯
Can you please find out gerunds in this paragraph?
Hiking through the dense forest, we heard a twig snapping behind us. A deer was grazing nearby. The sun began setting, casting a warm glow on the tree tops. Being in the forest and listening to the sounds of nature calmed our souls. We enjoyed breathing in the fresh, earthy air.
🎉🎉🎉
Thanks for watching! 😀
The lesson was lovely that I saw on your UA-cam channel. We can remove "that" because the subject is "I"😂
Exactly! "That" is tge object of the relative clause and it can be omitted. Good student! 🤩🇨🇦
The lesson I saw on your UA-cam channel was lovely.
Enjoy your Friday!
You too! 🤩
❤
Have a great day! 🤩🇨🇦
Please get videos on noun clauses & adverb clauses
Thanks for the suggestion! Let me see what I can do. 🤩
Thank you for reply
My pleasure! Have a wonderful day!
Is this example from an online dictionary correct? 'They speak a language akin to French.'
It omits 'that is' or 'which is' after the word 'language.'
BTW, I enjoy watching your videos a lot!
Yes, you can remove "that is" or "which is" in this sentence without changing its meaning. It would simply become:
"They speak a language akin to French."
In this case, the meaning remains clear, and the sentence sounds more concise. Both "that is" and "which is" function as relative clauses here, but if they're not needed for clarification, omitting them is perfectly acceptable.
THIS IS REALLY HELPFUL! I have a questionWhy here we can omit "which is".
Main: This is an opera in seven parts.
Extra: It is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus.
Can i change
The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky.
into
The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky.
?
THANKS SO MUCH
Yes, you can change "The dogs that are rescued from animal shelters are very lucky" to "The dogs rescued from animal shelters are very lucky."
In English, relative clauses with "that" or "which" can sometimes be reduced by removing the relative pronoun (like "that" or "which") and the auxiliary verb (like "are"). This is known as a reduced relative clause. In this case:
"The dogs that are rescued" becomes "The dogs rescued."
This makes the sentence more concise while retaining the original meaning.
In the first example, "which is" can be omitted to form a reduced relative clause.
When we say, "This is an opera in seven parts which is based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus," we can omit "which is" to create a more concise sentence: "This is an opera in seven parts based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus."
The reason we can omit "which is" is because "based on the trilogy of ancient Greek tragedies by Aeschylus" is acting as an adjective phrase describing "an opera in seven parts." English allows us to reduce relative clauses in cases like this, especially when they describe or clarify the subject.
This reduction often improves the sentence's flow and readability by avoiding unnecessary words without changing the meaning.
@@englishspeaking360 y
Thanks a lot ！！
👍👍👍👍👍
🤩🤩🤩
Thanks for your fantastic teaching, I have a question. Can we ask, who did Jun meet? In this case we can omitted that Claus
Hmmm... I'm not sure what you mean. If you have only a main clause like "Who did Jun meet?" then WHO can’t be omitted. You can only omit WHO when it is not the subject of a relative clause.
Thanks a lot
Could you please make a video on how get subtle difference between two words. Because english language has same words with subtle differences. I always find myself unable to understand this.
Hello! Do you mean like this: ua-cam.com/video/E9TMpd2rglI/v-deo.html
If you have other ideas of confusing words, let me know.
@@englishspeaking360 yes, you got it right.
@indyanatureandpeace5694 Great! I have a playlist with a few similar videos. You might be interested. Here's the link. What is the difference? Words with similar meanings. Comparative grammar. English Speaking 360: ua-cam.com/play/PLdDArlpQeGSZ-4waDSqMDPo0HZZg4hCxW.html
@@englishspeaking360 Thanks 🙏. I want you to make more videos on this topic. Some more confusing words are neglect and ignore, begin, start, commence, terrible and horrible, big,huge, enormous, gigantic, massive and so on.
❤🎉.
🤩
Sir, make a video on singular and plural uses of scissors, pants, shorts etc..
Good idea! I'll see what I can do.
Sir i have got 9/10 marks
Wow, that's awesome! You must be getting good at relative clauses! 👍 Watch part 2 as well!
❤❤❤👏👏👏👍👍👍
Does that mean we can always use that instead of who or which. Any difference among them🙏🙏🙏
Good question! It's a little technical but here's the explanation.
In relative clauses, "that" can sometimes substitute for "who" or "which", but there are rules and subtle differences to keep in mind.
1. Who vs. That
"Who" is used when referring to people.
Example: She is the teacher who inspired me.
"That" can also refer to people in restrictive (defining) clauses, though "who" is more common and preferred in formal English.
Example: She is the teacher that inspired me.
However, "that" is not typically used in non-restrictive (non-essential) clauses, where additional information is added.
Example: My sister, who lives in New York, is visiting. (Correct)
My sister, that lives in New York, is visiting. (Incorrect)
2. Which vs. That
"Which" is used to refer to animals or things and is common in both restrictive and non-restrictive clauses.
Restrictive Example: This is the book which helped me the most.
Non-restrictive Example: This book, which I bought last year, is amazing.
"That" can replace "which" in restrictive (defining) clauses when referring to things, but not in non-restrictive clauses.
Example: This is the book that helped me the most. (Correct)
This book, that I bought last year, is amazing. (Incorrect)
Summary
"Who" is for people; "which" is for things; "that" can replace either in restrictive clauses.
"That" is not used in non-restrictive clauses, where "who" and "which" are preferred.
Do you have the book the same as you teaching on line I can buy it please .
You are the best ❤❤❤❤
I appreciate the love! I teach everything in my videos so I didn't think there was a need for a book. 😉 However, I have a website with easy explanations and extra activities. Check it out when you have time. Englishspeaking360.com
"The horse THAT BELONGS to my neighbor won the race".
The other way we can express the rule is;
When A VERB FOLLOWS "THAT" or "WHICH" it can't be removed, you just can't leave it out.
Hello! Yes, that's a great way to explain it. However, it doesn't work for all relative pronouns. I wish it did. It would be so much easier to explain.
Thanks for chiming in!
Have a great day! 🌞
When relative pronoun is a subject in the relative clause, it can´t be dropped, but if it functions as an object there, we could either keep it or spare it.
I wonder that is WHY a noun ( adv, conj ) or a relative pronoun 😅? Thank you, teacher.
The relative clause pronoun that is wich is use in the case the subject is odject or a thing ?
04:08
I think it should be
The lawyer who specializes in labor law represented us in court.
Here article "the" should be used not "a"
Hi! Nice try, but no cigar. A is the right article here because he is one of the lawyers with that specialty out of many. Using THE would mean that only one lawyer is specialized in labor law.
@@englishspeaking360
Ok its mean both are correct depending on situations.
Sir, long time no see! In quiz time, question 4, if we omitted are as well, can we omit that or which?
Yes, that works! 🤩👍
Part 2 that followed by part 1 is not available yet
I'm working on Part 2, and it's coming soon. 🤩