Nope. If he's as good as he professes it should make no difference. Everyone that goes missing is in a vulnerable position - I would of thought that's common sense 🤔
If a family member goes missing near water, this is the man you want searching for them. He's recovered countless bodies. No idea why he's getting criticism from certain people!
@@jjr185 I think time will prove him to be correct. When he said that it was “literally impossible” for her to reach the sea, and the next day said she’s probably in the sea… I think one day we’ll look back and see he was right.
The "certain people" are relatives and friends of the staff at Lancashire police who are trying to deflect the fact it's a Mickey mouse outfit by demonising the one person who knows exactly what he's doing, who exposed the total incompetence and amateurish way the case has been handled.
They could have easily stated from the start that she is highly vulnerable due to mental health issues, left it just as that like they have with others who have gone missing, instead of detailing a specific personal problem. Then organised a grid search in case she walked off. How stupid has this situation got?
Who do you mean by saying they ?. They rely on information from the Public . They with held , vital information ...Caususing so much concern from the media , retired Police professsionals , and the public people . Questions need answering .
If she walked off there is no immediate life threatening situation. It is normal to focus on the life threatening scenarios first (river / kidnapping).
I agree, they should not have issued any statement detailing specifics, stating that Nicola was vulnerable because of mental health issues would have sufficed. The person(s) leading this investigation should have utilised the expertise of Peter and his team to it's full potential and in order to do that they needed to allow for some free reign on where to search and act upon feedback received from Peter himself and it appears that wasn't the case because he was under strict instruction
It's ridiculous Peter Faulding being treated this way!. He's the best and most professional person to search for people!. Some people maybe need to do a little homework before slating him. It's pathetic!.
The thing is, if they’d shared that information with him, it would have been all over the news within an hour. Of course they couldn’t tell him. But if he had such a close and trusting relationship with the family, why didn’t they tell him? Probably for the same reason.
Hes milking his 15 minutes for sure! The amount of times iv heard him say "iv got a great relationship with the police but....." he sure has a funny way of criticizing but not criticizing!
He's only the best because that's what he keeps saying every time he's on TV, it's like watching an advert. Also he can't be professional if he's seeking the limelight running off to the media every day. It's a weird situation, he's trying to help but he's now trying to attack the people who asks for his help, that can't be right.
Devon And that`s exactly what she is/was. No matter if she had private problems, this is not an issue that even should be discussed publicly, it`s so disgraceful and disgusting. Let`s face it, all of us have problems and have been drunk or high in the past, we have health problems, and we wouldn`t wanna be exposed therefore...
And she's since been found in the stretch of water that Peter said it was 'impossible' she could be in due to his 'expertise.' Guy has been a joke from start to finish. Endlessly promoting his company, constantly making unwanted press statements and he couldn't even find her.
This man is honest and the only one making any sense this man should be in charge 🤦🏻♀️🙄 it’s like a circus show my heart goes out to her family and friends 🙏🏼 praying she is found safe and well 🙏🏼🥺
Well looks like the police were on the right track and faulding did nothing but act like he was something special, even without the information of her mental health he should have searched the river with the mindset it was either an accidental fall in or suicide, the guy is an absolute fool with a high tech search device but he's too arrogant to use it properly.
This man helped for free to help Nicola and the family, he is being requested by people to give his opinion. The family must be going through absolute hell. Respect to Peter Faulding and his team.
and why has he become the spokes man ? Has the family asked him to be on the TV every hour of the day on every station? I doubt it. This guy is liking his 15 mins far too much. he was asked to dive and scan the river yet now he seems to think he is in charge and is definitely the one talking to the press more than anyone. Its about time the police told him to f off imo
For Police to have not secured the area IMMEDIATELY is utterly breathtaking.....Crucial evidence would have been LOST and it has likely COST Nicola's Life
Yes I totally agree with you my friend,, I,m sorry but it was 1 mistake after another with the police , they were that sure that poor girl was in the river right from the start And no one else was involved ,, now they are left with egg on their faces and looking for a red van ,,, does the left hand know what the right hand is doing ,, no respect for the police
The police give away any chance of forensics or evidence and gave over 2 weeks for any third pary or herself to get rid of any evidence its like the police blundered this for some reason hope its not more rapust murdering police involved
Peter Faulding is intelligent, compassionate, professional, and a man of integrity. He has been exceptional in his work. He has been doing his best to help the family. The incompetent police have blundered enormously. They should have informed Peter Faulding of the information that they realeased to the public when he was taken on board for the investigation. He would have done things differently as he is the expert. Withholding pertinent information from him has been detrimental to the case. Thank you, Peter, for all that you have done and all that you continue to do to assist. We need more people like you.
@Mr Bullfinch Most people are really heartbroken by the turn of events, and this case has taken a toll on many. We wanted the best for Nicola and her family. I will not rescind my comments on Mr. Faulding. You need to realize that he followed procedure and protocol during his investigation. He was given specific instructions, and that is exactly what he did. You need to be aware that he was not updated with crucial information. If he were, then he would have done things differently. He worked with and adhered the information and the instructions that he was given. What would you have done? If your decision was to choose otherwise, then that would be like one of the trolls on the internet. Besides, what have you done to help? Were you a volunteer? We do not need armchair detectives. We need skilled competent people who are guided by humanity,compassion, and integrity.
@@AnaSaro-xi9cu No he didn't! He didn't believe the police from the start and wouldn't listen to them, thought he knew better! He's a egotistical DIVA! Like i said, hope he never works again!
From day one it's been handled by the police appallingly, knowing all the personal struggles she was suffering from they treated the search based on suicide and became fixated on the river only, the police have realy left themselves open to public critisiom and rightfully so.
@@jjr185 Pretty grumpy for a Friday but okay. I think he is a hero because his job consists of seeing things that he can never unsee. I am very thankful for people like that. I could not do what he and police officers do. He is pretty darn wonderful!
@@martinhenderson6351 I am assuming this is a dig at my previous comment which I stand by. He came at the request of the family free of charge, he wasn't told about her mental health issues and he has helped many have closure. I couldn't see what he sees. He is a hero!
Wouldn't be surprised if this guy never works for the police again, clearly alcohol did not play a part on the day as Nicola drove the kids to school. The whole idea of not mentioning it was to stop Peter drawing conclusions, he just doesn't seem to get it. If you are in a team it is your job to follow instructions, not endlessly speculate as he is constantly doing. He did the job that was asked of him, that should be the conclusion of his involvement.
When trying to find the cause of a problem you have to have every bit of information available to avoid coming to the wrong conclusion. What you say makes absolutely no sense. Of course he could of just said fuck it I’ve done what I’m told, but he obviously he is a bit more human than that!
If she was suicidal she may have swam down river. The point was that there was no current to take the body out to the estuary and further than they searched. The police should face told him more so he could have searched further.
I think you’re spot on. Of course they couldn’t trust him with sensitive information, he’d have been in front of the cameras within an hour sharing it with the world.
In Belgium they have now (20 days later) found the woman that fell (with her bike) into the river Zenne. Here body was found more than 10 km further down the river. The case is similar but not identical. The banks of the Zenne were very steep (you cannot get out by yourself) and the current of the Zenne is probably faster than the river Wyre.
THIS FAULDING GUY AGAIN!!??!!?? My God, is he ever going to stop the constant interviews? It's crazy how many he has done now!! 3:59 when Faulding says hes not being critical of the police but just the comms team.....he has criticised the general police EVERY DAY! He has said MANY TIMES that sufficient searches have not been done, that the ground should be beaten down and they haven't done that, that they should be looking for deposition sites, that they should be searching more than just the river, that they are too focused on the river, that they are wrong to search the estuary, that they were wrong to rule out a 3rd party.......HE NEVER STOPS CRITICISING THE POLICE! He is giving multiple interviews to multiple media outlets everyday, saying the same stuff over and over......helping to fuel these conspiracy theories that have been happening. He said he is the face of the investigation....shouldn't Nicola be the face, be the focus Mr Faulding? He says he is the voice of the family......how can that be when they haven't spoken to him in days?? He offers zero relevant up to date information yet is never out of the media! He also says he could have been trusted with confidential information and wouldn't have repeated it to the media but how could the police know that? Would you trust someone with private details when they keep putting themselves in front of the camera, even before joining the search he was talking to the media? Maybe Lancs. police probably vetted him and decided it was too risky? Besides, to say the info would have changed his tactics is ridiculous quite frankly.....he is on record, in one of the MANY interviews he gave, stating that the police gave him one specific area to search and that was the area by the bench in the water. Him saying he would have gone down river etc is ridiculous as the police told him where he was permitted to search. PLEASE STOP GIVING THIS GUY A PLATFORM! SUPPORT THE FAMILY IN THEIR SEARCH FOR NICOLA.
Thank you Peter and your team for how you conducted the search you carried out. You and your team acted professionally. I as a member of the public l was encouraged when you first offered your help in this desperate situation. The Police seemed to be going around in circles and getting nowhere. Your team as l understood did a 10mile search of the river and did not find any evidence of her unfortunately. “And of course l must say free of charge” l really appreciate your involvement in this really sad situation and hope against hope she will be found alive and safe to be reunited with her whole family who are living through this awful nightmare.
Thank you Peter for speaking up and for someone having enough backbone to mention this “woke” BS which has put this woman’s safety and privacy in total jeopardy. You were the only person who spoke so frankly from the outset and if others don’t recognise your honesty and integrity throughout then they are part of the bigger problem. There are many of us who appreciate Peter’s involvement so once again thank you 🙏🏻
An older person went missing from a care home couple years ago. Local community put a call out on social media to join a search after she was missing couple days. About 150 of us went to village hall and were put into four search teams all led by couple police officers. Younger volunteers were tasked with getting in ditches searching and the more difficult areas. The lady was found unfortunately she had passed away but her family were able to get closure. As part of the search team we all worked with the police officers and we also were able to give valuable local knowledge of the area. The police could've done this and got people on their side. I'm sure hundreds of people would of turned up. I know locals were out searching but from what I've read it doesn't appear the police were utilising members of public to their advantage.
@@ladygardener100 oh I see. Its just when the older lady went missing the heat sensor helicopters were up for hours plus tracker dogs out. But it's rural area here as well. When the community search teams came together the person was located that very same day . True to say she only had gone a mile and a half from the care home. It's just so sad and tragic when a person is missing and the uncertainty for those involved. I'm praying there is some breakthrough somehow.
Yes lots of egos. And yours Peter, is the biggest. How many interviews are you going to do? Your job is complete and your services no longer required so perhaps you should keep quiet and move on
It's quite ironic that he's talking about egos. He left saying his job was done, then he's back again. Maybe he missed the attention. He sure likes talking to the media. There are 170,000 people reported missing in the UK every year. Around 15% are unaccounted for, for mord than a couple of days. I wonder in how many of those cases his company has offered his help for free?
Am not detective and i dont know paul seeing interviews something with him right tell me add up i know shouldn’t judge but interested in the kind of shuff i think peter doing what felt was right i think need investigate the family or paul ask what happened that night to led to her disappearance.
The superintendent came over as highly rigid from the start. She clearly follows the "rules" to the letter and disregards any other thinking. We must haver "evidence" before we do anything etc.
Tunnel vision - IF the phone was on the bench then Nicola was there and that's where they will look FINISHED - DO not even consider that somebody put it there with the dog and the harness and the fit bit TO FOOL US 🙄
Lancashire Police have completely failed in their handling of this case... unfortunately I expected nothing else from the police nowadays - that way you're not going to be disappointed.
@ gthbn how can you know that? No one knows the evidence that the police already have which has effected their actions. Agree it doesn't look right but I'm assuming professionals know their jobs, otherwise why have a police force? We should wait until it's finished and then there might be an enquiry before we all cast the first stones making accusations with no knowledge.
@sheffsteel7 by their own admissions they have assumed Nicola has gone into the river so anyone thinking they drove through with a dash cam isn't going to bother checking it. The area her phone was found in wasn't sealed off, yes it's popular but to look for potential signs of where someone might have fallen in you need to keep the area secure. Also, according to Peter and the media, buildings and land close to the river haven't been searched. The lack of action in doing this has led to it being contaminated by countless people from outside the area.
Peter is looking for excuses IMHO. Is he saying he would have looked harder if he'd known these vulnerabilities? His task was to search the river, I don't blame him for not finding her but I blame him for his categorical statements she was not in the river. Which he appears to be starting to row back here. Rivers are unpredictable. Peter's ego is large.
The biggest ego is his. This guy is unprofessional and needs to know when to be quiet. Why is he still performing interviews on this case and more importantly why are broadcasters still asking him!? He’s a big part of the problem and it’s his own doing.
I think Peter is very professional and I’ve had a couple of negatives reply’s when I’ve supported him. Thank goodness for people like peter who remember offered his services for free!
@@flowerjpotter1629 I didn't say he shouldn't look - I'm disputing this being described as charity. If it were my loved one though, I wouldn't want him giving TV interviews every other day saying...nothing.
I think Mr Faulding and his team are amazing at there jobs, they are experts,its big a shame they did not have the information they needed, it's been very unprofessional from the start. My heart gose out to the family and friends.🎗 keep hope 🎗
Unprofessional from the start . Could be the reason , Media , Joe public , and retired Police professionals , have shown so much attention . Early retirements ??
They was told to check from the bench up the river 3 or 4 miles they dint go that far down, not there folt at all, if they where told from the start,the information they needed they would have used a Different strategy in the search, completely not there folt. My opinion
I understand he offered to help, he didn't find her, he did it for free. But, jeez, this fella has a lot to say. he is on every single media channel. Rolls out the same lines, "10 cases a year" "official underwater team", "police divers did a great job". Thanks for your help and effort, but we dont need you saying about checking local ditches etc. For all the critics the police are getting, I still stand by that we do not 7know what is going on behind closed doors with the investigation.
Mr Faulding has had his 15 minutes of fame and then some. Any incident involving a person in water (PIW) is by definition a high risk missing person search, this should be absolutely no surprise to Mr Faulding. Secondly, Faulding et al. had one task: search the river for a body (living or otherwise), this forms one task amongst many areas searched by other skilled and technical resources, better suited than a specialist dive team. The circumstances leading to any high urgency PIW search is at the time irrelevant… He has a point about the wider media engagement disaster, however as for comments on egos, irony!
Biggest ego is Faulding himself. I’m really amazed at how many experts there are in the comments 🤔 How does the manner of her entry into the water effect her location ? What he is saying is nonsense.
I hope he continues with his self-publicity at this point because the more he says, the more obvious it will to those who are a little naive as to what he is all about.
It’s unforgivable that Peter Faulding wasn’t fully informed on Nicola’s vulnerability. I wouldn’t blame him if he walked away and told the police and Paul to get on without him. He’s obviously an amazingly talented and compassionate human being. Absolutely disgraceful that he was so badly treated.
@@martinhenderson6351 I still feel he is being unfairly blamed. remember Peter Faulding saying during his first interview that if a body were caught in reeds , he wouldn’t be able to detect it. The sonar only worked in the water. Surely he expected the police to check the reeds along the river bank ? The whole thing is so tragic. No winners in this. But I still feel he did his absolute best. What a horrendous job for any human being to have to do. Rest in peace Nicola. At least the family can lay her to rest now.
@@martinhenderson6351 I have my opinion and you have yours. I still feel he did his best. You disagree , and that’s fine. To me he came across as a caring , compassionate individual who spends his life doing this sort of recovery work. He’s been extremely successful in many instances. We need people like him because it’s a job that most people would find repelling. It’s easy to criticise him now. If he had been the one to find her , he’d be hailed as a hero. As it is , he’s receiving a lot of negativity, so he’s obviously trying to defend his reputation. The truth is we won’t know how long Nicola was in the water until the autopsy is performed. He may well be vindicated when that piece of information is confirmed.
@@martinhenderson6351 I can’t answer your questions because I don’t know , and neither do you. Lots of questions still to be answered. Have a lovely night
Maybe less time in ‘thought policing’ exercises and more training in real detective work would be a start. The ‘alphabet policing’ and constant ‘diversity’ employing rather than the right person for the job needs to take some of the blame to. You’ve more chance having a copper on your doorstep for something they ‘think’ you ‘think’ than if you’d been burgled.😡
we had fat Dan the police man on his bike as our bobby and all he had to say was i know your parents that stopped our nonsense well for a wee while anyway@@Othillde
I agree, Peter should have been informed on Nicolas alcohol issue it would have helped him to do his job properly, because that information was withheld it made everyone look silly, Peter came out and stated that she isn’t in the river because he didn’t have that crucial piece of information, whoever made the decisions on this case needs to be held accountable, because from the start everything has in essence been misconstrued. I could be wrong but I wouldn’t be surprised if we learn that a former police officer was involved.
Well, yes Peter did come out and say she’s not in the water. But then said he thinks she is in the water. Then that she isn’t again. He said its literally impossible for her to reach the sea, then that he thinks she’s probably in the sea… He speculates and speaks before he thinks, so of course they didn’t want to share sensitive information with him. It would have been all over the news within an hour 😂
Yes, his Job was to search the river, he was told she fell in, which implies that she would have been in the shallower part of the river, if the police told peter that they believed she jumped in I am guessing that his search would have included the deeper part of the river too. In essence falling in and jumping in are two very different things.
@@KamalTiwari82 They were put in a very difficult situation to be fair. They obviously knew that anything they told Peter would be all over the media in no time, so whilst it may have been helpful to share that info with him, realistically they just couldn’t. Nothing to stop Paul telling him though… although the police probably gave him a heads up not to tell Peter anything he wouldn’t want made public.
You know who looks silly? Peter. For coming out and saying anything at all, let alone that Nicola 100% wasn’t in the river. He’s a cog not the whole wheel and should’ve have been assuming
"... we’ve searched it extremely thoroughly and we’ve ruled out, especially, the area where Nicola supposedly went in all the way down to the first weir and then onward down the river quite a distance. And then that’s my area cleared then, and we went upstream as well for about a mile upstream just in case, so it’s been extremely thorough. Peter Faulding. I knew she was there. A woman goes missing beside a long hard to search object. The police rule out a kidnapping as no-one can carry a woman to a vehicle unseen. As Sherlock used to say, whatever is left, however improbable, is the truth. Search the rjver properly. P. S. She's fell in. She hasn't jumped in purposely, imho.
What l don't understand is Nicola loved Willow, why would she leave her to roam free.lf she did leave of her own accord surely she would have made sure Willow was safely tied up.Nicola must have the leash with her only the harness was left.This makes me think she was taken suddenly,she was still logged in to her office.The phone would have been left so her whereabouts couldn't be traced on route.lf she had gone of her own accord she would need clothes money credit card.
Bloody hell Peter, time to take a step back from the media interviews and take your ego with you! We all know just how great you are now. We won’t forget…
Peter's ego hurt coz he didn't find her. Personally I think he's useless. Turns out his sonar equipment was not that much more superior than what the professionals were using. We're fed up with you Peter
If she is not in the river then the best equipment in the world will not find her, sonar equipment cannot find what is not there, weird point you make.
Peter, the police didn't reach out to you. Paul, Nicola's boyfriend, did. So why didn't Paul inform you that she was an alcoholic when he made contact with you? Don't you find that odd?
Peter is projecting and lack of self awareness is funny, he has flip flopped so much his "expert" credability is more than in question. Jeremy is pedaling misinformation (no surprise there), the police have already stated that initially they did cordan off the bench and had it examined.
Jeremy Kyle is lucky to have found any job in news broadcasting. He's absolutely atrocious in broadcasting, and he's not very bright. He uses the technique of shouting / adopting an angry tone, talking over people, and talking excessively to mask how unintelligent he is
As a trusted police partner of many years Peter Faulding absolutely should have been told about all of the background available to help him conduct the best search possible. The only reason to not do that is ego/territorial behaviour. They didn't like him arriving into the situation because it implied that what they'd already done wasn't the best it could be. That is not putting the best interests of the missing person or their family at the forefront of their activity. If they're intimidated by hi-tech kit and niche specialists then heaven help them. Why are they in the job they're in? To assist the public - not to feather their own nest. I didn't warm to the lead detective, I felt her manner in the press conference was inappropriate and less than open. What a mess. It is a comms/PR disaster but worth remembering that that's not always the Comms team's fault. It's a job I used to do and you frequently get "blocked" by senior members of an organisation who don't understand media relations properly and don't use their PR Comms function in a way that allows a good job to be done. They make decisions about what should or shouldn't be said on different criteria to the ones that good Comms professionals know matter. That's what usually creates the chaos. If you're employing Comms professionals get excellent ones and then make sure you listen to them.
Bore off Peter Faulding. The police don't have to tell you anything and are obviously keeping you out of the picture for a reason... All you're interested in, is promoting your new book..... Stay away and stop using a missing woman to up your sales.
Peters got the biggest ego of all & police released the information because Peter & Paul was leaking information to the press & him being privy to certain information wouldn't negate his search in any way.
''There are egos playing here'' Says the man who has done 30 interviews with every person and organisation he can, has constantly portrayed himself as some super mega, never-fail Alpha know-it-all investigator, and has said multiple times that he should have been told everything by the police. ''We get the job done.'' ''I find them''
This man is going be wheeled out for his opinion by the media every time someone goes missing now. Just as they wheel out Paul Burrell every time a 'Diana' story arises.
He only had one job to do which he gave himself the role, he still didn’t delivered and keeps changing his story to suit his reputation, let’s not forget he said ( she is not in the river) he is the one that said( the phone was left as decoy) and so on on on and on ….. all hypothesis should have been taken into consideration therefore should not have changed the way his search was conducted , he is a lier
I still do not believe family/police are telling the whole truth. Police would only attend home environment for issues of domestic or in support of a mental health act assessment.
The main ego at play here seems to be Peter's. He may be extremely good at his job, but he has come across as incredibly arrogant from the start. No wonder he's got the police's backs up. He's been speaking out of turn from the start, so I'm not surprised the police haven't wanted to confide in him.
Peter Faulldiing is an expert & he”s a good man. People who speak badly are missed informed…………if people like this man stop talking then it will becomes a cold case. Apart from anything PF & crew worked without pay just kind hearts to find Nicola. I’m more concerned in 3 weeks I’ve only heard her partner say I love her once?
You are making an excellent point here about Peter talking keeping the investigation going longer. Lancashire police said normally they would be winding up their search at this point. But because of all the public interest they are continuing.
@@flowerjpotter1629 thank you flower 🌸 bless you! But we or they must talk about Nicola. Now I worry was she unwell or was life too much stress & all x
EGO'S. How many interviews have you done son? It seems 1000's of Sherlock Holmes have decided what has happened. He said "I assumed she went in the river". Surely your job is to search the river and not assume anything. Anything is possible hear so I wouldn't assume anything.
If I was the partner - regardless of what might have happened previously - I'd have been raging over them searching 2ft of bloody water. My only instincts would have been that she's either walked off or been abducted.
This egomaniac been shouting his mouth of since the start of this. Blabbing all sorts of nonsense. Why on earth would the family or police trust him if they didn't at that time want it to be public about Nicola's health problems. And whether she drowned by accident or by suicide it makes no difference to searching for her body.
Why did the family.. especially Paul, who reportedly had long conversations with Peter, not mention Nicola,s struggles to him?? It would have been kept confidential.
This case is getting ridiculous. I strongly believe she isn't in the water. Everything being reported seems to not be focused on finding her. Now information is coming out about her health issues which I really don't think has anything to do with her going missing in my opinion. It just feels like people want to talk about her going missing but no one has any idea of what could have happened to her and its heartbreaking. There's a lot of the public who want to find out but they keep getting bashed by the media for speculating and getting involved. Speculation can have a negative impact on the case but when nothing is moving forward and we aren't getting any closer to the truth more and more people will add to the speculation. That one guy said there's ego's at play.. Ridiculous unacceptable that behaviour should get people taken off the case. The important thing is to find her or find out what happened to her for the sake of her family and friends. You can't say much work was done. If that was true we'd be closer to the truth but we aren't.
He is the one with the ego , this very annoying fame thirsty individual who got himself involved and did not delivered ! He is the one changing his tunes constantly! His job was to look into the river , full stop 🛑 now he wants celebrity status
No one should be criticising Peter Faulding for doing what he is an expert at doing day in and day out. I really do think people need to know who he is and what he does for a living. To accuse him of doing the search for Nicola Bulley with an ulterior motive is ludicrous!!! Why don't they just leave him alone. The police wanted him there, her family wanted Peter Peter Faulding fthere and that's all that matters. Who ca
There should have been indication of her having vulnerabilities. No need to mention alcohol or anything else perhaps say there was some concern for her state of mind.
..The alcohol WAS mentioned in the media, certainly on one source, in the very early coverage (as i commented then about her possibly being hung over and stumbling into the water). With due respect to Nicola maybe posters could have been put up in pubs and clubs..if they are serious about finding her. Either the alcohol was a big problem or it wasn't. I don't believe a lot ot the info. coming out now.
Do you think Peter Faulding should have been informed about Nicola Bulley's issues with alcohol?
I cannot for the life of me see what difference this would have made!
Yes, since he works with the police, he might have proceeded differently.
If it would have made a difference to his search, then yes, he is the expert.
Nope. If he's as good as he professes it should make no difference. Everyone that goes missing is in a vulnerable position - I would of thought that's common sense 🤔
@@sarelito9202 How exactly?
Absolutely SHOCKING that the expert was NOT informed = A woman's life is at stake here
Family could have informed him.
If a family member goes missing near water, this is the man you want searching for them. He's recovered countless bodies. No idea why he's getting criticism from certain people!
I agree Bobo2100 why people criticise him is beyond me, he's done a brilliant job I applaud him well done Peter !
@@JR-dl9ztWhy has he done a brilliant job,he hasn’t found her.
@@jjr185 I think time will prove him to be correct. When he said that it was “literally impossible” for her to reach the sea, and the next day said she’s probably in the sea… I think one day we’ll look back and see he was right.
The media told their cult members to hate on him. We live in a tribal country were people defend their narrative no matter what
The "certain people" are relatives and friends of the staff at Lancashire police who are trying to deflect the fact it's a Mickey mouse outfit by demonising the one person who knows exactly what he's doing, who exposed the total incompetence and amateurish way the case has been handled.
They could have easily stated from the start that she is highly vulnerable due to mental health issues, left it just as that like they have with others who have gone missing, instead of detailing a specific personal problem. Then organised a grid search in case she walked off. How stupid has this situation got?
APALLING to reveal her PERSONAL medical issues and demean a VIBRANT COMPETENT WOMAN
Who do you mean by saying they ?. They rely on information from the Public . They with held , vital information ...Caususing so much concern from the media , retired Police professsionals , and the public people . Questions need answering .
And what would have happened if she was alive wanted to come back then heard that was public knowledge
If she walked off there is no immediate life threatening situation. It is normal to focus on the life threatening scenarios first (river / kidnapping).
I agree, they should not have issued any statement detailing specifics, stating that Nicola was vulnerable because of mental health issues would have sufficed. The person(s) leading this investigation should have utilised the expertise of Peter and his team to it's full potential and in order to do that they needed to allow for some free reign on where to search and act upon feedback received from Peter himself and it appears that wasn't the case because he was under strict instruction
It's ridiculous Peter Faulding being treated this way!. He's the best and most professional person to search for people!. Some people maybe need to do a little homework before slating him. It's pathetic!.
The thing is, if they’d shared that information with him, it would have been all over the news within an hour. Of course they couldn’t tell him. But if he had such a close and trusting relationship with the family, why didn’t they tell him? Probably for the same reason.
why he the best dont you think the divers that were there long before him dont know their job he did a part of the river and thats all
Hes milking his 15 minutes for sure! The amount of times iv heard him say "iv got a great relationship with the police but....." he sure has a funny way of criticizing but not criticizing!
He's only the best because that's what he keeps saying every time he's on TV, it's like watching an advert. Also he can't be professional if he's seeking the limelight running off to the media every day. It's a weird situation, he's trying to help but he's now trying to attack the people who asks for his help, that can't be right.
Lol the expert who checked the area of river 4 times where she was found. Yeah he’s the best in the world in his own mind.
nicola was described as a wonderful mum and wonderful person last week by friends i will stick with those characteristics, hope your safe nicola.
Devon And that`s exactly what she is/was. No matter if she had private problems, this is not an issue that even should be discussed publicly, it`s so disgraceful and disgusting.
Let`s face it, all of us have problems and have been drunk or high in the past, we have health problems, and we wouldn`t wanna be exposed therefore...
What a hole allowed her private business to be let out
ignore the police being called out for domestic a few times? has that happened to you?
This guys ego is huge. If he refers to his own expertise once more I wills scream.
And she's since been found in the stretch of water that Peter said it was 'impossible' she could be in due to his 'expertise.'
Guy has been a joke from start to finish. Endlessly promoting his company, constantly making unwanted press statements and he couldn't even find her.
Nicola could have walked three miles away from the river in the missing first hour on that Friday morning
If she did that though, her dog would have walked with her. He wouldn't have stayed by hef phone
Then jumped on a Bus , bon voyage ..
This man is honest and the only one making any sense this man should be in charge 🤦🏻♀️🙄 it’s like a circus show my heart goes out to her family and friends 🙏🏼 praying she is found safe and well 🙏🏼🥺
The way I see it, a maximum of 50% of what he says can make sense, because the other 50% of what he says is a direct contradiction.
Well looks like the police were on the right track and faulding did nothing but act like he was something special, even without the information of her mental health he should have searched the river with the mindset it was either an accidental fall in or suicide, the guy is an absolute fool with a high tech search device but he's too arrogant to use it properly.
This man helped for free to help Nicola and the family, he is being requested by people to give his opinion. The family must be going through absolute hell. Respect to Peter Faulding and his team.
And just released his book 😅
and why has he become the spokes man ? Has the family asked him to be on the TV every hour of the day on every station? I doubt it. This guy is liking his 15 mins far too much. he was asked to dive and scan the river yet now he seems to think he is in charge and is definitely the one talking to the press more than anyone. Its about time the police told him to f off imo
@@nickedwards2904 he’s just Tryna further his brand and get more contracts with police forces and grab the lime light
@@nickedwards2904
He is just saying it's a Balls up with Dire Consequences...!
@@roncollins9222 and who is he to say that? who has asked him to front every press conference and slam everyone else ?
For Police to have not secured the area IMMEDIATELY is utterly breathtaking.....Crucial evidence would have been LOST and it has likely COST Nicola's Life
Yes I totally agree with you my friend,, I,m sorry but it was 1 mistake after another with the police , they were that sure that poor girl was in the river right from the start And no one else was involved ,, now they are left with egg on their faces and looking for a red van ,,, does the left hand know what the right hand is doing ,, no respect for the police
There are no proof that she got taken
The police give away any chance of forensics or evidence and gave over 2 weeks for any third pary or herself to get rid of any evidence its like the police blundered this for some reason hope its not more rapust murdering police involved
its turned into a big circus her poor family
I’m loving the case. It’s like a circus sideshow.
All the egos and bickering while Nicola may still be alive and needing help. Vanity.....a very destructive sin.
Agree . I am more of the opinion Nicola wanted out , disappear , to a new life ..
Fingers crossed, she is coming home, Nicola is coming home, stay positive, love and sympathy to her loved ones.
Home for Xmas , after Nichola has had , space and time . No rush .
One main ego…. Faulding…
I trust Peter much more than the Lancashire constabulary! Peter deserve a medal 🏅
He has achieved maximum exposure,nothing else.
You're a total idiot, and if you think that you need you brains tested
And a statue of him erected.
Peter Faulding is intelligent, compassionate, professional, and a man of integrity. He has been exceptional in his work. He has been doing his best to help the family. The incompetent police have blundered enormously. They should have informed Peter Faulding of the information that they realeased to the public when he was taken on board for the investigation. He would have done things differently as he is the expert. Withholding pertinent information from him has been detrimental to the case. Thank you, Peter, for all that you have done and all that you continue to do to assist. We need more people like you.
And a man who thought he new better and was wrong! And a man who hasn't been off the tele and is selling a book 👍🏼 hope he never works again 👍🏼
@Mr Bullfinch Most people are really heartbroken by the turn of events, and this case has taken a toll on many. We wanted the best for Nicola and her family. I will not rescind my comments on Mr. Faulding. You need to realize that he followed procedure and protocol during his investigation. He was given specific instructions, and that is exactly what he did. You need to be aware that he was not updated with crucial information. If he were, then he would have done things differently. He worked with and adhered the information and the instructions that he was given. What would you have done? If your decision was to choose otherwise, then that would be like one of the trolls on the internet. Besides, what have you done to help? Were you a volunteer? We do not need armchair detectives. We need skilled competent people who are guided by humanity,compassion, and integrity.
@@AnaSaro-xi9cu No he didn't! He didn't believe the police from the start and wouldn't listen to them, thought he knew better! He's a egotistical DIVA! Like i said, hope he never works again!
From day one it's been handled by the police appallingly, knowing all the personal struggles she was suffering from they treated the search based on suicide and became fixated on the river only, the police have realy left themselves open to public critisiom and rightfully so.
Some people are idiots, Peter. Pay no mind. You're a hero to many!
Maybe he will be a hero if he finds her. At the moment he just tells us how wonderful he is.
@@jjr185 Pretty grumpy for a Friday but okay. I think he is a hero because his job consists of seeing things that he can never unsee. I am very thankful for people like that. I could not do what he and police officers do. He is pretty darn wonderful!
@@martinhenderson6351 I am assuming this is a dig at my previous comment which I stand by. He came at the request of the family free of charge, he wasn't told about her mental health issues and he has helped many have closure. I couldn't see what he sees. He is a hero!
The biggest ego was Peter Faulding's - a malevolent grifter who exploited this woman's death to promote his business.
Absoutely spot on. Hopefully he shows a bit of humility now but I suspect he won't.
Let’s compare how much he’s done for charities and good causes with what you’ve done. My guess is he’s done a lot more than you ever will
Wouldn't be surprised if this guy never works for the police again, clearly alcohol did not play a part on the day as Nicola drove the kids to school. The whole idea of not mentioning it was to stop Peter drawing conclusions, he just doesn't seem to get it. If you are in a team it is your job to follow instructions, not endlessly speculate as he is constantly doing. He did the job that was asked of him, that should be the conclusion of his involvement.
When trying to find the cause of a problem you have to have every bit of information available to avoid coming to the wrong conclusion.
What you say makes absolutely no sense.
Of course he could of just said fuck it I’ve done what I’m told, but he obviously he is a bit more human than that!
If she was suicidal she may have swam down river. The point was that there was no current to take the body out to the estuary and further than they searched. The police should face told him more so he could have searched further.
HE IS THE EXPERT = How dare they withhold information from him 😤
@Pilkington Archive 🟠 You've got a type haven't you? Bald head fetish. 👴🏻 You won't get Peter's sausage no matter how hard you simp.
I think you’re spot on. Of course they couldn’t trust him with sensitive information, he’d have been in front of the cameras within an hour sharing it with the world.
Yeah, sure 🙄. Nicola just wandered off & her dog just sat there & waved her goodbye. What utter drivel! What is wrong with these people?
People across the globe should not blame Peter & his professional team
Biggest ego is his! People with huge egos always accuse others of having them, classic deflection.
I don’t think we’ll be seeing much of Peter for a while.
In Belgium they have now (20 days later) found the woman that fell (with her bike) into the river Zenne. Here body was found more than 10 km further down the river. The case is similar but not identical. The banks of the Zenne were very steep (you cannot get out by yourself) and the current of the Zenne is probably faster than the river Wyre.
So apples and oranges 🙄
@@dws84 Just to indicate that it is not easy to find somebody once they are in the water.
Egos at play? Including his presumably?
THIS FAULDING GUY AGAIN!!??!!?? My God, is he ever going to stop the constant interviews? It's crazy how many he has done now!!
3:59 when Faulding says hes not being critical of the police but just the comms team.....he has criticised the general police EVERY DAY! He has said MANY TIMES that sufficient searches have not been done, that the ground should be beaten down and they haven't done that, that they should be looking for deposition sites, that they should be searching more than just the river, that they are too focused on the river, that they are wrong to search the estuary, that they were wrong to rule out a 3rd party.......HE NEVER STOPS CRITICISING THE POLICE! He is giving multiple interviews to multiple media outlets everyday, saying the same stuff over and over......helping to fuel these conspiracy theories that have been happening.
He said he is the face of the investigation....shouldn't Nicola be the face, be the focus Mr Faulding? He says he is the voice of the family......how can that be when they haven't spoken to him in days?? He offers zero relevant up to date information yet is never out of the media!
He also says he could have been trusted with confidential information and wouldn't have repeated it to the media but how could the police know that? Would you trust someone with private details when they keep putting themselves in front of the camera, even before joining the search he was talking to the media? Maybe Lancs. police probably vetted him and decided it was too risky? Besides, to say the info would have changed his tactics is ridiculous quite frankly.....he is on record, in one of the MANY interviews he gave, stating that the police gave him one specific area to search and that was the area by the bench in the water. Him saying he would have gone down river etc is ridiculous as the police told him where he was permitted to search.
PLEASE STOP GIVING THIS GUY A PLATFORM! SUPPORT THE FAMILY IN THEIR SEARCH FOR NICOLA.
Well said.
Thank you Peter and your team for how you conducted the search you carried out. You and your team acted professionally. I as a member of the public l was encouraged when you first offered your help in this desperate situation. The Police seemed to be going around in circles and getting nowhere. Your team as l understood did a 10mile search of the river and did not find any evidence of her unfortunately. “And of course l must say free of charge” l really appreciate your involvement in this really sad situation and hope against hope she will be found alive and safe to be reunited with her whole family who are living through this awful nightmare.
Oh shut you idiot
Thank you Peter for speaking up and for someone having enough backbone to mention this “woke” BS which has put this woman’s safety and privacy in total jeopardy. You were the only person who spoke so frankly from the outset and if others don’t recognise your honesty and integrity throughout then they are part of the bigger problem. There are many of us who appreciate Peter’s involvement so once again thank you 🙏🏻
👏🏻
Yes I agree
An older person went missing from a care home couple years ago. Local community put a call out on social media to join a search after she was missing couple days.
About 150 of us went to village hall and were put into four search teams all led by couple police officers.
Younger volunteers were tasked with getting in ditches searching and the more difficult areas.
The lady was found unfortunately she had passed away but her family were able to get closure.
As part of the search team we all worked with the police officers and we also were able to give valuable local knowledge of the area.
The police could've done this and got people on their side. I'm sure hundreds of people would of turned up. I know locals were out searching but from what I've read it doesn't appear the police were utilising members of public to their advantage.
Well said.
This. Idea is not useful as there is a possibility this is a crime scene. Tracker dogs could have been used, but fairly early on.
@@ladygardener100 We don't know a crime has been committed, so effectively its a search and rescue.
@@ladygardener100 oh I see. Its just when the older lady went missing the heat sensor helicopters were up for hours plus tracker dogs out. But it's rural area here as well. When the community search teams came together the person was located that very same day . True to say she only had gone a mile and a half from the care home. It's just so sad and tragic when a person is missing and the uncertainty for those involved. I'm praying there is some breakthrough somehow.
Yes lots of egos. And yours Peter, is the biggest. How many interviews are you going to do? Your job is complete and your services no longer required so perhaps you should keep quiet and move on
And enjoy his holiday in Cornwall rather than doing multiple interviews!
It's quite ironic that he's talking about egos. He left saying his job was done, then he's back again. Maybe he missed the attention. He sure likes talking to the media.
There are 170,000 people reported missing in the UK every year. Around 15% are unaccounted for, for mord than a couple of days. I wonder in how many of those cases his company has offered his help for free?
This bloke absolutely loves the sound of his own voice.
Can’t stand him so annoying
And the look of his own face.
Which one?
@@mizztree954 p
PF
Once again , why did Paul not tell Peter when Peter was comforting him , please explain to me ?
I would like to know that too, Dermot.
🤔
Am not detective and i dont know paul seeing interviews something with him right tell me add up i know shouldn’t judge but interested in the kind of shuff i think peter doing what felt was right i think need investigate the family or paul ask what happened that night to led to her disappearance.
Dermot, the husband thought the dive team had been fully briefed by the police.
The dive team also thought they'd been fully briefed.
Comforting him 🥴
The superintendent came over as highly rigid from the start. She clearly follows the "rules" to the letter and disregards any other thinking. We must haver "evidence" before we do anything etc.
Yet without evidence they said “we believe she has gone in the water”
She needs firing
Tunnel vision - IF the phone was on the bench then Nicola was there and that's where they will look FINISHED - DO not even consider that somebody put it there with the dog and the harness and the fit bit TO FOOL US 🙄
@@namelesswon When she said that, I realised that there was something else going on.
Highly rigid , that about sums it up limited vision , to what open vision offers ..
Lancashire Police have completely failed in their handling of this case... unfortunately I expected nothing else from the police nowadays - that way you're not going to be disappointed.
@ gthbn how can you know that? No one knows the evidence that the police already have which has effected their actions. Agree it doesn't look right but I'm assuming professionals know their jobs, otherwise why have a police force? We should wait until it's finished and then there might be an enquiry before we all cast the first stones making accusations with no knowledge.
@sheffsteel7 by their own admissions they have assumed Nicola has gone into the river so anyone thinking they drove through with a dash cam isn't going to bother checking it. The area her phone was found in wasn't sealed off, yes it's popular but to look for potential signs of where someone might have fallen in you need to keep the area secure. Also, according to Peter and the media, buildings and land close to the river haven't been searched. The lack of action in doing this has led to it being contaminated by countless people from outside the area.
Peter is looking for excuses IMHO. Is he saying he would have looked harder if he'd known these vulnerabilities? His task was to search the river, I don't blame him for not finding her but I blame him for his categorical statements she was not in the river. Which he appears to be starting to row back here. Rivers are unpredictable. Peter's ego is large.
The biggest ego is his. This guy is unprofessional and needs to know when to be quiet. Why is he still performing interviews on this case and more importantly why are broadcasters still asking him!? He’s a big part of the problem and it’s his own doing.
I absolutely agree with peters take on this situation. He should have been briefed. It may have made a huge difference.
I don’t care if the woman liked her drink, just wish the police would find her. Seems like they’re trying to tarnish her now
Agree.... Most people do drink, they need to get on with their job and try to find her...
I think Peter is very professional and I’ve had a couple of negatives reply’s when I’ve supported him. Thank goodness for people like peter who remember offered his services for free!
I agree with you
He doesn't see it as 'free' - he is getting paid in exposure, for both his services and the book he has out. Don't be so naive.
@@AM2K2
So what ?
If it were my loved one I'd want his expertise.
@@flowerjpotter1629 I didn't say he shouldn't look - I'm disputing this being described as charity. If it were my loved one though, I wouldn't want him giving TV interviews every other day saying...nothing.
How could we forget?
No bigger ego than Peters
I think Mr Faulding and his team are amazing at there jobs, they are experts,its big a shame they did not have the information they needed, it's been very unprofessional from the start. My heart gose out to the family and friends.🎗 keep hope 🎗
Unprofessional from the start . Could be the reason , Media , Joe public , and retired Police professionals , have shown so much attention . Early retirements ??
So amazing that a walker found her body in the stretch that Peter's team 'checked'?
Guy is a clown.
They was told to check from the bench up the river 3 or 4 miles they dint go that far down, not there folt at all, if they where told from the start,the information they needed they would have used a Different strategy in the search, completely not there folt. My opinion
Wait!?? Jeremy Kyle is still on TV...now that's a mystery
Peter found him months after he went of air
@@dianecameron137 🤣🤣
@@dianecameron137 hahahahaha
His toupee was found before he was.
Two huge egos in one interview
Peter Faulding seems to have a pretty big ego too.
Telling us all how great he is while complaining about egos
I understand he offered to help, he didn't find her, he did it for free. But, jeez, this fella has a lot to say. he is on every single media channel. Rolls out the same lines, "10 cases a year" "official underwater team", "police divers did a great job". Thanks for your help and effort, but we dont need you saying about checking local ditches etc. For all the critics the police are getting, I still stand by that we do not 7know what is going on behind closed doors with the investigation.
Mr Faulding has had his 15 minutes of fame and then some. Any incident involving a person in water (PIW) is by definition a high risk missing person search, this should be absolutely no surprise to Mr Faulding.
Secondly, Faulding et al. had one task: search the river for a body (living or otherwise), this forms one task amongst many areas searched by other skilled and technical resources, better suited than a specialist dive team. The circumstances leading to any high urgency PIW search is at the time irrelevant…
He has a point about the wider media engagement disaster, however
as for comments on egos, irony!
100%
Biggest ego is Faulding himself.
I’m really amazed at how many experts there are in the comments 🤔
How does the manner of her entry into the water effect her location ?
What he is saying is nonsense.
Your delusional
@@stumpytkd1774 You’re….moron 😂
Can’t believe people are still believing what he says. His intentions and motives were apparent from the start.
I hope he continues with his self-publicity at this point because the more he says, the more obvious it will to those who are a little naive as to what he is all about.
It’s unforgivable that Peter Faulding wasn’t fully informed on Nicola’s vulnerability. I wouldn’t blame him if he walked away and told the police and Paul to get on without him. He’s obviously an amazingly talented and compassionate human being. Absolutely disgraceful that he was so badly treated.
Thr family could have told him anytime he was there
@@martinhenderson6351 I still feel he is being unfairly blamed. remember Peter Faulding saying during his first interview that if a body were caught in reeds , he wouldn’t be able to detect it. The sonar only worked in the water. Surely he expected the police to check the reeds along the river bank ?
The whole thing is so tragic. No winners in this. But I still feel he did his absolute best.
What a horrendous job for any human being to have to do. Rest in peace Nicola. At least the family can lay her to rest now.
@@martinhenderson6351 I have my opinion and you have yours. I still feel he did his best. You disagree , and that’s fine. To me he came across as a caring , compassionate individual who spends his life doing this sort of recovery work. He’s been extremely successful in many instances. We need people like him because it’s a job that most people would find repelling. It’s easy to criticise him now. If he had been the one to find her , he’d be hailed as a hero. As it is , he’s receiving a lot of negativity, so he’s obviously trying to defend his reputation. The truth is
we won’t know how long Nicola was in the water until the autopsy is performed.
He may well be vindicated when that piece of information is confirmed.
@@martinhenderson6351 I can’t answer your questions because I don’t know , and neither do you.
Lots of questions still to be answered. Have a lovely night
Maybe less time in ‘thought policing’ exercises and more training in real detective work would be a start. The ‘alphabet policing’ and constant ‘diversity’ employing rather than the right person for the job needs to take some of the blame to. You’ve more chance having a copper on your doorstep for something they ‘think’ you ‘think’ than if you’d been burgled.😡
back in the days officers had to be the right height and you would have seen local bobby on beat. those days have gone
I remember them well…nowadays they come all shapes and sizes, tattoos, uniforms 12” to long…right scruffy bunch of No gooders.
we had fat Dan the police man on his bike as our bobby and all he had to say was i know your parents that stopped our nonsense well for a wee while anyway@@Othillde
Policing has been sabotaged for decades now - deliberately so.
@@Othillde She might have been the Butterbean of the force, routinely squashing the prisoners into submission. Nothing to see here, roll away.
Think of the time and money wasted by withholding the information!!
But Peter 🤔You connected quite well with Paul 🤷🏼♀️HE could've told you?🤷🏼♀️🤔
Observing Peter Faulding, he has been very noisy, is it all about him? One could almost imagine he has a book out.
I agree, Peter should have been informed on Nicolas alcohol issue it would have helped him to do his job properly, because that information was withheld it made everyone look silly, Peter came out and stated that she isn’t in the river because he didn’t have that crucial piece of information, whoever made the decisions on this case needs to be held accountable, because from the start everything has in essence been misconstrued. I could be wrong but I wouldn’t be surprised if we learn that a former police officer was involved.
Well, yes Peter did come out and say she’s not in the water. But then said he thinks she is in the water. Then that she isn’t again. He said its literally impossible for her to reach the sea, then that he thinks she’s probably in the sea… He speculates and speaks before he thinks, so of course they didn’t want to share sensitive information with him. It would have been all over the news within an hour 😂
His job was to search the river, whether or not he knew about her issues should make no difference.
Yes, his Job was to search the river, he was told she fell in, which implies that she would have been in the shallower part of the river, if the police told peter that they believed she jumped in I am guessing that his search would have included the deeper part of the river too. In essence falling in and jumping in are two very different things.
@@KamalTiwari82 They were put in a very difficult situation to be fair. They obviously knew that anything they told Peter would be all over the media in no time, so whilst it may have been helpful to share that info with him, realistically they just couldn’t. Nothing to stop Paul telling him though… although the police probably gave him a heads up not to tell Peter anything he wouldn’t want made public.
You know who looks silly? Peter. For coming out and saying anything at all, let alone that Nicola 100% wasn’t in the river. He’s a cog not the whole wheel and should’ve have been assuming
Peter clearly a decent bloke.
Clearly wants publicity for his book.
"... we’ve searched it extremely thoroughly and we’ve ruled out, especially, the area where Nicola supposedly went in all the way down to the first weir and then onward down the river quite a distance. And then that’s my area cleared then, and we went upstream as well for about a mile upstream just in case, so it’s been extremely thorough.
Peter Faulding.
I knew she was there. A woman goes missing beside a long hard to search object. The police rule out a kidnapping as no-one can carry a woman to a vehicle unseen.
As Sherlock used to say, whatever is left, however improbable, is the truth.
Search the rjver properly.
P. S. She's fell in. She hasn't jumped in purposely, imho.
What l don't understand is Nicola loved Willow, why would she leave her to roam free.lf she did leave of her own accord surely she would have made sure Willow was safely tied up.Nicola must have the leash with her only the harness was left.This makes me think she was taken suddenly,she was still logged in to her office.The phone would have been left so her whereabouts couldn't be traced on route.lf she had gone of her own accord she would need clothes money credit card.
Bloody hell Peter, time to take a step back from the media interviews and take your ego with you!
We all know just how great you are now. We won’t forget…
Peter's ego hurt coz he didn't find her. Personally I think he's useless. Turns out his sonar equipment was not that much more superior than what the professionals were using. We're fed up with you Peter
Not finding her is a result in itself. Had she been in the water she would have been found; instead, the alternatives have to be considered.
@@christinestanding Not true - there was a story just last week of a body being found in the river, the person went missing months ago.
If she is not in the river then the best equipment in the world will not find her, sonar equipment cannot find what is not there, weird point you make.
I have worked with professionals for many years. I can recognize clever well trained people with integrity. Peter Faulding is one of them.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Peter, the police didn't reach out to you. Paul, Nicola's boyfriend, did. So why didn't Paul inform you that she was an alcoholic when he made contact with you? Don't you find that odd?
The boyfriend should be a suspicious number one.was even laughing on the interview,, wasn't a genuine worried boyfriend 🤔
The family were driving the investigation in the absence of the police.
Thing is with all the expertise and gadgets in the world you can't 100% predict or beat nature
Peter is projecting and lack of self awareness is funny, he has flip flopped so much his "expert" credability is more than in question.
Jeremy is pedaling misinformation (no surprise there), the police have already stated that initially they did cordan off the bench and had it examined.
Jeremy Kyle is lucky to have found any job in news broadcasting. He's absolutely atrocious in broadcasting, and he's not very bright. He uses the technique of shouting / adopting an angry tone, talking over people, and talking excessively to mask how unintelligent he is
Just like kyle this peter the Diva twat should never work again 👍🏼
As a trusted police partner of many years Peter Faulding absolutely should have been told about all of the background available to help him conduct the best search possible. The only reason to not do that is ego/territorial behaviour. They didn't like him arriving into the situation because it implied that what they'd already done wasn't the best it could be. That is not putting the best interests of the missing person or their family at the forefront of their activity. If they're intimidated by hi-tech kit and niche specialists then heaven help them. Why are they in the job they're in? To assist the public - not to feather their own nest. I didn't warm to the lead detective, I felt her manner in the press conference was inappropriate and less than open. What a mess. It is a comms/PR disaster but worth remembering that that's not always the Comms team's fault. It's a job I used to do and you frequently get "blocked" by senior members of an organisation who don't understand media relations properly and don't use their PR Comms function in a way that allows a good job to be done. They make decisions about what should or shouldn't be said on different criteria to the ones that good Comms professionals know matter. That's what usually creates the chaos. If you're employing Comms professionals get excellent ones and then make sure you listen to them.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It’s unfortunate, but they knew they couldn’t trust Peter with sensitive information.
Why? When hes on the fecking tele every 5 minutes 🤦♂️
Oh dear I would trust him with life. All hail Peter The Great 😊
@@comara2011 I’ve heard the next South Park episode is going to be about Peter, don’t know how true it is though.
Bore off Peter Faulding. The police don't have to tell you anything and are obviously keeping you out of the picture for a reason...
All you're interested in, is promoting your new book.....
Stay away and stop using a missing woman to up your sales.
" What Lies Beneath" just found this book on Kindle. Author, Peter Faulding. I shall start reading it today.
At least he has succeeded in one of his missions then. He got you to buy his book
@@chantallennox1201 have you written a book?
Peters got the biggest ego of all & police released the information because Peter & Paul was leaking information to the press & him being privy to certain information wouldn't negate his search in any way.
Peter Faulding has the victims' best interest at heart and some people don't lift up to this standard.
Peter faulding . Knows his stuff he is legend👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
So he constantly tells us.
Yes, there are egos playing here, and Faulding's is the biggest!
''There are egos playing here'' Says the man who has done 30 interviews with every person and organisation he can, has constantly portrayed himself as some super mega, never-fail Alpha know-it-all investigator, and has said multiple times that he should have been told everything by the police. ''We get the job done.'' ''I find them''
This man is going be wheeled out for his opinion by the media every time someone goes missing now. Just as they wheel out Paul Burrell every time a 'Diana' story arises.
Exactly !!!
He only had one job to do which he gave himself the role, he still didn’t delivered and keeps changing his story to suit his reputation, let’s not forget he said ( she is not in the river) he is the one that said( the phone was left as decoy) and so on on on and on ….. all hypothesis should have been taken into consideration therefore should not have changed the way his search was conducted , he is a lier
@@br2431
So you wouldn't want his help if your child went missing.
Ok.
I literally saw his 22nd interview yesterday and thought that must be the last........ nope.
I still do not believe family/police are telling the whole truth. Police would only attend home environment for issues of domestic or in support of a mental health act assessment.
The main ego at play here seems to be Peter's. He may be extremely good at his job, but he has come across as incredibly arrogant from the start. No wonder he's got the police's backs up. He's been speaking out of turn from the start, so I'm not surprised the police haven't wanted to confide in him.
Peter Faulldiing is an expert & he”s a good man. People who speak badly are missed informed…………if people like this man stop talking then it will becomes a cold case. Apart from anything PF & crew worked without pay just kind hearts to find Nicola. I’m more concerned in 3 weeks I’ve only heard her partner say I love her once?
You are making an excellent point here about Peter talking keeping the investigation going longer.
Lancashire police said normally they would be winding up their search at this point.
But because of all the public interest they are continuing.
@@flowerjpotter1629 thank you flower 🌸 bless you! But we or they must talk about Nicola. Now I worry was she unwell or was life too much stress & all x
EGO'S. How many interviews have you done son? It seems 1000's of Sherlock Holmes have decided what has happened. He said "I assumed she went in the river". Surely your job is to search the river and not assume anything. Anything is possible hear so I wouldn't assume anything.
Yes absolutely he should have been told, he wouldn’t have just focused on her being in the River ,,, I would love to see him solve this case ,,,
If I was the partner - regardless of what might have happened previously - I'd have been raging over them searching 2ft of bloody water. My only instincts would have been that she's either walked off or been abducted.
This egomaniac been shouting his mouth of since the start of this. Blabbing all sorts of nonsense. Why on earth would the family or police trust him if they didn't at that time want it to be public about Nicola's health problems. And whether she drowned by accident or by suicide it makes no difference to searching for her body.
Why did the family.. especially Paul, who reportedly had long conversations with Peter, not mention Nicola,s struggles to him?? It would have been kept confidential.
I have nothing but respect for Peter Faulding. He's on the ball and Lanc Police need to catch up with him.
Yes!!
This case is getting ridiculous. I strongly believe she isn't in the water. Everything being reported seems to not be focused on finding her. Now information is coming out about her health issues which I really don't think has anything to do with her going missing in my opinion. It just feels like people want to talk about her going missing but no one has any idea of what could have happened to her and its heartbreaking. There's a lot of the public who want to find out but they keep getting bashed by the media for speculating and getting involved. Speculation can have a negative impact on the case but when nothing is moving forward and we aren't getting any closer to the truth more and more people will add to the speculation. That one guy said there's ego's at play.. Ridiculous unacceptable that behaviour should get people taken off the case. The important thing is to find her or find out what happened to her for the sake of her family and friends.
You can't say much work was done. If that was true we'd be closer to the truth but we aren't.
I feel she could be in a Lake nearby, the wyreside lakes
@@mammadijacopo3347 what makes you think that?
He got called Jerry again, classic.
He’s a ghoul
He is the one with the ego , this very annoying fame thirsty individual who got himself involved and did not delivered ! He is the one changing his tunes constantly! His job was to look into the river , full stop 🛑 now he wants celebrity status
Yeah. He’s soo annoying.
He's full of himself, just my opinion.
Paul had an opportunity to tell him too.
He didnt need to. This cry baby peter is all butthurt because he didn't do hes job and if now looking like a fool!
His intentions are positive but let's be honest here, he has shown to be among the most egocentric of anyone in this story.
Peter we are with you man. Top work and huge respect to you.
How can u find somebody who's not there
No one should be criticising Peter Faulding for doing what he is an expert at doing day in and day out. I really do think people need to know who he is and what he does for a living. To accuse him of doing the search for Nicola Bulley with an ulterior motive is ludicrous!!! Why don't they just leave him alone. The police wanted him there, her family wanted Peter Peter Faulding fthere and that's all that matters. Who ca
Peter faulding is the only one being honest in all this!
He’s a diver maybe he should stick to diving.
Egos? He has the biggest ego
That's the problem in this world full stop ! Ego !
There should have been indication of her having vulnerabilities. No need to mention alcohol or anything else perhaps say there was some concern for her state of mind.
..The alcohol WAS mentioned in the media, certainly on one source, in the very early coverage (as i commented then about her possibly being hung over and stumbling into the water). With due respect to Nicola maybe posters could have been put up in pubs and clubs..if they are serious about finding her. Either the alcohol was a big problem or it wasn't. I don't believe a lot ot the info. coming out now.
Of course it would colour the search