At 14:01 For (Gbest - Xi) , It should be (1.25-1.88) At 14:37 , Initial Velocity that we found in the last iteration was 0 but here you write 0.2583 and in all steps for finding updated X you added it with velocity but here you subtracted (1.25-0.2666) Please explain this.
At 14:21 how u have taken v3 is 1.153 becoz at 1st u have calculated v3 as 0.153 And also at 14:30 u have taken v4 as 0.2583 and also u have calculated at 1st v4 as 0
05:30 Initial Velocity = 0 08:09 New Velocity Calculate (3.3825 for X1) and so on for all particles Iteration 2 13:24 velocity Calculated (3.489 for X1) and so on
There are too many errors in your video, at 14:21, the previous v was 0.1537 but you set it to 1.1537 and the same error in x4. And why do you always use xi - vi for x4 ? Hope you reply soon, thank you
Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we accidently type 1.1537 ( use 0.1537). For all particles when we will update position we will add velocity in their older position. For x4, kindly use (1.25 + 0.2066)
@@RitikaxRayPixy thank you for your response. Actually I have a problem regarding geotechnical engineering. I have data regarding the bearing capacity of soil. There are a few input parameters on which the bearing capacity of soil depends. Dear ritika, I just wanted to know how I can optimise this problem? I mean what should be my inputs for the different particles. Or simply how can I approach this problem? Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks and regards
Hii mam i am a student i have implemented pso code based on flow chart.. Can u share ur email id So that i can share my code with u.. and please review mam
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
ua-cam.com/play/PLVLAu9B7VtkalMRDfFRT_Bzf45VE3OGBF.html
Amazing video. Explaining with an example helped me skip through the thory and directly understand the problem by solving the problem. Thank you !
Glad it helped!
At 14:01 For (Gbest - Xi) , It should be (1.25-1.88)
At 14:37 , Initial Velocity that we found in the last iteration was 0 but here you write 0.2583 and in all steps for finding updated X you added it with velocity but here you subtracted (1.25-0.2666)
Please explain this.
At 14:01 Gbest = 1.25 so yes you are write , It should be (1.25-1.88)
At 14:37 - for 2nd iteration: we are using updated velocity instead of 0
@@RitikaxRayPixy could you explain how have you updated the velocity from 0 to 0.2583
?
By Using velocity update formula.
At 14:21 how u have taken v3 is 1.153 becoz at 1st u have calculated v3 as 0.153
And also at 14:30 u have taken v4 as 0.2583 and also u have calculated at 1st v4 as 0
05:30 Initial Velocity = 0
08:09 New Velocity Calculate (3.3825 for X1) and so on for all particles
Iteration 2
13:24 velocity Calculated (3.489 for X1) and so on
There are too many errors in your video, at 14:21, the previous v was 0.1537 but you set it to 1.1537 and the same error in x4. And why do you always use xi - vi for x4 ? Hope you reply soon, thank you
Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we accidently type 1.1537 ( use 0.1537). For all particles when we will update position we will add velocity in their older position. For x4, kindly use (1.25 + 0.2066)
Very well explained.......thank you......keep it up
I don't understand where we take 0.8. Value of w
thank you ritika..... ❤❤ you are amazing.....😊
how i can determine the values of c1,c2,w ?
c1 and c2 range from 1.5 to 2.5 (for stability c1+c2
Please make a video on MPPT
Dear ritika , can you please help me to apply this optimization in civil engineering problem?
Sure, How we can help you?
@@RitikaxRayPixy thank you for your response. Actually I have a problem regarding geotechnical engineering. I have data regarding the bearing capacity of soil. There are a few input parameters on which the bearing capacity of soil depends. Dear ritika, I just wanted to know how I can optimise this problem? I mean what should be my inputs for the different particles. Or simply how can I approach this problem? Hope to hear from you soon. Thanks and regards
Please can you do a video on how to derive an objective function of any problem.
As Soon As Possible!
Please also a solution to traveling salesman problem using PSO and Genetic Algorithms
@@RitikaxRayPixy please also make video on how to use PSO for mppt
Optimization problem formulation: Separable Programming Problem in Optimization || Part 07 || ~xRay Pixy
ua-cam.com/video/UXN6knvlP-g/v-deo.html
And where we take 2.05 coefficient value
Mam i think g best value in 2nd interaction is 1.88
Thank you did mera exam pass karane ke liye.... Love Yu
Hii mam i am a student
i have implemented pso code based on flow chart..
Can u share ur email id
So that i can share my code with u.. and please review mam
researchpixy73@gmail.com
@@RitikaxRayPixy Thanku mam for sharing