What a whirlwind of a few days and also the festivities have just begun. Look forward to more content based around the winter events and the upcoming premiums in War Thunder
If people don't complain about things in the dev server nothing will change. change is a result of these complaints, Gaijin will never put in the work if no one complains. We should not take for granted that the live server version of vehicles will be all good whether we complain or not. Keep complaining boys and girls.
nobody cares. It's a plane in a video game being talked about by a youtuber who makes videos for fun. get a life and find some real things to worry about.
All of those secondary guns along the sides of the Colorado are 5-inch. The lower level casemated guns are 5"/51 anti-ship guns, while the ones a deck higher are 5"/25 anti-aircraft guns.
There's one important aspect of the problem with the dev server and people's anticipation I wish to mention here: The trust that the vehicles will be updated to the standard the people expect. Given Gaijins record, there is very little trust in the community that an issue with a vehicle is rectified on launch. While likely, vehicles that make it to launch with big issues appear very likely to stay that way, meaning you will wait quite a while for a fix for your favourite vehicle - or never see it. The engines for the F-15E being a prime example: It took outrage to change what the Community wanted. Not patience or trust in the companies idea of fairness and balance. So when people see those machines, incorrect as they are, I think it triggers a big fear that it will come out in a similar state and then people are stuck with that and it is not unfounded. Thus this outrage in bug reports is understandable. This really isn't fixable in the way they do the dev server. There is no way for people to know what the final thing will be like, so they flood the reporting system with everything, not really checking the quality of their reports. And you cannot really blame them for that. It is the fear created by the system that is the Dev Server and the experience of having machines released without desired changes. Thus they can write "SUBJECT TO CHANGE!", "WIP" and "NOT FINAL!" all over it, but that won't change a thing. It is the nature of the system of bug reports, unclear information from both the developer and the IRL vehicle data and the constant fear that things may release as "less capable" because nobody has any idea what the final thing is going to be like. People have nothing more but the thing they "see" (which is why "WIP" stuff is difficult to present to any customer!). That's why we get those stupid classified leaks too. It is desparation and the issue that people feel like they cannot provide information to warrant a change, even though an issue gets more and more suspicous as being incorrect modelling. It does not justify leaking anything, of course, but it is extremely necessary to acknowledge that War Thunders development and bug reporting cycle certainly acts as a catalyst for this behavior. It would not happen nearly as much otherwise.
The funny thing about the Colorado is it's also gunna get bigger[wider] if they add the retrofit that was done to it with the torpedo protection armor and the upgrade of all the 3" and 5" guns being replaced with dual mount 5" [127mm] multi-purpose guns
@ oh go cry yourself to sleep. You guys got jets this update yet are the biggest cry babies that people wanted something different. It’s no US players bitching about other mains, it’s always you guys that just can’t stop crying. 🤣
If Gaijin wanted to introduce a squadron jet for the USSR and specifically chose this jet, it would have made much more sense to add the Su-33 as a tech tree aircraft while designating the Su-27K or the T-10K (the pre-production naval Flanker, developed before the fall of the USSR) as the squadron jet.
Did I miss something somewhere or why isn't anyone saying something about the G6-HVM that was leaked? Same thing that happened to the Chinese planes? Haven't seen any updates on it anywhere yet.
@sebastiankillin7940 Bud...make sure you read properly before you make a comment... I'm asking if the G6 is having the same thing happen to it as with the Chinese planes...
@@dzban02it's not about that it's about what year the vehicle is from Apparently SU-27SM got SU-27SM3 upgrades but isn't called SM3 lol So UMPK being modern 2023 means that SU-34 is now 2023 instead of 2014-15 A-10A Early premium can carry gunpods while Late can't ingame Thing is... Late CAN carry and use them but it doesn't because by the time Late came around the gunpods went out of service so they're not using them anymore
Talking about weapons not behaving the way they should.. Why arn't i allowed to designate up two four targets with the Longbows hellfires. No fire and forget? wtf but the italian helo has acces to fire and forget?
People have been so insufferable lately on the topic of the Dev server. How long will it take for them to realize how this works? and how long to understand the disclaimers at the beginning of literally EVERY video made by EVERY youtuber? Just because it says ONLY MICAs on the blog doesn't mean it's getting MICA-NGs. The Python 4 has been in the files for a year and has never been implemented. Just MICAs on the blog doesn't mean it won't get Magic 2's. There are so many things that shouldn't have to be a discussion if people would use common sense and logic instead of worrying about what the next biggest and best thing is.
It’s very odd the biggest update of the year for the only has two new aircraft, because there focusing on minor nations and don’t these planes to be over showed but, last year and the previous years everyone got something for the update it’s odd like I really doubt a f18a takes away from the euro fighter and that French jet, f18 a wouldn’t even be top tier, and what about Russia? They don’t have one top tier with a respectable flight model, it’s just all ODD!
the F-18 didn't get added because every nation that would get them either just got a top tier fighter. Whether that be the Eurofighter, Rafale, F-15, or any other, the whole point is filling gaps. If i was a betting man, you're a US main who cries when you don't get a new fighter every patch. The F-18 will come eventually, just not now. In the mean time, pick up a new nation and stop whining.
@ good thing you’re not a “betting man” bc I play 5 nations Russia, us, GERMANY, brits,and Japan, i play them all and I have to tier for them all, so yes I am getting the euro fighter too, and nothing you said takes away from the point that, the f18a with sparrows could have came in this patch, and don’t look past how I mentioned in my last post, that RUSSIA HAS NO RESPONSIBLE TOP FLIGHT MODLES su27, mig29 need a buff in flight performance but your probably a me of the weird people who think it’s okay for how much the grippen is STILL over performing and I’m a betting man…
None of that shit is necessary. The later MICAs are in the same generation as things like the Python 4, a missile which has been in the files for a year without implementation. IR MICAs are not needed either considering that French jets and Magic 2's are some of the best systems and weapons at top tier
I swear people wanting the Mica IR literally have no idea what the capabilities of that missile are, and have no idea how much it would break the game.
‘Rafale’ means gust of wind or a gale. ‘Rafael’ is a ninja turtle or some shit. Please stop confusing them. There is a reason the French named it the Rafale and not the Rafael
@@Piggiesgomoomooif every wt players would call the Abrams « Abrahams » wouldn’t it be annoying ? This is the frustration we have when people misspell it
My only thing about the US not getting anything in air is that there are 3 f-16s and 3 F-15, why tf do we need 3 of each, are they going to add 3 hornets too? 3 F-35s? We don’t need 3 of 1 specific vehicle. Give us the early and the late variants and thats it, they could’ve added the hornet and super hornet in place of a F-15 and F-16
''It does not mean we have plans to create fictional weaponry and turn one thing into something else that it is not'' They literally did with the Brimstone though... Eurghhh, just put the spade down.
So we dont play 10.0 + with new markers tankers we going to die just so GJ can sell more premium planes and helis 😂f shit i m aut will come back when they fix they shit
What a whirlwind of a few days and also the festivities have just begun. Look forward to more content based around the winter events and the upcoming premiums in War Thunder
U BOOTS WHEEN
Time of OnlyFabs
His comment about premium BMD tech tree isn’t something I’d take to heart, they said the same thing about the A-6 two years ago.
If people don't complain about things in the dev server nothing will change. change is a result of these complaints, Gaijin will never put in the work if no one complains. We should not take for granted that the live server version of vehicles will be all good whether we complain or not. Keep complaining boys and girls.
Exactly. The changes of wrong flight performances and such are *because* people complain about them.
Rafale is a French fighter jet.
Rafael is an Israeli defense company.
He mentioned in another video he knows it is wrong to say Rafael but he likes the sound of it better 💀
@@nikolaisuterovich
0 efforts
@@nikolaisuterovich we don't give a shit
nobody cares. It's a plane in a video game being talked about by a youtuber who makes videos for fun. get a life and find some real things to worry about.
I suppose I prefer the sound of Quebec more than Canada. So I will call Canada Quebec if name doesn’t have his importance
All of those secondary guns along the sides of the Colorado are 5-inch. The lower level casemated guns are 5"/51 anti-ship guns, while the ones a deck higher are 5"/25 anti-aircraft guns.
There's one important aspect of the problem with the dev server and people's anticipation I wish to mention here: The trust that the vehicles will be updated to the standard the people expect. Given Gaijins record, there is very little trust in the community that an issue with a vehicle is rectified on launch. While likely, vehicles that make it to launch with big issues appear very likely to stay that way, meaning you will wait quite a while for a fix for your favourite vehicle - or never see it. The engines for the F-15E being a prime example: It took outrage to change what the Community wanted. Not patience or trust in the companies idea of fairness and balance.
So when people see those machines, incorrect as they are, I think it triggers a big fear that it will come out in a similar state and then people are stuck with that and it is not unfounded. Thus this outrage in bug reports is understandable. This really isn't fixable in the way they do the dev server. There is no way for people to know what the final thing will be like, so they flood the reporting system with everything, not really checking the quality of their reports. And you cannot really blame them for that. It is the fear created by the system that is the Dev Server and the experience of having machines released without desired changes.
Thus they can write "SUBJECT TO CHANGE!", "WIP" and "NOT FINAL!" all over it, but that won't change a thing. It is the nature of the system of bug reports, unclear information from both the developer and the IRL vehicle data and the constant fear that things may release as "less capable" because nobody has any idea what the final thing is going to be like. People have nothing more but the thing they "see" (which is why "WIP" stuff is difficult to present to any customer!). That's why we get those stupid classified leaks too. It is desparation and the issue that people feel like they cannot provide information to warrant a change, even though an issue gets more and more suspicous as being incorrect modelling. It does not justify leaking anything, of course, but it is extremely necessary to acknowledge that War Thunders development and bug reporting cycle certainly acts as a catalyst for this behavior. It would not happen nearly as much otherwise.
BMD-2M is a likely tonk for the tree
The funny thing about the Colorado is it's also gunna get bigger[wider] if they add the retrofit that was done to it with the torpedo protection armor and the upgrade of all the 3" and 5" guns being replaced with dual mount 5" [127mm] multi-purpose guns
They finna add the BMD 1 and call it a day
TECs ability to not complain about US players. Literally fucking impossible
i mean they are the worst so justified
@ oh go cry yourself to sleep. You guys got jets this update yet are the biggest cry babies that people wanted something different. It’s no US players bitching about other mains, it’s always you guys that just can’t stop crying. 🤣
@@wtaustrian russia main opinions are not valid.
@@bigtony4930 whos russian main?
Chicago Piano is the 1.1 naval gun the Chicago typewriter is the Thompson submachine gun
I wouldve enjoyed something NOT TOP TIER for the US like some cold war or late ww2 aicraft
If Gaijin wanted to introduce a squadron jet for the USSR and specifically chose this jet, it would have made much more sense to add the Su-33 as a tech tree aircraft while designating the Su-27K or the T-10K (the pre-production naval Flanker, developed before the fall of the USSR) as the squadron jet.
"Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa! TEC isnt pronouncing this foreign word properly!" I swear you people got nothing better to do.
Turn around.
How do you view the models like he does here?
Waiting for my GPS fab 5000 😏
I just woke up and in my haze, I read the thumbnail caption as "Dragon Balls" and was very confused.
@4:44 God bless him. Now that I have kids, I understand the madness a little more.
finally US 16" guns
Did I miss something somewhere or why isn't anyone saying something about the G6-HVM that was leaked? Same thing that happened to the Chinese planes?
Haven't seen any updates on it anywhere yet.
There is literally a section in this video where he reviews a comment Smin made on chinese planes.
@sebastiankillin7940 Bud...make sure you read properly before you make a comment...
I'm asking if the G6 is having the same thing happen to it as with the Chinese planes...
@@stiaancoetzee7778he’s not your bud, guy
@@User-gx3sr Im not your guy,bud.
@@User-gx3srSit down bud
4:00 What the fuck are even those? I may not be an aerospace engineer, but that doesn’t even like will even glide at all.
I was expecting 1945 refit version Colorado class
Yeah it should be 45 fit!!!
@@masongros7319 west virginia my guess it might be premium its only class shares refitted tennesee class superstructure
@ I would love the West Virginia
Love the lattice masts on the Colorado!
Still no frence 10.0 premium 😂
Bro you French mains cry over everything, Be quiet and grind like the rest of them.
They can't even make AP bombs work and that ordnance is in the game almost from the beginning 🤣
Fab 3000 glide bomb is nuts, i ironically said fab 3000 glide bomb when in the chat the other day lol
The UMPK is pretty modern as in 2023 so I feel like it should only be available to later Russian craft like the SM3
it's just glide bomb it nothing special about it
it dosen't need any special pylons to be deployed and etc
@@dzban02it's not about that it's about what year the vehicle is from
Apparently SU-27SM got SU-27SM3 upgrades but isn't called SM3 lol
So UMPK being modern 2023 means that SU-34 is now 2023 instead of 2014-15
A-10A Early premium can carry gunpods while Late can't ingame
Thing is... Late CAN carry and use them but it doesn't because by the time Late came around the gunpods went out of service so they're not using them anymore
why? it's only ever been used on su-34. russians arent dumb enough to climb an su-25 to 10km to drop it (and probably get it shot down in the process)
The su27sm doesn't have anything from the Su27SM3 other than the extra 2 r77 which was needed
@ i was talking about the Su-25 my g
I would love to see cluster bombs added.
Please add more Chinese IFVs and light tanks (type 15). No one asked for another t-80
Where is Bismarck?
I'm pretty sure he's been dead for very long time
Talking about weapons not behaving the way they should.. Why arn't i allowed to designate up two four targets with the Longbows hellfires. No fire and forget? wtf but the italian helo has acces to fire and forget?
I think the dev is made to be hated(by some) it can fix some issues sometimes that wouldn't be happening if the dev didn't exist for public
People have been so insufferable lately on the topic of the Dev server. How long will it take for them to realize how this works? and how long to understand the disclaimers at the beginning of literally EVERY video made by EVERY youtuber? Just because it says ONLY MICAs on the blog doesn't mean it's getting MICA-NGs. The Python 4 has been in the files for a year and has never been implemented. Just MICAs on the blog doesn't mean it won't get Magic 2's. There are so many things that shouldn't have to be a discussion if people would use common sense and logic instead of worrying about what the next biggest and best thing is.
It’s very odd the biggest update of the year for the only has two new aircraft, because there focusing on minor nations and don’t these planes to be over showed but, last year and the previous years everyone got something for the update it’s odd like I really doubt a f18a takes away from the euro fighter and that French jet, f18 a wouldn’t even be top tier, and what about Russia? They don’t have one top tier with a respectable flight model, it’s just all ODD!
the F-18 didn't get added because every nation that would get them either just got a top tier fighter. Whether that be the Eurofighter, Rafale, F-15, or any other, the whole point is filling gaps. If i was a betting man, you're a US main who cries when you don't get a new fighter every patch. The F-18 will come eventually, just not now. In the mean time, pick up a new nation and stop whining.
@ good thing you’re not a “betting man” bc I play 5 nations Russia, us, GERMANY, brits,and Japan, i play them all and I have to tier for them all, so yes I am getting the euro fighter too, and nothing you said takes away from the point that, the f18a with sparrows could have came in this patch, and don’t look past how I mentioned in my last post, that RUSSIA HAS NO RESPONSIBLE TOP FLIGHT MODLES su27, mig29 need a buff in flight performance but your probably a me of the weird people who think it’s okay for how much the grippen is STILL over performing and I’m a betting man…
@ and I’m not grind a 6th nation, spent more then enough of my life already doing so.
Waiter! Waiter! LAV 25 please
people wouldn’t leak stuff if gaijin listened, so keep leaking lads
We want MICA-IR for Mirage 2000-5 and for Rafal !! Where's our MICA-IR ?!! Not Only MICA-EM !! MICA-IR too !!
not coming for awhile goober
The MICA-IR technically classes itself as the same generation of missile as the R-73M, R-74, IRIS-T, Python 4, AIM-9X, and AIM-132 ASRAAM.
None of that shit is necessary. The later MICAs are in the same generation as things like the Python 4, a missile which has been in the files for a year without implementation. IR MICAs are not needed either considering that French jets and Magic 2's are some of the best systems and weapons at top tier
I swear people wanting the Mica IR literally have no idea what the capabilities of that missile are, and have no idea how much it would break the game.
🗣🗣No F18😭
Jk guys.
Colo
Rada
What is this Raphael vehicle you are talking about all the time? Can not find it.
rafale....
Go watch his past video on the Rafale specifically. He mentioned he only calls it Rafael because it sounds better but he knows it is not called that
‘Rafale’ means gust of wind or a gale.
‘Rafael’ is a ninja turtle or some shit.
Please stop confusing them. There is a reason the French named it the Rafale and not the Rafael
No one cares
@@Piggiesgomoomooif every wt players would call the Abrams « Abrahams » wouldn’t it be annoying ? This is the frustration we have when people misspell it
He messed up a random forgien word, stop bein a baby
@speedyvik1198 people mess up my language all the time, there are more important things to worry about
@@Piggiesgomoomoo exactly
Pls give israel SAM
12 seconds
Dislike each time I ear RAFAEL again!!!
Even the Devblog say Le RAFALE! Translate :burst/gust and not a italian name!
hi bro! nice videos... but can you please stop calling the rafale as if it was written Raphael?
imagine being mad that someone isn't pronouncing a foreign word properly
Stop saying Raphael. Just say RA-FAIL, if you can't do the french pronunciation.
raphael sounds cooler
funni ninja turtle
My only thing about the US not getting anything in air is that there are 3 f-16s and 3 F-15, why tf do we need 3 of each, are they going to add 3 hornets too? 3 F-35s? We don’t need 3 of 1 specific vehicle. Give us the early and the late variants and thats it, they could’ve added the hornet and super hornet in place of a F-15 and F-16
Their will be three F-35 variants lol
this is the dumbest thing ive ever read
@@cameroncarley7958 we don’t need 3
@@rilukko so you think we’re getting every other countries F-35s in just the American tech tree?
@@PalexHorse why not, they’re all different from each other
''It does not mean we have plans to create fictional weaponry and turn one thing into something else that it is not'' They literally did with the Brimstone though... Eurghhh, just put the spade down.
Ostwind 2 and Ho-Ri prototype moment
The brimstone does use laser guidance in real life though...
@@TallyPatka-dz2cz no it doesn't
U BOOTS WHEN FFS
So we dont play 10.0 + with new markers tankers we going to die just so GJ can sell more premium planes and helis 😂f shit i m aut will come back when they fix they shit