William Rees - Measuring Our Ecological Footprint

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @drakewauters2109
    @drakewauters2109 Рік тому +1

    Wonderful mindset.

  • @PT-cu2fg
    @PT-cu2fg 2 роки тому +14

    Bill Rees always speaks the truly Inconvenient Truth.

  • @Glen-uy4jt
    @Glen-uy4jt 10 місяців тому +3

    ¨ what would an intelligent species do? ¨ develop and implement various strategies. Here is one example of a basic overall strategy. Any undertaking must maintain or improve the quality of the air, water and soil. It also must promote peace and respect for everything.

  • @StressRUs
    @StressRUs 2 роки тому +16

    Bill Rees is my favorite and most revered ecologist/environmentalist. Stress R Us

  • @kirkha100
    @kirkha100 Рік тому +2

    Love Bill Rees. Looked briefly at the channel. I’m down the road and further on from many of your interviews in terms understanding the imminent consequences of Overshoot. I am not saying I’m “prepared”. I’m making some gambles, based on acceptance of the premise. Culture as a rationalization of various biological imperatives within a finite context will not be denied or avoided.
    Brick wall or bottleneck, I don’t care. Extinction is possible. Bottleneck will be VERY narrow. Choose your preferred narrative. Your disbelief or denial is to my benefit. Nothing fair about it.
    Grasshoppers taste vaguely like asparagus. Leaf springs(5160 steel) from abandoned vehicles make good knives. Garden won’t produce enough calories yet, but I’m getting there. Trapping is more energy efficient than hunting. Accept the premise. Throw the dice. Everyone is gonna play. Attendance is mandatory.
    Oh, wait. Let’s have a war!

  • @drakewauters2109
    @drakewauters2109 Рік тому +2

    Intelligence is highly scalar. At the macro scale, intelligence breaks down significantly. Acting with intelligence as a group has never been a long term solution. We need to solve that problem.

  • @MrRollingEgo
    @MrRollingEgo 2 роки тому +6

    It ended too soon. what a great talk. i love it.

    • @Andre-hm5vo
      @Andre-hm5vo 2 роки тому +5

      I agree even though this talk is dated however still relevant. His disposition now seemingly is one of hopeless as the human species are just to simply moronic to change for the better let alone even understand the root problems. Personally I'm getting to the point of utter disdain for this generation of humans and I would like to see a end to us for the greater good!

    • @AudioPervert1
      @AudioPervert1 2 роки тому

      If you want more lectures by William Rees - please visit CACOR The Club Of Rome Canada. He is a member of the organization
      and has presented many lectures and discussions there in.

    • @MrRollingEgo
      @MrRollingEgo 2 роки тому +1

      @@AudioPervert1 thank you! I know. I watch CACOR often. I also e-mail sometimes with Prof. Rees. Such an eloquent talker!!!

  • @hascleavrahmbenyoseph7186
    @hascleavrahmbenyoseph7186 Рік тому +2

    Dr. William Rees is right about everything that he is saying, but before we start switching to solar energy and or better mass transportation, we must address the actual problem, that being our erroneous behavior model i.e. "Profit = income - expenses. Guided by this old model of behavior, every attempt to correct climate change will backfire and we'll be dealing with an even sicker environment and a more disrupted economy. We must, as a first step, correct our collective behavior by creating a new "Global Economic Model" GEM which is designed around a profit definition that fits well with nature's economy. I would suggest this definition: "Profit = our gratefulness and loving care for the environment and sustenance that it provides to all of us." Solar energy is a good idea, provided it doesn't change the earth's orbit, due to the radiometer effect. Better mass transportation is a very good idea; however, guided by our old definition of 'profit', this better mass transportation will probably cause a cascade of major bankruptcies. Keep in mind that switching any major industry such as petro with another major industry will cause an alarming amount of damage to our environment. This isn't like buying a new bicycle. These kinds of changes will trash the earth. Unless we face the fact that the dictionary definition of "profit' is 100% backwards to nature's actual economy, we're doomed. I think my new definition of 'profit' is the only way to reverse global warming and also virtually end homeless. Please help me by offering any thoughts on these ideas. It may already be too late to form a new GEM, but it is never too late to try.

  • @clarkdavis5333
    @clarkdavis5333 2 роки тому +7

    There is definitely one smart human...

  • @TennesseeJed
    @TennesseeJed 2 роки тому +8

    WASF, please pass the organic marmalade and vegan butter, we are toast.

  • @olivieraleman
    @olivieraleman 2 роки тому +2

    Gustave LeBon is the author of the book he refers to.... The Mind Of The Crowd

  • @unseenseer
    @unseenseer Рік тому +1

    👍👍

  • @treefrog3349
    @treefrog3349 2 роки тому +7

    The developed "Western" world gobbles up resources while "third world" nations are left to starve. Shouldn't that human tendency send chills down the spines of people of limited means EVERYWHERE? It doesn't. In many ways I envy their naiveté and innocence. As a fairly well-educated, world-travelled old man, now of precarious limited means, I have become rudely aware of the socio-economic juggernaut coming for most of us.

    • @christinearmington
      @christinearmington Рік тому

      I’m horrified that a local population in Chile is being locked out of water so that a corporation can grow asparagus for export. Ima guess those locals don’t have 2d Amendment rights.

  • @victorgrauer5834
    @victorgrauer5834 Рік тому

    Gertrude Stein called Ezra Pound "the village explainer."

  • @GregoryJWalters
    @GregoryJWalters Рік тому

    The Collapse of the North Atlantic Cod under Canada's watch? How could this possibly happen with such enlightened Public Policy? Eh bien, merci!

  • @kathybehlen7088
    @kathybehlen7088 2 роки тому +10

    why so few views. should be blasted from rooftops.

    • @mkkrupp2462
      @mkkrupp2462 2 роки тому +5

      Because people don’t want to know. And they don’t want to modify their lifestyles…

  • @treefrog3349
    @treefrog3349 2 роки тому +4

    Our myriad human mythologies fail to recognize homo sapiens as merely one of many species within an ecosystem. To US, we believe that the Earth is ALL ABOUT us exclusively. Everything else is merely a "gift of god" for our preferential use. Talk about "fatal flaws"! Our over-population and extravagant exploitation of everything on this planet is about to provide us with a brutal come-uppance. "Hubris" is the word that best describes our homocentric arrogance. The ancient Greeks were aware of that fatal flaw thousands of years ago. We ignored the warnings of our ancient forefathers, and we will soon pay for our childish exuberance and puerile arrogance.

  • @slowburn1764
    @slowburn1764 Рік тому +3

    All this is common sense but they haven’t taught that for ages so we believe the economic narrative instead and this is fatally flawed as discussed

  • @Joeyjojoshabbadoo
    @Joeyjojoshabbadoo 7 місяців тому +1

    We're not tribal. Human beings are not tribal. That's not what 'nation-states' are. A tribe is like a relatively small unit, where you know everyone in the tribe, or kind of do, and it's sort of an extended family that you can turn to for actual real help in the real world, because a small nuclear family is a terrible institution, and why would you ever limit your day to day existence to such a small group of immediate-family blood relations for a whole host of reasons. And so a numerically larger but still pretty small tribe is just better.
    Nations or countries are totally dissimilar, and the only thing holding them together is the same language, and some of the particular, familiar cultural quirks, as well as the brute force of law/violence, and mere practical necessity and inertia. But it exists mainly for the dominant group to be able to exploit the masses, by way of slavery or serfdom or high taxes. And is a completely made up invention that is not like a tribe at all. And people are not tribal at all. Other than being social animals, and not loners like cheetahs, who are born into a local society that's typically part of an official country, and being relentlessly indoctrinated, mainly because there would be no instinct to be 'tribal' without all that indoctrination, and so the elite class would not be able to dominate and exploit the poor as easily without that mother of all social constructs. So we are definitely not 'tribal'.....