How Sweden's Anti-Russia Fighter Will WRECK Putin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 кві 2024
- ✈️ Sweden's strategic entry into NATO marks a pivotal shift in European defense, introducing the Saab JAS 39 Gripen, a technological titan of the skies. As we delve into Sweden's military transformation and the Gripen's cutting-edge capabilities, discover how this fighter jet redefines aerial combat and strengthens NATO's strategic edge. 🌍🔗 #Sweden #SwedenNATO #NATO #scandinavia #russia #vladimirputin #putin #europe #europeansecurity #europeandefense #MilitaryAlliance #AerialCombat #militaryanalysis #militarytech #natovsrussia #geopolitics #fighterjet 🚀🛡️
#themilitaryshow - Наука та технологія
Canada had a chance to buy a fleet of these things and turned it down in favor of the F35. I love the F35 and what it brings and I understand the decision had a lot to do with NORAAD compatibility, but when you have a tiny airforce and a huge amount of airspace to cover the Gripen just makes more sense to me.
Financially not really possible, but running both platforms would have been an interesting concept. Save the really hi tech plane and put hours on the cheaper to run platform
@Ob1sdarkside lol yea definitely outside our budget. Canada doesn't care much for defense spending
@julianjames2899 In Ireland we still have propeller airplanes and rely on the UK to screen Russian planes
I commented this before I saw your post, but it fits here. The Gripen is absolutely the perfect choice for defending Canada's north. Yet we chose to bow yet again to the US and order the unnecessarily advanced and expensive to operate F-35.
@@jasonolson1593 An American here, and after seeing the Gripen perform in the Red Flag Exercises in Alaska, I am an avid fan, placing more faith in Sweden's 4.5 generation airframe than I do with the F-35. I have come to the conclusion that the F-35 is repeating the same doctrinal failures of the F-4 Phantom. Conversely, the Gripen knows exactly what its mission is, and doesn't pretend to do anything else.
Imagine building a fighter jet to counter Russia only for Russia to counter itself for you.
English?😊
😂😂
@@John_13_35 sense of irony/humour? :)
Don't have to imagine hard to believe Russia shoots itself in the foot with every step (sometimes literally). Surprised they can still walk.
@@John_13_35 Are you having trouble understanding it?
The world is a wonderful place and Swedes are wonderful people!
They not give you money taras don't bother yourself. (
But sweden cannot mess with russia at all thats a fact
@@barkhasunder9745what do you mean? In what way can't we mess with russia? What do you mean? Are you saying that we couldn't defend alone against russia or do you mean that we could not directly invade russia?
True... of course - this statement has nothing to do with ice hockey! Greeting from Finland!! ;)
thanks, but its bit chaos here in sweden xD too many gang related killings
The Gripen is great because, it can land and takeoff on highways and be maintained with a group of 6 people and a small maintenance van out in the countryside away from an airfield.
In theory, the US fighter aircraft can do the same. Difference is, the Swedes ACTUALLY PRACTICE that capability. Theory and application are worlds apart.
Lol @@davidford3115
@Wishalloy NATO countries is not the same as the US alone. And most of NATO operate Eurofighters of various manufacture. It is the former Warsaw Pact nations that generally operate US fighter aircraft, along with a few of the smaller nations like Denmark.
The germans used autobahn as airstrips during WW2 some 80 years ago.
You want a fighter jet that is capable of dominating the sky not dominating the landing. OMG.
I love the Gripen's profile, the canards make it look really cool. The Typhoon looks cool too.
Yeah, Europe really dug into the delta + canard design, and for good reason. The US tried out a delta version of the F-16 (F-16 XL) that got better range and carrying capacity without losing speed or handling. It would have been cool to see those in service.
That would be, I believe, the Eurofighter, which is what Brittain, France, and Germany all fly. It is limited to customers the three country's approve, not Turkey.
Lqqppqpqqqqa@@billbellell9462
@@hanrockabrand95 Yes the looked at the SAAB Draken in comparison
The canards make the plane unstable *by design*. The computer constantly adjusts to maintain stability, but when you need to maneuver, oh boy it is agile.
The key point every single Gripen UA-cam video misses is that the Gripen is built to be like the Borg. They mention "datalink2 bla bla bla, but miss the point. As does this video. The Gripen is The Borg. Everything is shared in real time at all time. The full view of the battlefield is updated in real time, sharing data sources from all sensors, not only radar, but also ground units and so on. It's more advanced than the F-35 in this field.
The Borg…like Björn Borg?
@@the_black_douglas9041Thank you! I was hoping for that
Resistance is futile?
Yea right.
The nordic countries united and working together on their own land......... Sounds good to me .
Everytime I contemplate Sweden's and Finland's ascension to NATO, I can't help but imagine the God of War Ragnarok theme playing out, with Rainbow Bifrost, Lightning, Thunder, and all.
Finally we are in.
Welcome!
Finaly shit hits a fan
Welcome from Canada
Seems u never been at war child
@@GggGgg-ek3dw
Duh. Sweden’s never been to war. It’s kinda their whole thing. They ain’t no slouches when it comes to military technology tho
There have been many smoking accidents on russian radars and other air defense installations lately. This improves the possibilities of flying surprises.
And on bombers, apparently. 🤔
What a frikking awesome fighter jet! It was really nice to learn about it's unique capabilities.
Well as i am an old F-4 Phantom ll pilot i thing the Gripen is a very amazing war plane and thanks....
Old Shoe🇺🇸
Sweden should have just sent these jets to Ukraine, their own people won't have to fight and they can have more data on how their fighters fare in actual battles..
Our PM have promised to look into sending Gripen C to ukraine if we get into NATO. Lets hope he stand for his word
No way we'd do that before entry into Nato, it's just recently become an option.
Gripen C wont do. We have been on Gripen E for a while.
@@jesse7644 Gripen C is a very capable jet. And it will get a sensor upgrade including the same radar as Gripen E. The bulk of our airforce is still on C btw
@@andersmalmgren6528 You guys build a fine jet.
My minor Swedish blood is quite proud..
Another ?
@@GoodMan_000 Great welcome to Sweden.
@@BosseJorgensson
Swedenor some islam parts of once sweden ?
I always felt attracted to highways landing, servicing capabilities
We rate the Gripen, and it gives us confidence when we integrate our systems with the Swedes. This is the advantage we have over our adversaries. This integration is a force multiplier.
Blabla
@@GoodMan_000
Is that the most sophisticated answer you can muster?
@@elainekarlsson8384
If you consider the fact that Sweden put nuke target on own children and even on next generations of children for the sake of USA , then , you'll agree with me, "blabla" is appropriate answer to such kind of intelect
@@GoodMan_000 So why didn't you write that instead from the beginning?
@@elainekarlsson8384
It was post for mr. "ColonelJohnmatrix100"
Its what we are all waiting for
Release the Griffin
Show us
The timing for this has never been better
First it was the Bradleys then the leopards then the Patriot missiles then the Abraham’s then himars lol all failures
@@DanAth-il1uq
All already disposed of old junk posing as "valuable help"
Lets try helping them for real
Lets give them something that doesnt require 100000 grunts to with it.
And this time lets make sure the help gets there without getting gefunneled to god knows where on the way.
This would buy UA the time they dont have
Russia cant keep this up forever
Another year of stalemate is an opportunity for "victory" (in this case victory means not losing)
@@DanAth-il1uq First it was the little man with the huge table bald-faced lying to the entire World: “we will not invade our sovereign neighbors” right up until the morning he invaded.
Then it was a “three-day Special Military Operation,” not a brutal and illegal invasion of Ukraine.
That was followed by Bucha, and Mariupol, and then Kherson. All of them completely destroyed as the invaders “liberated” them.
That was followed by blowing up the Kakhovka Dam, and flooding the much of the oblast.
Don’t forget about the sinking of the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet, the MOSKVA. And the Rostov-on-Don submarine wiped out in the Sevastopol drydock along with one of Russia’s best landing ships. Over a third of the Fleet has been lost to the country they invaded, that doesn’t even have a navy.
Don’t forget, dan.
Gripen, not griffin
@@AiluropodaPanda Grip, Greif, Griffin
Beloved child has many names
We’re avenging Carolus Rex with this one🔥🔥🔥🔥
For the life of me, I cannot figure out why small European countries like the Czech Republic and Switzerland (and even Poland or Finland) are buying the F35 and not the Gripen C or E? It is nearly as capable as the F35 and is so much cheaper to operate (or buy in the case of the C model). I guarantee there will be buyers remorse when they realize they can't fly as much due to cost per hour. I understand this is partly due to the connection with the US but the Gripen does use some US components so that connection is still there if not to a smaller degree.
Radar signature....maybe?
@@Jay.Kellett Apparently that is not a problem for the Gripen (especially the E model). It uses EW jamming very effectively. Even F22 pilots are impressed with it.
America have great supplies lines so you can buy as many as you want and you can buy spare parts and in twenty years you can still buy spare parts and upgrades.
It is simple. The local colonial administrations have been ordered to do so.
Gen 4 planes do not stand a chance facing any Gen 5 planes. F22 has a record of 111:0 against other American planes in excise. Chinese excise confirmed that. Only a fool or a poor country would buy Gen 4 fighter jets in 2024.
happy to have Sweden aboard! welcome good people
Thanks, great to be with you.
The Gripen specs speaks for itself, state of the art in flight fighting technology and weapons capabilities.
Hungary - we say no.....unless....we can have a few flying zoomies pew pews ?
Sweden - ok
Hungary - JOY !!
You from Hungary? Whats your opinion of your handling of our NATO application?
@@urgi Hungary ? Sounds like someone's a bit....Hangry, lol , Am I right ? :P
Hungary should not be in neighter NATO nor the EU. They dont share European values
@@urgihe thinks you joined just to sell weapons to NATO members. Russia was more dangerous on Soviet times and long before that to Sweden than Putin. He thinks you were just opportunistic, nothing else
Sweden is ok with this kind of blackmailing. Our Primeminister went to Budapest with some contracts in his bag and came back with a smile on his face. It's all good.
Heja Sverige!
Lots of RuZZia bots on here!😂
Busy trying to avoid going to the front.
Centuries of military history shows that the Swedes fight with a disciplined savagry second to none. You can beat them with numbers but it is really going to cost you dearly!
Excellent
This is the jet Canada should have acquired instead of the F-35
So that's what Saab has been doing since designing the Saab 93!
when we go, NO ONE have to excuse them self. swedish Soldier here... "klocka in alla!"
Imagine peace.
The Gripen in many ways took the idea pioneered by the Northrop F-20 _Tigershark_ and built a really great small fighter.
The Gripen is absolutely the perfect choice for defending Canada's north. Yet we chose to bow yet again to the US and order the unnecessarily advanced and expensive to operate F-35 😤😤
How can something be unnecessarily advanced? What is too much technology?
@@slavikk6712 it's about the cost to benefit ratio
@@jasonolson1593 that plane will benefit the country that owns it for plenty of years down the line. If I was Canada I would also buy the Swedish plane. It would be nice to have both. One for stealth and one for dog fights.
@@slavikk6712 in a perfect world, yes. Having both would be great. Unfortunately we have major procurement problems in Canada. Getting any new equipment for our military is a red tape nightmare and always comes with huge cost overruns. Which is one reason we need to focus on cheaper, simpler options.
@@jasonolson1593 yeah you guys got the same issues as us. We just passed another aid bill to my birth country Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel but we can’t help our homeless of fix the border crisis
One of the biggest factors in fighter jet cost is whether they are single engine (Gripen, F-16) or twin engine (Typhoon, Rafale, F-15). The engine is the component around which the rest of the aircraft is built, and they are $10s millions per engine. That's a big chunk of the cost difference, in both purchase price and cost per hour. Double the engines means double the consumables, maintenance and checks.
Saab airbag equipped. Although they did have a few recalls.
Thanks for a great video. Is there any chance there could be another video on Gripen operating with Erieye, the KC130 Refueller and Gulf Stream SIG INT aircraft. This, coupled with the BAS 90 Doctrine and Sweden's supply and command and control system is just simply impressive.....
looks good and much underestimated.
It’s an awesome plane. Had Sweden been in NATO for years, I think countries would be lining up for it, given sensor integration. It’s perfect for Ukraine but numbers don’t justify it. If it was a 10 year old NATO plane , it would be a no brainer
Awesome Right On
Four jets to Hungary if they do not oppose Sweden's entry into NATO was fuck~~ blackmail?
Orban is doing well😊
Guess Hungary basically forced Sweden to give up a few copies for inspection and retro engineering by Russia in exchange for the "safety"of NATO membership.
More like a bribe to soften the deal. They got 4 C/D types - not the E.
@@knowledgeisgood9645 - totally worth it to seal the deal. And they make a NATO partner's air force stronger at the same time.
And now Hungary has to pay Sweden for maintenance and parts for YEARS
Fantastic
Sometimes a smal country need to show the big ones that they are not sure to win, Jas, submarines, cv 90, take Gotland as a example, we sank the carrier many times, and the US didnt now what happend. The score for JAS speaks for it self.
F16 is less maneuverable and the top speed is M2 not 1.8
No, F-16 is more maneuverable. At least, until the Gripen is switched from peace mode to war mode which removes / expands the limits of the flight control system and cranks up engine power. Just what the Gripen is capable of in war mode is a closely kept secret but I would NOT want to be on the receiving end to find out...
Lands on dusty higway, crew of maybe 6 fix the turnaround. Change engine in a couple of hours ? No sweat. Reconfigure the complete software, goes fast. No crew ? The pilot if trained can fix it by himself if the gear is there. Cold, heat no problem. Sorties after sorties...
Sounds pretty Swedish (IKEA) to me. Functional for the purpose intended.
Least exaggerated western thing:
Don't you think that a certain someone from Hungary will pass the secrets of this plane to Russia?
Hungary already operates Gripen, they only recieved a few more. Totaling 18 Gripen C/D variants, If anything it is safe to assume Russia knows the inside out of these older variants. Gripen E altough looking very similar, is a completely new airframe, slightly larger overall, and many components have been changed. It could even be considered to be Gripen 2.0 if you want.
I don't think either Hungary or Russia has particually more insight to the Gripen E model then any of us. The only once owning them, except Sweden, is Brazil i think. And I don't think even them has control of the whole Gripen system.
Can we hear more about Finland?
It can notch AND crank at the same time? That's powerful by itself.
These planes flying on low altitude over you makes you freeze and shit your pants. Its like thor's hammer in the sky in modern time.
NATO countries can form unified aerospace fighter programs utilizing proprietary technology and designs. The Unted Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy jointly produced the Panavia Tornado and Eurofighter Typhoon, both excellent. Add in Sweden and their future production lines may impress and surprise even the most optimistic analysts.
The Gripen really looks like a Su24 with the Eurofighter Typhoon fused together lmao 😄
Send it to Ukraine and let's see.
Wow, the Swedes have put a lot of thought in to this, and come up with a blinder! The Grippen was built with one enemy in mind... The Russians!
That title would be excellent for a comedy skit on the topic.
"Landet, du välsignade" Jussi
18:26 lol the V22 Ospreys looks so funny!
I am amazed they actually fly sometimes....
@@Johnnybanarna Well it actually doesnt sometimes. Far too many crashes. Its a lemon.
@@onair1360 Exactly what i meant.
I still don’t understand why these aren’t the jets being sent to Ukraine.
They *will* be sent to Ukraine. The condition was Swedish membership in NATO. Now we're members.
There are so few of them
Because Sweden wasent part of NATO.
Love the video
F16s with Have Glass V paint have an average 1.2-square-meter radar cross-section
Remember that the performance of any aircraft is determined more by the pilot than just technology.
But... they're all pretty good pilots I reckon. Because of that, I figure it really is mostly technology because they're all really, really good pilots. Am I wrong?
That's the most stupid thing I've ever heard. There's a reason technology has evolved over the entire history of mankind and that's to make individual skill gaps irrelevant. This is why bows beat slings, crossbows beat bows and guns beat crossbows. This is why the best fighter pilot in history piloting a Mig-15 will never be able to beat the dumbest, most incompetent pilot on an F-35.
Some truth to that. Chuck Yeager pulls stunts in the MiG-15 that no Soviet bloc pilot would dare attempt; they believed it was suicide to even try.
I don't know what I am talking about but I don't think so. With stealth aircraft, advanced radars and beyond-visual-range missiles it doesn't matter how good the pilots are they will be shot down before they even know what hit them.
No, just some dummy that doesn't realize what a half decent pilot could do in an F22.@@Cajek2
Yet to prove practically in Ukraine
Let’s see some of these and what they are capable of doing?
You forgot to mention that it is a f*cking beautiful fighter jet!
Love the Gripen. Dont know why we should not go that way... We would have a new airforce now, for the half cost..... Stupid..
ceiling is 15000 metres, not feet
lol
From what is shown on official sources the Gripen E, and it's ew-shield/countermeasures, allmoast seems better then the ew of the F35? Maybe it has to do really well in that percpective since the stronger radar-signature, but no dubt the electric warfare capacity, aswell as the weapon systems, of this monster is really impressive.
I see the Grippen as the heir of the F5/F20. You need to have a modern low(er) cost platform to supply your allies. Not all your allies need, or can pay, for F35.
The end of the cold war, eliminated the "non alignment" criteria for system procurement. China has not priven itself trustworthy, and Russia has stagnated development
Gripen advertisement
Rap battles instead of war
Just for reference, re: joint wargames engagements vs USAF/USN/USMC - the US military likes to play in "Nightmare" mode, and generally handicaps their pilots, operating on the principle that their pilots, and the force as a whole gain little to nothing if we go in gangbusters.
Not saying a F-15/F-16 vs. Gripen engagement would be "USA is playing on godmode" against the Gripen if they weren't handicapped, but it would not be as lopsided as it sounds here. A relatively recent example was in recent wargames where the Philippines Air Force was involved as an opponent, they scored a couple of simulated intercepts with their aircraft on F-22s. The rules of engagement required visual range engagement, and the F-22s were equipped with external drop tanks carrying 6000lbs of extra fuel, negating their stealth and reducing their maneuverability. The Philippines were flying KAI FA-50PHs, a light attack version of the KAI T-50 supersonic trainer.
That said, Gripen C's would be more than a match for the Su-35/Su-34 or the MiG-27s, especially given the pilot skill delta and the ability to utilize current spec NATO BVR munitions. Going to Gripen E would make it even more lopsided.
i am Shareholder!
How much do these planes cost? How quickly will they be built in the right quantity? How quickly will the pilots be trained? Where will the combat experience come from?
17:23 Question: How quickly can the Gripen be ready for use by Ukrainian pilots? Would they need more time to "translate" the weapons like with other NATO planes? If so, then maybe the F-16s are still the better choice for now? Idk.
Good video.
AAMs all around!!
🙂
It’s rumored that Ukrainian pilots have trained on Gripen in simulator. Personally, I think that Gripen shares design philosophy with other Western fighters. So coming from MiG or Shukoi, any training in F-16 should be largely applicable to Gripen.
@@NothingIsKnown00 interesting point about some of the pilots having been trained in NATO craft and simulators...That might prove to be an advantage for the UAF if...IF they are smart about the rotation schedules and the like, to get those experienced pilots back on the classrooms, as instructors, to train the next class, and so on.
Dorito from war thunder is my favorite jet
4:40 I hope it doesn't preVent the user information but rather present :3
LMAO 🤣 thanks for pointing that out. I missed it the first time through. Does that typo mean this channel is just a text-to-speech bot? 🤔
Gripes has been used by manny Nato countries before SWE join😂😂😂
Not the E version
If pilots and military had a choice, the Gripen would be 1st for Ukraine. Unfortunately, politics and US industry rule. So f.i. Swiss and Belgium had to give up their technical choice of Saab's plane and buy the way more expensive (and controversial) F-35.
So much vids on gripen. Is this a pic ad?
Everyone has a plan 'till they get pu-
Wonder how much we dont know and are secret about Gripen E ?
now i know what talk kok means and its a smaller one....talking as itself the biggest badass in the neighbour
You kidding me right?!
What a disgusting joke! Where are all the adults our PM always talk about?
..........where's the espresso machine?
It’s pronunced greepen not grippen 😂
Wish it had 2 engines then i think it might have been ordered by Canada as well but with a single engine the f35 was just a better deal for Canada since they going to spend once cry once might better get the best. But i do think Canada does need to order 100 f15ex to support the f35 and to use as interceptors.
Hahahahaha.... Thanks for the good laugh!!
Wahoo another game changer
Another game changer weapon 🤣. Don't you think it's starting to get suspicious?
Eye opening...😃
It's a Great fighter. It's situational awareness is tertiary to either the F-22 or the better F-35 but it's easier to fly with less training but it's not a 5th Gen fighter more like 4++ but it's fun to fly!!
Is it going to drop ABBA cds?
is it true that the F-35 can not carry IR missiles internally
❤
It appears even Gripen C can carry the Meteor. She will do just fine against the Ruskis.
How many combat missions did this plane had!?
Finally some great news after some bad news that ive recieved today!
what is it?
??
?
One drawback is it's size and combat radius .....
Are the Swedes sending these to Ukraine or not?
Can it rival the su 35,and how will it rival it
The video makes the Grippen look like a great aircraft. However, Argentina’s Mirages looked like great aircraft too in 1982 until British Harriers (which weren’t air superiority a/c) decimated them.
There’s more to it than stats & figures 🤷♂️