Impressive but not for the mainstream user who expects unlimited, ungated features. If it can handle multiple characters properly then i'll be jealous.
Why would a paid censored service be end of a free, uncensored, open source, community driven application? Please try to be creative rather than click baity with your titles.
hmm... you might have a point, I will adjust the title...some people dont know that it is censored, paid...etc. in terms of content, but the title as you have said, might not have been a good choice... adjusting.
Hey, comparing this to Stable Diffusion isn't fair. You gotta prompt SD differently and add way more details about the image like lighting, if it's a photo or animation, etc. The models you used are also fine tuned towards characters specifically. You can get images that are just as good as DALL-E 3 if you just use better prompts.
SDXL can generate very impressive pictures and adheres to large part of the prompt as per the video samples, but not as the level of details in the samples provided by Open ai Dalle 3, SDXL better prompting can create stunning pictures... either ways, I still believe, that SDXL and Stable diffusion will remain more superior in terms of adoption and continue to improve, because they give us ultimate freedom in creation and we dont have to put our data on someone Elses servers and trust that they will not do anything with it.
As long as companies like openai censor and monitor the output of their generative ai programs, open source will always be superior.
agree.
How do I contact you for a project?
I am sorry, not taking private or business contacts at the time being.
can you recommend anyone?
sorry, I can not.
SD should just assimilate Dall E3 and Midjourney so we can use it on our own and also completely offline :-)
Hey how can we contact you for business inquiries?
I am sorry, I am not available at the time being for private or business inquiries.
Impressive but not for the mainstream user who expects unlimited, ungated features. If it can handle multiple characters properly then i'll be jealous.
exactly, it is amazing, but wont be used by most people with current cost and limitations.
Why would a paid censored service be end of a free, uncensored, open source, community driven application? Please try to be creative rather than click baity with your titles.
hmm... you might have a point, I will adjust the title...some people dont know that it is censored, paid...etc. in terms of content, but the title as you have said, might not have been a good choice... adjusting.
@@AI-HowTo with this answer you have gained my respect and a humble follower. Thank you for listening.
Hey, comparing this to Stable Diffusion isn't fair. You gotta prompt SD differently and add way more details about the image like lighting, if it's a photo or animation, etc. The models you used are also fine tuned towards characters specifically. You can get images that are just as good as DALL-E 3 if you just use better prompts.
SDXL can generate very impressive pictures and adheres to large part of the prompt as per the video samples, but not as the level of details in the samples provided by Open ai Dalle 3, SDXL better prompting can create stunning pictures... either ways, I still believe, that SDXL and Stable diffusion will remain more superior in terms of adoption and continue to improve, because they give us ultimate freedom in creation and we dont have to put our data on someone Elses servers and trust that they will not do anything with it.
the big difference between the two is how good Dalle 3 is following the prompts and composing the elements of the prompts inside one coherent picture.