If you are denormalizing an existing relational data model (by definition a RDM is normalized) than you are not changing anything in your data model. So if I got it it you mean you are doing the necessary denorm-joins outside an event stream tool in a more proper event. Look man I really think you are confusing things when you say the the RDM is not ideal for events because of "resolving joins", this is called the logical-physical confusion. The RDM is a logical concept, if evaluating joins is slow this is not an issue of the model itself but of its physical implementation choices. Normalisation is a feature of the model that and it brings many advantages like semantic consistency.
ITS REALLY WORKED LOL THANK YOU DUDE
If you are denormalizing an existing relational data model (by definition a RDM is normalized) than you are not changing anything in your data model. So if I got it it you mean you are doing the necessary denorm-joins outside an event stream tool in a more proper event. Look man I really think you are confusing things when you say the the RDM is not ideal for events because of "resolving joins", this is called the logical-physical confusion. The RDM is a logical concept, if evaluating joins is slow this is not an issue of the model itself but of its physical implementation choices. Normalisation is a feature of the model that and it brings many advantages like semantic consistency.
normalized streaming makes absolutely no sense and not sure who/why/when would even think of doing that. this is not even an option.