MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!! ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!! KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!! DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK NA YAN. NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!! PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!! MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!! PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!! BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG. KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!! AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!! TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!! NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO??? NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
@JohnJohn-yl4ko and @AlReviews-bn3uv, No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@JohnJohn-yl4koNuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Nuclear energy will always carry risks no matter what. We just have to carry out proper procedures in making safe operations for a much secure production
@@pilotx3mm420 True every action has a risks. The plant is like a gas tank in our home na ginagamit parin natin even though we know that there's a small possiblity na sumabog ito!!!
@@Skidnet that's the reason why nga napag iiwanan bansa natin kasi as we start to grow and buid something para sa pag unlad ng bansa daming Pilipino kumakalaban we know it's for us.
@@SkidnetThe nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013. This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere. Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
@@markmaras7970No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
That is blatant lie what you just said. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro Thanks Chatgpt. Pero mas magmamahal naman ang singil sa kuryente kung kulang ang energy reserve kaakibat ng tumataas na demand sa kuryente, lalo pa na pa-deplete na Malampaya.
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!! ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!! KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!! DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK NA YAN. NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!! PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!! MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!! PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!! BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG. KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!! AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!! TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!! NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO??? NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro tangnamo kukuha ka lang ng info sa chatgpt pa. Hindi yan itatayo kung di papakinabangan pinabayaan lang yan ng mga nakaraang gobyerno.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED??? KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!! MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!! NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
@@rhondelacruz1543 Dapat kasuhan ng economic sabotage ang mga tututol. Dahil property na yan ng pilipino. Eh bakit hindi ipapagamit. Dahil feeling lang nila. ITS HIGH TIME. We use that. kung mag leak man hanggang morong. edi ievacuate ang mga tourists. Normal lang nmn ang radioactive leaks habang nag ooperate ang mga nuclear reactor. kailangan lang malayong malayo ka sa planta na yan. Mga 2 probinsya.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Some Filipino dont like the nuc. Power plant to open!! Pro Kung maka reklamo sa taas ng kuryente nor mga bilihin Wagas!!! We need to change just to adopt so that our nation developed. that's the reason why napag-iiwanan bansa natin.
@@stefyganda9798 for now ayaw nyo pro for sure pag nag work na yan masasabi n'yo sa sarili nyo "laki pala pakinabang". I know na May takot ang mga Pilipino when it comes to nuc. But the reality nuc. Plant is safer as normal plant if handle correctly that's the reason why nagdala ang ph ng mga scholars sa Amerika to have a skills and knowledge for our nuc plant.
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013. This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere. Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
The operator of Japan's destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant demonstrated Tuesday how a remote-controlled robot would retrieve tiny bits of melted fuel debris from one of three damaged reactors later this year for the first time since the 2011 meltdown. Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings plans to deploy a “telesco-style” extendable pipe robot into Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 reactor to test the removal of debris from its primary containment vessel by October. That work is more than two years behind schedule. The removal of melted fuel was supposed to begin in late 2021 but has been plagued with delays, underscoring the difficulty of recovering from the magnitude 9.0 quake and tsunami in 2011. During the demonstration at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' shipyard in Kobe, western Japan, where the robot has been developed, a device equipped with tongs slowly descended from the telescopic pipe to a heap of gravel and picked up a granule. TEPCO plans to remove less than 3 grams (0.1 ounce) of debris in the test at the Fukushima plant
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Greenpeace, sige i subsidize ninyo kuryente ng Pinas para naman bumaba. Masyado kayo makaLuma. Adopt the technology and manage the risks. That's it. Give our present and future a chance to prosper..
I've been inside the reactor itself, it is smaller than I imagined but looks like it will still work. Such a waste, all those fears of earthquake possibly causing a meltdown all those decades ago never did happen. Imagine how much power it would have generated had it been made operational way back then.
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!! ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!! KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!! DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK NA YAN. NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!! PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!! MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!! PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!! BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG. KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!! AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!! TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!! NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO??? NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!! ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!! KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!! DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK NA YAN. NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!! PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!! MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!! PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!! BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG. KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!! AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!! TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!! NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO??? NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED??? KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!! MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!! NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013. This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere. Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
The operator of Japan's destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant demonstrated Tuesday how a remote-controlled robot would retrieve tiny bits of melted fuel debris from one of three damaged reactors later this year for the first time since the 2011 meltdown. Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings plans to deploy a “telesco-style” extendable pipe robot into Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 reactor to test the removal of debris from its primary containment vessel by October. That work is more than two years behind schedule. The removal of melted fuel was supposed to begin in late 2021 but has been plagued with delays, underscoring the difficulty of recovering from the magnitude 9.0 quake and tsunami in 2011. During the demonstration at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' shipyard in Kobe, western Japan, where the robot has been developed, a device equipped with tongs slowly descended from the telescopic pipe to a heap of gravel and picked up a granule. TEPCO plans to remove less than 3 grams (0.1 ounce) of debris in the test at the Fukushima plant
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED??? KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!! MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!! NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
Safe use of nuclear is better. But how about safe & proper disposal of waste? King find solution first for nuclear waste bcos in long run it will cause bigger problem in d future. Filipino scientist & researcher must look 4 solutions together as we starts to activate BNPP.
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!! ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!! KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!! DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK NA YAN. NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!! PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!! MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!! PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!! BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG. KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!! AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!! TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!! NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO??? NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED??? KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!! MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!! NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
2:30 Greenpeace has been known to be anti nuclear so their comment is unnecessary to the topic at hand. Greenpeace pushing for renewables like solar and wind which is not available all the time while geothermal can only be put in select areas.
Eto Sabi sa Proverbs 26:12-16 There is more hope for a foolish person than for those who think they are wise. The lazy person says, “There's a lion in the road! There's a lion in the streets!” Like a door turning back and forth on its hinges, the lazy person turns over and over in bed.
Better educate yourself more because you sounded like ignorant. Ignorance for you is a bliss. Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
@basicbackyardfarm4445, Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
I do accept the new technology of nuclear energy its for the better of the country rather than Fossil fuels i know there are risk but the nuclear energy will be available 92% of the time than newer cleaner energy using solar,hydro,wind,and thermal they will be only available 32% of the time a cleaner energy won't replace the energy given out by nuclear reactor's and im really looking forward to it power demand's are getting higher because of the greenhouse effect on earth rather than old fossil fuels
Haha kayalang pano kapag tinaasan ng ibang bansa ung price ng mga radioactive pellets na raw materials para sa Nuclear power plant. Eh di wala din,.ganun pa din singil.sa kuryente. Tapos ung mga Electric Transmission Company may biglang additional na charges eh di wala lahat, same electric bill at nagkaroon pa ng risk sa mga tao sa Bataan at Near Provinces.
Eh paano pag naubusan tayo ng coal or oil edi wala din. Nagshoshortage na nga, maarte ka pa. Mas mahal parin coal kaysa Uranium. Ang apoy may risk pero nagluluto ka parin. Tama ka lang sa ETC at dapat may gawin gobyerno dun.
guys, don't focus on things that we didn't sure if we can handle if it goes heavy! mag focus tayo sa solar & renewable energy kagaya ng sabi ng ating mahal na pangulo. we can't handle a leak for now! if you want to produce nuclear energy make it far away from our fellow filipino's. may posibilidad na gamitin ng mga terorista sa masama ang mga pasilidad na nuclear natin!
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED??? KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!! MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!! NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
@@lorjin007No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@lorjin007Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer. Better educated yourself instead of always sleeping. You sounded like arrogant, conceited, immoral and immature like a toddler throwing tantrums
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro Ser nasa dulong bahagi ng bataan yan. kung sakali hanggang morong lang nmn ang pagsabog at tagas ng radioactive material niyan pag nabuksan. Hindi naman populadong lugar ang lugar na yan at may bundok pang nakaharang. it was well-studied before it was constructed. Dont hinder ang pag unlad ng bansa para sa takot na wala namang kasiguraduhan.
Kng gustohin.. Ma operate nmn yan.. Kaso parang ayaw ata din kng puro lang salita.. Tagal2x na yan dapat meron na kayong solution sa mga dapat e repair o problema sa BNPP... Itong Greenpeace dapat mag tayo kayo ng renewable energy plant..
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013. This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere. Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’ Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange. If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price. This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
yan ang problema sa pinoy wala pa masama na agad ang iniisip. lahat naman may masamang epekto pero kaya nman pagbutihin ng di makaapekto ng sobrang sama
Let's do it. Let's reopen this very important facility ❤
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!!
ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!!
KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!!
DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK
NA YAN.
NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!!
PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!
MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!!
PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!!
BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG.
KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!!
AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!!
TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!!
NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO???
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
For a Better Philippines 🇵🇭
The power of the sun in the palm of our hands!
Lipat ka sa Morong, pwede?
@JohnJohn-yl4ko and @AlReviews-bn3uv, No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@JohnJohn-yl4koNuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
tama lang yan para mag mura kuryente natin tapos kaya na mabukas factory d2
Nuclear energy will always carry risks no matter what. We just have to carry out proper procedures in making safe operations for a much secure production
Okay naman yan ,kaso lang masyado na tayo pinag iwanan ng ibang bansa
@@pilotx3mm420 True every action has a risks. The plant is like a gas tank in our home na ginagamit parin natin even though we know that there's a small possiblity na sumabog ito!!!
@@Skidnet that's the reason why nga napag iiwanan bansa natin kasi as we start to grow and buid something para sa pag unlad ng bansa daming Pilipino kumakalaban we know it's for us.
@@SkidnetThe nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013.
This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy
The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
@@markmaras7970No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Finally umusad din. Inubos ng mga dating namuno ang panahon kakadebate kung ligtas ba yan o hindi.
That is blatant lie what you just said. Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro Thanks Chatgpt.
Pero mas magmamahal naman ang singil sa kuryente kung kulang ang energy reserve kaakibat ng tumataas na demand sa kuryente, lalo pa na pa-deplete na Malampaya.
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!!
ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!!
KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!!
DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK
NA YAN.
NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!!
PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!
MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!!
PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!!
BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG.
KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!!
AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!!
TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!!
NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO???
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro tangnamo kukuha ka lang ng info sa chatgpt pa. Hindi yan itatayo kung di papakinabangan pinabayaan lang yan ng mga nakaraang gobyerno.
Delikado talaga ang nuclear Kung pababayaan , Kaya nga may maintainance.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED???
KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!!
MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!!
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
@@rhondelacruz1543 Dapat kasuhan ng economic sabotage ang mga tututol. Dahil property na yan ng pilipino. Eh bakit hindi ipapagamit. Dahil feeling lang nila. ITS HIGH TIME. We use that. kung mag leak man hanggang morong. edi ievacuate ang mga tourists. Normal lang nmn ang radioactive leaks habang nag ooperate ang mga nuclear reactor. kailangan lang malayong malayo ka sa planta na yan. Mga 2 probinsya.
Nuclear powerplant would be really useful, siguro magkakaroon pa tayo ng mga foreign investors. kasi the electricity cost will be lowered
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro ua-cam.com/video/KC7YD98HixM/v-deo.htmlsi=g19wKLtT75pxd6NR
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro said the guy who can't even spell delusional right.
@@EckonOmyst-jv1roanything has risk you just have to take it for better result
Some Filipino dont like the nuc. Power plant to open!! Pro Kung maka reklamo sa taas ng kuryente nor mga bilihin Wagas!!! We need to change just to adopt so that our nation developed. that's the reason why napag-iiwanan bansa natin.
oo tapos papayag mag trabaho sa South korea at taiwan hahaha
3rd world mentality. What would you expect from a nation who have a low IQ and poor education.
Dyan nalang sa province nyo itayo Ang NPP. Ayaw Namin dito sa region3.
@@stefyganda9798walang sense yung sinasabi mo, sa bataan nga nakatayo yung nuclear plant tapos sasabihin hwag sa region 3. Nasaan ang kokote mo.
@@stefyganda9798 for now ayaw nyo pro for sure pag nag work na yan masasabi n'yo sa sarili nyo "laki pala pakinabang". I know na May takot ang mga Pilipino when it comes to nuc. But the reality nuc. Plant is safer as normal plant if handle correctly that's the reason why nagdala ang ph ng mga scholars sa Amerika to have a skills and knowledge for our nuc plant.
Yes! To Nuclear Power Plant For The New 🇵🇭
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro bla bla bla
This is such a major advancement. God bless yall
sana matuloy to para di magkaroon ng energy crisis
Kailangan na yang I open❤
next year po, siguro sa 2025 or by october mag oopen na yan
Its about time 🇵🇭👏
yes its time...
All Industrialized countries used Nuclear Power for so many decades like USA .
SA WAKAS MAKASABAY NA SA IBANG BANSANG MAUNLAD. NEGATIVE MINDSET NLNG TLGA NG IBA MGA KAPWA PILIPINO NEED MAG ADJUST
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013.
This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy
The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
The operator of Japan's destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant demonstrated Tuesday how a remote-controlled robot would retrieve tiny bits of melted fuel debris from one of three damaged reactors later this year for the first time since the 2011 meltdown.
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings plans to deploy a “telesco-style” extendable pipe robot into Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 reactor to test the removal of debris from its primary containment vessel by October.
That work is more than two years behind schedule. The removal of melted fuel was supposed to begin in late 2021 but has been plagued with delays, underscoring the difficulty of recovering from the magnitude 9.0 quake and tsunami in 2011.
During the demonstration at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' shipyard in Kobe, western Japan, where the robot has been developed, a device equipped with tongs slowly descended from the telescopic pipe to a heap of gravel and picked up a granule.
TEPCO plans to remove less than 3 grams (0.1 ounce) of debris in the test at the Fukushima plant
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro BOT
Greenpeace, sige i subsidize ninyo kuryente ng Pinas para naman bumaba. Masyado kayo makaLuma. Adopt the technology and manage the risks. That's it. Give our present and future a chance to prosper..
Yes!!! Finally 😊
I've been inside the reactor itself, it is smaller than I imagined but looks like it will still work. Such a waste, all those fears of earthquake possibly causing a meltdown all those decades ago never did happen. Imagine how much power it would have generated had it been made operational way back then.
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!!
ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!!
KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!!
DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK
NA YAN.
NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!!
PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!
MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!!
PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!!
BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG.
KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!!
AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!!
TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!!
NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO???
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
About time, imagine if that was operational decades ago. NakaROI na sana tayo ng matagal na.
Lets go!
tama poyan paganahin nayan
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!!
ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!!
KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!!
DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK
NA YAN.
NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!!
PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!
MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!!
PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!!
BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG.
KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!!
AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!!
TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!!
NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO???
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
Yong kontra lang namn dyan mga makakaliwa.sana tuloy nayan kong ang gusto ng nkkrami dapat yon sundin
Please open it now! 😭🙏
yes lets make it happen philippines.. this is a great alternative to lower down our electricity cost which is one of the highest in the region
For Better Philippines Open 2 Nulclear power plant in Luzon,1 in Visayas and 2 Mindanao.
Very good..... Correct we need nuclear energy
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED???
KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!!
MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!!
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
Sana mabuksan nayan para mabawasan na bayarin SA kuryinte
we need nuclear and energy,
Lagyan din ng nuclear power plant ang Visayas at Mindanao ..
If those expert study the safety of this nuclear facility why not for the good of our country
Good
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013.
This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy
The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
The operator of Japan's destroyed Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant demonstrated Tuesday how a remote-controlled robot would retrieve tiny bits of melted fuel debris from one of three damaged reactors later this year for the first time since the 2011 meltdown.
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings plans to deploy a “telesco-style” extendable pipe robot into Fukushima Daiichi No. 2 reactor to test the removal of debris from its primary containment vessel by October.
That work is more than two years behind schedule. The removal of melted fuel was supposed to begin in late 2021 but has been plagued with delays, underscoring the difficulty of recovering from the magnitude 9.0 quake and tsunami in 2011.
During the demonstration at the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' shipyard in Kobe, western Japan, where the robot has been developed, a device equipped with tongs slowly descended from the telescopic pipe to a heap of gravel and picked up a granule.
TEPCO plans to remove less than 3 grams (0.1 ounce) of debris in the test at the Fukushima plant
Bihira ata nanonood ng NEWS “Magtataas ng singil ng kuryente dahil sa pagtaas ng presyo ng coal/ gas” 😅🤣😆😆
BOTTT SPOTTED!!! HAHAHA
Open the nuclear power plant!
Nagmamagaling Yang greenpiece ah
It's about time
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED???
KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!!
MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!!
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
Safe use of nuclear is better. But how about safe & proper disposal of waste? King find solution first for nuclear waste bcos in long run it will cause bigger problem in d future. Filipino scientist & researcher must look 4 solutions together as we starts to activate BNPP.
oh buksan na ang bataan nuclear powerplant
Political and vested interests? TRUE. We remained stagnant while our neighbors rose.
MAKINIG KAYONG MABUTI. BUONG SAMBAYANAN LALO NA KAYO DIAN SA PAMAHALAAN!!!!
ITAKDA AT GASTUSIN NIO NA ANG 40 PORSIENTO NG PONDO NG BNSA, PARA MAILAAN PARA SA PAG ANGKAT O PAGGAWA NG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES, PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!!
KAHIT DALAWANG BESES NA LANG TAYO KUMAIN SA ISANG ARAW!!!! IBIGAY NA NATIN ANG PONDO, PARA SA ATING MGA KAGAMITAN NG ATING SANDATAHAN!!!!
DAHIL HINDI TAYO TITIGILAN NG MGA ABUSADO AT MGA KRIMINAL NA MGA ENTS TSIK
NA YAN.
NUMERO UNONG MGA TRAYDOR AT SINUNGALING ANG PAMAHALAAN NI GINPING!!!!!
PADAMIHIN NG PADAMIHIN ANG ATING MGA KAGAMITAN PARA SA ATING PWERSA!!!!
MAG ARAL KAYO AT MAGSALIKSIK, SA LARANGANG ITO!!!!
PAGSAMA SAMAHIN NA NATIN ANG ATING OT TAK, PARA PROTEKTAHAN ANG ATING MGA TERITORIOS AT MGA MANGINGISDA!!!!!
BIGYAN NIO NG PONDO ANG DOST AT UP, UPANG LUMIKHA NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA KAGAMITAN!!!! ANDIAN NA ANG TEKNOLOHIYA, IREVERSE ENGINEER NIO NA LANG.
KAHIT MGA MABIBILIS LANG AT MGA KARGADONG FAST BOATS, YAN PADAMIHIN NIO!!!!
AT SA PAG TE TRAIN NG MGA SUNDALO SA PAGGAMIT NG MGA SOPISTIKADONG MGA BIG TICKET HARDWARES. DAHIL HINDI BASTA BASTA ANG PAG GAMIT NG MGA YAN. HINDI TAYO PWEDE PUMALPAK DIAN, DAHIL MASASAYANG ANG PERA!!!!
TEKNIKAL NA ANG LABANAN NGAYON!!!!
NAIINTINDIHAN NIO BA MGA SINASABI KO???
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING MGA KOMENTOS SA BUONG PILIPINAS, SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!! DO IT NOW!!!
The best way is to let the US take a look at it. Because they have one like that functioning in the US.
Tama lang yan kelangan jan safety talaga ayaw na halos mag supply ng indonesia ng coal satin
Go nayan
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
FOR A SAFE AND CHEAP ELECTRICITY ALL THE WAY!!
Goo nuclear.. Ang mahal ng koryinti
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED???
KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!!
MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!!
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
Open it. But upgrade it to latest technology
Finally
Matagal na dapat binuksan yan
Dapat maakinabangan na tlga Yan binayaran Ng Tanong bayan Yan.
Build a brand new nuclear power plant. Bataan is over 40 years old and rusting😊
I agreed to nuclear , kuryenti is too expensive
Lets go PNRI
2:30 Greenpeace has been known to be anti nuclear so their comment is unnecessary to the topic at hand. Greenpeace pushing for renewables like solar and wind which is not available all the time while geothermal can only be put in select areas.
It's time due to high price of electricity
Buksan na yan d2 sa abroad marami nuclear power plant kaya mura lng ang kuryente.
TAma yan
Eto Sabi sa Proverbs 26:12-16
There is more hope for a foolish person than for those who think they are wise. The lazy person says, “There's a lion in the road! There's a lion in the streets!” Like a door turning back and forth on its hinges, the lazy person turns over and over in bed.
Magtayo ng bagong nuclear plant..wag ng i renovate yan delikado
Sa tagal na pinagtatalonan yan kung pina andarr sana yan mula noon pa napakinabangan na sana ng husto yan kisa gumagastos sa pang maintainance
Ng pandemic na..ntapos n pandemic ganon padin bayangan nila 😅😅😅
Bulsa lang nman ang pinuproblema nila.
Better educate yourself more because you sounded like ignorant. Ignorance for you is a bliss.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
@basicbackyardfarm4445, Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
Never depend in Middle east oil Philippine and Japan technology support each other
Open Open.
Sa ibang mga bansa mga pilipino ang mga nag aayos ng nuclear nila..
Go go go BNPP🇵🇭👍
Open na yan para mapakinabangan na
The office space low occupancy is good for many , the complaints are from the rich people who cant Increase office space price
Ang tagal na hinihintay ng tao mabuksan yan e.
Uranium enrichment para maka gawa tayo ng nuke warheads
The BNPP IS SAFE...IT'S ABOUT TIME TO MAKE IT FUNCTIONAL...
FINALLY!
I do accept the new technology of nuclear energy its for the better of the country rather than Fossil fuels i know there are risk but the nuclear energy will be available 92% of the time than newer cleaner energy using solar,hydro,wind,and thermal they will be only available 32% of the time a cleaner energy won't replace the energy given out by nuclear reactor's and im really looking forward to it power demand's are getting higher because of the greenhouse effect on earth rather than old fossil fuels
amend epira ng makapasok na bnpp....wag hayaang mapunta sa private sector ang bnpp
Ayaw nga ng meralco yan😂😂
Marami kasing pilipino advance magisip pero negative Naman..
Haha kayalang pano kapag tinaasan ng ibang bansa ung price ng mga radioactive pellets na raw materials para sa Nuclear power plant. Eh di wala din,.ganun pa din singil.sa kuryente. Tapos ung mga Electric Transmission Company may biglang additional na charges eh di wala lahat, same electric bill at nagkaroon pa ng risk sa mga tao sa Bataan at Near Provinces.
Eh paano pag naubusan tayo ng coal or oil edi wala din. Nagshoshortage na nga, maarte ka pa. Mas mahal parin coal kaysa Uranium.
Ang apoy may risk pero nagluluto ka parin.
Tama ka lang sa ETC at dapat may gawin gobyerno dun.
Just say no to commercial nuclear power on the grid. It simply is not needed: expensive & slow ☢🚫
open it so that our electric bill will be 100
bakit ang solar and wind turbine kailangan mo ng battery. mas mahal ang battery and toxic waste ang acid niyam.
guys, don't focus on things that we didn't sure if we can handle if it goes heavy! mag focus tayo sa solar & renewable energy kagaya ng sabi ng ating mahal na pangulo. we can't handle a leak for now! if you want to produce nuclear energy make it far away from our fellow filipino's. may posibilidad na gamitin ng mga terorista sa masama ang mga pasilidad na nuclear natin!
sana magamit na iyan sayang pera ng taong bayan diyan.
SI SEN ANGARA NA BA ANG BAGONG HEAD NG DEP ED???
KUNG AKO SA GOBIERNO NG PILIPINAS, DAGDAGAN NIO NG MALAKING PONDO SA TESDA, AT DAGDAGAN ANG MGA KURSO AT PROGRAMA SA LARANGAN NG PAGAGAWA O PAGMENTENA NG MGA KAGAMITANG PANDIGMA O PANG DEPENSA NG ATING SANDATAHANG PWERSE!!!!!
MAHINA DIN KAYO EH!!!!!
NOW, IPAKALAT AT I SHARE ANG AKING KOMENTO SA BUONG PINAS AT SA BUONG MALACANANG AT SA ATING PANGULO, NG MAKATULONG NAMAN KAYO SA ATING BNSA!!!!! DO IT NOW!!!!!
we are 2 decades behind on this... next year we should have nuclear energy already
4 Decades!!
Buksan na ang BNP sa Bataan
About time. Thats taxpayers money. Cordon the surrounding beaches so nuclear leaks wont affect many.
ung ibang bansa dekada n nila npakinabangan mga planta nila, habang eto tayo sa pinas ngtatalo parin na delikado 😅
Yung mga di pabor sa nuclear pwedeng umalis na kayo? Di kayo na kaka tulong gusto namin maka tipid
PBBM kahit yan lang legacy mo sa pilipinas. Murang kuryente.
Napakadami na binuksan at bubuksan. Panay tulog ka kasi napag iwanan kana
@@lorjin007No one can tell exactly what will and will not happen. It is much safer for you not to hold a dynamite or grenade in your hand wishing it will not explode. In Japan for instance, they are a more developed country and more technically advanced than Philippines. Would anyone here who advocates for nuclear energy still believes that if you observe and strictly follow procedures, accidents and disaster will not happen? You must be dillusional then. If you wanted to endanger your lives then do so but leave others out of it. You did not experience what those victim of nuclear power plant disaster had gone through. As a result of the nuclear plant disaster, which caused the triple tragedy of the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear accident, approximately 20,000 people lost their lives and over 2,500 are still officially reported as missing, while a further 6,000 suffered injuries. In total, over 470,000 people were evacuated from their homes. You have NO RIGHT to endanger the lives of others for your greed
@@lorjin007Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange
The price of electricity is formed at the energy exchange and it is always determined by the most expensive power plant which is necessary to meet demand. And usually it is the gas power plant which is the most expensive and determines the price of electricity
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer.
Better educated yourself instead of always sleeping. You sounded like arrogant, conceited, immoral and immature like a toddler throwing tantrums
@@EckonOmyst-jv1ro Ser nasa dulong bahagi ng bataan yan. kung sakali hanggang morong lang nmn ang pagsabog at tagas ng radioactive material niyan pag nabuksan. Hindi naman populadong lugar ang lugar na yan at may bundok pang nakaharang. it was well-studied before it was constructed. Dont hinder ang pag unlad ng bansa para sa takot na wala namang kasiguraduhan.
Di lang sa energy pati mga aspiring scoentist naten magbebenifit
Sa mga ayaw ng nuclear na mindset, wag tumawid ng kalsada baka masagasaan ka, wag kng kumain baka mabulunan ka, wag kng matulog baka bangungutin ka. 🤣
Ignorance is much more dangerous than nuclear energy
kaya di progress ang bansa meron at meron nanamn magcoocment na delikado samantalng dekada na gingamit ng ibang bansa
Kng gustohin.. Ma operate nmn yan.. Kaso parang ayaw ata din kng puro lang salita.. Tagal2x na yan dapat meron na kayong solution sa mga dapat e repair o problema sa BNPP... Itong Greenpeace dapat mag tayo kayo ng renewable energy plant..
Favor ako sa nuclear energy because kahit mayayamang Bansa....
The nuclear industry has been in decline in the USA for decades. Despite the country being one of the first nations to generate nuclear energy for commercial civilian purposes, there have been few developments since the late 1970s. For instance, since 1978, only two nuclear power plants have started construction, and that only occurred in 2013.
This industry has stalled because of various broad challenges related to economics, regulatory frameworks, and technological problems, as well as declining respect within the public sphere.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste, which in the US is mostly stored in tanks at sites owned by the Department of Energy
The industry was also fatally wounded by the Three Mile Island partial meltdown in 1979, which caused new regulatory delays to the 51 new reactors that were under construction at the time. With the introduction of new safety procedures and back-fit requirements, the speed of construction was slowed down, and the costs skyrocketed for many reactors. After that, many contracts were canceled and the industry ground to a halt.
Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer
yan ang problema sa pinoy wala pa masama na agad ang iniisip. lahat naman may masamang epekto pero kaya nman pagbutihin ng di makaapekto ng sobrang sama
The real question is.. Is the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant still safe to use or is it better to just build a new one instead.
Mga taong nag rereklamo sa pag reopen ng bataan nuclear power plant ay sya rin nag rereklamo sa mahal na bayarin sa kurente 😂😂😂
greenpeace is holding us back....
Anay ng bayan.....
Lugi mga electric company malugi sila haharangin nila Yan hahahhaha
madami na sme hindi na kaya bayaran ang meralco madami na umaalis business mahal kasi ang fuel and electricity.
Lahat ng tutul sa pag bubukas wag pagamitin ng nuclear power. Doon sila mag bayad sa meralco hehe
Better replace that with something new instead. Equipment is outdated and potentially dangerous na at this point nevertheless.
How ironic na kung sino pa mga mga walang alam, mga hindi experts, sila pa puro kontra and nega.