Natural Theology and Luther | Reasonable Faith Podcast

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 бер 2024
  • The Blackwell Companion To Natural Theology is reviewed by a Lutheran commentator.
    For more resources visit: www.reasonablefaith.org
    We welcome your comments in the Reasonable Faith forums:
    www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/
    Be sure to also visit Reasonable Faith's other channel which contains short clips: / drcraigvideos
    Follow Reasonable Faith On Twitter: / rfupdates
    Like the Reasonable Faith Facebook Fan Page: / reasonablefaithorg

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @kencoughlan9477
    @kencoughlan9477 2 місяці тому

    Thank you Dr. Craig. I just stumbled across this today. In case it is not clear, I am Ken Coughlan, the person who filmed that review for Lutheran Core. It is a privilege and honor to hear your thoughts on it. God bless and thank you for all you have done for the cause of Christ.

  • @AnonNorwegianPartiot
    @AnonNorwegianPartiot 4 місяці тому +4

    I’m a Lutheran who first became a Christian largely thanks to natural theology and WLC played a big part.

  • @rebanelson607
    @rebanelson607 4 місяці тому +4

    I side with Dr. Craig on this and I agree with the Lutheran gentleman that heavy duty theology books are not for most of us!

  • @alexgonzalez631
    @alexgonzalez631 4 місяці тому +3

    I absolutely love that reasonable faith is interacting with Lutheranism, that's if you have not already. WLC has been a huge blessing from God in my life. I've learned so much from your work! However, due to a pursuit for a more "high church" liturgical worship I've considered Lutheranism and currently going through their catechism. I have to say, lutherans do not affirm irresistible grace. Grace is certainly resistible. Christ died for ALL. I see that just over emphasize that there is no prior factor to our salvation than God drawing us in. Upon God giving us faith, through us not resisting his grace given through natural revelation, we then can choose to follow him. It seems spot on with Scripture when John says "we love because he loved us first", and in his gospel, "you did not chose me but I chose you"

  • @willcole1450
    @willcole1450 4 місяці тому +3

    Nice silver play button!

  • @bruhmingo
    @bruhmingo 4 місяці тому +2

    Minor correction, Lutherans do not hold to irresistible grace. Scripture is clear that people, even those given the gift of faith, can drive out the work of the Holy Spirit.

  • @theautodidacticlayman
    @theautodidacticlayman 4 місяці тому +1

    The lead singer of a band called Caedmon’s Call has “come to terms” with being one of the unelected… it’s a sad consequence.

  • @lexnaturae6638
    @lexnaturae6638 4 місяці тому

    Great discussion! Does natural theology include arguments about original sin?

  • @InfamousTub
    @InfamousTub 4 місяці тому +2

    I've contacted a local Reasonable Faith chapter and received no response. What should I do from here?

    • @darrow2381
      @darrow2381 4 місяці тому +2

      Pray

    • @ReasonableFaithOrg
      @ReasonableFaithOrg  4 місяці тому +6

      Please email the Global Chapters Director at chapters@reasonablefaith.org. - RF Admin

  • @SuperNarski
    @SuperNarski 4 місяці тому

    I'm greatly indebted to WLC's work, but I have to correct you here.
    Lutherans do not believe in irresistible grace.

  • @GR-dk5ju
    @GR-dk5ju 4 місяці тому +2

    You do not seem to understand the distinctions between Reformed and Lutheran theology, Dr. Craig. Please do not lump our theology together. Please do not bare false witness.
    11:40 No; Lutherans DO NOT believe in irresistible grace!
    12:19 This problem does not exist within the Lutheran sacramental paradigm; Lutherans believe that the Holy Spirit is given in baptism.

  • @JohnMark61355
    @JohnMark61355 4 місяці тому

    If 1000 people who lived 1000 miles from where Jesus lived, died 1000 minutes after Jesus rose from the dead, can they be saved?

    • @donthomas4793
      @donthomas4793 4 місяці тому

      Yup.

    • @JohnMark61355
      @JohnMark61355 4 місяці тому

      @@donthomas4793 Thank you. Considering what most Christians think about what it takes and who is saved, what is the basis of your opinion?

    • @donthomas4793
      @donthomas4793 4 місяці тому

      @@JohnMark61355 the problem with most Christians they don’t grace and they get church tradition mixed up with scripture. And the more they learn, they think that it adds to, which is incorrect. I am no more saved today with all my learning then, when I was the day, I accepted..

    • @JohnMark61355
      @JohnMark61355 4 місяці тому

      @@donthomas4793 I appreciate your response. I am looking for specific Biblical and/or Biblically-based tradition upon which “the 1000” are saved, or not saved.

    • @donthomas4793
      @donthomas4793 4 місяці тому

      @@JohnMark61355 well, Mark it wouldn’t matter if it’s 1000 or 1 million, or if you’re a Mormon or if you’re whatever fill in the blank . If you can say that you put your trust in Jesus for your salvation and him alone, you bring no merit to the table you’re in, if you can’t say that you’re not.