This is a great demonstration of the importance of the dynamism between the interveiwer and the one being interviewed. Great video and very interessting thoughts on one of the main sources of the schism we see around the world today
yes, we need to find a better balance to the contributions that all of humanity makes, rather than evaluating input/output on financial gains only, it is this 'poverty of shared thinking' that starves the many.The fundamentals of the common good sometimes require us to review the old ideas, to adapt and change and make them relevant again - that sometimes the advancement towards a 'space race' leaves behind the very foundations we neglect to build on - that we just need to discover a new piece that fits the puzzle and change the attitudes that will make it viable. the appeal to ancient authority is not to let it die out, but to give it a new voice, a rethink of ideas. When too many at the top have skimmed the surface by way of accolade and fame, it must act as a call to our senses to move back towards a traditional position from which to refocus and reclaim. When you break it down, any new idea really still has found its knowledge from a starting point that already exists or has done before, otherwise how else does it get tested, analysed, measured & argued, how else did it inspire such great thought. There is always something new to be found under the same sun, when we are willing to adapt & unite, to esteem & recognise each other and stay open to move collectively towards universal growth.
Тут йдеться про те, що народ голосує за популістів, бо старі партії не дають відповіді та дії на питання, як подолати страшенну нерівність між внеском до суспільного блага і дивідендів від них і як гармонізувати економіку та її зростання, щоб це все перебувало під контролем громадськості, а не дикого ринку чи купки так званої фінансово-політичної еліти, адже людям важливо не просто зростання економіки, а й таке зростання, яке вестиме до гармонії з виробництвом, з природою, з екологією, з людською натурою і тим усім, що так важливо для людей і робить їх людьми...
Based on the idealogy of globalization here on earth… Does a form of globalization exist in heaven? The haves and not haves, the saved and not saved… The fully righteous and the semi- righteous. Does the idea of Arch-Angels help create the idea… That in heaven there are class or levels of authority in Heaven? If Heaven has many rooms or many houses, How will we the immigrated to heaven be assigned? What might the criteria for which location are we to be assigned? That is if we are allowed to be imported to heaven. Pardon my lack of knowing- ignorance. Pardon the facetious question. G.
His discussion is related to Karl Marx Theory of Labor in which he explained that workers were paid lesser than their excess excertion of energy in work during the industrial revolution. Karl Marx emphasized that laborers were exploited by the bourgeois and alienated from their rights.
Minimum wage is not a subsistence wage. It's a sub-subsistence wage which guarantees the very real slave-master relationship that permeates the American working class today. Investor profits of stable elites are pitted against struggling workers who face insane odds of outworking their poverty.
LMAO, I mean he is a Harvard professor. His use of diction is extremely complex and has a lot of depth. But I think in general you need to have a good knowledge about the world's economy and politics in order to fully understand what they're saying in this interview.
First, the woman doing the interview was annoying. Second, Michael Sandell was interesting to listen but not overly so. There a little flaw in his comparitve philosophy when he mentions the important difference between the work teachers and health workers do and others like a banker or a sportstar and the enormous differences in wages. Some might argue against any difference in their worth at all, the banker and sportstar contributing in ways to social infrastructer that are not so obvious as the health or education worker. And that's where any comparative philosophy should end because to talk further about wages earned between the two example groups is futile. That's because educators and health workers are civil servants paid by pre-established conditions of the government they work for and government funds have a limit. Governments are in the business of collecting taxes and providing services to people. Sportstars are paid by corporations who are in the business of making money...the more money they make the more they can pay their stars. So to compare salaries is nonsense, it's all apples and oranges. You can only judge the worth of each of the examples given in a philosophical way and even that may be futile because we are all different and our ultimate conclusions will mirror that.
But at the end of the day, that is the fundamental problem: living in a world where society serves markets/companies and not the other way around, in which those should be a tool for improving life and development of society. The difference in payment make visible the issue around a society that is bowed down to the interests of the real minority
Financial and Marketing money are scamming/bogus money! The Former robs people with high interest+high rent/properties, and the Latter robs workers off their deserving wages! Companies need to be stopped spending too much money on Marketing, a good portion of which goes to these Celebs, Sports Stars, and some useless famous idiots (wtf??)
This was published 4 years ago and now, with this pandemic, this speech has even more relevance and accuracy!
This is a great demonstration of the importance of the dynamism between the interveiwer and the one being interviewed. Great video and very interessting thoughts on one of the main sources of the schism we see around the world today
Congratulations Tian Wei for this excellent interview. Give us more of this !
yes, we need to find a better balance to the contributions that all of humanity makes, rather than evaluating input/output on financial gains only, it is this 'poverty of shared thinking' that starves the many.The fundamentals of the common good sometimes require us to review the old ideas, to adapt and change and make them relevant again - that sometimes the advancement towards a 'space race' leaves behind the very foundations we neglect to build on - that we just need to discover a new piece that fits the puzzle and change the attitudes that will make it viable. the appeal to ancient authority is not to let it die out, but to give it a new voice, a rethink of ideas. When too many at the top have skimmed the surface by way of accolade and fame, it must act as a call to our senses to move back towards a traditional position from which to refocus and reclaim. When you break it down, any new idea really still has found its knowledge from a starting point that already exists or has done before, otherwise how else does it get tested, analysed, measured & argued, how else did it inspire such great thought. There is always something new to be found under the same sun, when we are willing to adapt & unite, to esteem & recognise each other and stay open to move collectively towards universal growth.
Great mind . Bravo
This many years later; the man has good senses
Incredible relevant to the issues we are facing in 2020
9:24 why did the audio do that when she said that about women?
Does anybody know where I can find the full interview?
Man i'd give everything to have a conversation with him
Fruitful interview
Good
Hear hear!
7:30 Exactly!
Тут йдеться про те, що народ голосує за популістів, бо старі партії не дають відповіді та дії на питання, як подолати страшенну нерівність між внеском до суспільного блага і дивідендів від них і як гармонізувати економіку та її зростання, щоб це все перебувало під контролем громадськості, а не дикого ринку чи купки так званої фінансово-політичної еліти, адже людям важливо не просто зростання економіки, а й таке зростання, яке вестиме до гармонії з виробництвом, з природою, з екологією, з людською натурою і тим усім, що так важливо для людей і робить їх людьми...
Intresting
With love from Ukraine!
Hear, hear!
Dinner for one
Hear. hear!
quite a bit of hegelian influence, which I didn't know about sandel. Very interesting.
I think we are over worked without achieving goal of good life
Based on the idealogy of globalization here on earth… Does a form of globalization exist in heaven? The haves and not haves, the saved and not saved… The fully righteous and the semi- righteous. Does the idea of Arch-Angels help create
the idea… That in heaven there are class or levels of authority in Heaven? If Heaven has many rooms or many houses, How will we the immigrated to heaven be assigned? What might the criteria for which location are we to be assigned?
That is if we are allowed to be imported to heaven.
Pardon my lack of knowing- ignorance.
Pardon the facetious question.
G.
Its about Philosophy of Man rather than Human... on socio economic and politcal in morality on society crtique issues about it
His discussion is related to Karl Marx Theory of Labor in which he explained that workers were paid lesser than their excess excertion of energy in work during the industrial revolution. Karl Marx emphasized that laborers were exploited by the bourgeois and alienated from their rights.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Minimum wage is not a subsistence wage. It's a sub-subsistence wage which guarantees the very real slave-master relationship that permeates the American working class today. Investor profits of stable elites are pitted against struggling workers who face insane odds of outworking their poverty.
Restrictions/Limitations to land/real estate ownership (per head), problems solved!
💗👍
This guy professor looks at guys liberals don’t.
So I think his opinion should be heard.
Viet nam ❤
14:38
people have been putting up walls for literally centuries... look at the massive wall the chinese built that can be seen from space.
B+
I dont think I can understand this even in my own language
LMAO, I mean he is a Harvard professor. His use of diction is extremely complex and has a lot of depth. But I think in general you need to have a good knowledge about the world's economy and politics in order to fully understand what they're saying in this interview.
what he's trying to say in sum is the need of socialism to take place in this century
Tsk, Tsk, silly Sandel. We don't talk. We scream and shout.
We talk, Tsk, Tsk.
why does he look like he needs to cry
This guy is correct on some issues, yes. However, he is also an elitist hack, by the way. You don't have to believe this comment.
I just ask this gentleman one question. “ How do you think about Biden administration?”
TRUMP 2020
This guy's a bafoon AND has something to hide?
First, the woman doing the interview was annoying. Second, Michael Sandell was interesting to listen but not overly so. There a little flaw in his comparitve philosophy when he mentions the important difference between the work teachers and health workers do and others like a banker or a sportstar and the enormous differences in wages. Some might argue against any difference in their worth at all, the banker and sportstar contributing in ways to social infrastructer that are not so obvious as the health or education worker. And that's where any comparative philosophy should end because to talk further about wages earned between the two example groups is futile. That's because educators and health workers are civil servants paid by pre-established conditions of the government they work for and government funds have a limit. Governments are in the business of collecting taxes and providing services to people. Sportstars are paid by corporations who are in the business of making money...the more money they make the more they can pay their stars. So to compare salaries is nonsense, it's all apples and oranges. You can only judge the worth of each of the examples given in a philosophical way and even that may be futile because we are all different and our ultimate conclusions will mirror that.
But at the end of the day, that is the fundamental problem: living in a world where society serves markets/companies and not the other way around, in which those should be a tool for improving life and development of society. The difference in payment make visible the issue around a society that is bowed down to the interests of the real minority
Financial and Marketing money are scamming/bogus money! The Former robs people with high interest+high rent/properties, and the Latter robs workers off their deserving wages! Companies need to be stopped spending too much money on Marketing, a good portion of which goes to these Celebs, Sports Stars, and some useless famous idiots (wtf??)