Yes it’s been nice having someone book the show that does that well, it wasn’t like that for a long time, n as we know now, last guy had a lot of things goin on behind the scenes and didn’t care about the show
Correct, the fake fighting indy incel crap that weird young men like is the absolute worse trash on the planet, look at aew, the lowest ratings of any wrestling show in the history of mankind
Dave never said he hated the show look at the comment he said it was an easy show to watch and he enjoyed it. There was a lot of memorable moments and for me the moments make this a really memorable show because almost every match I remember. The Dawning of Gunther as the world champion, Judgement Day implodes, Bron's ascension, Nia Jax wins the Women's title, Dom turns on Rhea Ripley, Roman Reigns epic return and Cm Punk's in ring return. But was there one match where you will remember six months from now? There was no match that was blow away on the show. I enjoyed the Punk and Mcintyre match but the criticism that this was supposed to be a blood feud and you excepted the match to be a little more intense vs the bracelet drama that we got that is valid criticism. Dave is entitled to this opinion and the matches he gives five stars a vast majority of the time they are story driven matches both in the build up and during the match itself. Just because he was never in the business does not mean he can't review wrestling just like movie reviewers. There are a lot of guys in the business that respect Meltzer's opinion he is more of a historian of the business and knows and studies the business.
At the end of the day, the fans who went or watched it all seemed to be pleased with the money they spent. That means they'll buy tickets or keep their peacock sub, and thats the only valuable metric.
@@DowntownLupo no match really deserved more then a 3.5. I think his analysis was spot on, I called everything on the card and that's fine. The matches were fine but nothing special. It was the storytelling that made it a great show
You guys are doing what Melzter does , you admit wwe was stale and complain sbabout him talking bad about it for years , walking contradiction , It was a angle show , some good matches , I liked the show , Meltzer likes more ring story telling , go watch some of his 5 star matches and the story going into it , WWE just has great showmanship and production , and thanks to AEW launching WWE cleaned house and got better for us as fans
Summerslam had plenty of moments that I'll remember. AEW has had trouble giving consistent non-wrestling moments.
Angles make people want to watch your show. That's why the WWE is thriving right now.
Yes it’s been nice having someone book the show that does that well, it wasn’t like that for a long time, n as we know now, last guy had a lot of things goin on behind the scenes and didn’t care about the show
Correct, the fake fighting indy incel crap that weird young men like is the absolute worse trash on the planet, look at aew, the lowest ratings of any wrestling show in the history of mankind
LA Knight vs Logan Paul was a better wrestling match than anything recently at AEW.
Holding off stars so he can give extra to AEW this weekend.
😂😂
Dave never said he hated the show look at the comment he said it was an easy show to watch and he enjoyed it. There was a lot of memorable moments and for me the moments make this a really memorable show because almost every match I remember. The Dawning of Gunther as the world champion, Judgement Day implodes, Bron's ascension, Nia Jax wins the Women's title, Dom turns on Rhea Ripley, Roman Reigns epic return and Cm Punk's in ring return. But was there one match where you will remember six months from now? There was no match that was blow away on the show.
I enjoyed the Punk and Mcintyre match but the criticism that this was supposed to be a blood feud and you excepted the match to be a little more intense vs the bracelet drama that we got that is valid criticism. Dave is entitled to this opinion and the matches he gives five stars a vast majority of the time they are story driven matches both in the build up and during the match itself. Just because he was never in the business does not mean he can't review wrestling just like movie reviewers. There are a lot of guys in the business that respect Meltzer's opinion he is more of a historian of the business and knows and studies the business.
At the end of the day, the fans who went or watched it all seemed to be pleased with the money they spent. That means they'll buy tickets or keep their peacock sub, and thats the only valuable metric.
Please stop using the word "expert" when referring to meltzer.Hes a nitwit at best.Stop giving this goof credibility
When’s he giving his star ratings for it?
Not sure but knowing him nothing gets more than a 3.5
@@DowntownLupo no match really deserved more then a 3.5. I think his analysis was spot on, I called everything on the card and that's fine. The matches were fine but nothing special. It was the storytelling that made it a great show
@@jordancooper7631 LA Knight vs Logan Paul was better than anything at AEW in a long time.
@@zemm9003that was at least 4.5 and Punk v McIntyre was 4.9 at least.
Who gives a fuck
Dave is too gay
You guys are doing what Melzter does , you admit wwe was stale and complain sbabout him talking bad about it for years , walking contradiction , It was a angle show , some good matches , I liked the show , Meltzer likes more ring story telling , go watch some of his 5 star matches and the story going into it , WWE just has great showmanship and production , and thanks to AEW launching WWE cleaned house and got better for us as fans
That’s actually a great idea that sounds like a future episode for the pod thanks!
@@DowntownLupo ill watch it for sure
@@josebillyb.a.8128 you're a real one
Best story line ever !!! Dave meltzer is getting pushed out the industry.