Everything that is presented in the video is nonsense. The explosion of an anti - aircraft missile is not enough to destroy the fuselage of the aircraft from this explosion in the air . For the destruction of the fuselage of a large aircraft in the air, an internal explosion / explosions of sufficient power or an overload exceeding the inherent design of the aircraft or a prolonged fire on board the aircraft that damaged the power structure of the aircraft or a collision with another aircraft where the fuselage is damaged. If you don't believe it, you can see how the downed Il-76 fell near Belgorod. Also, two Patriot SAM missiles were fired at the Il-76, or 2 anti-aircraft missiles were launched at the Ukrainian Boeing shot down in Iran, because the combat application is one target, two anti-aircraft missiles. Also, fragments of these missiles are immediately found at the crash site, and next to flight MH 17, fragments of an anti-aircraft missile were never found and the SBU committed a forgery - slipped the details of a disassembled Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile. Yes, the details, because this missile (by the way, it refers to the type 9M38 warhead without I-beams, or as the Dutch called them, a bow tie) did not have a combat application, it was simply disassembled, cut out with an angle grinder and slipped into the case. It is also nonsense from the point of view of physics, in particular in the dynamics-aerodynamics section. The speed of the aircraft was about 900 km/h, about 485 knots, about 250 m/s. This means that the initial velocity of the debris is the same. And therefore, the vector of the resulting force will be directed forward and down to the earth under the action of inertia and gravity forces forward and down. And therefore, not one fragment can fall to the point where the destruction of the aircraft began. And the first fragments of flight MH17 fell to the ground before the impact was made on the plane (according to the Dutch version). This is nonsense.
Assalamualaikum halo bang alaric lancar puasa
Were same because i post that 😁😁😁😅😅😅
This cardboard plane is soooo great
👍
Improved since your first one,
Mantaps recreation nya 😄😄
Nice
Niceeee❤
Kamu makin bagus buatnya🎉
Nice cardboard airplane. Great work 👍😊
How that can broken?
nice work bro
What kind of cardboard do You use :v?
Nice🎉
Thanks 🤗
Thanks 🤗
Pls Tutorial of The Boeing 747-100 🥺🙏🖐️
😢 im so sad
What the name of the song
С днём смеха
Magni airlines pls 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
your hansome when you did a face reveal ❤
Please do TACA 110
Dek, anak saya pengen banget ketemu kamu krn sama hobi buat pesawat dari karton 😁
Dimana rumahnya?
Can you please do MH370 that vanished on March 8th 2014?
Bro he already did that video
@@crashaviation7272 whoops 💀
mh370 ?
You destroyed ur plane😢
RiP😢
PLS DC-10
Alaric aku nemu notifikasi situs aneh dari google,isinya alamat kamu
Gimana?
@@alariccopilot aku lagi cari tau nihh
Everything that is presented in the video is nonsense. The explosion of an anti - aircraft missile is not enough to destroy the fuselage of the aircraft from this explosion in the air . For the destruction of the fuselage of a large aircraft in the air, an internal explosion / explosions of sufficient power or an overload exceeding the inherent design of the aircraft or a prolonged fire on board the aircraft that damaged the power structure of the aircraft or a collision with another aircraft where the fuselage is damaged. If you don't believe it, you can see how the downed Il-76 fell near Belgorod. Also, two Patriot SAM missiles were fired at the Il-76, or 2 anti-aircraft missiles were launched at the Ukrainian Boeing shot down in Iran, because the combat application is one target, two anti-aircraft missiles. Also, fragments of these missiles are immediately found at the crash site, and next to flight MH 17, fragments of an anti-aircraft missile were never found and the SBU committed a forgery - slipped the details of a disassembled Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile. Yes, the details, because this missile (by the way, it refers to the type 9M38 warhead without I-beams, or as the Dutch called them, a bow tie) did not have a combat application, it was simply disassembled, cut out with an angle grinder and slipped into the case. It is also nonsense from the point of view of physics, in particular in the dynamics-aerodynamics section. The speed of the aircraft was about 900 km/h, about 485 knots, about 250 m/s. This means that the initial velocity of the debris is the same. And therefore, the vector of the resulting force will be directed forward and down to the earth under the action of inertia and gravity forces forward and down. And therefore, not one fragment can fall to the point where the destruction of the aircraft began. And the first fragments of flight MH17 fell to the ground before the impact was made on the plane (according to the Dutch version). This is nonsense.
The flight crash in the past by a missle in Ukraine RIP
Ya sudah buang Aja