Thanks for the video! I would give Helm some more credits on the Templating part tho.. Helm's templating capabilities, with its flexible Go templates and dynamic values.yaml, offer a level of sophistication and customization that Kustomize doesn't match. This makes Helm a clear winner in templating, especially for complex Kubernetes deployments
some rounds are just ridiculous, e.g. saying that Kustomize is better at handling secrets while Helm provides the same functionality differently is nonsense - it's a draw to me in handling secrets round also the next round regarding handling super complex projects - I have no idea why you decided the clear winner was Kustomize when you gave 0 insights into what functionality Helm misses which Kustomize provides
I really enjoyed the comparison of these two technologies and the thorough analysis you made, thank you for posting this video!
Thanks for the video! I would give Helm some more credits on the Templating part tho.. Helm's templating capabilities, with its flexible Go templates and dynamic values.yaml, offer a level of sophistication and customization that Kustomize doesn't match. This makes Helm a clear winner in templating, especially for complex Kubernetes deployments
Although this video doesn’t mention the sealed secrets in Kubernetes, it provides good insights.
Can you make a video on TILT please.
I love the content you uploading. All the best.
Thanks for the info. Great amount of detail and good comparison.
great comparison 👍
Excellent Video!
Thanks for sharing. Very nice explanation
Good 👍
some rounds are just ridiculous, e.g. saying that Kustomize is better at handling secrets while Helm provides the same functionality differently is nonsense - it's a draw to me in handling secrets round
also the next round regarding handling super complex projects - I have no idea why you decided the clear winner was Kustomize when you gave 0 insights into what functionality Helm misses which Kustomize provides
Get the best of both with Flux2 :)