I recently bought Intel Arc 770 16gb about 2 months ago for 320$, here in Europe thats a good price, upgraded from rx 6600 and for me Arc770 is amazing card. Video editing is on the next level with AV encoder, 16gb VRAM and with all the effort Intel put in every driver update it will just get better and better with the amazing specs (bandwidth, 256bit...) card full potential is yet to come. :)
I agree that there is a ton of potential there, and for encoding it is great that is what I am going to use it for. I often cover affordable ways to get into PC gaming. In my opinion Intel just isn't there yet. the 6750XT is going to continue to be the king of gaming value until they run out of stock or the ps6 sets the bar to something crazy like 32gb VRAM. Intel had some stand out moments but across the board it falls short. you are basically banking on the driver team taking a interest in the specific game you want to play or else the performance is lack luster. It does provide a good experience in all the games i tested, just in the price range the AMD did better, However, I am happy you are enjoying it we need more competition. Have fun gaming!
@@JohnnyRage303 Yeah Intel still have a long way to go but for their first lineup this is good and especially for me and others who don't have a money for Nvidia and probably that will get only worse and worse, Ngreedia is now like Apple for GPUs. :D For us with limited budget only solution if not 6700/6750xt was Intel Arc A770 version with 16gb, I'm on 1440p so I need at least 12gb of VRAM, I had a little luck seller still had this Intel Arc card and I really enjoy it, thanks for this video and answer. :)
@@JohnnyRage303 Yes, that makes sense and matched what I said, however the 7000 card equivalent isn't any better than the A770 so once this admittedly great budget card runs out then at current pricing the A770 becomes the best value choice. At this price tier although given the value both the A580 and the A750 are great alternatives beating the competition for price to performance at the 200 ISH dollars price point and still giving excellent av1 encoding.
Interestingly the current smd cards also cannot compete with the 6750xt. The A770 more or less matches the equivalent priced amd 7000 cards while still winning in ray tracing. This comes down to known performance Vs future software upgrades. Intel has already shown a commitment with multiple software updates and ever increasing performance and I would take it over the current equivalent 7000 cards but for games the 6750xt is a remarkable card for the price. At the same time some credit needs to go (at this point) to intel. They have produced a card which trys (and often succeeds) in competing in all areas from ray tracing to encoding and upscaling in a first generation product. As for XESS Vs FSR. From what I understand XESS gives better quality but doesn't improve the frame rate as much. It appears to nanage similar quality and frame improvements if you move the quality down 1 level from an FSR equivalent.
You can get a A770 for $289, once the 6700T/66750XT is sold out that will put your options at RX 7600 8GB as low as $249 or RTX 4060 at $295. Both are 8gb cards vs 16gb but if intel cant put that hardware to use then its a mute point. I have a 6600XT laying around but I don't have a 7600 to compare. I bet the intel would hold its own. So at that point you get double the VRAM and the potential for future performance with intel. It will get interesting. I think the New cards will come out (probably later this year) prior to 6750XT stock completely drying up. But intel has battlemage on the horizon. It will certainly be interesting to see what is in the future for budget cards.
You should definitely check your monitoring software settings again as it was showing 8MB VRAM and UHD 770 of iGPU and later turned it off from the screen itself. Though FPS seems accurate. I would really like to see more benchmarks of the Intel ARC A770 with similarly priced GPUs.
Thanks for pointing that out, yeah when I was testing I noticed that with the arc gpu it switched its numbering in afterburner from when the amd card was in. The fps was accurate though for my numbers. I noticed it half way through. I currently use the a770 in my recording pc. I might pull it out to do more tests in the future but right now it's my av1 processor haha.
Oh wow that's embarrassing, it's all 6750xt. If you look at the afterburner info it shows that. I must have accidentally left that 7900xtx title in that's from the editing. The footage is correct. Sorry about that and thanks for the catch. The 7900xtx is much faster haha.
In hind sight I made a few recording editing errors on this video, the FPS and recorded data is all correct, but when I recorded the first few games MSI was set to GPU1 which in the intel system once I installed the A770 its was the Integrated graphics. So the readings were all wrong. Then when I caught this I set MSI afterburner for the overlay to GPU3. I am not sure how it was GPU3 there should just be the integrated cpu and the gpu but that's how it saw it. This is why the A770 was showing low usage and power in a few clips. Interestingly even once I corrected to GPU3 monitoring MSI Afterburner would not display much of the data it usually does on my AMD / NVIDIA Cards. this footage was filmed a few months ago I haven't checked back to see if they have updated it to display correctly. I still use the A770 in my recording PC to this day. It is serving me well. The performance FPS data is all accurate. it was just the readings from the GPU in the overlay that were messed up.
Just bought an a770 16g phantom gaming for 400$ cad so happy with it 😊
I got the titan for 280$ like 3 months ago I'm happy with it bro🤙
I recently bought Intel Arc 770 16gb about 2 months ago for 320$, here in Europe thats a good price, upgraded from rx 6600 and for me Arc770 is amazing card. Video editing is on the next level with AV encoder, 16gb VRAM and with all the effort Intel put in every driver update it will just get better and better with the amazing specs (bandwidth, 256bit...) card full potential is yet to come. :)
I agree that there is a ton of potential there, and for encoding it is great that is what I am going to use it for. I often cover affordable ways to get into PC gaming. In my opinion Intel just isn't there yet. the 6750XT is going to continue to be the king of gaming value until they run out of stock or the ps6 sets the bar to something crazy like 32gb VRAM. Intel had some stand out moments but across the board it falls short. you are basically banking on the driver team taking a interest in the specific game you want to play or else the performance is lack luster. It does provide a good experience in all the games i tested, just in the price range the AMD did better, However, I am happy you are enjoying it we need more competition. Have fun gaming!
@@JohnnyRage303 Yeah Intel still have a long way to go but for their first lineup this is good and especially for me and others who don't have a money for Nvidia and probably that will get only worse and worse, Ngreedia is now like Apple for GPUs. :D For us with limited budget only solution if not 6700/6750xt was Intel Arc A770 version with 16gb, I'm on 1440p so I need at least 12gb of VRAM, I had a little luck seller still had this Intel Arc card and I really enjoy it, thanks for this video and answer. :)
@@JohnnyRage303 Yes, that makes sense and matched what I said, however the 7000 card equivalent isn't any better than the A770 so once this admittedly great budget card runs out then at current pricing the A770 becomes the best value choice. At this price tier although given the value both the A580 and the A750 are great alternatives beating the competition for price to performance at the 200 ISH dollars price point and still giving excellent av1 encoding.
15:44 feel the same
Interestingly the current smd cards also cannot compete with the 6750xt. The A770 more or less matches the equivalent priced amd 7000 cards while still winning in ray tracing. This comes down to known performance Vs future software upgrades. Intel has already shown a commitment with multiple software updates and ever increasing performance and I would take it over the current equivalent 7000 cards but for games the 6750xt is a remarkable card for the price. At the same time some credit needs to go (at this point) to intel. They have produced a card which trys (and often succeeds) in competing in all areas from ray tracing to encoding and upscaling in a first generation product. As for XESS Vs FSR. From what I understand XESS gives better quality but doesn't improve the frame rate as much. It appears to nanage similar quality and frame improvements if you move the quality down 1 level from an FSR equivalent.
You can get a A770 for $289, once the 6700T/66750XT is sold out that will put your options at RX 7600 8GB as low as $249 or RTX 4060 at $295. Both are 8gb cards vs 16gb but if intel cant put that hardware to use then its a mute point. I have a 6600XT laying around but I don't have a 7600 to compare. I bet the intel would hold its own. So at that point you get double the VRAM and the potential for future performance with intel. It will get interesting. I think the New cards will come out (probably later this year) prior to 6750XT stock completely drying up. But intel has battlemage on the horizon. It will certainly be interesting to see what is in the future for budget cards.
You should definitely check your monitoring software settings again as it was showing 8MB VRAM and UHD 770 of iGPU and later turned it off from the screen itself. Though FPS seems accurate.
I would really like to see more benchmarks of the Intel ARC A770 with similarly priced GPUs.
Thanks for pointing that out, yeah when I was testing I noticed that with the arc gpu it switched its numbering in afterburner from when the amd card was in. The fps was accurate though for my numbers. I noticed it half way through. I currently use the a770 in my recording pc. I might pull it out to do more tests in the future but right now it's my av1 processor haha.
So was the A770 tested against the 7900XTX or the 6750XT? Your footage shows the 7900XTX.
Oh wow that's embarrassing, it's all 6750xt. If you look at the afterburner info it shows that. I must have accidentally left that 7900xtx title in that's from the editing. The footage is correct.
Sorry about that and thanks for the catch. The 7900xtx is much faster haha.
Why is the power draw of the A770 so low?
In hind sight I made a few recording editing errors on this video, the FPS and recorded data is all correct, but when I recorded the first few games MSI was set to GPU1 which in the intel system once I installed the A770 its was the Integrated graphics. So the readings were all wrong. Then when I caught this I set MSI afterburner for the overlay to GPU3. I am not sure how it was GPU3 there should just be the integrated cpu and the gpu but that's how it saw it. This is why the A770 was showing low usage and power in a few clips. Interestingly even once I corrected to GPU3 monitoring MSI Afterburner would not display much of the data it usually does on my AMD / NVIDIA Cards. this footage was filmed a few months ago I haven't checked back to see if they have updated it to display correctly. I still use the A770 in my recording PC to this day. It is serving me well. The performance FPS data is all accurate. it was just the readings from the GPU in the overlay that were messed up.