@@birandkoray speaking of what if I calculated that had Damon Hill won the Hungarian Grand Prix and Schumacher decided to let villeneuve through to win Schumacher would’ve actually won the title basically villeneuve: 81-4hun+6jer= 83, Schumacher: 78+6jer=84 bcs in the 1997 points 1st: 10 2nd: 6 and 3rd: 4
Was Hakkinen and that MP4-12 really that good in 1997? I'm not sure they were ever going to be title contenders but Mika went missing too often in races whereas Coulthard got wins and plenty of podiums. Am I missing something with Mika's season or are a lot of judgements based on his much better second half and what he'd go on to do in 1998?
I came to a new conclusion about F1 recently. I don't need V10s back, though they would be nice. What I need is a reduction of corporate involvement. I need a relaxing of safety. For example, there are far more dangerous motorsports still existing just fine (TT motorcycle), so I don't know why F1 has to be so safety aware. Courage ought to be rewarded. Secondly, corporate equals boring. Instead, if we had private ventures (privately owned and run teams) people who a taking a financial gamble, for the chance of a financial reward (like investing in a race horse), that's far more interesting.
These clips are ripped straight from their podcast, it's not a topic specifically chosen for a video. I listened to this episode, I'm pretty sure it was their top 10 driver rankings from 1997
Had Hakkinen had great luck he could've legitimately been a title contender in 97.
"what if"s are limitless, same is true for DC
@@birandkoray speaking of what if I calculated that had Damon Hill won the Hungarian Grand Prix and Schumacher decided to let villeneuve through to win Schumacher would’ve actually won the title basically villeneuve: 81-4hun+6jer= 83, Schumacher: 78+6jer=84 bcs in the 1997 points 1st: 10 2nd: 6 and 3rd: 4
Flat spotting is an error...not luck.
Good idea turn and bring back V tens into it’s on podcast
Was Hakkinen and that MP4-12 really that good in 1997? I'm not sure they were ever going to be title contenders but Mika went missing too often in races whereas Coulthard got wins and plenty of podiums. Am I missing something with Mika's season or are a lot of judgements based on his much better second half and what he'd go on to do in 1998?
MP4-12 one of the best looking cars ever for me, doesnt get talked about!
1.great channel name
2.coulthard was brilliant and nobody can persuade me otherwise
I came to a new conclusion about F1 recently. I don't need V10s back, though they would be nice. What I need is a reduction of corporate involvement. I need a relaxing of safety. For example, there are far more dangerous motorsports still existing just fine (TT motorcycle), so I don't know why F1 has to be so safety aware. Courage ought to be rewarded. Secondly, corporate equals boring. Instead, if we had private ventures (privately owned and run teams) people who a taking a financial gamble, for the chance of a financial reward (like investing in a race horse), that's far more interesting.
I'd argue Coulthard was the better driver, but mika had a peak couple of years 98/99 also, I feel because he was Ron D's golden child.
This is a very weird question.
These clips are ripped straight from their podcast, it's not a topic specifically chosen for a video. I listened to this episode, I'm pretty sure it was their top 10 driver rankings from 1997