Why doesn't that match up? It was recorded for Fortune Records in '62 and put in a vault and then ultimately released for the first time by Norton Records, who pressed it on a 45.
That's exactly what I'm saying. As it wasn't released until 2010, it would've been impossible have a 45 of it beforehand...an acetate, maybe, but the poster said mono 45.
Great tune however I am unsure exactly what your description means, "Ripped directly from the mono 45" does not match up with "Not released until 2010". Does this mean it existed as a 45 since 1962 in the US but did not have an UK issue until 2010 or, that it was issued as a 45 from the master tapes in 2010?
top track
Why doesn't that match up? It was recorded for Fortune Records in '62 and put in a vault and then ultimately released for the first time by Norton Records, who pressed it on a 45.
That's exactly what I'm saying. As it wasn't released until 2010, it would've been impossible have a 45 of it beforehand...an acetate, maybe, but the poster said mono 45.
So are you saying it is taken (ripped) from the Norton 2010 release? Like I said it was not clear to me what was meant.
Great tune however I am unsure exactly what your description means, "Ripped directly from the mono 45" does not match up with "Not released until 2010". Does this mean it existed as a 45 since 1962 in the US but did not have an UK issue until 2010 or, that it was issued as a 45 from the master tapes in 2010?
it was recorded in 62 but unreleased till 2010 on 45 great post peace...
like it should be