How absolutely insulting for an 11-2 team ranked number 22 in the nation to have to play a bowl game against a 5-7 team who shouldn't have even been in a bowl game to begin with.
Louisiana Tech should now be called Low-Tech for both their level of play and their sportsmanship. At the end of the game, the LT Losers were more than chippy, they were downright lowlife. If they wanted to make a statement, maybe they should have scored a touchdown.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I still think that Army should have played Colorado in their bowl game. #22 Army vs #23 Colorado.
How absolutely insulting for an 11-2 team ranked number 22 in the nation to have to play a bowl game against a 5-7 team who shouldn't have even been in a bowl game to begin with.
Agreed. A ranked 11-2 conference champ has to go to the hellhole of Shreveport to play a terrible 5-7 team. Smh.
To be fair they were supposed to play initially against a 10-3 conference champ, but Marshall opted out.
@@WARMACHINE2013 I still don't understand how two 10+ win conference champs were put in what many consider the worst bowl in the worst location.
LT was probably invited because they were playing in LA - but it was still a poor choice. Army was a hair’s breadth from making the CFP.
Louisiana Tech should now be called Low-Tech for both their level of play and their sportsmanship. At the end of the game, the LT Losers were more than chippy, they were downright lowlife. If they wanted to make a statement, maybe they should have scored a touchdown.
Poor choice for an opponent.....army deserved a tougher opponent.