Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
INDIANS Aur PAKISTANIS - Yeh Dekho 🇮🇳🇵🇰 - Abhijit Chavda Geopolitics, WW3, The Ranveer Show हिंदी
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 чер 2022
- Link For Requesting Videos To React ----- www.owlib.com/...
OUR OTHER CHANNELS
INDIAN AMERICAN REACTIONS -- / @indianamericanreactions
INDIAN AMERICAN WORLD ----- / @gajabreactions
===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*
Twitter► / iavlogger
Instagram► / indianamericanvlogger
===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*===*
Love & Enjoy!
Original Link: • INDIANS Aur PAKISTANIS...
As requested by our subscribers we have reacted on this video.
For Video Removal Email Us @ indianamericanvlogger@gmail.com
Disclaimer : Our channel has been created to give our reactions, reviews and analysis on news, festivals, movies, songs, trailers, teasers etc for entertainment purpose only.
Copyright Disclaimer : Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
#abhijitchavda #pakistan #TheRanveerShow
INDIANS Aur PAKISTANIS - Yeh Dekho 🇮🇳🇵🇰 - Abhijit Chavda Geopolitics WW3 The Ranveer Show हिंदी
Nehru is selected and appointed by Gandhi not through elections. He neglected People's choice Sardar Patel
@@anujmishra2588 Man you are wrong about this.Soon after Independence in 1947 only Nehru has been chosen to beacome PM. And Patel died in december 1950
In which advanced democracy d first head of state or gvt was an elected one?
@@pallabighatak8834 That's why we are seeing the blunders in our democracy.
What kind of ppl choice.. Come on, ppl even did not chose which party ll rule d country, forget which leader...
@@pallabighatak8834 there was an election between jinnah and congress and congress won and then it was thought who will be the first pm while everyone voted for patel only gandhi voted for nehru and he urged patel to not become pm coz nehru was anglophile and gandhi was a English/British supporter also he never wanted swarajya he wanted india to become a dominion and if you have any doubts go read his own writings etc in which it's written but some people after seeing facts don't wanna believe that
Ma'am and Deda, Nehru didn't do this by mistake. He did it intentionally. He didn't want India to be United. Believe it or not.
I donot think that he did it intentionally but he did that according to panchsheel theory which eventually failed and due to that failure he died in 1963
Mam dukh toh ye h ki humne chuna hi ni h nehru ko🤣😂😂🙂🙂🙂
Since childhood they tought us Chacha Nehru, sala mai topi laga ke ghumta tha 14Nov. ko. 😭😭😭
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂
@@gigabyte1739 ho gya? Nhi join karke bhi kya ukhaad liya , join kiya hota or nuclear weapons banaye hote toh China ki aukaat nhi hoti 1962 ms kuch karne ki
Nehru and Gandhi were somewhere supported by British. Nehru was a weak leader ,even dr Ambedkar warn him against the case of China but he never listened to him and the consequences was 1962 India China war.
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
That time USSR was not with China and Nehru was puppet of Gandhi
2nd
mam aaj prayagraj mere area me stone pelting hua namaz ke baad 😭😭
Dande maare unhe?
Secularism ka churan hai
Ganga jamuna tehjib chutiyapa
Stay Safe. Peaceful community ne pure desh ka peace kharab kar rkha hai.
😞
Mam india ma kayi jaga ma danga ho raha ha india jal raha ha please react 😭😭
Always support to modi
My pm my pride 🙌🙌🙌💯💯💯💯
@BUSINESSMAN that'the person who can't understand long vision 😉😉
@BUSINESSMAN when modi does work for hindu he is good and when some hard decision are been taken then bring Yogi is this your nationalism 🤔🤔
@BUSINESSMAN cm post is different and pm post is different when modi was cm he has also done with same interest Yogi is doing as cm in UP but now modi is pm he has to control all 130 crore public pressure is different .
Ending the debate just keep faith in modi after he won india is having the hope and hindus are now more proactive are now not in fear of anybody.🙏🙏
@BUSINESSMAN bhai pm post par yogiji Beth jayenge to bhi yhi hoga ek zimmedari aati hai empires ka zamana nahi chal rha bhaisahab
waiting for the next part
कोई मुस्लिम बोले की भारत किसी का बाप का नहीं तो बोलना की thumara बाप को 35% Jamin दे दीया गया हैं oo भी jansankhya से 2 guna बड़ा मिला था अब पूरा भारत हिन्दू का हैं 👍
Kabo valley ek samey Manipur ka part huwa karta tha par Nehru ne Myanmar ko dediya tha. Agar aaj tak hamara hota toh Tik lakari ke mamle mai koi kami na hota.
Mr Nehru UN ke General secratary banna chahte the isliye...
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
14:17 He wanted nothing. He was a British stooge who acted in accordance with the orders of the British. India ko develop na hone dena, Balochistan ko India me na milana despite their request, Nepal ne bhi request kiya tha but he rejected. Gifting Coco Island to Myanmar, stopping India's development. Everything.
Brother i am sad that the only source of information you have is this guy. I recommend just search once on the internet why nehru rejected the US offer. It was all baits to create divide between india and ussr. Obviously if us brings some country in unsc, ussr would veto it and not let it come. And if ussr brings one, usa would veto it. Only a country with good relations with both countries could come
Nice reaction 💞💞👌❣️❣️
Agar sardar patel 1st pm hote to India America se bhi power full hota
Jyada ho gya bhai
Agar hum America se powerful hote toh aaj China ke jagah hum US se lad rhe hote
America se jyada powerful hona India ke liye tabhi possible tha agar humne kabhi british ko kabja nahi karne diya hota
@@rhythmkhandelwal2940 Sirf British say kabza ki bat nahi hai... india mai modern aur secular education hoti toh hi india aaj superpower hota.. Jo bhi County religion based education woh kabhi nahi aage ja sakta
Episode was good as always but the point on which I disagree is ki sirf waha ki Military and politicians hi india ho hate karte hai ye puri taraha galat hai unka hate puri taraha se religion pe based hai or ye unke ander bachapan se hi dala jata hai to normal log hame hate nahi karte ye bus ek delusion hai warna waha ke politicians elections nahi jiet rahe hote sirf hame gali deke
Exactly
so Gandhi is responsible
Yes weha ka bhoot sara log india ko hate karta ha par ek cheez weha ka politicians elected nahi hota
@@tilaksubudhi2886 ye bhi sahi hai 😂
thanks for reaction
Mr. Lehru 😂
Mam Modi has been very good in terms of foreign policy and development but internal security has been a disaster. Things like Shaheen bagh protests, the farm bill protests, Bengal violence after BJP lost the elections a lot of BJP workers were killed in that, and now this Nupur Sharma thing. BJP should not have suspended Nupur Sharma this has sent a very bad message to the Hindu community of India. But anyways we’ll see what happens
Good job 👍
Ma'am after this please react to the world is f**** with abhijit chavda its his english podcast with ranveer
it's a amazing podcast you would get to know a lot
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
No its worst podcast
Jai hind mam and sir
Kashmir ko अलग कर दो और सभी मुस्लिम को भगाओ इंडिया से 🚩🚩 we want to make Hindu country
Kasmir ko alag karne ki jarurat nhi hai ESE HI BHAGA DENGE BATWARA HOCHUKA AB 1 INCH BHI NHI DENGE3
Ye sab pehle karna chahiye tha na
@@skbeditz3920 yes bro
Hamne nai Chuna Nehru ko Mam 😅. Gandhi ne chuna.
Absolutely right ✅
Usa samay tu tha kya
@@tanajimorkane4755 han beta
Part 2 please
Ye bahut zyada Pakistani bhai bhai krta hai iska Ghar se koi ARMED FORCES mein gya nhi hga are unse pucho jinka papa ,bhai border mein lada hai
He probably only met good pakistanis all his comfortable life bro. Can't blame him. One forms opinions only by what one sees
Jab tak aapko sachai pata chalegi hamari lanka lag chuki hogi
Let's see in future 😂😂😂😂
Ha congress AAP jaisi parties apne apne states to Lanka bna degi or injam tere jaise chomu modi pr daal denge
Please react on Sushant Sinha’s new video: Nupur Sharma ko lekar sadak par hangama.
He has message for Modi ji as well in the end.
Mam leader toh sardar patel ko chuna tha.. but... nehru ko kisi 1 person ne chuna tha 🤦
@@deepakchaudhary4188 baap se ase baat krtaa h.. jaat hoke bhi bewakoof h😂😂
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Please react 2nd part of this video 🙏🙏🙏
Mam react to aktk new documentary about nupur mam please
Reaction on bharat ki beti Easter henmte song
India's first centralised AC railway terminal | Pak Reacts | PNMM....... is video pa aap ka bara main bohot kuch bola , aap ko narrow minded bola ,,,
kuch reply di jia??
Kya bola wo PKMKB wala ?
@@Piyush01 😂👌
i hate nehru
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
maam is savage 😆😆
Will be waiting for part 2
The so-called American “offer” to India of a permanent seat in the Security Council replacing China was made in this combustible context. To be precise, it was not an offer but merely a vague feeler to explore Indian reactions to such a contingency. The U.S. intended it to be a bait to entice India into an alliance with the West against the Sino-Soviet bloc, as it was then known, and lure it into becoming a member of the “defence” organisations it was setting up in Asia to contain presumed “Communist expansionism”.
The enticement, as the correspondence between the then Indian Ambassador in Washington, Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, and Prime Minister Nehru makes clear, was suggested during her conversations with U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Ambassador-at-large Philip Jessup. When Pandit informed Nehru of these feelers, he responded, “India because of many factors is certainly entitled to a permanent seat in the Security Council. But we are not going in at the cost of China.” In September 1955, Nehru stated categorically in the Lok Sabha : “There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind… The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certain specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter.”
Nehru refused to consider the American feeler not because he was a wide-eyed Sinophile but because he was well aware that all Washington was interested in was to use India for its own ends. Had India accepted the American bait, it would have meant enduring enmity with China without the achievement of a permanent seat in the UNSC. The Soviet Union, then China’s closest ally, would have vetoed any such move since it would have required amendment of the UN Charter that is subject to the veto of the permanent members.
Then how china got Permanent membership if they was USSR ally...why didn't US vetoed it.?
True that…we would’ve been Pakistan
It seems you are Nehru
@@ameyadeshmukh2599 Product of Congress Education system 😂😂
@@ameyadeshmukh2599 To Tu kya Nixon hai
China, Pakistan ka kya..
Abhi to अंदर aag lagi hai 💔
Accidental hindu was not interested in progress of india nor eradication of poverty , then not interested in to be powerful but letting the enemy to capture indian territory
Pls react on shri Banke bihari ricites poem of radhakrishn serial plssss
Jawaharlal Nehru indians ne nhi chuna unhe gandhiji ne chuna tha he was not our choice
Bholna mat nehru ne hi iit or aims banye the.. Or ajj ki report ke hisab se wo world best university h..
Gandhi was a face appointed by britishers themselves so that, gandhi ko popularity mile aur ye drain karte wealth india ki.
Alag alag state main aisi halat hain west bengal,Delhi,Rajasthan,Punjab.
aaj humare community be ghar aggr hai toh iska shrey pura nehru je ko hi jata hai mai openly na hi nehru or Gandhi jee ko manta hu dono nay end mai aise galti kare ki country ka hi loss karwa diya jo hum indians or hum Kashmiri pandit bugat rahe hai abi tak aub kash ki 370 or ram mandir ki tarah modi jee humara masla b solve kar de Hume apne homeland return karwa de bcoz humare kul devi mata raginya devi jo ki humare community Mata kheer bhawani k nam se hum bulate hai unhe hum rooz rooz unke darshan kar sakey
1st view
Dusra part Kab aa raha hai?
Loved that you react on Shri Abhijit Chavda and Ranveer Allahbadiya’s podcast please react on english one also
amazing review
Janm hua in a sense Ajj ka Republic of India, uske pehle India had different kingdoms ruling different parts of it
British ka agents Khali Gandhi hi nahi nheru bhi tha
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Ma'am please react on OM trailer 🥰
pnmm guy told that u guys are narrow minded and have very little sense in his last video
Konsi wali ?? Tittle batao
@@mac_eagle centralised ac train station wale ke end ke discussion mein
@@aspirant_pro_maxx haha bas kabhi kabar dekh leta hun ki udhar kya chal rha h
Unn gadho ko dheakna band karo
Instrument of Accession was signed on 27 October while Pakistani raiders entered Kashmir on 22 October. So Pakistan didnt start a war after Hari Singh Signed Accession. It was that Hari Singh was forced to sign accession with India as raiders were nearing close to capital Srinagar.
@Perfect reaction Abhijit Chavda said that after instrument of accession Pakistani raiders strted a war.
और अब UN मे आडे वही आ रहा है जिस को हमारे मूर्ख नेताओ की वजह से UN मे परमनंट सीट मिली. चायना…
JAI HIND JAI BHARAT 🕉️🇮🇳🙏🚩👌
VERY VERY NICE VIDEO 👍👍👍
Pata nhi hamne kya paap Kiya tha jo aise prime minister hamare upar thop diya gaya 😠😠
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Gandhi's ne iss desh ki durdasha kar di.
Agar sahi decision liye hote to aaj usa ke baad India world ki 2nd super power hoti.
And logo ne nahi Mahatma Gandhi ne chuna tha.
Gandhi ne bnaya tha nehru ko.
First people choice subash bose they..
Aur nuclear test bhi atal bihari ji ke time hua. Unko bhi pta tha. Jiske पास power hai uske hath main duniya hai
His podcast with Maj. GD Bakshi was pure classic
🇮🇳
Nehru great leader make university ,school but Bjp modi not make any college ,university ,not job ,discrimination lower cast by pandit thakur bjp corruption government
👌🙏❤🇮🇳
Nehru stopped army because he was friend of shekh Abdullah and shekh Abdullah said to stop army because POK people didn't like shekh Abdullah
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
3:26 we are human first !! you gotta change ur way of looking around things.
Wo Indian ki soch hai pakistan ki soch to gazwa e hind waali hai
Mam ka reaction 🤣
mere hisab se desh ke khade hone ke liye koi excuse nahi hona chahiye.every citizen should follow nation first theory.we should not divided in the name of hindu muslim or any other ideology other wise we could be ruled by other any time."Indians Jago "
Nehru Gandhi ki murti nikalo. They were not freedom fighters they were problems. They don't deserve respect
Sale to feku hai freedom fighter sala feku China galman brige bana raha sala feku ko ek sabad nahi nekel raha
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Next part juldi laon
Aage videov me aapke pyare usa ki pol khuli he isliye agla part nahi aa raha kya???
Are Nehru ko pm banaane ke liye Gandhi ne सरदार वल्लभ भाई पटेल को बोले थे आप अपना नाम वापस लेलो।।वरना नेहरू को कोन पीएम बना रहा था।। धुआ बाज
🧡🧡🙏
Nehru didn't love india.
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Jo insan apne community ka nahi huwa it means ki nehru jee hum Kashmiri Pandits k nahi huwe khud Kashmiri pandit ho k toh woh insan country ka kya hota jis insan nay apne community ko khatam karne k liye saam daam daand baidh sab kuch apnaya woh insan country ka bala karta
Great video 👍
Neheru was a great failure 👎
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Part 2??
Nehru is not chosen for the country
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Ranveer jaise log hi India k liye sabse badi problem hai bina kisi ko offend kiya kabhi sach nhi bola ja sakta agar ap hard truth bolenge saamne wala offend hoga hi
Bhai ye banda geopolitics ka gyaani hai ki spokesperson hai bjp ka
Every country needs enemy to sustain...
@BUSINESSMAN yes right wing feeded by right wing...
React to second part
Mam react on what Pakistan think about Osama bin Laden.
Literally you will shock.
D unsc issue is not so clear.... Dere was 1 extension dat was approved, nd india china were d contenders... China's name came 1st..india signed a friendship treaty with china, acc to which india nd china ld support nd ll not go against each oder in international forum like UN.. China's name comes 1st,india supported dat.. Dats all... 2nd extension never happened.. It is wrong india gave its own seat to china... Dat is a misrepresenatation.. I dont like nehru, but my dislike to nehru cant change d fact seat 1st was offered to china.. Nd after 1st extensiom, d proposal for 2nd extension never came
Also it was merely a bait offer by the US to get India away from USSR camp
Sir mam please do reaction on Sham Sharma show new episode ' is film ka kya hoga' please please please
❤❤❤🙏🙏
Please for the 1000th time, react to World War 2 by oversimplified
8th
🙏
Nehru is worst Prime Minister of India
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers
Abhi ye pichle videos me usa ko bura bhala keh raha tha aur ab india ko
This person does not apply his brain while giving the details of history. I request all the viewers to read on its own and decide rationally.
Exactly. I also searched on the internet why nehru rejected these offers. Turns out they were all baits to create divide between india and ussr. If usa brings one country in unsc, ussr would veto it. And if ussr brings, usa would veto it.
Mam india ma danga ho raha ha Kiya jago ma india jal raha ha please react
Nehru the great and modi the toilet🚽 cleaner guru love from India🇮🇳
Nehru ko kya khena chahiye.....,
he is wrong in some places...
Is jasay darpok Indian ki india may koi jarurat nahi ha isko Pakistan may hi apna channel chalana caahiay
Please react on the face to face rizwan ahmed latest video
Nehru my ....
At that time situation may be different
So we can't only blame Nehru
Haa but Nehru se galti hui thi but hame situation ko bhi samajhna parega
There were two vague offers - one by the US in 1950 and one by the Soviet Union in 1955. The US “offer” came around the time when Mao took China as a communist republic. The Soviet Union “offer” came around the time of Nehru’s landmark visit to USSR that built the Indo-USSR friendship.
Both the cases were about India getting the UNSC seat in place of China whose seat was given to a renegade ROC government. In both cases, the superpowers feared China for their own reasons.
Both the vague offers were fairly kneejerk affairs. The first by fear and second from euphoria. They were never followed through.
Nehru still wanted the UNSC seat, just not at the cost of China’s seat.
Since the US and USSR didn’t simultaneously offer anything, India had no chance of getting through. Had India shook US hands in 1950, the Soviets would have vetoed and had India shook USSR hands in 1955, US would have vetoed. The bigger powers were interested in their own games and would not have let India into the club without being sure that it will side them in conflict. There was no way India could have sided both US and USSR.
While there was near zero chance for getting through even if Nehru had said yes to the initial proposal, there were plenty of risks:
Offend China and bring the eventual 1962 war a lot sooner.
Destroy India’s reputation as a nation with a principled foreign policy.
Lose independence in foreign policy and become a pawn of one of the superpowers