@@holtlewis2617Just take shots of great skies when you're out or even at home. That way you can have a folder of different sky images (cloudy, sunrise, sunset etc) to select from.
I understand . Do you think using an ND filter and having water look like fog is real? Or Bokeh is real? or using a red filter to have a black sky or Infrared photography. All of these are tools either hardware or software to express yourself - that is my opinion. I love taking photos with film and doing no correction or almost nothing, but I also love changing the sky on a photo, different expressions, what do you think guys?
I find Luminar works well for many of my images, but you do need to play with the sliders and occasionally need to adjust the mask, either to lessen the effect on the non sky portions or occasionally to leave part of the original sky intact and blend with the "new" sky. Definitely use PS when I need the sky reflected in the water, though I usually use a different technique of flipping vertical the entire image and PS treats the water like its the sky. In either case, its so much easier than it was a few years ago.
Amazing Serge! I always love your videos and keep up with it❤️ I have been watching all your videos since I started as a photographer in 2019
What a great way to start off the new year! Thank you!
Happy new year and many thanks
Thank you for this present! You're my teacher, merci!
I'm sorry to mention this, but photographers should really use their own sky photos.
Why?
Not your own work for one. The RPS will not accept any image that is not your own work as well.
@@holtlewis2617Just take shots of great skies when you're out or even at home. That way you can have a folder of different sky images (cloudy, sunrise, sunset etc) to select from.
Creating fake content is ashamed
I understand . Do you think using an ND filter and having water look like fog is real? Or Bokeh is real? or using a red filter to have a black sky or Infrared photography. All of these are tools either hardware or software to express yourself - that is my opinion. I love taking photos with film and doing no correction or almost nothing, but I also love changing the sky on a photo, different expressions, what do you think guys?
thankyou
Im must say the Luminar replacements are really not usable to me. So many artifacts ... Photoshop is just superior.
I find Luminar works well for many of my images, but you do need to play with the sliders and occasionally need to adjust the mask, either to lessen the effect on the non sky portions or occasionally to leave part of the original sky intact and blend with the "new" sky. Definitely use PS when I need the sky reflected in the water, though I usually use a different technique of flipping vertical the entire image and PS treats the water like its the sky. In either case, its so much easier than it was a few years ago.