Genius! SpaceX new fuel changes everything!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @stephenkingsley5815
    @stephenkingsley5815 9 місяців тому +12

    By the time I got to this video, it had been released for 10 hours. Meaning it was produced within the last week. Whaat new fuel are you talking about? SpaceX has been using methane for years! Click bait!

    • @northfloridarails2136
      @northfloridarails2136 9 місяців тому

      Only starship uses methalox. Falcon 9 and falcon heavy used rp1 and lox.

    • @ChrisGWarp
      @ChrisGWarp 9 місяців тому +2

      @@northfloridarails2136 Um no, China’s Landspace (IIRC) were first to reach Orbit with Methalox. So no, SpaceX are not the only ones using it.

    • @stephenkingsley5815
      @stephenkingsley5815 9 місяців тому

      @@northfloridarails2136 And the first prototypes of Starship flew. When?

  • @bearlemley
    @bearlemley 9 місяців тому +2

    3:06
    (RP1) “degrades the reusability of the rocket”
    LOL tell that to booster 1058

  • @gregl4791
    @gregl4791 9 місяців тому +5

    I clicked the link to see what *new* fuel SpaceX has, only to learn it’s a 12-year-old fuel: methane. *Duh!*

  • @Hogger280
    @Hogger280 9 місяців тому +3

    Fossil fuel is a misnomer - they are not made from dinosaurs and plants; rather are made "Abiogenically" in the Earth where temperatures and pressures are right and is an ongoing process.

    • @disorganizedorg
      @disorganizedorg 9 місяців тому

      That must explain the imprints of ferns and the like that are not infrequently found in coal.

    • @Hogger280
      @Hogger280 9 місяців тому

      @@disorganizedorg Your logic is faulty. Fossil imprints are found in many geologic formations not associated with oil or coal, so finding them in coal and concluding that they created the coal is a Post Hoc Fallacy.

    • @disorganizedorg
      @disorganizedorg 9 місяців тому

      @@Hogger280 I wasn't asserting that fossils (or the life that in some cases became fossils) "created" coal; I was asserting that they were the source of the carbon that other processes converted into coal. What non-biological process are you saying concentrated the carbon? Is the below paper incorrect, and if so can you direct me to something that debunks it?
      www.geochemsoc.org/files/6214/1261/1770/SP-2_271-284_Sato.pdf

  • @metriczeppelin
    @metriczeppelin 9 місяців тому +8

    CLICKBAIT, again!! SpaceX is using NO new fuel. You're getting right up there with Great SpaceX, another CLICKBAIT channel. Shame on you!

  • @XCX237
    @XCX237 9 місяців тому +1

    Great video. Go SpaceX Go 💪💪💪

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      Thank you 🙌

    • @XCX237
      @XCX237 9 місяців тому

      @@techmap9 I forgot to say thank you for improving your voice. You were starting to sound like a Mexican in a box.

  • @StEvEn-dp1ri
    @StEvEn-dp1ri 9 місяців тому +6

    So, ULA kicked the Russian rocket engine RD-180 to the curb? That's your take? I'm pretty sure when Russia invaded Ukraine the U.S. government sanctioned Russia making it impossible for ULA to continue using the RD-180 engine. It forced ULA to find new engines. Otherwise, ULA would have been quite content to continue with the status quo. ULA didn't have a choice, they could no longer fly the Russian engines and since they are old technology, a one-and-done use, they couldn't reuse engines they already may have had. Considering ULA is a company made up of aerospace giants Lockheed and Boeing, they should be ashamed of themselves anyway for not innovating and making their own engines. That's just my humble opinion though, it doesn't mean much.

    • @rodrigochaves8614
      @rodrigochaves8614 9 місяців тому

      You hit the sweet place.

    • @highpointsights
      @highpointsights 9 місяців тому

      I haven't heard anyone comment recently on the presence of the RD-180 (I think that's the one). The Russians built a motor with a system American engineers said couldn't be built. Well they built it and worked really well. Then the USSR told them to destroy the motors! The head of the project said no. Told them to hide the motors which they did! How do you think we have been getting those motors all these years! I may have some details shuffled. You are welcome correct my errors!!!

  • @MUCKFOOT399
    @MUCKFOOT399 9 місяців тому +1

    all the smoke is actually a smoke screen to hide the aliens.

  • @highpointsights
    @highpointsights 9 місяців тому +2

    Elon has been talking about it for years. I believe he was the one who cued up the onset of cryogenic fueling!! Simply because you can get more fuel in your BFR!!!

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      Thanks for your cmt

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      Yes

    • @Hogger280
      @Hogger280 9 місяців тому +3

      Cryogenic fueling was pretty much perfected in the Apollo rocket using LOX in all three stages and LH2 in the second and third stages.

    • @highpointsights
      @highpointsights 9 місяців тому +2

      @@Hogger280 THANKS. I really try to keep my facts straight but sometimes I miss. I got up at the age of 13 to watch Alan Shepard launch the first time

    • @Hogger280
      @Hogger280 9 місяців тому +2

      @@highpointsights Yeah, I worshiped the Gemini and Apollo programs.

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 9 місяців тому +1

    🛸

  • @kevinbissett293
    @kevinbissett293 9 місяців тому

    Thank You the science, chemistry lesson. I ace it in college but it had been so long since I used it in this much detail. I had to listen to this twice just make sure I got it all. I understood it all. Great job on explaining it. I love the detail you go through to provide this kind content. Thank You very much. Pretty exciting episode for me. I really appreciate the time you take to convert metric to imperial. Please keep putting out this kind information. It's great. It's like I'm back in school. Thanks again.

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 9 місяців тому

    Excellent stuff bro, keep up the excellent work

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      Thanks, will do!

  • @scottymoondogjakubin4766
    @scottymoondogjakubin4766 9 місяців тому

    Methalox is the way to go ! Even tho CH4 is a greenhouse gas after its oxidized and burned it changes to C02 and H2o !

  • @mikerash-pc4jc
    @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

    If Elon has mounted 3.0 raptors to the booster and star ship. This going to be a truly rememberable disassembly!

  • @aracoixo3288
    @aracoixo3288 9 місяців тому +1

    🌕🌌🌞

  • @ljotacon
    @ljotacon 9 місяців тому +4

    you have so many facts wrong

  • @disorganizedorg
    @disorganizedorg 9 місяців тому

    The RD-180 burning kerosene has little to do with methane being a late comer to the party.

  • @spaceweasel
    @spaceweasel 9 місяців тому +1

    Powered by Swamp Gas.

  • @HankKroll
    @HankKroll 9 місяців тому

    COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES
    Earth is very unique indeed. Our solar system was born in Orion. After we left Orion Earth froze up for a billion or so years because space is cold and the sun didn’t burn as hot back then. At that time early Earth had a 1000 PSI carbon dioxide atmosphere much like Venus has today. With such a thick 3000-mile deep atmosphere you wouldn’t see the sun. Our solar system drifted out of Orion at 7 kilometers per second and eventually was captured by Sirius A and B about 850-million years ago. Sirius B is the size of Earth but has 1.5 solar masses. It was the light from those objects that created all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the Sun. The sun could not get through a 3000-mile-deep atmosphere. It’s all underground now in the form of coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick.
    Sirius B is the size of Earth but it puts out more than 100 times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum. Sirius B is in a fifty-year elliptical orbit around the two-solar-mass Sirius A of 8 to 12 astronomical units. At 8 AU it could feed off Sirius A and put out more than 1000 times the light of our sun. One teaspoonful of Sirius B would weigh more than a city bus on Earth.
    When your home planet is in the Sirius system you need ORME gold, the white powder gold mentioned in Exodus to spray in your atmosphere to shield it from the harsh UV light of Sirius B. The Nephilim came to Earth 400,000 years ago to mine gold. They tried to get it out of seawater but that wasn’t enough for their needs so they moved to South Africa. They imported a race of smaller workers called Igigi from another planet to dig underground because the Nephilim are tall standing up to twenty feet making it impractical to go underground.
    Enlil was a hard taskmaster who worked many of the Igigi to death. His brother Enki was more kind and gentle causing friction between himself and his brother. After starving 15,000 Igigi to death they rebelled and sought refuge away from the mines.
    They needed workers to continue mining gold so they did a lot of genetic experimenting using some of their own DNA eventually creating a subservient creature they called Adam. They needed a genetically compatible mate so they took part of Adam’s rib to clone Eve. Problems developed when humans became aware that the large beings they were working for were not gods after all by slave masters.
    Additionally the newly created humans were capable of mating with the indigenous Neanderthals and other races. Other problems arose when the Nephilim looked upon the fair human females and decided to mate with them creating races of giants the heroes of old, the men of renown.
    Enki decided to bring the Moon into orbit to thaw the ice caps 2,500-miles back by tilting Earth 23.5 degrees in relation to the Sun’s rays. The moon has an ocean inside so to move it one simply starte the huge pumps moving the center of mass in the direction they wanted to go. Enlil realized that the resulting impact would cause world-wide floods and he only wanted to save most of the flora and fauna. Enlil was forbidden to tell his son, Noah about the impending flood. Instead he drew plans for an Ark and a letter to Noah explaining the situation. The rest is history.
    Once the Nephilim had enough gold they burned it into the white powder to take if off planet. It weighs less than nothing in that state, especially when heated.
    Our Sun was leaving the vicinity of the Sirius at that time so it was time for the ORME gold to be shipped. They kept the knowledge of the philosopher stone from the humans to limit their age to 120 years so they wouldn’t overpopulate the planet.
    It was little Sirius B that created most all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the sun. When you are driving your car down the road or heating your house with electricity generated by a coal generating plant you are recycling stellar energy that did not come from the Sun!
    Humanity has been worshiping the wrong sun god for the last 4000 years. The ancient Egyptians knew we were in orbit around Sirius and based their New Year when Sirius becomes visible on the horizon. Book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES www.GuardDogBooks.com

  • @Lucky4wd4840
    @Lucky4wd4840 9 місяців тому +1

    Men in Black don't want us to use the fuel in our homes but it's OK to burn it in your rockets! What wrong with this?

  • @dumitrulangham1721
    @dumitrulangham1721 9 місяців тому

    😮😮😮

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому

      🥰🥰🥰

  • @funlovingJohn
    @funlovingJohn 9 місяців тому +2

    Nothing new here, just rehashing old news.

  • @Booster-13I
    @Booster-13I 9 місяців тому +1

    This is wrong. Spacex won’t use new fuel to the people watching

  • @mikerash-pc4jc
    @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

    The starship will make my point. Not my opinion. You are welcome to dump on me if starship ever reaches orbit and land both the booster or starship.

  • @fouraces9137
    @fouraces9137 9 місяців тому +3

    Do you always hash over the obvious, the established norm. Like this is new, why when I selected the today filter you're pumping out this crap. Gotta push something out don't we, doesn't matter what the quality of the content is just that you have content to garner ad renvenue. Welcome to the blocked channels list.

  • @3DThrills
    @3DThrills 9 місяців тому

    New Glenn uses Hydrogen and Oxygen and brags about no emissions.

  • @BoneTime
    @BoneTime 9 місяців тому +1

    Nothing burger

  • @michaeldiroma2861
    @michaeldiroma2861 9 місяців тому

    Not so ignoramus, methane is the oceans of Titan a moon of Saturn…

    • @disorganizedorg
      @disorganizedorg 9 місяців тому

      Yes, and it can be manufactured in situ from materials present on Mars. No hydrocarbons there, and Hydrogen has a lot of negatives like low density requiring huge tanks, metal embrittlement, extremely low boiling point. Storable liquids like RFNA and Hydrazine require more infrastructure to manufacture and are a handling nightmare. Solids are impractical due to low Isp. There aren't many options beyond those.

  • @mikegardner107
    @mikegardner107 9 місяців тому

    It seems the text is written by AI and read by AI. The facts stated are repeated several times. The repetition makes the video unnecessarily long and makes it boring. It’s also click bait. If you are following Spacex and space flight in general you know that Methalox have been in use for many years. Pinpointing the date it first came into use would be interesting?

  • @JtM8292
    @JtM8292 9 місяців тому +2

    First 🤗

    • @techmap9
      @techmap9  9 місяців тому +1

      👯👯👯

  • @mikerash-pc4jc
    @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

    Maybe most who post do not care that that starship is to heavy 1, too many engines on a single frame. The hot booster ring needs to be taller and a full cone in the center. That is what damaged starship. But if they are truly using the 3.0 raptor. Well it will explode sooner. Getting off the ground is no accomplishment. A 2 1/2 minute burn from booster is no accomplishment. So when you root for a failure is makes you a moron. Would you scrap your butt to starship and go for a ride.
    To learn from failure your must exceed from the launch before. They must reach 36,000 kilometers in order to do lunar injection or mars injection. The launch team remove the safety shut down sensors in order to burn all the engines. This is unsafe and solves nothing. But to make Elon understand the faa and nasa need to give SpaceX an open ended license to launch as many rockets as often as they can. Then they will come around. Last they need to change material from stainless to titanium. The would reduce weigh by 78%. Also the rocket would be stronger. With all the fuel on board booster could take starship to high orbit without starships engines. With titanium. This would remain reusable. Laugh now! In the end you will find me correct.

    • @beyondu9048
      @beyondu9048 9 місяців тому +1

      You can’t even type correctly. You must be more brilliant than the best of the best who work at Space X…. Why don’t you work there?

    • @mikerash-pc4jc
      @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

      @@beyondu9048
      Oh wait? Are you the guy that say an explosion is a success?

    • @mikerash-pc4jc
      @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

      You can’t read correctly? And your an Einstein? lol
      We starship blows up please continue to eat the covers off your books rather than maybe read them!

  • @averiWonBTW
    @averiWonBTW 9 місяців тому

    Goofy ahhh ai generated video

  • @mikerash-pc4jc
    @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

    To my doubters. My proof will come on launch. When booster explodes, I was right, when starship explodes, I once again will be proved right on the hot launch ring.
    So please rain on me. I hope they launch asap. Aka another Roman candle.🧨

    • @endlessstrata6988
      @endlessstrata6988 9 місяців тому

      Win win tbh. If the launch succeeds we get closer to cheap high orbital insertions, if it fails it's free fireworks.

    • @JunkztrGaming
      @JunkztrGaming 9 місяців тому

      Its a win win no matter which way you look at it, sorry.

    • @mikerash-pc4jc
      @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

      @@JunkztrGaming
      Nice wish! I deal in reality. I worked in the industry doing prototype. Every time a part of a system came back. With now criteria and dimensions. I know the previou test failed. As to starship . The wrong materials and two many engines on one frame will fail. The hot stage ring will fail until they build one taller and a full cone to deflect starship engine exhaust away from the engines. If SpaceX is unwilling to build a bigger engine. Then they must take the engine work they need put 9 engines on two boosters then the out 15 engines on booster. Current design will hever fly ever. On the booster they can put 6 gimble engines with 9 outer engines. This combination would take it to orbit.
      If then truly mounted rapper 3.0 engine on ship 3 it will be spectacular light show. Go SpaceX. Apply for an open ended license under practice. Then blow up as many rocket as you can afford. But soon or later SpaceX and Elon will come around.

    • @endlessstrata6988
      @endlessstrata6988 9 місяців тому +1

      @@mikerash-pc4jc Somehow I get the feeling that the people actually launching the rockets will know a bit more than some random person on the internet. But what do I know? Probably as much as you do.

    • @JunkztrGaming
      @JunkztrGaming 9 місяців тому +2

      I'm in the Airforce for Aerospace Propulsion and in Aerospace Engineering as a civilian. You talk a lot and hold zero value with anything you say as its just speculation with zero math done behind it.
      " I worked in the industry doing prototype"
      Compare the last 10 years of work with SpaceX and their Falcon and (HEAVY) rockets?
      You really have no ground to say as much as you have... WE ALL KNEW IT WAS GOING TO FAIL A HANDFUL OF TIMES... so you were never right against all of us Starship fans. You were actually making yourself look like some type of know it all which in return just makes you look very very... childish. Oh and by the way they will NEVER use titanium because 304L Stainless Steel is beyond capable of providing EVERYTHING they need to launch and travel in space, re enter the atmosphere and land.
      You said for them to use Titanium in another comment... another reason I dont think you worked in prototyping or at least it wasn't at a company as you have over looked the MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF PROTOTYPING ANYTHING!!! That is cost efficiency... again something you are taught to keep in mind when developing something. Titanium is 25-50x more expensive (DEPENDS ON GRADE OF TITANIUM) than the steel they use... so seriously just stop.
      If you did work in prototyping anything you would know that fails are absolutely a win as long as you get a step further and learn from it. So please.... save your non sense for other people as you wont be able to push your speculations onto me. Have a good day..@@mikerash-pc4jc

  • @mikerash-pc4jc
    @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому +2

    Musk is wrong, not listening to his engineers. 33 engines will fail ever time. If the have installed raptor engine 3.0. Well is will explode sooner rather than later.
    I would like SpaceX to advance as the best on earth. But Elon is still to hard headed.
    Answer is bigger engines and less of them to complete the mission.
    I am wrapping in dismay. How many more failures will be sold as progress. They are not. But I still hope for advancement and completion of the starship.

    • @shawngadwa269
      @shawngadwa269 9 місяців тому

      Everyday Astronaut has a video about this, comparing starship to the n1 moon rocket and addressing the issue of if more engines are bad. In short, no.

    • @k.sullivan6303
      @k.sullivan6303 9 місяців тому

      EDA is in Musk's back pocket now. He wouldn't dare criticize Musk's baby these days. EDA's channel gets a lot of attention due to Musk.@@shawngadwa269

    • @metriczeppelin
      @metriczeppelin 9 місяців тому +3

      Hey Mikey, what kind of drugs are you on anyway? The last test had all 33 raptors firing perfectly. Raptor 3.0 is on it's way to use on the next iteration of Starship. You made no mention of why Elon is hardheaded and what he is not listening to from his engineers. SpaceX is already the best rocket company on Earth.

    • @shawngadwa269
      @shawngadwa269 9 місяців тому

      @metriczeppelin I mostly agree with you, however he was referring to how many engines can be detrimental to the rocket because if one engine fails it could take out neighboring engines and/or cause catastrophic leaks. Both are issues spacex has been addressing by strategic use of valves, engine shielding, and making more robust engines that don't fail.

    • @mikerash-pc4jc
      @mikerash-pc4jc 9 місяців тому

      @@metriczeppelin
      Yes they all fired at 1/3 throttle. Were the appt full power, they will never see 9 minutes burn. So what do you think zippy?