Sound logic. You are right. Pretty much everything we deal with is as you say conceptual. You made me think of the way that people can get natual immunity to TB by coming into contact with a carrier / sufferer. Having seen someone die horribly from TB, protection from that is perhaps worth having, which I think is given very soon after birth and possibly mandatory in the UK. Like you, I might agree to some shots if research reveals only positive benefits.
I am subbed to your channel & I have watched many of your videos over the years. Have never heard you address vaccines though, do you have any videos on the topic? I watch a guy called John St. Julien who runs an orphanage in Tanzania & he has some very down-to-Earth yet out-of-the-box thinking on vaccines, especially relevant in his line of work & part of the world. I think you're right, sometimes the risk of contracting the disease may outweigh the risk of taking the vaccine. Each will be considered on it's own merits.
@@myfrequencies1912 Thanks for your reply. I've not really gone into vaccines in my vids. I have five kids (born in Thailand) and they have had only the necessary / mandated vaccines, which are not that many and spread out over time. There is not the same pressure over there, and they will inform which ones are voluntary. I've had a rabies shot myself after getting bitten by a dog. Over there it's considered essential to get a shot immediately as the only way to find out if the dog has rabies is to cut off its head, apparently, by which time, if you've been infected, you're screwed. Mind you, I didn't do the full trial, which is several shots over a month or so. I just had the first shot or two. But I'd say having had a disease injected by a dog's fangs is worth protecting against. So yeah, I'd say it is certainly a personal choice, and one not to be taken lightly. Our bodies are amazingly adaptable and you look pretty fit and healthy from playing around in the dirt, which is like you say probably the best way to build up immunity.
@John Thor Totally agree mate. A healthy immune system is the priority and nature usually provides everything we need for that without the need for quackery and phuckery from Big pharma and their "models". :)
Check out Louis Pasteur germ theory v beauchamps terrain theory. we as you say are a biome, bacteria, viral, mitochondria and human all in one.... I am on your side in this and know you will pull this apart logically ... keep well. salut mon ami.
Ah this is where another commenter, my friend Brandon got this term "Terrain Theory". I have heard that the story of Pasteur & Beauchamps is ground zero in this story. Something I noticed when I came to France is that every sizeable town has a "Rue Pasteur". There's no way someone became that highly thought of just because he figured out how to extend the shelf life of milk! lol
@@myfrequencies1912 Haha.. good spot re: the rue signs, made me laugh. Please check out Dr Andy Kauffmans presentations, maybe on bitchute as you tube have deleted some of his work, a profoundly truthful medical guy and upsetting the mainstream doctors with the need for 'debate' on viruses, bacteria and vaccines and the bodies self cleansing cycles being exosomes excreted from cells being wrongly diagnosed as disease. ...
@@frizzlefry5904 So I need to learn what an "exosome" is then I guess.... It sounds like a generalised term for physical matter made/stored in cells which is being sent out to other parts of the body, or for excretion. & then I guess they have an effect on the general health of the body if there are too many of them at once so as to cause noticeable symptoms, & those symptoms then can be interpreted one of two ways. Why don't they just write that on Wikipedia instead of all this mumbo jumbo that I have to decipher, eh? I've heard of Kaufman (he's everywhere since Covid) so I will seek out an interview. Thank you.
The model the experts use to interpret reality is based on flawed understanding. (Look up the Pasteur/Bechamp story). If the model is broken, all extrapolations from that model will be similarly broken. There are already multitudes of new-wave experts moving medical understanding into previously unimaginable territory, with "miraculous" results, (Dr Joe Dispenza, Dr Bruce Lipton) but the establishment has centuries of momentum (not to mention trillions of £/$/€'s worth of momentum) & so it cannot simply be changed with evidence which challenges the model. That's why it seems like a conspiracy, (in large part, because it is thanks to Big Pharma companies funding universities & influencing the curriculum which shapes the medical paradigm) & that's also why it's so easy to expose the truth. - Most vaccines are junk "medicine" which does little to help the body & may well actually be damaging it.
@@chad_hominem I guess it's difficult (impossible) to change direction with so much momentum. What bugs me is that this kind of realisation ALWAYS implies that there are going to be a few people at the top who KNOW damn well what's going on, & they're letting it happen. That idea alone is enough to turn off what, 90% of people who come across the type of information you guys are showing me links to? So both the experts & the laypersons out here in internet land, are deliberately turning away from controversial information for fear of getting into "a conspiracy theory". It's wilful ignorance. Like my man Hank Green from SciShow said: "There isn't a debate!"
There is no debunking the THUTH. Thank you!
Sound logic. You are right. Pretty much everything we deal with is as you say conceptual. You made me think of the way that people can get natual immunity to TB by coming into contact with a carrier / sufferer. Having seen someone die horribly from TB, protection from that is perhaps worth having, which I think is given very soon after birth and possibly mandatory in the UK. Like you, I might agree to some shots if research reveals only positive benefits.
I am subbed to your channel & I have watched many of your videos over the years. Have never heard you address vaccines though, do you have any videos on the topic?
I watch a guy called John St. Julien who runs an orphanage in Tanzania & he has some very down-to-Earth yet out-of-the-box thinking on vaccines, especially relevant in his line of work & part of the world.
I think you're right, sometimes the risk of contracting the disease may outweigh the risk of taking the vaccine. Each will be considered on it's own merits.
@@myfrequencies1912 Thanks for your reply. I've not really gone into vaccines in my vids. I have five kids (born in Thailand) and they have had only the necessary / mandated vaccines, which are not that many and spread out over time. There is not the same pressure over there, and they will inform which ones are voluntary.
I've had a rabies shot myself after getting bitten by a dog. Over there it's considered essential to get a shot immediately as the only way to find out if the dog has rabies is to cut off its head, apparently, by which time, if you've been infected, you're screwed. Mind you, I didn't do the full trial, which is several shots over a month or so. I just had the first shot or two.
But I'd say having had a disease injected by a dog's fangs is worth protecting against.
So yeah, I'd say it is certainly a personal choice, and one not to be taken lightly. Our bodies are amazingly adaptable and you look pretty fit and healthy from playing around in the dirt, which is like you say probably the best way to build up immunity.
@@myfrequencies1912 Will check ot John St. Julien. Thanks for that
@John Thor Totally agree mate. A healthy immune system is the priority and nature usually provides everything we need for that without the need for quackery and phuckery from Big pharma and their "models". :)
Delighted to see so many wise replies, i shoudnt have expected any less on your channel brother, be well
I appreciate that. Yes, a good bunch of guys keep turning up to comment.
Stephen Hawking said "question everything"
Check out Louis Pasteur germ theory v beauchamps terrain theory. we as you say are a biome, bacteria, viral, mitochondria and human all in one.... I am on your side in this and know you will pull this apart logically ... keep well. salut mon ami.
Ah this is where another commenter, my friend Brandon got this term "Terrain Theory". I have heard that the story of Pasteur & Beauchamps is ground zero in this story.
Something I noticed when I came to France is that every sizeable town has a "Rue Pasteur".
There's no way someone became that highly thought of just because he figured out how to extend the shelf life of milk! lol
@@myfrequencies1912 Haha.. good spot re: the rue signs, made me laugh. Please check out Dr Andy Kauffmans presentations, maybe on bitchute as you tube have deleted some of his work, a profoundly truthful medical guy and upsetting the mainstream doctors with the need for 'debate' on viruses, bacteria and vaccines and the bodies self cleansing cycles being exosomes excreted from cells being wrongly diagnosed as disease. ...
@@frizzlefry5904 So I need to learn what an "exosome" is then I guess.... It sounds like a generalised term for physical matter made/stored in cells which is being sent out to other parts of the body, or for excretion.
& then I guess they have an effect on the general health of the body if there are too many of them at once so as to cause noticeable symptoms, & those symptoms then can be interpreted one of two ways.
Why don't they just write that on Wikipedia instead of all this mumbo jumbo that I have to decipher, eh?
I've heard of Kaufman (he's everywhere since Covid) so I will seek out an interview. Thank you.
@@myfrequencies1912 Recommended list :-) ua-cam.com/play/PLJDySKsv9uxjX_9BOsEZES4WFnW3pJhSH.html
purposeful and systemic social-emotional blackmail with any argument (shutting out dissent) is the first dead giveaway
Yes, that's the biggest red flag here.
Your sayin bout this does the goverment put stuff in these injectins that does something to the bodu
ua-cam.com/play/PLJDySKsv9uxjX_9BOsEZES4WFnW3pJhSH.html - start researching homie
The model the experts use to interpret reality is based on flawed understanding. (Look up the Pasteur/Bechamp story).
If the model is broken, all extrapolations from that model will be similarly broken.
There are already multitudes of new-wave experts moving medical understanding into previously unimaginable territory, with "miraculous" results, (Dr Joe Dispenza, Dr Bruce Lipton) but the establishment has centuries of momentum (not to mention trillions of £/$/€'s worth of momentum) & so it cannot simply be changed with evidence which challenges the model.
That's why it seems like a conspiracy, (in large part, because it is thanks to Big Pharma companies funding universities & influencing the curriculum which shapes the medical paradigm) & that's also why it's so easy to expose the truth. - Most vaccines are junk "medicine" which does little to help the body & may well actually be damaging it.
I would like to see if your theory can be debunked... Makes complete sense to me my friend
It can't be debunked cause the establishment is running on a century old scam.
ua-cam.com/play/PLJDySKsv9uxjX_9BOsEZES4WFnW3pJhSH.html
@@chad_hominem I guess it's difficult (impossible) to change direction with so much momentum.
What bugs me is that this kind of realisation ALWAYS implies that there are going to be a few people at the top who KNOW damn well what's going on, & they're letting it happen.
That idea alone is enough to turn off what, 90% of people who come across the type of information you guys are showing me links to?
So both the experts & the laypersons out here in internet land, are deliberately turning away from controversial information for fear of getting into "a conspiracy theory".
It's wilful ignorance.
Like my man Hank Green from SciShow said: "There isn't a debate!"