That "guy's" name is Dr. KV Murali from Tamil Nadu India. As a Tamilian, I salute him for speaking on behalf of all Indians except for the woke audience booing and supporting this female historian creature.
Sikhs have been defending mother india from foreign invasions for thousands of years... Unfortunately , the Sikhs living in foreign countries have been systematically brainwashed by the foreign enemy elements and started destroying india by making them poke their own eyes...... Hope you understand wht I'm trying to say. Please take care of your children before they get brainwashed and starts hating india and leaving it . ❤️🙏
@@imranhasan4109 he isnt saying about brtishersm the europeans killed native americans whole ethnicity vanished, and he said that woman is froma genocidal family
@@imranhasan4109lol did she answer his question with information and proof ? She played a victim card , first ask her to answer his question and then speak
That women card at 41:25, speaks a lot about her. She is a coward who hides behind the women card whenever she feels she can't win an argument with rationality, tells a lot about her and the people who were cheering her.
You are critiquing the professor's alleged use of the so called "woman card" against an Ad Hominem logical fallacy (i.e. when the character and legitimacy of a person is questioned or attacked *instead of* the argument that is put forth, for more info: m.ua-cam.com/video/F5CMW2XBH6I/v-deo.html) It is the case that there exists no other way to properly address an Ad Hominem than to inspect and expose why this fallacy may have been used. She has correctly employed this measure, by noting that the man, instead of engaging with the argument and the evidence to support the argument, has rather attacked her legitimacy. Attacks on legitimacy by appealing to character (even if it is without addressing gender) is historically established as a patriarchal measure that is employed by men against women. Men are less likely to use an ad Hominem against a man, especially a man that projects strong masculinity. Ad Hominems are largely employed against those seen as being of inferior standing, and gender does play a part in the choice to employ this logical fallacy. The professor is rightly not engaging with the fallacy itself but with its root that lies in patriarchy- patriarchy being the key feasible reason/excuse/basis for this man to use an ad hominem against this woman- gender is the only area where he can ostensibly claim society-endorced elitism and so justify this cheap tactic. She is astute in noticing and exposing this factor that lies behind his choice to indulge in discourse that is unbecoming. // Also, if you want another example of an Ad Hominem logical fallacy, just look at any of the replies to this comment. Notice that this comment isn't edited; Bhakt behavior is just that predictable.
It was really shocking to hear the boo's & some guy trying to pull the mic from him!!! shame on the crowd. She is just a self proclaimed scholar. She sounds annoying and irritating hardly a scholar. She has a hidden agenda, her husband and father are evangelists...what else do you expect from her. Cant believe so many people showed up stayed and cheered her. UNBELIEVABLE!!!
@Roger Fox really man if a person who has studied his/her life time for the past and history to unravel and u who I don't know writing these things while sitting on toilet u r sounding like paid propoganda and yup unbiased and securely intolerant and uneducated in these things
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 so u accuse others of paid prognanda when u yourself sound like one...u cannot learn one sided history and term the other side as bigots..tell your so called great historian if she has the audacity then also state the other side which she clearly hide to provoke a distraughted picture of history
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 lol propaganda is done by you and that so called historian who wants to create propaganda to white wash the images of Mughals . Her research is done on what grounds ???? Studying in western universities about indian history is completely ingnoring the facts
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
Point to be noted, 1. Self proclaimed Historian 2. Radical feminist who played the WOMEN card beautifully and played as a Victim 3. Glorified him to only create hate against BJP. Americans are loosing hold in Indian politics now. She is an American agent designed for this role. 4. HINDU publishers is a great supporter of left wing and DMK, so the alignment with this kind of people are natural
I'm a Hindu, I'm Hindutva, I am proud. I don't need someone to define me based on their own false beliefs. If someone dares to put my culture under threat or disrespect, I have the courage to fight back with twice power and authority.
False idea comes when there is no facts like purity impurity notion of Brahmins. Her answers are corroborated with evidences. Grow up hindutwa, year is 2022 AD and not BC
@@kimjongun7574 Give me evidence in the 21st century of that practise of brahmins and you generalising all. Its not unique coming from a North korean dictator follower. The jokes on you.
@@kimjongun7574 fanatic jihadis doesn't have facts terrorist aurangjeb killed sikh gurus killed millions, imposed taxes for practicing our own religion in our own land he is a foreign cult, his entire family was a big terrorist organization.
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 Haha really ? Dont know where you get your statistics but from all the religions you think in Hinduism the woman treated poorly ? Haha for real ? Go and look again
I am surprised no one asking did Aurangzeb killed Sikhs Gurus and their young children ? Does killing young children largely for religious reasons make him a "GREAT" king ? (The Sikh Gurus were not ruling class of Punjab, Mughals ruled till Kabul)
Yeah I too wondered when she didn't spoke how Aurangzeb imprisoned his own father. She literally played woman card and the saddest thing was that the man was stating the truth but everyone started whooooing him where as when she spoke everyone were giving her the round of applause like wut?
Pretty sure his religion is pretty clear about not killing children,women,elderly,or disabled. Even if he did that pretty sure he didn’t but hypothetically if he actually did that then it would no way been because of religious reasons.
@@Kthxrny the speech itself is organised by the foreign ab.rahamic elements. And the invitees are also curated According to them. That's why all were wooing
@@Awk_potats Aurangzeb definitely ki lled children, this has been proven, Mughals themselves have documented all this. So stop your lies, you are an anti Hindu. Your religion does tell you to ki ll non believers. Stop your taqqiya.
@@oreki8707 the same logic you used in generalising a person's beliefs from their name. Individual identity should not be quashed by Comminal identities. Seeing a person as part of a community first and an individual second is a sad way to look at them, and even worse a dangerous way.
Hatts off to my fellow Indian brother though he could have said exactly what he said without showing his anger with loud voice... and clear rhythmic claps to those Indians who wooooed and clapped against a fellow Indian... You see this has always been our problem. We leave loopholes for outsiders to squeeze themselves in and point fingers on our own people in our own land. We are more welcoming towards a foreigner when we disregard the existence of our own people living in the Northeast. The hatred among ourselves, the fights we fight inside, the lack of a strong bond and most importantly Indian fails miserably in understanding that we are brothers and sisters of one family and no matter what, we don't allow anyone to point a finger on our people. If there's a problem, we will solve that among us but we don't tolerate insults from an outsider.
How? Explain it logically. They applaused because she stood up against that disrespectful filth of a man who doesn't know how to talk to people. Nothing to do with colonial mindset.
Seems apart from hindus , all other communities are peaceful, generous, innovative , benevolent ... Propaganda at its best and newsmedia like Hindu gives perfect platform to these PR agents
They have always murdered in the name of castism and higher birth. The power hungry have hijacked the agenda and have been running for sometime now. The sheep are simply following.
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core. Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
@@btecndcomp well that's given cuz they are known for being warriors at every level of every good platform. Hence, it is included and I ain't discarding the analogy.
37:00 When she talks bad about our nation none stands to stop her but the brave guy. But when he dares to cross question her why do you stop him? He would have destroyed her if he is given few more time!
@@sarfaraz8751 //what is the point// there is no point unless someone like Truschke tries to spread lies and starts turning historical victims into historical villains. then it becomes important to establish the truth, even if it bitter to listen to.
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core. Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
I didn’t think he got the answer from her. Has she done the scientific survey or any logical question he asked. She replied simply that she is historian and she played women-card and lastly she can be wrong. 😂 Great to watch him ❤. This should be part of “DISTROYED IN SECONDS” series 😂😂😂😂
The reason she ignored him because of his disgusting behaviour, and started racist attack on her, she did not degrade hindus she was just giving her scholarly account of this Mugal King, so it will bring peace than divide.
Came here after the Reels. First of all, hats off to Dr. KV Murali for boldly stating the facts. 37:46. As a Tamilian, I am proud. And for the crowd, the event is organized by The Hindu. How else the mindset of folks attending it would be !!
She avoided any difficult questions skillfully. Disappointed to see them applauding to her cliche responses, but delighted by the probing questions which were answered only partially.
I don't have any grudge against this woman. But "THOOO" hai to all the audience clapping there and cheering this lady for her love to Mughals. Aaa thooo to all hindus who are cheering and clapping for this lady.
@@movie6888 my dear friend When that lady is doing non sense by saying that Aurunzeb was a great and caring done good thing 🤦♂ Then the man is doing the same thing. We know on whats agenda she is working and we also know aurunzeb created just a problems and conflicts nothing at all. And she is prasing him So what is this my dear tell me 🙂
38:56 He thinks he can win an argument by screaming! oh yes,🙄,asking genuine question(!) which is not even Related to the topic! And saying America killed 21 billion people!!!!! Hence there is not even 10 billion people on earth.🙄stupids
@Good man there are 3 volumes of the same book, it was translated to Farsi language because it did not get printed in Hindi or Urdu. And Wikipedia is known to peddle anti Hindu propaganda, despite 17000 page chargesheet filed it still says anti CAA protests were initiated by hindus. So, beware of what you read on wikipedia. And farishtah is not a unreliable source it is a contemporary primary source which quotes incidents, autrocities first hand ...!! Make conclusions after going through the text.
@@mahimnajoshi950 Yes, The protests were started mainly by hindus, in Assam. Assamese didn't wanna provide citizenship to any foreign nationalist irrespective of their religion. So you are wrong here. But looks like those protests doesn't suit your agenda of hatred so you want to only look at protests that were held in Shaheen Bagh. 😂😂 How do you live on these self built lies man?
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
I so want Dr. Vijay Prashad to have an interview with her :) For the people who don’t know, Vijay Prashad is an American-based Indian historian, author, journalist, political commentator, and Marxist intellectual.
Hats off to that man! And, I love how she dodged the question actually asked of "did she do the archaeological surveys before citing those figures?" She reads from books itself & to claims herself as a "trained historian". I mean, don't cite figures if you read from some deluded 'sources' and consider them 'authentic' just cause it fits your perspective! Just cause she reads Sanskrit and Persian doesn't make her remarks authentic. And, being a woman myself, I'm so disgusted she played the women-card. But, what more can we expect from her! She also goes on to say "She may not be right" but she talks as if it's all proven and tested, what a woman.
Exactly, she is trained to spread false narratives. A good historian is the one who does comprehensive unbiased research before coming to any conclusions.
Started watching at 35:00 Destroyed: 37:45 Fools clapping: 40:55 Women card: 41:09 and 41:27 Iske baad dekhna band kr diya. The Hindu has become hub of left liberals, and a platform to promote Hinduphobia. Ignore them😊
So...he talked simply about Native American genocide and her background and she completely ignored it, and turned it into a "woman talking" card that he never even mentioned because that was familiar territory for her and that's all she could handle?
The worst thing is at 41:30 when they all clap like that! Bharat ko China aur Pakistan se jyada khatra toh apne hi inn logo se hai Bahar k dushmano ko toh hum sambhal lenge, inko kaun sambhalega? STOP Gora Validation!
Viraj thakkar.. Whatever you said is absolutely correct man... The internal enemies are the worst.. Shame on the audience there except the one who asked that question
@Gulrez Rana if the person who write the book don't mention it on the talk . and if it is written on the book then it proves she is clearly biased in the video. and if she don't written about it on the book then she misses out a whole history in northern india which make her inadequate in topic or she write a biased book
@haider2 k9 afghans and iranian were dealt with the same way, were they enemies of islam ?, Its actually a different concept. Human mind tend to simply things such that it will become easier to understand. So simple the notion is easier it to agree on because we can't comprehend complexity of the situation as it will take real hard work and who wanna do that, just listen to someone who give simpler answer to every situation and fallow it blindly . That's how one become an ignorant being . While we are all ignorant but the extent differs drastically. And it was a muslim who put founding stone for establishment of Golden temple.
@Gulrez Rana Sikh wear a part of history specifically in north india from pakistan punjab to indian punjab, whole region as they were super power in the region from 1800 to 1857. Punjab is the only state which were under the British rule for 100 years where as rest of india were ruled for 200 years. It was the last state which britisher occupy and most wealthy of that time. eg kohinor diamond of queen vactoria was taken from punjab
One thing i hate about our indian culture is that we play blame game when there are comment as "we need to have indian professors lecturing Americans about American history in America" ok we already do that we say that they hace no right speaking about Indian history or culture while on the other hand we speak about their cultures too everyone have the right to speak about each other that how we learn and grow hate speech is one thing but the right to expression is another and i don't see anything hateful here. but all we do is play blame games instead of acknowledging our problems and finding solution.
I read this book in 2019, it was an eye opener... Now while Prof. Audrey is reciting it., I am still able to recall each and every word from her masterpiece... Great Book... Highly recommended 👍
Bro , I have read both Hindu and Muslim scriptures , Both the scriptures are against Idol worship❌ and call towards worshiping one True GOD. Example ~ekam evaditiyam (sanscrit) - God is only one without a second. (6- Section- 2- Verse- 1). Example.2 Yajur Veda - chapter- 32: - God Supreme or Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape. These verses match with the Quran.
I've been through quite a few comments and believe can make a calculated comment of my own. I believe this is the issue with the current Indian State i.e. we don't want to consider a VIEWPOINT. We've gotten so much intolerant that if anything goes beyond our beliefs we're agitated. The gentleman, who was not very gentle, for sure asked really good questions and to some extent the speaker answered them. Now to come to a conclusion as to whether she is a Islam or Mughal lover one needs to read the book and not come to a conclusion merely on the grounds of the presentation/speech. Simply because we saw the post on a pro right channel does not mean we have to come to watch the video with a presumption that there is something wrong or anti hindu. Listen to the whole presentation and the discussion through a neutral prism then you'll know whether it is a Propaganda or a view point proposed after research and analysis. Finally, as she said she does not need to be right, as a historian she's just trying to reveal a different point of view, which does not necessarily has to be completely wrong merely because it does not suit your ideology and above all she clearly says that she's looking forward to writers who'll come up with writings which very well can be challenging her views. But I am really happy that you people actually came and watched the whole video to make a reasoned viewpoint, because most of us are not even willing to do that and spew hate simply because you saw something on a 30 secs reel.
the point is, we indian should be proud of our country and ancestors that withstood stupidity and tarrny of the past rulers/ invaders, we are still here, we survived so that we learn from past and become the nation of wealth again because the very wealth that attracted invasions and loot in the first place.
@@HawkLad the Indus Valley civilization was the only civilization where weapons were not found. Prosper and live happily has always been the mantra of Indians and Hindus unlike the uncivilized barbaric and blood thirsty psychopaths that invaded us
@@ehahaproductions680 thats a major reason why organised and systematic hindhuphobia is being propagated by academia and pseudo leftists to downplay our culture and wipe our civilization out coz the truth about our past is too harsh for the new faith people to digest
@@HawkLad thats the main reason becz of wealth..bt unlike these invaders we didnt believe in conquering other people's land to live peacefully..bt some treachers betrayed us
Go ahead.. they will not shout at you. If you are good and can challenge them and win with proper reasoning and argument, they might make u a president of their history club. Many Indians are history professor there... Do that in India.
How can you possibly understand/study anyone or anything if you are searching for something in particular. Yin-Yang, but what if Yang is massively bigger compared to Yin?
She saying hindutva means hindu nation, without understanding what it actually means.but in their own country American they asks non Christians like Ramaswamy dozens of questions for being a Hindu can he run the usa as a president. This lecture is a little to do with history but more to politics. It's obvious she is funded for spreading propaganda
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core. Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
She is no Snape Snape while vindictive had extremely valid reasons She’s trying to be Bellatrix to Aurangazeb’s Voldemort Actually that’s unfair to Voldemort Aurangazeb is much worse than Voldemort and isn’t a tenth as talented
@@Phoenix-King-ozai Aurangzeb isn’t worse than Voldemort who’s the literal amalgamation of evil Just because a trained historian tells you the truth doesn’t mean you have to throw a tantrum about it
@@marybarton2011 lions learn from history and they have the audacity to adapt and tear you apart when time comes..it would be better for the sheep to run back and run fast
It depends what u consider as hinduphobic the truth or the political and physiologycal perspective what Indians where proposed by British for hating there own king then all is history
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 mugal were mass murderer ,rapists who plundered this land for wealth and for islamization same as isis and taliban totally unhuman and cruel ,barbarians cult.
@@Awk_potats ramayan and mahabharta is a proof of that people who are believing it from before the birth of islam are proof. then muhmmad can be myth? who rode a mule to heaven or teared moon into twoo halves.
Right , bruh if you go to mecca you get questions but when you go Dwarka you will get answers read the mahabharat , understand it and then speak. All archeological location in india prove that lord Krishna and lord ram existed
There is historical evidence of all three Abrahamic religions. Judaism, Christianity and Islam, have solid historical proof that are confirmed by different religous followers from back than. Not the same with Hinduism. It's an old mythological religion.
An interesting question would be: Did Aurangzeb's twin policy of supporting and destroying temples for power, also extend to Mosques? In other words did he destroy mosques in regions where muslims had rebelled? Did he destroy mosques in Bijapur when he won over Adilshahis or Golconda?
@Ruemann Its not so much the exact number of temples he destroyed. He destroy plenty. But my point was that if he did implement a stern policy of destruction for temples but not so for mosques, that itself is proof enough that he discriminated systematically against Hindus. And so far I have not seen any evidence that he destroyed mosques because they were threat to his power. I also think what Hindu right does is irrelevant to the discussion. What historical evidence exists is relevant.
@@ahm512 On what basis can you conclude that it was common amongst Hindu kings to destroy each other's temples to establish political power during or around Aurangzeb period? Do you have any evidence of that?
@@ahm512 Can you point out examples of Hindu kings destroying Hindu temples to establish their power, during or around Aurangzeb's time? I cant find any.
With all due respect, please cite instances of Hindu kings destroying temples to establish political power during Aurangzeb period. If you can't, then say so.
38:57 haha they ultimately snatched his mic without even letting him complete.. Freedom of speech🎉 Later on she plays a women card but never answers if she did a survey
@@terryknight6817 Facts and she! She just cherry picking and interpreting it in a way that suits her mentors.She doesn't deserve to be called a scholar.
@@terryknight6817 Facts! She is trying to whitewash a psychopath who decaptivated his own brother Dara and threw his head infront of his father Shajahan . This woman must be a psychopath, that is why she is trying to whitewash the likes of Aurangazeb!
Most of the muslims think like her. All the people who attended this talk are supporters of this women. It is very difficult for him. But he could have presented things without becoming emotional. It is difficult to control our emotions. Aurangazeb is a so evil. He killed his brother mercilessly. He was very voilent towards Brahmins. The kind of cruelty will disturb any civilised person. Becoming emotional will not help us in anyway. Becoming emotional does not stop these people. They will do mischief. What we can do is present the correct history to people.
As super sayian Goku i can confirm that she is highly accurate according to Marvel cinematic universe and dc comics. We were led to independence in 2000 BCE by Batman and our greatest freedom fighter was Iron Man😂😂😂😂😂
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
@@zain9109 you are very seriously misinformed. Hindustan held assets worth 45trillion us dollars economy until your forefathers came along and looted our beautiful country. Seems like your information is un scrutinized just as your religion for 1400 years. Please be factually fair at least. That's the least we can expect.
Her whole argument is based upon the fact that Hindu Nationalist vilify Aurangzeb. But she doesn't realise that propaganda has nothing to do with history. So when you study Aurangzeb you have to focus on what records say of him, what was his circumstances etc. Whether Hindu Nationalist hate him or not has nothing to do with historicity. Her arguments aren't reputed enough to make her a historian.
@@sanketjalkote2600 Maharaj got what he deserved, lol. Aurangzeb the great still scare you all even after many centuries. Even you forgot the British. Genital worshippers.
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
Everyone has inherent bias it’s just how hard you work to fight that bias that makes more credible and I think a historian knows how to fight that bias than a random UA-cam commenter
Lol, how was the "heated question" in anyway related to "people can't handle a woman talking". That's Audrey exploiting feminism and not responding in facts. He also didn't say that she is not a trained historian. He pointed the hypocrisy of her nation and the people she orignated from for which she had no response.
By her own admission as Mughal kings cannot be viewed though a European lens, similarly Indian history can not be viewed under an American lens- the Mughal rule by and large (other than for a brief period of Akbar's reign) has been antagonistic to indigenous Indian ethos and civilization). Therefore, Jadunath Sarkar is definitely a more authentic historian as he has based his research on primary evidences and using an indigenous lens.
I don't think that's a fair point. Being American doesn't mean a person's lens is American, just like being Indian doesn't mean ones lens is Indian. 1) Micheal Danino was born French, he has done wonderful work on the continuity of Indian culture from the indus sarswathi civilization to present. So refute her on facts, make counter arguments in research, just saying she won't understand something because she is American is disingenuous, and not an argument that would sit well in the Indian ethos, which has always strived for truth.
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only. Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
@@zain9109 Also Mughals never reached the South of India, There where Indian empires that were centralized and larger than the mughals before them, there where huge empires that could outshine the mughals and had international reach like the Cholas. PS Mughals missed a golden period to bring education to the masses, The printing press, global navigation, global trade all were available during the mughal period, which they did not capitalise on, that lapse leaves us in our current state. So their glorification is unfounded. They where an empire not dissimilair to many before them, running on their concerns. The long lasting value they left behind to the Indian citizen, apart from the tombs strewn across the landscape is debatable.
@@rohitdodu These days people bring out exaggerated versions that suits them esp rightwing. Any analysis should be fair. It's funny that all good things the mughals brought that can be seen by us and is benefitting us is ignored but instead politically motivated mostly hypothetical stories of atrocities are promoted and is actually believed by majority of people. I pity my country - if we dont realize/appreciate where we come from , we wont know where we are headed. Mughals never ruled south India at a stretch, hence no one speaks hindi/urdu in those areas (except Hyderabad/telangana state). That urdu culture never reached there. However people in south enjoy mughlai cuisines since they have fine tastebuds.
@@zain9109 true, but your comment about Hindu culture is wrong. India does have a glorious history and culture before the mughals, and mughal architecture and cuisine are a small part of the larger Indian story, an important but small part nonethless
This is the same Professor who constantly makes anti-Hindu remarks in her classes teaching god knows what. She has called Hinduism "inherently oppressive, racist, misogynistic and violent"
Maybe instead of using whataboutism fight the task at hand and if you don’t know what whataboutism is it’s the act of bringing something to the conversation that originally had no place there She has negative views on Hinduism about that matters
No atrocities was committed him. He just attacked evil and immorality. The greatest Indian ruler ever, Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir, the only who defeated the British. During his reign Mughal India was the world's largest economy, worth 25% of world GDP, and is signalled the proto-industrialization. But yet he did enjoy a luxurious life. What king he was. Amazing, greater than Saladin Ayyubi.
@@abdever2140 yes, he was so great ruler that he tortured his own father who loved him dearly , he mercilessly killed his elder brothers, he killed 4 kids who only refused to accept islam ,look how great he was! and now my advice for you is you better marry aurangzeb.
@@tusharranjan1054 reference about 4 kids sir. Wikipedia... I don't see aurangzeb as an ideal ruler. But the history is collection of events and the perspective of the people who witnessed and wrote those events. The forced neutralization of the religious atrocities committed by the previous kings is wrong and pseudo secularism. Read the authentic books and references and generate your own view.
@@tusharranjan1054 Yes Aurangazeb was really cruel and strict, but also you can't deny the fact that he was the only one who defeated the British at that time. And also you can't deny the fact that India at that time had World's Largest Economy as well, which you did not get from the British India nor the current India.
That "guy's" name is Dr. KV Murali from Tamil Nadu India. As a Tamilian, I salute him for speaking on behalf of all Indians except for the woke audience booing and supporting this female historian creature.
Yes sir. Infact he didn't even talk about the gender.
Definitely deep respect for him.
@@vikramsriram3950come on guys he asked the correct thing but it is out of topic at that time they are taking about mugal Empire right
We need to have Indian professors lecturing Americans about American history in America
Sikhs have been defending mother india from foreign invasions for thousands of years... Unfortunately , the Sikhs living in foreign countries have been systematically brainwashed by the foreign enemy elements and started destroying india by making them poke their own eyes...... Hope you understand wht I'm trying to say. Please take care of your children before they get brainwashed and starts hating india and leaving it . ❤️🙏
😉✌️
True dude
Yo!
Totally agree, but history lectures must be from history not from the akshay or watsapp uni👏🏻
Invite her for a debate before J. Sai Deepak
She'll forget to speak on Indian history forever.
She will forget to speak english itself!
Who came here after a shorts or reels of that particular time 😅
Me
Me
I want this lady to give her lecture in front of Jaishankar and want all these audiences should present... Hat's off to that brave guy..
अंध भक्त केवल तू तू में में कर सकते है😂
में कुत्ता हु तो तू भी कुत्ता है😂😂😂
booooo
He would clap her
He would eat her in a single line
@@mightytitan1719 yes and he would smile at her imbecile knowledge
She is the perfect example of "education can't make an idiot a learned"
Very true ..
The hall is full of idiots 😂😂
exactly why she is uttering the truth she must speak what we Indians want to listen 🙌
@@thededro3352 says the one who can't even reveal their own name because they are ashamed of their converted ancestry !
@@thededro3352 truth without any basis ! 😂
@@SawantSumeet look who's talking who can't write a single sentence properly needs to edit it. Trying to educate others 😂😂
Good to see the brave guy, who spoke and showed her own history 😂
So what? Even if e the britishers were bad, that doesn't make her research false. You should argue with information and proof.
@@imranhasan4109 the world knows the reality, we don’t need these people to tell us their opinion.
@@imranhasan4109 the whole world knows the reality ha haa lol
@@imranhasan4109 he isnt saying about brtishersm the europeans killed native americans whole ethnicity vanished, and he said that woman is froma genocidal family
@@imranhasan4109lol did she answer his question with information and proof ? She played a victim card , first ask her to answer his question and then speak
Having the courage to speak the truth in front of amarican professor and hundreds of people is spectacular.... hats off to our indian brother❤❤
I don't know Aurangzeb have a PR team .
😂😂
You not know very much from look of things
Not just a team but entire cult at his disposal
@@btecndcomp And U must be Reporting from NDTV during 17th Century
😂😂😂😂👍👍👍👍
That women card at 41:25, speaks a lot about her.
She is a coward who hides behind the women card whenever she feels she can't win an argument with rationality, tells a lot about her and the people who were cheering her.
I agree the Hindu guy was Racist not sexist
@@vivekjha8473 neither racist nor sexist ,he kept a valid point but he got bit too aggressive in keeping it but his point was valid nonetheless
I agree with Audrey Trishke in every way and this video has persuaded me to love Aurengzeb in every way.
@@minahmansoor7063 Good for you.
You are critiquing the professor's alleged use of the so called "woman card" against an Ad Hominem logical fallacy (i.e. when the character and legitimacy of a person is questioned or attacked *instead of* the argument that is put forth, for more info: m.ua-cam.com/video/F5CMW2XBH6I/v-deo.html)
It is the case that there exists no other way to properly address an Ad Hominem than to inspect and expose why this fallacy may have been used. She has correctly employed this measure, by noting that the man, instead of engaging with the argument and the evidence to support the argument, has rather attacked her legitimacy.
Attacks on legitimacy by appealing to character (even if it is without addressing gender) is historically established as a patriarchal measure that is employed by men against women.
Men are less likely to use an ad Hominem against a man, especially a man that projects strong masculinity. Ad Hominems are largely employed against those seen as being of inferior standing, and gender does play a part in the choice to employ this logical fallacy.
The professor is rightly not engaging with the fallacy itself but with its root that lies in patriarchy- patriarchy being the key feasible reason/excuse/basis for this man to use an ad hominem against this woman- gender is the only area where he can ostensibly claim society-endorced elitism and so justify this cheap tactic.
She is astute in noticing and exposing this factor that lies behind his choice to indulge in discourse that is unbecoming.
//
Also, if you want another example of an Ad Hominem logical fallacy, just look at any of the replies to this comment.
Notice that this comment isn't edited; Bhakt behavior is just that predictable.
41:25 When you can't answer with genuine facts then play woman victim card . 🙌
Kudos to the guy for standing straight in front of a hostile crowd and unintelligent host and ask truthful questions. Kudos to you man. Hats off ❤❤❤
It was really shocking to hear the boo's & some guy trying to pull the mic from him!!! shame on the crowd. She is just a self proclaimed scholar. She sounds annoying and irritating hardly a scholar. She has a hidden agenda, her husband and father are evangelists...what else do you expect from her. Cant believe so many people showed up stayed and cheered her. UNBELIEVABLE!!!
@@satishkumarsivagnanam5267 I want those people to watch this video in front of everyone.
That man literally won with his arguments 😂
If you don't mind it is a she not he
@@kimjongun7574 Perhaps your wrong placement of words here. He not she..
@37:46 he destroyed tht lady on the stage. 😂😂
@@KK-gc5lj in hindutuvadis world😂😂
He just raised hi voice, why she is speaking about indian history. And she gave him tight slap on his face with a very well reply to him😊
She took Hindu Nationalist name more than Mughals
@@natgruff2890 bro where are you from ??
@Roger Fox really man if a person who has studied his/her life time for the past and history to unravel and u who I don't know writing these things while sitting on toilet u r sounding like paid propoganda and yup unbiased and securely intolerant and uneducated in these things
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 so u accuse others of paid prognanda when u yourself sound like one...u cannot learn one sided history and term the other side as bigots..tell your so called great historian if she has the audacity then also state the other side which she clearly hide to provoke a distraughted picture of history
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 lol propaganda is done by you and that so called historian who wants to create propaganda to white wash the images of Mughals . Her research is done on what grounds ???? Studying in western universities about indian history is completely ingnoring the facts
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only.
Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
She: I'm a historian. I'm women
Audience: shamelessly clapping for not answering 😢
Same feeling 😢
She didn’t even answered
Point to be noted,
1. Self proclaimed Historian
2. Radical feminist who played the WOMEN card beautifully and played as a Victim
3. Glorified him to only create hate against BJP. Americans are loosing hold in Indian politics now. She is an American agent designed for this role.
4. HINDU publishers is a great supporter of left wing and DMK, so the alignment with this kind of people are natural
I'm a Hindu, I'm Hindutva, I am proud. I don't need someone to define me based on their own false beliefs. If someone dares to put my culture under threat or disrespect, I have the courage to fight back with twice power and authority.
False idea comes when there is no facts like purity impurity notion of Brahmins. Her answers are corroborated with evidences. Grow up hindutwa, year is 2022 AD and not BC
@@kimjongun7574 Give me evidence in the 21st century of that practise of brahmins and you generalising all. Its not unique coming from a North korean dictator follower. The jokes on you.
@@kimjongun7574 And go educate yourself first on the definitions of Hindu, Hinduism and Hindutva.
@@Gsham007 Vikas Dubey UP hindutwa terrorist who beat up poor Dalits.
@@kimjongun7574 fanatic jihadis doesn't have facts terrorist aurangjeb killed sikh gurus killed millions, imposed taxes for practicing our own religion in our own land he is a foreign cult, his entire family was a big terrorist organization.
What I learnt is that Woman victim card is the best card. Thank you.
So who gets to play the Victim Card in the case of One Hindu girl being Killed by her Hindu parents every 58 seconds. She or her Mother who kills her?
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 Aurangzeb is still alive. Raise your voice for Kashmiri and Bangladeshi Hindus
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 Haha really ? Dont know where you get your statistics but from all the religions you think in Hinduism the woman treated poorly ? Haha for real ? Go and look again
@@bittersweet4306
Channel is about "India's" Hinduism
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 what is the refrence of your data ...I am not finding it on internet .... don't spread your fake propaganda
Brave man stood strong.... In a audience where Weaklings dwell...
she well handled the crowd she well aware of current indians mindset 😂😂
I am surprised no one asking did Aurangzeb killed Sikhs Gurus and their young children ? Does killing young children largely for religious reasons make him a "GREAT" king ? (The Sikh Gurus were not ruling class of Punjab, Mughals ruled till Kabul)
Yeah I too wondered when she didn't spoke how Aurangzeb imprisoned his own father. She literally played woman card and the saddest thing was that the man was stating the truth but everyone started whooooing him where as when she spoke everyone were giving her the round of applause like wut?
Pretty sure his religion is pretty clear about not killing children,women,elderly,or disabled. Even if he did that pretty sure he didn’t but hypothetically if he actually did that then it would no way been because of religious reasons.
@@Kthxrny the speech itself is organised by the foreign ab.rahamic elements. And the invitees are also curated According to them. That's why all were wooing
@@Awk_potats Aurangzeb definitely ki lled children, this has been proven, Mughals themselves have documented all this. So stop your lies, you are an anti Hindu. Your religion does tell you to ki ll non believers. Stop your taqqiya.
@@Awk_potats It was 100 percent Religious. That's why Guru Teg Bahadur was slaughtered
Worst explanation by her she cant take the criticism and started chanting being a woman
Heckling from audience seat doesnt equate criticism, it implies arrogance.
@Shubh Singhal they won't understand after all she was advocating a tyrant and cruel who happens to be their forefather .
@@saifulhaque4098 u guys sure have a lot to say considering u guys cut people's throat just for showing cartoons
@@holyturtle1132 what makes u think I participate in lynching people for eating beef considering I myself am a big fan of Japanese kobe beef
@@oreki8707 the same logic you used in generalising a person's beliefs from their name. Individual identity should not be quashed by Comminal identities. Seeing a person as part of a community first and an individual second is a sad way to look at them, and even worse a dangerous way.
Hatts off to my fellow Indian brother though he could have said exactly what he said without showing his anger with loud voice... and clear rhythmic claps to those Indians who wooooed and clapped against a fellow Indian... You see this has always been our problem. We leave loopholes for outsiders to squeeze themselves in and point fingers on our own people in our own land. We are more welcoming towards a foreigner when we disregard the existence of our own people living in the Northeast. The hatred among ourselves, the fights we fight inside, the lack of a strong bond and most importantly Indian fails miserably in understanding that we are brothers and sisters of one family and no matter what, we don't allow anyone to point a finger on our people. If there's a problem, we will solve that among us but we don't tolerate insults from an outsider.
when dogs have no answer to academic research they started attacking racially and aggressively.
Could't agree more!
That applause after her reply to most most popular question is perfectly showing how we colonised
😐
True
I am still trying understand the reason for applauds
That type of mentality is what had created a self loathing sense in the Indians.
The people who applauded are from a particular religion. A very privileged and appeased minority
True people are still colonised in their minds
How? Explain it logically. They applaused because she stood up against that disrespectful filth of a man who doesn't know how to talk to people. Nothing to do with colonial mindset.
Seems apart from hindus , all other communities are peaceful, generous, innovative , benevolent ... Propaganda at its best and newsmedia like Hindu gives perfect platform to these PR agents
Every one has violence and discrimination
They have always murdered in the name of castism and higher birth. The power hungry have hijacked the agenda and have been running for sometime now. The sheep are simply following.
I really don't understand if you are being sarcastic
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core.
Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
@@southpole9450 Babur was from uzbekistan
Reading comment section brings my belief back in humanity
Why? It's full of Hindutva idiots
@@btecndcomp no it's full of Hindutva warriors
@@rishabmandal4710 Warriors of youtube comments?
@@btecndcomp well that's given cuz they are known for being warriors at every level of every good platform. Hence, it is included and I ain't discarding the analogy.
@@btecndcomp that's better than being jihadi 😂
People who came here after watching a short 😂
37:00 When she talks bad about our nation none stands to stop her but the brave guy.
But when he dares to cross question her why do you stop him? He would have destroyed her if he is given few more time!
bruh aurangzeb’s own son revolted against him…
In Kalimat-i-Tayyibat, Aurangzeb writes that ‘the demolition of a temple is possible at any time, as it cannot walk away from its place’.
@@sankrantis6622 bruh of course there have been numerous patricide/fratricide in history Ashoka Ajatshatru many more what is the point.
@@sarfaraz8751 //what is the point// there is no point unless someone like Truschke tries to spread lies and starts turning historical victims into historical villains. then it becomes important to establish the truth, even if it bitter to listen to.
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core.
Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
Like Sanjiv revolted as Indira and ended up in a plane crash?
I didn’t think he got the answer from her. Has she done the scientific survey or any logical question he asked. She replied simply that she is historian and she played women-card and lastly she can be wrong. 😂 Great to watch him ❤. This should be part of “DISTROYED IN SECONDS” series 😂😂😂😂
She also didn't answer the question of historians manupulating the facts in those times😂😂😂
The reason she ignored him because of his disgusting behaviour, and started racist attack on her, she did not degrade hindus she was just giving her scholarly account of this Mugal King, so it will bring peace than divide.
@@RehanChowdhury-ol1pv all she did was victim blaming
She is sponsored by Pakistan terrorists to promote anti india Propaganda
Correct 💯
Came here after the Reels. First of all, hats off to Dr. KV Murali for boldly stating the facts. 37:46. As a Tamilian, I am proud. And for the crowd, the event is organized by The Hindu. How else the mindset of folks attending it would be !!
She avoided any difficult questions skillfully. Disappointed to see them applauding to her cliche responses, but delighted by the probing questions which were answered only partially.
I don't have any grudge against this woman.
But "THOOO" hai to all the audience clapping there and cheering this lady for her love to Mughals.
Aaa thooo to all hindus who are cheering and clapping for this lady.
correct bro ye mare madarchod inko to mai dango mai bachane bhi nahi jauga esse log bade harami hote opportunity ko dekhte hai bass aur kuch nahi
Why? Cant accept facts?
HINO--they are Hindus in name only
@@biebersucks27 Lol, her book has been discredited by people belonging to the far left in India.
@@biebersucks27 stop destroying the meaning of facts by justifying her bs.
The man is really a courageous and asking a genuine question.
Salute to that man
Without any facts i can also do this types of nonsense, he said on population 😂🤣🤣 abortion is this the topic is here.
@@movie6888 my dear friend
When that lady is doing non sense by saying that Aurunzeb was a great and caring done good thing 🤦♂
Then the man is doing the same thing.
We know on whats agenda she is working and we also know aurunzeb created just a problems and conflicts nothing at all.
And she is prasing him
So what is this my dear tell me 🙂
@@movie6888 Study history
@@movie6888 you and ur white buddies mad !! Your ancestors track records would never be forgotten
38:56
He thinks he can win an argument by screaming!
oh yes,🙄,asking genuine question(!) which is not even Related to the topic! And saying America killed 21 billion people!!!!! Hence there is not even 10 billion people on earth.🙄stupids
37:40
For Hindu
Such historians rank Truman S as the best president , creating a history which serves their own interests
Lol she actually glorified him in her book😂. All bunch of lies to whitewash barbaric Mughal history.
@Mohammed Faizan Ahmed Katua spotted
@Good man actually she doesn't have facts, read farishtah by Muhammed quasim. The primary source which supply was disturbed by Congress gov.
@Good man there are 3 volumes of the same book, it was translated to Farsi language because it did not get printed in Hindi or Urdu. And Wikipedia is known to peddle anti Hindu propaganda, despite 17000 page chargesheet filed it still says anti CAA protests were initiated by hindus. So, beware of what you read on wikipedia. And farishtah is not a unreliable source it is a contemporary primary source which quotes incidents, autrocities first hand ...!! Make conclusions after going through the text.
@@mahimnajoshi950 Yes, The protests were started mainly by hindus, in Assam. Assamese didn't wanna provide citizenship to any foreign nationalist irrespective of their religion. So you are wrong here. But looks like those protests doesn't suit your agenda of hatred so you want to only look at protests that were held in Shaheen Bagh. 😂😂 How do you live on these self built lies man?
@@StarGamingPubgMobile I was talking about Delhi.
37:48 when a legend start questioning europe how they are more butcher then anyone else in the history
It’s ad hominem attack, she is not there to talk about British or America history, it’s another topic
Shame on you lots of public couldn't ask one question despite of a brave man
When you can't answer a legitimate questions then just play a victim card. Just left things 🤐
Aurangzeb was as great as “The Hindu” represents any “Hindu”
@@risenrisenrise Understand the Sarcasm buddy
🔥
Word!
Woman card ! lol ... she just proved that she couldn't defend that argument
Absolutely
historianaudreytruschke.wordpress.com/
She blocks people on twitter when her lies get exposed.
@@priyalgarg6683 we'll I'm one of them. She's nothing more than a coward. Simple!
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only.
Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
I so want Dr. Vijay Prashad to have an interview with her :)
For the people who don’t know, Vijay Prashad is an American-based Indian historian, author, journalist, political commentator, and Marxist intellectual.
Hats off to that man! And, I love how she dodged the question actually asked of "did she do the archaeological surveys before citing those figures?" She reads from books itself & to claims herself as a "trained historian". I mean, don't cite figures if you read from some deluded 'sources' and consider them 'authentic' just cause it fits your perspective! Just cause she reads Sanskrit and Persian doesn't make her remarks authentic. And, being a woman myself, I'm so disgusted she played the women-card. But, what more can we expect from her!
She also goes on to say "She may not be right" but she talks as if it's all proven and tested, what a woman.
37:47.. wow brother. 👏👏u demolished the entire speech. 🔥🔥
she said "trained historian". Trained by whom?? 😂😂
Yes... 100%...
Alqaida 😂
Muslim peace university 😂
By the ghost of aurengzeb
Exactly, she is trained to spread false narratives. A good historian is the one who does comprehensive unbiased research before coming to any conclusions.
Started watching at 35:00
Destroyed: 37:45
Fools clapping: 40:55
Women card: 41:09 and 41:27
Iske baad dekhna band kr diya.
The Hindu has become hub of left liberals, and a platform to promote Hinduphobia. Ignore them😊
they wanted to impress her.
You seemed like a Math genius. Can you give the total of One Hindu Girl killed by her Hindu Parents every 58 seconds for past 5074 years. Thank you.
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 Women card 😊
@@anuragshrivastava8297
TOTAL?
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 dude go and learn English first 😑...besides r u by any means trying to say that Hinduism is 5074yrs old?
So...he talked simply about Native American genocide and her background and she completely ignored it, and turned it into a "woman talking" card that he never even mentioned because that was familiar territory for her and that's all she could handle?
West : A day without hypocrisy, a day is wasted.
The worst thing is at 41:30 when they all clap like that!
Bharat ko China aur Pakistan se jyada khatra toh apne hi inn logo se hai
Bahar k dushmano ko toh hum sambhal lenge, inko kaun sambhalega?
STOP Gora Validation!
Viraj thakkar.. Whatever you said is absolutely correct man... The internal enemies are the worst.. Shame on the audience there except the one who asked that question
@Mahi Khan please find your Documents for NRC
Imagine if she was against aurangzeb you think anyone would tolerate? We're too soft on this lady
So true ..it was painful to watch that
Exactly!👏
sikh and mughal empire under Aurangzeb , nothing on that aspect
@Gulrez Rana if the person who write the book don't mention it on the talk . and if it is written on the book then it proves she is clearly biased in the video. and if she don't written about it on the book then she misses out a whole history in northern india which make her inadequate in topic or she write a biased book
@haider2 k9 afghans and iranian were dealt with the same way, were they enemies of islam ?, Its actually a different concept. Human mind tend to simply things such that it will become easier to understand. So simple the notion is easier it to agree on because we can't comprehend complexity of the situation as it will take real hard work and who wanna do that, just listen to someone who give simpler answer to every situation and fallow it blindly . That's how one become an ignorant being . While we are all ignorant but the extent differs drastically. And it was a muslim who put founding stone for establishment of Golden temple.
@Gulrez Rana Sikh wear a part of history specifically in north india from pakistan punjab to indian punjab, whole region as they were super power in the region from 1800 to 1857. Punjab is the only state which were under the British rule for 100 years where as rest of india were ruled for 200 years. It was the last state which britisher occupy and most wealthy of that time. eg kohinor diamond of queen vactoria was taken from punjab
She does mention about Sikh rebellion under Aurangzeb in her book.
@@rohanshinde4327 then she is being biased in the video.
One thing i hate about our indian culture is that we play blame game when there are comment as "we need to have indian professors lecturing Americans about American history in America" ok we already do that we say that they hace no right speaking about Indian history or culture while on the other hand we speak about their cultures too everyone have the right to speak about each other that how we learn and grow hate speech is one thing but the right to expression is another and i don't see anything hateful here. but all we do is play blame games instead of acknowledging our problems and finding solution.
I read this book in 2019, it was an eye opener... Now while Prof. Audrey is reciting it., I am still able to recall each and every word from her masterpiece... Great Book... Highly recommended 👍
Aurangzeb is great according to them but can't handle Trump 5 years 🤣...
Trump was actually better than aurangjeb.
@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 yes but I am telling to american historian who is glorifying aurangzeb
American presidencies are for 4 years only. You can't manage current events, so there is little hope for you with history.
@@marybarton2011 nobody takes u seriously 🤣
Dedicated to Audrey : Jay shree ram🙏
Unsubscribed the Hindu...
Bro , I have read both Hindu and Muslim scriptures , Both the scriptures are against Idol worship❌ and call towards worshiping one True GOD.
Example ~ekam evaditiyam (sanscrit) - God is only one without a second. (6- Section- 2- Verse- 1).
Example.2 Yajur Veda - chapter- 32: - God Supreme or Supreme Spirit has no ‘Pratima’ (idol) or material shape.
These verses match with the Quran.
Because you couldn’t handle the truth
I've been through quite a few comments and believe can make a calculated comment of my own. I believe this is the issue with the current Indian State i.e. we don't want to consider a VIEWPOINT. We've gotten so much intolerant that if anything goes beyond our beliefs we're agitated. The gentleman, who was not very gentle, for sure asked really good questions and to some extent the speaker answered them. Now to come to a conclusion as to whether she is a Islam or Mughal lover one needs to read the book and not come to a conclusion merely on the grounds of the presentation/speech.
Simply because we saw the post on a pro right channel does not mean we have to come to watch the video with a presumption that there is something wrong or anti hindu. Listen to the whole presentation and the discussion through a neutral prism then you'll know whether it is a Propaganda or a view point proposed after research and analysis.
Finally, as she said she does not need to be right, as a historian she's just trying to reveal a different point of view, which does not necessarily has to be completely wrong merely because it does not suit your ideology and above all she clearly says that she's looking forward to writers who'll come up with writings which very well can be challenging her views.
But I am really happy that you people actually came and watched the whole video to make a reasoned viewpoint, because most of us are not even willing to do that and spew hate simply because you saw something on a 30 secs reel.
Audience should be always receptive to know the agreements and disagreements....... Not to outcry and create havoc to disrupt an intellectual forum.
Not a historian but a great story teller , don’t know why we Indians invite these people to talk history!
This is all funded
The Hindu daily publishers,🤷🤷
Yeah all funded and newspaper like The hindu give them space
the point is, we indian should be proud of our country and ancestors that withstood stupidity and tarrny of the past rulers/ invaders, we are still here, we survived so that we learn from past and become the nation of wealth again because the very wealth that attracted invasions and loot in the first place.
If you were so wealthy and powerful, why were you invaded and ruled?
@@HawkLad the Indus Valley civilization was the only civilization where weapons were not found. Prosper and live happily has always been the mantra of Indians and Hindus unlike the uncivilized barbaric and blood thirsty psychopaths that invaded us
@@ehahaproductions680 thats a major reason why organised and systematic hindhuphobia is being propagated by academia and pseudo leftists to downplay our culture and wipe our civilization out coz the truth about our past is too harsh for the new faith people to digest
@@HawkLad thats the main reason becz of wealth..bt unlike these invaders we didnt believe in conquering other people's land to live peacefully..bt some treachers betrayed us
@@ehahaproductions680 sati and infanticide want to know your location
I will study History, take a PhD in it, and the first thing I'll do is, go to the US, start telling their history to then and let's see how they react
Go ahead.. they will not shout at you. If you are good and can challenge them and win with proper reasoning and argument, they might make u a president of their history club. Many Indians are history professor there... Do that in India.
How can you possibly understand/study anyone or anything if you are searching for something in particular. Yin-Yang, but what if Yang is massively bigger compared to Yin?
43:49 He exposed her propoganda, she didn't answer his question.🤔
Yes
IP(Indian Propaganda) is what she's exposing and doing an excellent job.
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 by spreading lies and falsehoods in the name of history
Bcz he is andhbhakt
37:45 Well done Sir 🙏🏻 You are Real Son of Mother India
Real propaganda victim who hear only bogus stories
@@kimjongun7574 bro he says truth
@@uniquespy3100 Truth of ecstatic University
Saar that is a European propaganda saar.
@@kimjongun7574 can you debate with me I will give you refrences even about Islam from Qur'an and Hadis 😂😂
She saying hindutva means hindu nation, without understanding what it actually means.but in their own country American they asks non Christians like Ramaswamy dozens of questions for being a Hindu can he run the usa as a president. This lecture is a little to do with history but more to politics. It's obvious she is funded for spreading propaganda
Where was this lecture done
Today I realised the power of Women card 🙏🙏🙏
Is that why One Hindu Girl is killed every 58 seconds in India?
@@truthfearsdaguilty2804 yes stated by Aurangzeb
Yet you fail to recognize the Man card talking over a Historian and still being applauded
And descendants of Aurangzeb have victim card 😂😂 mughals have provided all the cards to his descendants and followers also
@@timurthejerk9270 SO YOU WANT HIM TO RESPECT A LOW STANDARD PERSON LIKE AURENGZEB ?
Professor snape is a TRAINED HISTORIAN now?
Shows you never read Harry Potter.
😂😂
Audrey does not at all looked like a white European but she looks like a Iranian or turkish background, coincidently Mughals where from Turkey and Iran primary. No wonder she shamelessly keeps defending mughals and hates hindus to the core.
Her father-in-law and husband work as a missionary in India for converting poor Hindus to Christianity
She is no Snape
Snape while vindictive had extremely valid reasons
She’s trying to be Bellatrix to Aurangazeb’s Voldemort
Actually that’s unfair to Voldemort
Aurangazeb is much worse than Voldemort and isn’t a tenth as talented
@@Phoenix-King-ozai Aurangzeb isn’t worse than Voldemort who’s the literal amalgamation of evil
Just because a trained historian tells you the truth doesn’t mean you have to throw a tantrum about it
I really enjoyed the moment.... Hats off to the bro.
The speaker should cite the sources of her research...if done
Go read the book, it has all the citations you need
@@prajwalprajwal4268 and veracity of those citations? JNU Lefties? LOL 😂
38:27
"That's exactly what happens when a lion exposes himself between a herd of sheep" 🔥🔥💯💯💯
Lions are not emotional wrecks over events from 400 years ago.
A king is humble and can make anyone quiet by just having a normal relaxed conversation
do u know the name of that lion? he's really a lion.
@@marybarton2011 lions learn from history and they have the audacity to adapt and tear you apart when time comes..it would be better for the sheep to run back and run fast
@@marybarton2011 lions have pride, they are not SHEEP like beings who are/can be reared by their colonial masters.
Paper ka naam "The Hinduphobic" rkhlo✌🏻😁
Other than the name, every thing is Hinduphobic
It depends what u consider as hinduphobic the truth or the political and physiologycal perspective what Indians where proposed by British for hating there own king then all is history
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 Aurangzeb was a tyrant. Mughals were terrorists. Change my mind.
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 mugal were mass murderer ,rapists who plundered this land for wealth and for islamization same as isis and taliban totally unhuman and cruel ,barbarians cult.
@@mdsaiffarhan2812 Mughals won't even respect a women how can they be great 😂😂😂
What is the name of the guy
These comments below are very enlightening and shows thinking of contemporary Indians. Thanks.
After christianity and Islam came to India our Ram and Krishna became mythological
It was always mythological there’s not a single proof those gods.
@@Awk_potats ramayan and mahabharta is a proof of that
people who are believing it from before the birth of islam are proof.
then muhmmad can be myth? who rode a mule to heaven or teared moon into twoo halves.
Right , bruh if you go to mecca you get questions but when you go Dwarka you will get answers read the mahabharat , understand it and then speak. All archeological location in india prove that lord Krishna and lord ram existed
@@Awk_potats what is the proof of muhammad,,your allah,,,huh?
There is historical evidence of all three Abrahamic religions. Judaism, Christianity and Islam, have solid historical proof that are confirmed by different religous followers from back than. Not the same with Hinduism. It's an old mythological religion.
An interesting question would be: Did Aurangzeb's twin policy of supporting and destroying temples for power, also extend to Mosques? In other words did he destroy mosques in regions where muslims had rebelled? Did he destroy mosques in Bijapur when he won over Adilshahis or Golconda?
@Ruemann Its not so much the exact number of temples he destroyed. He destroy plenty. But my point was that if he did implement a stern policy of destruction for temples but not so for mosques, that itself is proof enough that he discriminated systematically against Hindus. And so far I have not seen any evidence that he destroyed mosques because they were threat to his power. I also think what Hindu right does is irrelevant to the discussion. What historical evidence exists is relevant.
@@ahm512 You mean destroying a mosque is of no symbolic consequence to muslims? That's obviously false.
@@ahm512 On what basis can you conclude that it was common amongst Hindu kings to destroy each other's temples to establish political power during or around Aurangzeb period? Do you have any evidence of that?
@@ahm512 Can you point out examples of Hindu kings destroying Hindu temples to establish their power, during or around Aurangzeb's time? I cant find any.
With all due respect, please cite instances of Hindu kings destroying temples to establish political power during Aurangzeb period. If you can't, then say so.
38:57 haha they ultimately snatched his mic without even letting him complete.. Freedom of speech🎉
Later on she plays a women card but never answers if she did a survey
Salute to the man who gave her a 3rd question jai hind
I don't get why does she have so much love for Aurangzeb???
Because the treatment he gave to Hindus
She is a historian and you are not.
I found her speech to be objective, you can’t refute her facts.
@@binukj7970
He didn’t do much to the Hindus.
He also protected the Bahrainis in Benaras.
@@terryknight6817 Facts and she! She just cherry picking and interpreting it in a way that suits her mentors.She doesn't deserve to be called a scholar.
@@terryknight6817 Facts! She is trying to whitewash a psychopath who decaptivated his own brother Dara and threw his head infront of his father Shajahan . This woman must be a psychopath, that is why she is trying to whitewash the likes of Aurangazeb!
The man at 37:47 was right, and could have been more effective had he not shouted
He did not shout at the speaker it was the blind audience who booed.... To make himself audible he had to.
Thinks he can prove he's right by shouting lol. Typical chaddi
Most of the muslims think like her. All the people who attended this talk are supporters of this women. It is very difficult for him. But he could have presented things without becoming emotional. It is difficult to control our emotions. Aurangazeb is a so evil. He killed his brother mercilessly. He was very voilent towards Brahmins. The kind of cruelty will disturb any civilised person. Becoming emotional will not help us in anyway. Becoming emotional does not stop these people. They will do mischief. What we can do is present the correct history to people.
As super sayian Goku i can confirm that she is highly accurate according to Marvel cinematic universe and dc comics. We were led to independence in 2000 BCE by Batman and our greatest freedom fighter was Iron Man😂😂😂😂😂
Sir where ever you are you have a respect 🎉😊
When you write a book starting from 1190 I hope you include taimur lung.
She will glorify him too..
@@vilasosc exactly what I was going to comment, just like Khushwant Singh did.
No one glorify taimur, not even muslim
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only.
Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
@@zain9109 you are very seriously misinformed. Hindustan held assets worth 45trillion us dollars economy until your forefathers came along and looted our beautiful country. Seems like your information is un scrutinized just as your religion for 1400 years. Please be factually fair at least. That's the least we can expect.
"The goal is to not be always right, but to move forward" ???? Wow! Enough said Lady !
I, for one, am moving forward from this video.
42:02
Her whole argument is based upon the fact that Hindu Nationalist vilify Aurangzeb. But she doesn't realise that propaganda has nothing to do with history. So when you study Aurangzeb you have to focus on what records say of him, what was his circumstances etc. Whether Hindu Nationalist hate him or not has nothing to do with historicity. Her arguments aren't reputed enough to make her a historian.
Aurnagzeb The Great ruler , the great war lord , muslim ummah need 1000 Aurangzebs now , 1000 times more powerful. Insha allah, God wills it.
@@imaadahmed2986 your are not getting anything
@@sanketjalkote2600 Maharaj got what he deserved, lol. Aurangzeb the great still scare you all even after many centuries. Even you forgot the British. Genital worshippers.
38:34 Epic lines man!
Yes great line, 21 billion people had been killed by america!😃great fact...only indian can know these facts......
The part for which you have came here,starts from 37:47
Thank you sir ❤
That speaker is claiming to be historian but show attitude when exposed American atrocities.
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only.
Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
Which country don't have atrocities?
Ya cause is what whataboutism and completely irrelavant.
she failed to hide bias by repeatedly chanting Hindu nationalist......
Everyone has inherent bias it’s just how hard you work to fight that bias that makes more credible and I think a historian knows how to fight that bias than a random UA-cam commenter
Thanks to people like you for defaming the image of India..
Lol, how was the "heated question" in anyway related to "people can't handle a woman talking". That's Audrey exploiting feminism and not responding in facts. He also didn't say that she is not a trained historian. He pointed the hypocrisy of her nation and the people she orignated from for which she had no response.
Are you slow? She's a trained historian. Not a politician.
@@18ashfaqahsan2 What are you talking about? When did I say she's a politician? Did you even watch the video?
You guys snached mic from him you should have let him complete what he is saying
I was here just to view the comments....well you guys didn't disappoint
well you surely did disappoint. sadly, we are not brave enough to digest the truth about our falsified Hindu traditions.
and that's a huuuuuge understatement, considering the things that he did
hinduism=plague.
@@crusaderofunderdogs8005 well religions in general are plagues. but abrahamic religions are a lot more than a plague/disease/curse
@@manjitmishra410 Look mister .She did not excuse the guy.She said the guy was a F....killer..what more do you want? Jam on it.
The name "The Hindu" for this newspaper, is pretty much in literal sense just for namesake 🙃
itne saare Zoombies me ek hi Zinda Insaan Nikla. Brave man!!!!!! ❤
Currently its trending a lot...i thought it was a recent news...otherwise i would made an FIR against her
By her own admission as Mughal kings cannot be viewed though a European lens, similarly Indian history can not be viewed under an American lens- the Mughal rule by and large (other than for a brief period of Akbar's reign) has been antagonistic to indigenous Indian ethos and civilization). Therefore, Jadunath Sarkar is definitely a more authentic historian as he has based his research on primary evidences and using an indigenous lens.
I don't think that's a fair point. Being American doesn't mean a person's lens is American, just like being Indian doesn't mean ones lens is Indian.
1) Micheal Danino was born French, he has done wonderful work on the continuity of Indian culture from the indus sarswathi civilization to present.
So refute her on facts, make counter arguments in research, just saying she won't understand something because she is American is disingenuous, and not an argument that would sit well in the Indian ethos, which has always strived for truth.
If I were a Hindu, I would be so ashamed of the failures of my forefathers . Look at the beautiful mughal buildings, poetry, music, food, culture, arts, crafts. Mughals gave India such beautiful things and made culturally rich. Hindus could have at best built cow dung huts only.
Mughals made India by getting all small kingdoms under one centre.
@@zain9109 Also Mughals never reached the South of India, There where Indian empires that were centralized and larger than the mughals before them, there where huge empires that could outshine the mughals and had international reach like the Cholas.
PS Mughals missed a golden period to bring education to the masses, The printing press, global navigation, global trade all were available during the mughal period, which they did not capitalise on, that lapse leaves us in our current state. So their glorification is unfounded. They where an empire not dissimilair to many before them, running on their concerns. The long lasting value they left behind to the Indian citizen, apart from the tombs strewn across the landscape is debatable.
@@rohitdodu These days people bring out exaggerated versions that suits them esp rightwing. Any analysis should be fair. It's funny that all good things the mughals brought that can be seen by us and is benefitting us is ignored but instead politically motivated mostly hypothetical stories of atrocities are promoted and is actually believed by majority of people. I pity my country - if we dont realize/appreciate where we come from , we wont know where we are headed.
Mughals never ruled south India at a stretch, hence no one speaks hindi/urdu in those areas (except Hyderabad/telangana state). That urdu culture never reached there. However people in south enjoy mughlai cuisines since they have fine tastebuds.
@@zain9109 true, but your comment about Hindu culture is wrong. India does have a glorious history and culture before the mughals, and mughal architecture and cuisine are a small part of the larger Indian story, an important but small part nonethless
Ask Guru Teg Bahadur what he thinks of Aurangzeb
Daswe Pasha aur Aurangzeb ne dosti kar li hai 😂
Sochte kya Aurangzeb ne gholate tel mein jala diya
Apparently he was not a Guru in fighting and when you challenge a Badhshah be ready to get separated from your head
People like you can hide it's shame
@@eddiebrugal8660 And when you persecute the Khalsa prepare to get your lineage and rule expunged and reduced to nothing.
How many of you want to see a debate between sai deepak and Audrey?
I am getting angry over the volunteer who snatched the mic of the brave guy and the Audience booing in the back should leave India asap...😠😠😠
Then you should too leave India brother soon😂😂
This is the same Professor who constantly makes anti-Hindu remarks in her classes teaching god knows what. She has called Hinduism "inherently oppressive, racist, misogynistic and violent"
Maybe instead of using whataboutism fight the task at hand and if you don’t know what whataboutism is it’s the act of bringing something to the conversation that originally had no place there
She has negative views on Hinduism about that matters
Well you just look up the vedas and the upnishad to realise that.
@@Awk_potats look up at quran, bible you would find same. Islam is actually more like man serving religion and misogynist
@@Awk_potats than this cow worshipers
@@Awk_potats i mean you couldn't find that in Qouran??? Bro really??
She has selectively neglected the atrocities committed by Aurangzeb. He was a bigot and deservedly hated for his acts.
No atrocities was committed him. He just attacked evil and immorality.
The greatest Indian ruler ever, Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir, the only who defeated the British. During his reign Mughal India was the world's largest economy, worth 25% of world GDP, and is signalled the proto-industrialization. But yet he did enjoy a luxurious life. What king he was. Amazing, greater than Saladin Ayyubi.
@@abdever2140 hahahahahaha 😂😂😂😂😂
@@abdever2140 yes, he was so great ruler that he tortured his own father who loved him dearly , he mercilessly killed his elder brothers, he killed 4 kids who only refused to accept islam ,look how great he was! and now my advice for you is you better marry aurangzeb.
@@tusharranjan1054 reference about 4 kids sir. Wikipedia... I don't see aurangzeb as an ideal ruler. But the history is collection of events and the perspective of the people who witnessed and wrote those events. The forced neutralization of the religious atrocities committed by the previous kings is wrong and pseudo secularism. Read the authentic books and references and generate your own view.
@@tusharranjan1054 Yes Aurangazeb was really cruel and strict, but also you can't deny the fact that he was the only one who defeated the British at that time. And also you can't deny the fact that India at that time had World's Largest Economy as well, which you did not get from the British India nor the current India.
37:05 the moment 🙂
The way she calmly handled the "whataboutery" was really commendable