Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Climate activist meets coal worker: Are we destroying our future? | Flipping the script

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2024
  • A Fridays for Future climate activist goes head-to-head with a coal company worker. Both see climate change as a problem but have vastly different opinions about how Germany should fight it.
    DW's Flipping the Script reverses the roles of typical political debates: Voters discuss while politicians sit in the audience, listen and ask questions.
    The four-part series tackles issues such as climate change, migration, cannabis legalization and social mobility, putting the concerns of citizens from diverse backgrounds at the heart of political debates. Politicians from different political parties were the audience, asked questions and made comments. Invitations to attend Flipping the Script were extended to politicians from all parties with a parliamentary group in the German Bundestag.
    Chapters:
    00:00 - Intro
    01:14 - Are you afraid of climate change?
    08:05 - Should Germany lead the world in climate policy?
    13:39 - How can politicians bring people on board with climate protection?
    15:17 - Climate protection and sacrifice.
    19:58 - What's the best way to fight climate change?
    22:30 - Is Fridays for Future naive?
    25:41 - Politicians reflect on "Flipping the Script?"
    Politicians in the audience:
    Christoph Ploß, CDU
    Bianca Praetorius, CDU
    Derya Türk-Nachbaur, SPD
    Viola Matthtil-Reuther, SPD
    Annika Klose, SPD
    Georg Kössler, Die Gruenen
    Marcel Emmerich, Die Gruenen
    Georg Kurz, Die Gruenen
    Marcus Faber, FDP
    Lukas Köhler, FDP
    Anke Domscheit Berg, Die Linke
    Lorenz Gösta Beutin, Die Linke
    Flipping the script is part of DW's comprehensive coverage of the German Bundestag election campaign and the federal elections on September 26. Get an overview here: p.dw.com/p/3ymYc
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
    #FlippingTheScript #GermanElection #ClimateChange

КОМЕНТАРІ • 330

  • @dwnews
    @dwnews  3 роки тому +37

    What did you think of this discussion format? Is it something you would like to see more of on DW News?

    • @jackjackthompson5771
      @jackjackthompson5771 3 роки тому +3

      I enjoyed the conversation a lot. Much more of this please. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
      I still find the that environmental reactionaries have a youthful naïveté about expecting the political class to somehow come up with magical solutions. Bjorn Lomborg is very good on that issue. Also, there have always been natural disasters and framing the latest ones each time as “proof” sets up a false prophet of sorts.
      Regardless it’s nice to see both sides of the debate, together. Really enjoyed it,
      Merci,

    • @opg9712
      @opg9712 3 роки тому +1

      But my suggestion is that for us who don't understand German language you needs to do debate in English it's really hard to read subtitles..so my request is that please conduct debate in English so all the people around the world can understand really well..this informative debate.. otherwise this is the best debate that i hv evr seen

    • @walterpost9073
      @walterpost9073 3 роки тому +4

      It’s a good format but for the next time please invite people who know at least a little bit about the topic. The coal worker didn’t had a clue of what he was talking about. He knew nothing about climate change. And you definitely need a factchecker with a Laptop so there can’t be false arguments.

    • @crosstraffic187
      @crosstraffic187 3 роки тому

      I did like this discussion format and would like to see more. Perhaps you could try different formats, with more than just 2 people. Maybe include scientist vs social worker or labour leader. Have to say though Sebastian and Pauline were excellent. A 19 yr old gave this 60 yr old more confidence in our future.

    • @unclepete100
      @unclepete100 2 роки тому

      I find the format refreshing , instead of the usual suspects telling us plebs what to think. However, I do not think that it greatly contributes to politicians’ understanding of the problems under discussion. Seems more of a listening/exploring exercise for the political class. What I personally would like to see is some different experts interviewed, not (as previously mentioned) ‘the usual suspects’
      Perhaps you could ask your Twitter followers to nominate someone to comment/interview, during the pre production of broadcasting segments. You never know, that way you might escape the mainstream media bubble occasionally . Good luck

  • @bierrollerful
    @bierrollerful 3 роки тому +66

    "We should invest much more in research."
    German coal industry is propped up by *billions* of Euros in subsidies each year. How about we use that?

    • @MikeLiteraus
      @MikeLiteraus 3 роки тому +12

      That is used to keep prices low. If Germans actually knew the true price of electricity to power their homes, a lot of them could not afford it. The government subsidizes a lot of energy including green so the German customer doesnt feel it in prices, but feels it in a tax. Its about energy scarcity due to restrictions placed by the government. Scarcity leads to price increases which the government curtails with subsidies.

    • @anno-fw7xn
      @anno-fw7xn 3 роки тому +4

      @@MikeLiteraus no no its to keep up coal and gaß, up without the subsidies solar, wind and water would have bin proftibal in the 1990.
      power is never porftibal and captlisme will kill us all like it does with climate change. System change or refovulation

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 3 роки тому +5

      @@anno-fw7xn Jesus Christ you are thick headed. Renewables would be profitable in 1990 without subsidies on fossiles?
      1) Subsidies on fossiles have no direct impact on the price of renewable energy.
      2) Renwwable energy is and always has been much more subsidized than fossiles.
      Why do you think petrol is so expensive in EU? Because our governments put 150% tax on every liter of petrol or diesel we put in our cars.

    • @bierrollerful
      @bierrollerful 3 роки тому +4

      @@MikeLiteraus to keep prices low: Germany just about has the highest electricity prices anywhere.
      scarcity: Germany exports more electricity than it imports. In 2020, output of conventional power plants had to be reduced, because renewables met most of the demand.
      Subidizing coal industry only makes sense if you're the politician and you can expect "favors" from the fossil fuel industry. (I posted a comment with links to sources, but I guess DW filters out comments with links.)

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm 2 роки тому

      @@MikeLiteraus There are no state subsidies on green energy at all. They are purely financed with the consumer electricity price, and Germans really feel that cost, by paying the second highest electricity prices in Europe. The industry on the other hand is heavily subsidized, by the bought politicians. They pay close to the lowest electricity price in Europe. Reduced net transport fees, no energy tax, no green energy levy. The subsidies on fossil fuels are there to keep the status quo, because everyone currently in power profits from where they are. If they wanted to reduce the costs of energy they could reduce the energy tax, or only take the reduced 7% VAT, because heating is just as well a necessity as food or books. But they didn't do that, they subsidized their homies earlier in the chain, so alternatives had no chance to be competitive. The same is happening in France btw, nuclear energy is sold for 7 cent on the spot energy exchange, but the actual production costs per kwh are over 15 cents. The subsidized 7 cent (used to be less than 4) prohibited any other technology to have a chance on the market.

  • @MowGohhldRequired
    @MowGohhldRequired 3 роки тому +30

    The idea of "Flipping the script" is good. But the topic in this case is undermined by the selected guests.
    They lumped several potential conflicts together:
    Young with no life experience Middle aged worker with stable position in life (this alone can be enough for misunderstandings)
    The woman is from western germany the worker is from east germany (there is still some tension between east and west germans)
    The point is both cannot debate on equal footing. Also both have no leverage to change the social situation regardless weather they find a compromise or not. They can express their hopes and fears but still high politics decides what will happen. And politicians have been aware of their problems beforehand.

    • @Luredreier
      @Luredreier 2 роки тому +1

      I agree to some degree with the first half of your comment.
      Although I also find value in diversity.
      Two enviromentalists and two on the other side, affected by the changes, one enviromentalist from the same region as the coal miner and the other from the region of the first enviromentalist might have been preferable.
      I don't know.
      But your claim that they have no leverage simply isn't true.
      This is a election, this is *why* they're here right now.
      Both to convince the politicans *and* their fellow citizens.
      And indeed since this has a English subtitle also other citizens of the world.
      Perhaps the coal miners concerns about lack of electricity will convince someone in my own country, Norway that a few more windmills isn't *that* bad and that we *should* build more of them and sell our electricity to Germany, either directly through cables or indirectly through hydrogen, using the existing natural gas infrastructure.

  • @chantilmnop9010
    @chantilmnop9010 3 роки тому +44

    I love how the arguemnt is always "there are so many joblosses if we stop coal mining", and no one is talking about all the jobs and villages lost that were destroyed in order to mine said coal???
    also saying "we don't have 100% renewable energy" when CDU has actually fought against making sure we can cover all necessary electricity needs....

    • @Srab23
      @Srab23 3 роки тому +4

      Maybe people are more worried about losing their job tomorrow than everything in ten years lol. It almost seem like the human mind has a sort of blind spot to consequences that are decades away

    • @chantilmnop9010
      @chantilmnop9010 3 роки тому +4

      @@Srab23 you missed my point people lose their villages these days due to coal mining because where they live are the actual coal resources and therefore complete villages are resettled and destroyed, the argument that we will lose even more in the future is a complete different one
      and just because it's a blind spot doesn't mean we shouldn't ignore it, also it's not 10 years for everyone ask the people of Ahrensfeld...

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +3

      @@chantilmnop9010 coal mining isnt the only mining activity that changed environment drastically you know? Start looking at your smartphone and think how many villages are destroyed to make it.

    • @jasonlee6326
      @jasonlee6326 3 роки тому

      While the UK where I'm from still needs to go further we have had several days without fossil fuels in our energy mix, with more and more going into growing industries like wind. Actually doing stuff doesn't take long, it's the will to do it is the problem like you mention.

    • @stompysnake8233
      @stompysnake8233 2 роки тому +3

      Natural disasters are a possibility, not a certainty.
      Job losses are a certainty.

  • @Uchetysx5
    @Uchetysx5 3 роки тому +46

    Would Loooooovvvee to see this tried out in USA. Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders, Rand Paul sitting quietly in the crowd would be popcorn gold!

    • @qrtse7169
      @qrtse7169 2 роки тому +3

      💯

    • @paleggett1897
      @paleggett1897 2 роки тому +1

      Cruz and Paul would not ever earnestly sit down to do the work…

    • @qrtse7169
      @qrtse7169 2 роки тому

      @@piotrtrebisz6602 thank you sir I will 100% use this if I get into a debate and I will definitely look into what you just said

    • @paleggett1897
      @paleggett1897 2 роки тому

      @@piotrtrebisz6602 greed and power, power & greed…. It’s the RethugliKKKan and Democretin way…. Cruelty, that tends to be a new flavor of leadership to cover up the stench of those politicians

    • @paleggett1897
      @paleggett1897 2 роки тому

      @@piotrtrebisz6602 I concur. It is reflected in the rancor over the ‘Critical Race Theory’ as the practices and policies have closely followed/mirrored/supported its implementation starting with the Constitution and Bill of Rights ✌🏽

  • @Tammissa
    @Tammissa 3 роки тому +27

    The weather is getting worse. All countries have to start using other means of energy that is clean and doesn’t damage the environment. Jobs can be kept, just in a different way. Someone has to run the new clean energy systems. So jobs will not be lost, but our world will be lost. A job means nothing if we’re all dead, diseased, starving and at war with each other.

    • @perrywidhalm114
      @perrywidhalm114 3 роки тому +1

      No. Why spread fear and panic? Grow up ....

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +1

      "Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less." Marie Curie

    • @user-nf9xc7ww7m
      @user-nf9xc7ww7m 3 роки тому +2

      True, but many of the new jobs will require training and education that manual labourers or those too old to learn new tricks can handle.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-nf9xc7ww7m Where there is a will, there is a way. You are never too late to learn new things.

    • @miz4535
      @miz4535 3 роки тому +1

      @@flipwinks5387 She died of the effects of radioactivity of atoms. WHy could we fear less? Because we take precautions against the danger. The danger of climate change requires us to stop emitting GHGs.

  • @ChrisWo1983
    @ChrisWo1983 3 роки тому +11

    Hervorragendes Format, richtig gut gemacht 👍. Schön, dass hier eine offene und angenehme Diskussion durchgeführt werden konnte.

  • @Elementalism.
    @Elementalism. 3 роки тому +13

    I think the problem with wanting predictability is that the way we are currently looking at dealing with this issue prevents predictability.
    Whenever i look at politics and business talking about tackling this issue, we are talking about "what is the minimum that we need to do.
    And i do get that, the scale of the issue makes going beyond the minimum, even by a little bit, ends up costing massive amounts...
    But every time a new climate report comes out saying "well, it's going a little faster then we anticipated" we have to drastically change our plans.
    There is no buffer to catch this.
    We need to stop looking at the minimal that we can get away with
    That target will move as the problems get worse
    We need to go beyond the minimum, then, when a new report comes out saying "it's going faster then anticipated", then we have that buffer and we can say: great, unfortunate, but we don't have to change the plan.
    And even if that buffer is insufficient, the anount we have to change the plan will be drastically less.
    And yes, we know that these reports will come
    Because when is the last time you saw a report that stated: i'm sorry folks, i'm afraid we overestimated the problem...

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +1

      The longer we wait, the more expensive it gets!

    • @liasonlee1248
      @liasonlee1248 3 роки тому +1

      True, a report is just a human crafted documents, the climate isn't going to follow what is in those report. Being minimalistic towards a crisis for one's pleasure is just asking for trouble.

  • @unclepete100
    @unclepete100 3 роки тому +36

    Interesting concept, politicians asking questions and voters in the hot seat. My take? Germany is as divided as many other nations on climate policy. And greenhouse gases keep rising steadily......

    • @aloksen626
      @aloksen626 3 роки тому +2

      Quite an interesting format.

    • @krollpeter
      @krollpeter 2 роки тому +4

      Germany does not have those which are in total denial of climate change (or few only), as we what we see for example in the US. Even those who do not agree with Fridays For Future do mostly agree there is a certain need to do something.

    • @unclepete100
      @unclepete100 2 роки тому +1

      @@krollpeter Sure, ...do something by all means, but ‘Atomausstieg’ before ‘Kohleausstieg’ ? That’s insane

    • @krollpeter
      @krollpeter 2 роки тому

      @@unclepete100 I do not have the competence to say what is right. I would listen to science, if I had to decide.
      I think the guy is right, develop strategy and stick to it for as long as is is running well. Do not move the goalpost every week. And I am also in agreement with the young lady. If we do something we will actually enjoy a better world and better life, not a degradation.

  • @tesla3388
    @tesla3388 3 роки тому +6

    Good discussion from S.Korea

  • @NebraskaGonvilleJones
    @NebraskaGonvilleJones 3 роки тому +12

    So refreshing to a hear calm reasonable discussion about an important topic

    • @ItIsGonnaGetWayWorse
      @ItIsGonnaGetWayWorse 3 роки тому +1

      they aint american

    • @TheTeaParty320
      @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

      What is so important about this topic?

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      There are many calm reasonable discussions about important topics, only they are mostly not taking place in media outlets, as they are not that interesting for many (private) broadcasters.

    • @appleslover
      @appleslover 3 роки тому

      They ain't Americans

  • @lucacamphuisen3093
    @lucacamphuisen3093 2 роки тому +6

    Very good discussion showing both sides. Respect for the 19 year old. Glad we can keep the discussion civil and don't polarize the society into two parties by respecting other people's opinions. This is a non-partisan issue and we should respect and find solutions to the problems people may have when solving this issue. Another great video DW! Wish there were more of these type of videos here. Greetings from the Netherlands!

  • @imdylon
    @imdylon 3 роки тому +8

    Yes. Transitioning to renewables will result in less jobs in coal sector. But the COST of not embracing climate change as the reality and working towards sustainability is way dire than a job loss in some sectors.

    • @imdylon
      @imdylon 3 роки тому +1

      @Jao Bai Dun Well that's why it has to be a transition, wouldn't happen overnight.
      I suggest you read the latest IPCC report mate.

  • @haylekm
    @haylekm 3 роки тому +2

    What is feared is that as farms fail due to ongoing extreme weather, the looting will result in militaries taking control to prevent it.
    If we're over come by our fears we will sell our freedom for comfort from anxiety. This is the fear of totalitarianism. Climate is a real fear, but we should refuse to give up freedom, nor seek totalitarianism to avoid it. For 50 years climate debate has failed to convince people not just that it is real, but how bad it is going to be. If the economy cannot afford to stop it, then it certainly cannot afford what is to come. The emergency is that no country is prepared nor even can be.
    Disaster relief will eventually overwhelmed due to many floods, fires, storms and heatwaves. Farming productivity will diminish as the onslaught of extreme weather worsens. Countries will try to produce as much as they can with indoor farming methods, but these methods will not scale. Perhaps some areas will remain peaceful, but if you make people hungry enough then they will steal food at the least. Many areas will become under military and police control and this will be the new normal.
    We should stop climate change now, give up some luxuries, but after a while a sustainable infrastructure will return us to a better quality of life. We can remain democratic. To avoid companies acting in fear we must forgive the oil and coal companies while encouraging governments to stop supplementing unsustainable industries. We can move forward and eventually move on.

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому +8

    Those that never change, perish. Those that embrace change, thrive.

  • @MalcolmMusik
    @MalcolmMusik 3 роки тому +3

    Wonderful Project! Love it! 🧡💚

  • @seidenstickerj
    @seidenstickerj 2 роки тому

    How to take part?

  • @gkam44
    @gkam44 3 роки тому +1

    It is too late. The permafrost is outgassing Methane, there Methane seeps in Antarctica, and the world's ocean currents which regulate our climate are slowing down. If they stop, most of us will die.

  • @aorusaki
    @aorusaki 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the english subtitles!!!

  • @anno-fw7xn
    @anno-fw7xn 3 роки тому +3

    13:10 this guy dont get , at this peek time some indusrtie need to be shut down, or put on the own power cride, the econmice is not working.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      "Die Höhe reizt uns, nicht die Stufen; den Gipfel im Auge wandeln wir gerne auf der Ebene."
      "The height appeals to us, not the steps; the summit in mind, we like to stroll the plains."
      Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

  • @plung3r
    @plung3r 2 роки тому

    Developing countries don't have a capability to go full renewable. Current green energy are expensive. Countries like Germany, USA, France, UK, Japan, S. Korea may go full renewable in 15-20 years, but not India, China, Brazil, Indonesia, Africa. They have to find solutions for these countries also.

    • @RafToTheMaf
      @RafToTheMaf 2 роки тому

      Thats why it's up to us to do (at least) the Basic Research and set a new standart for renewables

  • @RamPrasad-rb4vc
    @RamPrasad-rb4vc 2 роки тому

    Very nice format. 👌👍

  • @Long_Toe
    @Long_Toe 3 роки тому +4

    I worked in the R&D of a building services engineering company for years, and am very passionate about innovation towards fossil-free society.
    However, Sebastian is my guy in this debate. What Pauline says is true, but known. What Sebastian says is the reality politics has to answer, and he is the only "politician" in this debate to give a "Ansatz" (proposal) towards a solution, namely setting up a fund in his area to help develop new industries.
    Pauline only points to the people in the audience, and is "flipping the charts" double so to speak, that was a real downer to me.
    I loved the part about "FfF is naive, and that's their "Aushängeschild". Very strong debate there, and a nice mild touch of irony:)
    So, if this was a real political debate, I would vote Sebastian, not Pauline, despite I'm a strong pro towards green politics.. Be aware green parties not to talk around the hot stuff. Come with solutions that do pain to the whole society by setting up funds for Lausitz & Co and don't let people drown in any respect!

    • @miz4535
      @miz4535 3 роки тому +1

      Industries being made redundant is as old as civilisation. Know any blacksmiths? It's a non argument.

  • @asmadali-
    @asmadali- 2 роки тому +1

    How to taaaaaaaalk without any anchor (technical or factual).

  • @diansetyohusodo6159
    @diansetyohusodo6159 3 роки тому +1

    It's need our participation as individual to limit carbon effect from generation to generation use green energy is a must and enlarge green field areas.

  • @Mazequax
    @Mazequax 2 роки тому

    I think this discussion was unfair, regarding their debating skills and experience.
    He completely took over the narrative and deflected so many questions by proficiently dancing around the topic; whilst at the same time undermining her points; and playing down the dangers of climate change, as though Germany were eternally safe from its impacts. She rarely intervened during points in which I saw great potential for undermining his position; pointing out how wrongly his messages could be received by the public, for example; or that he might lack a sense of urgency.
    Furthermore, he presents himself as the calmer and more reasonable of the two, while she started to become a little flustered at some point. In fact, he's an excellent orator, who gets his point through from start to finish. I am actually quite in awe of his skills. It's like his voice was demanding for attention. Look at how the audience hangs on his lips. NODDERS. She, on the other hand, sometimes lacked the finesse to finish her sentences in a satisfactorily manner - both rhetorically and content-wise.
    While he often uses very specific and technical terms, which makes for a very expertly impression, instilling in him trust and, thus, authority, she often talked in very broad and generalised terms. Her weakest point was the moment she had to admit, not being able to give any answers, not realising that a couple of general innovative ideas would have sufficed. While her points have good substance, she struggled giving them a concise and easily comprehensible, non-ideological voice, which makes her vulnerable to counter arguments and "external attacks", e.g. the CDU guy, as well as inherently creating more questions than there were before. Inherently, due to their (as such perceived) ideological nature.
    Ultimately, she's 19. Her performance, for that age and point of education, was impressive at very least. I just felt like this debate was a tad unfair :D And he isn't some nutty conspiracy theorist, either. They're both reasonable in their own perspective and have the same goal in mind; just don't see eye-to-eye regarding the when, the what, the how and the how much they're willing to sacrifice. Which, again, begs the question, whether or not both have the necessary life experience to draw from, to be able to comprehend the scope and gravity of this matter, the required sacrifices and the global effect of their action or inaction.

  • @rainebow77
    @rainebow77 3 роки тому

    nice!!! more of that!

  • @DMT4Dinner
    @DMT4Dinner 2 роки тому +1

    Id like to give the speaking platform to the young lady, and a solar job to the ex-coal miner

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm 2 роки тому

      Sorry no job for him, the German government dismantled 100k jobs in the solar industry in 2012/13 to protect the 15k jobs left in the coal industry, that even back then everyone knew had no future. Maybe he can move to the Congo and help mine cobalt safely.

  • @harveytheparaglidingchaser7039
    @harveytheparaglidingchaser7039 3 роки тому +1

    Reducing rampant consumption destined for landfill will increase quality of life

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm 2 роки тому

      Let's start with Apple products.

  • @user-nf9xc7ww7m
    @user-nf9xc7ww7m 3 роки тому

    I thought from the title that the coal miners would argue the climate activist's points and vice versa...

  • @MarcusSchmalzlockus
    @MarcusSchmalzlockus 3 роки тому +6

    We need a world wide one-child policy. But no one dares to tackle the real problem that is overpopulation.

    • @RamPrasad-rb4vc
      @RamPrasad-rb4vc 2 роки тому +1

      You are 100% right. Overpopulation is killing the planet. Nobody is even talking about it.

    • @tobiasgregori3842
      @tobiasgregori3842 2 роки тому +5

      @@RamPrasad-rb4vc it needs to be done in asia and africa. not europe. europe is on the decline and needs more births 1.6

    • @parthapratimghose173
      @parthapratimghose173 2 роки тому

      One child policy is retarded
      It should be 2

    • @parthapratimghose173
      @parthapratimghose173 2 роки тому

      @@tobiasgregori3842 don't worry lol when eu lacks people immigrants would come in filling the voids
      The only real population problem is sub Africa with insane poverty

  • @mikemack7933
    @mikemack7933 3 роки тому +13

    The girl is bright with optimism but the guy See's life more realistic from his experience both have good pounds and can learn from each other.

  • @yepyep2921
    @yepyep2921 2 роки тому

    Just finished watching and overall the hopes are high which is good. However, there needs to be more realistic and rational ideas.
    However, all that the woman says is contradicting - she’s a perfect politician in training: “I’d like to interrupt because you said climate protection means restriction and sacrifice above everything else, and I think it’s exactly the opposite. The social discourse is often: we shouldn’t do things too quickly now, things shouldn’t change now, things shouldn’t have to change, I think that in the end, it’s the opposite, we are doing climate protection now as a preventative measure to ensure that not everything changes and that we can still have a good life. And that’s why it’s so essential that we tackle things now, so we can make sure we live in an economy where all jobs are sustainable as soon as possible. That we live in an economy where jobs don’t continue to exploit, or contribute to destruction but that we live in an economic system where people can do well.”
    Ideally, the best solution at this moment is to continue to study the Earth and its cycles, learn from its history and make correction or predictions on that information. It’s basically what people have been doing for centuries.

  • @theowl2044
    @theowl2044 2 роки тому

    And yet they never answer how lithium ion batteries are made and recycled

  • @v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096
    @v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096 3 роки тому

    I liked this.

  • @smisma4600
    @smisma4600 3 роки тому

    It's a great format! Also with these little information peaces in between.
    The background music of the information peaces always makes me expect the beat to drop which is a little disappointing as it doesn't happen.

  • @ISSH-nu7rn
    @ISSH-nu7rn 2 роки тому

    I am child of the 80's so I am still waiting for Acid rains 🌧 and Ozon depletion. Waiting......🤔

    • @AA-vi1cc
      @AA-vi1cc 2 роки тому

      Waiting to realize it’s already happened? Have you not heard of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer? The 1987 international agreement limited the use of chemical pollutants that damaged the ozone layer and the hole over Antartica started to recover in the following years. And sulfuric and nitric acids have been measured in elevated amounts in rain water near industrial cites, this is well

    • @ISSH-nu7rn
      @ISSH-nu7rn 2 роки тому

      @@AA-vi1cc Keep telling yourself fancy stories...

    • @AA-vi1cc
      @AA-vi1cc 2 роки тому

      @@ISSH-nu7rn you could just google to confirm what i said but i take it you’d rather continue living in ignorance and denial

    • @ISSH-nu7rn
      @ISSH-nu7rn 2 роки тому

      @@AA-vi1cc In 40-50 years time climate will still change even without humans. Greenland 🇬🇱 was with out the ice, Egypt 🇪🇬 was a swap and lush forests. No cars and oil back then.That is the proof!!! Nothing stays the same on this planet. I recommend u hit some history books 📚 👌 😉

  • @bfukngu8841
    @bfukngu8841 3 роки тому +1

    It will be interesting to see if they actually follow through on this, because as far as I know there’s nothing out there right now that can power entire countries.

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm 2 роки тому

      So Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Uruguay or New Zealand aren't countries?

  • @muellerhans
    @muellerhans 2 роки тому

    We won't get new energy harvesting innovations that will change everything. Thank about how energy can be produced currently, what resources exist and what the nature does. You covered basically everything. Except for rain (and clouds), lightning, radiation and natural catastrophes (earthquakes, thunderstorms). Tho some products for making use of rain exist (at least in experimental state) but harvesting lightning energy is attempted since the late 80s. Even more adventurous takes like getting energy from natural catastrophes are imagineable but I doubt we will get anything from that during the next 50 years.

  • @nil0bject
    @nil0bject 3 роки тому

    Why do they think that Germany is the only country doing something?

    • @nil0bject
      @nil0bject 3 роки тому

      Coal miner only talks about people. Very weird. Does he think people is the only thing living on the planet? Total nutjob

    • @nil0bject
      @nil0bject 3 роки тому

      I live off grid on solar. I run multiple computers. It works! What a surprise. Maybe Germany doesn’t have batteries?

    • @channel_abc123_
      @channel_abc123_ 3 роки тому +4

      It's a vid made by a German news channel, featuring 2 German citizens/voters and a bunch of politicians about the German federal election, what do you want

  • @prometheanknight7377
    @prometheanknight7377 3 роки тому

    For people who think the girl is rich and entitled, know that the most poorest countries are effected the most by climate change. In Bangladesh currently 1 in every 7 people are displaced by floods and sea level rise, which have increased in frequency and intensity for climate change, but Bangladesh emits less than 0.1% of global annual cardon emissions. You should also know that renewable energy sources make more jobs than fossil fuels. So the girl if she is rich and entitled speaks more for the poor than the coal miner who could probably get it job in the renewable energy sector.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому

      Do you think this lady knows what true hardship is?? She lives in a modern western country, what do you think the hardest thing shes ever faced in her life? Has she ever experienced waiting on the line at 5 am in the morning just to get 10 litres of clear water so her family can drink or cook?

  • @magfes9209
    @magfes9209 2 роки тому

    Er hat einfach angst, dass er sein Job verlieren, und dafür schließt er die Augen.
    Vielleicht ändert er seine Meinung wenn kein Wasser mehr in seiner Region ist.

  • @user-qr7ee2cp4y
    @user-qr7ee2cp4y 3 роки тому +3

    This is like a 600 lb woman saying I want to get down to 90 lbs... how about she works on getting down to 300 lb and see how quick that goes? That's still a 50% reduction.

  • @tjmarx
    @tjmarx 3 роки тому +5

    I really enjoy the concept of this video, but let's be real. This isn't a video about climate change. You have one overly emotional participant, fresh from a natural disaster that she doesn't understand, talking about a subject she doesn't really understand and having a panic attack while she does because her head has been filled with an alarmist narrative instead of genuine science.
    The latest IPCC report talks about a need to shift away from emissions quickly over the coming decades and in so doing is talking about 2050. 2038 is well within that timeframe, there's no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
    A carbon neutral society is not a net zero (zero emissions) society. These terms need to be understood. A carbon neutral society is one where you take your emissions and you pay a place to say those emissions belong to them.
    A net zero society genuinely creates no emissions. A society which is domestically net zero but relies on other countries to use emissions generating technology in order facilitate it's domestic net zero, is not genuinely net zero. Genuine net zero means nothing in your society, including imported products generated emissions or that you have a means to remove such emissions from atmosphere and right now that's not possible to achieve.
    Let's pretend genuine net zero was possible, unless yankville, China and India hit those same targets it's not going to move the needle. Like it or not, Germany's climate change experience is influenced mostly by extraterritorial decisions in the big 3.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +1

      “A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step.” Laozi

    • @tjmarx
      @tjmarx 3 роки тому +1

      @@flipwinks5387 It's useless of that step is in the wrong direction

    • @miz4535
      @miz4535 3 роки тому +1

      2050 assumes we have significant carbon sequestration from technology that doesn't exist.

    • @tjmarx
      @tjmarx 3 роки тому +2

      @@miz4535 Again, false. 2050 is the target set by the IPCC for the large emission countries to change their ways, if we want to limit AGW average global temp rise to 1.5-2°c
      Try actually reading and understanding not only this report but all of the literature, and what climate change actually is. Alarmists are worse than deniers, indeed alarmists breed deniers.
      Become genuinely scientifically literate.

    • @tjmarx
      @tjmarx 2 роки тому

      @Waxel Punkt. Attempting to slow AGW to 1.5-2°c is desirable. To obtain that we do not need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
      We do need to start setting long term plans for now to 2050, but we don't need to destroy our economies by trying to make those changes overnight. Particularly when the overwhelming majority of ordinary people (I'd estimate 99%) including those who consider themselves "climate activists" do not understand what climate change actually is.

  • @DivorcedHedgehog
    @DivorcedHedgehog 3 роки тому +3

    I want the public to know, there have been far worse flooding of the past 100 years than this in the region.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      what is your point? 140+ dead is nothing to worry about? For me 1+ dead is unbearable in context of a phenomenon we created ourselves, due to straightening of rivers and sealing or building in areas nature originally created to compensate the water masses of floods!

    • @lauravergot9995
      @lauravergot9995 3 роки тому +2

      @@flipwinks5387 I agree with you but what you said has nothing to do with climate change or coal and everything to do with poor infrastructure and urban planning/ maintenance. I think the original commenter also agrees with you and that was the meaning of their comment. That we cannot blame climate change for this. I find it despicable how they are trying to hide these problems behind climate change. Sadly it's not happening only in Germany, many other states are doing the same.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      @@lauravergot9995 Sure, not everything can be blamed on climate change. But that has not been my intention in my response. Since I could not see any connection from the original post to climate change, it was merely trying to express that these deaths were actually not only of the flooding itself, but rather due to the poor planning of humans. My point was to make a connection to the original theme. As the planning to fight climate change goes in the same direction, in which result many will suffer and die, just as it happend during the flood.

    • @saadisave
      @saadisave 3 роки тому

      @@flipwinks5387 Libraries are far less efficient than the internet. More space for less information. (More trees too.)

  • @alexandrep.-morin3897
    @alexandrep.-morin3897 3 роки тому

    I get both their argument but dude, weve been telling the world since the 1970s that climate is changing because of our actions and 50 years later nothing drastic has changed. Yes we have to look back the entire economic system if we want to change....but we had 50 years to do so

    • @perrywidhalm114
      @perrywidhalm114 3 роки тому

      And, what have you done dude? Nothing ......

    • @alexandrep.-morin3897
      @alexandrep.-morin3897 3 роки тому

      @@perrywidhalm114 ah yes because of course everybody would listen to me lol

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      "Each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity." Marie Curie
      Actually human fuelled climate change started around 1830, so we did have quite some time to think about it, but at some point we must stop debating and start acting, if we would be honest to care about our children and theirs.
      It will not get easier with more time wasted on debates, rather the opposite is the case!!

    • @alexandrep.-morin3897
      @alexandrep.-morin3897 3 роки тому

      @@flipwinks5387 In my comments, im talking in the past tense because theres no way we could change now. Tomorrow is too late, and clearly were not prepare to change. Like you said, we need to act...except its too late and people are deaf.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      @@alexandrep.-morin3897 The people you are talking about are not deaf, just have slow minds. "It's never too late to become what you could have been." George Eliot

  • @Pr3d4tor99
    @Pr3d4tor99 2 роки тому

    its great that germany is striving towards more and more renewable energy but the problem is that the world is not made out of just germany!

    • @Psi-Storm
      @Psi-Storm 2 роки тому

      New technologies are always for the rich at first, because they are the only ones that can pay the development and rollout. Due to subsidies in the past that paid for mass production capabilities wind and solar are now the cheapest forms of energy production by a mile. With just those two, we can cover around 75% of the direct energy needs, the rest has to come from storage. That will cost money again to get it into cheap mass adoption, but it's doable.

  • @karlel9663
    @karlel9663 3 роки тому +1

    She's hot! Forget coal she's the damn reason for Global warming :p

  • @marcogergele6183
    @marcogergele6183 2 роки тому

    Sebastian Lachmann hat offenbar keine wirkliche Vorstellung von den Größenordnungen, um die es geht, und von der Irreversibilität und von Kipppunkten. Jeder, wirklich jeder, der sich intensiver mit den seriösen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen befasst, versteht die Panik und die unglaubliche Gefahr.

  • @admes12345
    @admes12345 3 роки тому +15

    We need nuclear power

    • @jaaksavat7916
      @jaaksavat7916 3 роки тому

      That's not what the people of fukushima are saying. However they got a bunch of nuclear second hand bargains. There's not e f en finance in place to decommission several outdated nuclear power stations in Europe

    • @encabsss
      @encabsss 3 роки тому +5

      @@jaaksavat7916 It’s their mistake that they put their back-up generator in the ground or basement. If they only place the back generator in the roof or in high level ground, the disaster in the Fukushima won’t happen.

    • @jaaksavat7916
      @jaaksavat7916 3 роки тому +1

      @@encabsss another mistake on the list. What about decommissioning like Sheffield, public money build it, privatised after and now back to the public purse to decommission. Nuclear power is insanity, in cost to build and to decommission, water usage and reliance, waste etc etc. Fusion might be game changer

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      As long as the waste problem is not solved, nuclear power is no solution. And just hoping on future tec, is neither an answer for the problems at hand.

    • @elchuchulo
      @elchuchulo 3 роки тому +3

      @@jaaksavat7916 yes the 2 victims of Fukushima... versus the millions that will die due to crop failures.

  • @micoroga9495
    @micoroga9495 3 роки тому +1

    For me, you can combat climate if the countries with significant parts on its contributing factors. A rich country can also has leverage to fund or mandate programs to eventually change to be environmentally friendly. The problem with envt activists are they want radical change, but cannot foresee how it affects other communities.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому

      More like their own community. Youre deluded if you think the radical changes they proposed will not impact their life.

  • @flipwinks5387
    @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

    Im weltweiten Vergleich müssen wir unseren Standard senken, wenn ein globaler Konsens erreicht werden soll.
    (In worldwide comparison we have to lower our standard, if a global consent is to be reached.)
    Wenn die ganze Welt auf unserem Standard leben würde, wäre dies nicht zielführend im Kontext der Klimakrise oder der Rohstoffknappheit.
    (If the whole world would live at our standard, this would not be expedient in context to climate-change or resource-scarcity.)
    "Wer in einer endlichen Welt an exponenziellen Wachtum glaubt, ist entweder verrückt oder Wirtschaftswissenschaftler" Kenneth E. Bolding
    („Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.“ Kenneth E. Bolding)

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 3 роки тому

      Why not? Why limit our world just on Earth? We are in a preliminary stage of exploiting the Solar system for resources. There are enough resources there to sustain human economic developđent for centuries.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      We are not even close to harvesting in space. So before looking for solutions maybe possible in the distant future, we should focus a solutions at hand right now.
      "Problems can never be solved thinking the same way that created them." Albert Einstein

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 3 роки тому

      @@flipwinks5387 yeah...a random quote from Albert Einstein that doesnt even apply here wont work on me.
      We are pretty damn close to start resource extracting on the moon and nearer asteroids. It could be done within 50 years or so.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      @@SuperLusername "Everyone has a bar in front of their head - only the distance makes a difference." Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach
      But you do know how much pollution is created by launching one rocket into space. As soon as you prove to me, that you are able save that amount here on earth, we can talk about space exploration on large scale to commence mining. Deal?

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 2 роки тому

      @Waxel Punkt.
      1) I dont agree that overpopulation is a problem. The only problem is the ineffective distribution of resources.
      2) "Getting rid" of anybody is a big NO from me. I may disagree with what most/all of them have to say, but in the words of a greater man than me: "...I will defend, to the death, their right to say it."
      3) Immigration for me is an issue only as long as it's legal and well regulated. Problem is, lately immigration into Europe has lately been illegal and unregulated. We literally have no idea who ever came into our union.
      4) There already are places without humans, where humans can only come and stroll around without literring or building anything - "National Parks" - if you're into that sort of thing

  • @laaaah4577
    @laaaah4577 2 роки тому

    Wow, this guys is completely delusional. Sounds like he’s already living on another planet

  • @SuperLusername
    @SuperLusername 3 роки тому +5

    16:11 I love that "...oh you sweet summer child..." look that he gives her.

  • @atillagoktan2119
    @atillagoktan2119 3 роки тому +1

    Tropical relaxation 📻

  • @AIRPLAYBROADCASTON
    @AIRPLAYBROADCASTON 3 роки тому

    What happens on the solar star of this universe affects the climate amongst other factors. I am not sure humanity has any control over that. People talk about clima wandel and clima neutral. Is it clima politik terms for something else like political change or political neutrality.

  • @szalailaci3722
    @szalailaci3722 2 роки тому

    I would like a dubbed version in English.

  • @jamesskinner1902
    @jamesskinner1902 3 роки тому +7

    Western society is so sad. Let’s ask the child what we should do?

    • @jensboettiger5286
      @jensboettiger5286 3 роки тому +4

      The way to teach children to take responsibility is to give it to them. That’s a traditional part of how German society works, though it’s rare that it’s seen on an international platform.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +1

      @@jensboettiger5286 what do the children know?? I remember being a-know-it-all-smug at 20 years old only to face reality of how the world works at 30's.

    • @Staff708
      @Staff708 3 роки тому

      It's not about her. It's about listening to the scientists. There is nothing to debate.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 2 роки тому +1

      @@Staff708 she isnt a scientist.

    • @Staff708
      @Staff708 2 роки тому

      @@harukrentz435 She doesn't need to be. She is advocating for facts and our survival and he just cares about himself.

  • @liasonlee1248
    @liasonlee1248 3 роки тому +9

    Honestly, just dismantle capitalist system and focus on survival against climate change, we had the chance of creating collectivized society to improvised everyone's living standard in general, we just wasted it on our insatiable greed and adopted the worse kind of economy model we could ever picked today.
    Add: "jobs" wouldn't be a problem as a collectivized economy wouldn't tie down one's livelihood as much as the capitalist system does, capitalist system is forcing people to do things that are profitable in the short term and adapt as many risks (cutting safety features, minimizing workers pay, destroying environment etc) on the way to maximize profits.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +1

      A c0mmunist detected.

    • @sb782
      @sb782 3 роки тому +4

      I love that you think this way, and in a perfect world you would be right. But we as humans can’t agree on anything, from protecting the environment, vaccines, etc .
      The system would only work if everyone does it, and not everyone would, thus you would need to enforce it.
      This world is imperfect, we need inperfect solutions

    • @liasonlee1248
      @liasonlee1248 3 роки тому

      @@sb782 And the world gives us inperfect future in return.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому

      @@sb782 the soviet had done it in the past. Look where they are now?

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +2

      We are all sitting in a highspeed train which runs to a cliff, the track is set and all we care to do is to change the driver every couple of years. And only when the train reaches the rim of the cliff, we will start to ask ourselves: how did we get here?
      True communism could work, but only if the whole world would participate. And THAT is the utopia 😢. For now, we will have to work with what we got 😉.

  • @palmtree_
    @palmtree_ 3 роки тому +4

    Nuclear power plants is the way to go

  • @harukrentz435
    @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +13

    Will this lady activist leave her convenient lifestyle though??

  • @vthilton
    @vthilton 3 роки тому +1

    Save Our Planet

  • @hwago123
    @hwago123 3 роки тому +2

    Is she even 18?

  • @henasgd1566
    @henasgd1566 2 роки тому

    GREENFLATION

  • @harpreetkahlon4559
    @harpreetkahlon4559 2 роки тому

    Pm

  • @curtisbattig6172
    @curtisbattig6172 3 роки тому +2

    Solar punk

  • @shoal2242
    @shoal2242 3 роки тому

    I TOO WANT TO MEET THIS CLIMATE ACTIVITIEST PAULINE ,, I want to chat with her in personal💌💘❤

  • @ronaldgarrison8478
    @ronaldgarrison8478 3 роки тому

    I hate to say it, but this was a fairly useless discussion, consisting of mostly a lot of hand-waving arguments. With this kind of issue, you really need to be quantitative about some things at least, or you're really not saying anything.
    On balance, I don't agree with much of what Sebastian said, mainly because he was all about doubt, how we don't know about this or that, and we need to pursue all possibilities. *NO*. I give that side of the argument to the FFF activist. OTOH I oppose her initially because she is…FFF. TBH that's the big strike against her-kurzgesagt.

  • @aboobakerpa2939
    @aboobakerpa2939 2 роки тому

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

    This girl should return to her job in the day care centre and leave science to real scientists and oilmen like me.

  • @bluthammer1442
    @bluthammer1442 3 роки тому +7

    we have to maintain a standard of living - he said. Of all the arguments against, that is the dumbest one i've ever heard in my life. We have one planet...but there are about 8 billion of us. We can retry a standard of comfortable living some other time. Given Germany's history and the hardships itself had faced, this is an incredibly stupid comment.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +9

      He said the reality. The real life. If you disagreed with him why dont you start living like people used to live in the 18-19the century? No car, no motorcycle, no phone, no internet, drawn your water from your well, basically no things that made our present life so convenient. Do that for a month and tell us how your standard of living is like.

    • @darinherrick9224
      @darinherrick9224 3 роки тому +1

      That focus on standard of living is why World War II happened. Countries saw a way to raise their standard of living by taking the wealth of of people they don't like and slaughtering them like animals.

    • @harukrentz435
      @harukrentz435 3 роки тому +3

      @@darinherrick9224 fallacy logic.

    • @alexandrecasey4769
      @alexandrecasey4769 3 роки тому

      @@harukrentz435 go camping for a week if you dont enjoy it well sorry you are already a weak cyborg addicted to comfort who are unable to change your way of living. At least in the 18th century people were not lazy...or they died. The natural selection is inverted now.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому +1

      I wonder why for so many, german history always starts at 1933?
      Some wise man once said: "Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed." And I agree, we could reach global consent, if some of us could lower their standard. What a naive thought, I sure know 😆.

  • @ouiroc
    @ouiroc 3 роки тому

    It's amazing how people don't remember where carbon came from in the first place we're not great in carbon it's already here the natural order of things just like oil And that the earth goes through cycles naturally from hot to cold and back again and in endless cycle

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      It does, but normally not at modern day speed. So we are the ones speeding up a process that will lead to our extinction, if we do not start to make a change (change of thought would be a first step long overdue 😉).

  • @loneranger6644
    @loneranger6644 3 роки тому +1

    Waiting for the next ice age when glaciers will cover Northern Europe making the growing of crops impossible. Countries will be fighting over food sources. Not a Happy outlook.

    • @lauravergot9995
      @lauravergot9995 3 роки тому

      It would solve overpopulation no! Isn't that what you want?

  • @rezzakali1613
    @rezzakali1613 3 роки тому

    Nonsense explain

  • @NextStitch
    @NextStitch 2 роки тому

    wow the young "hero". LOL

  • @gurufabbes1
    @gurufabbes1 3 роки тому +3

    "Politicians in the audience:....."
    And of course no one from the AfD. What a joke of a "discussion".
    The bias here is clear.
    EDIT: DW News responded that they were invited and chose not to attend. If that is the case, my criticism here is not valid.

    • @dwnews
      @dwnews  3 роки тому +5

      @gurufabbes1 Invitations to attend "Flipping the Script" were extended to politicians from all parties with a parliamentary group in the German Bundestag.

    • @gurufabbes1
      @gurufabbes1 3 роки тому +3

      @@dwnews If you say so... if they were invited and didn't attend, that's a different story. Thank you for replying and explaining.

    • @saadisave
      @saadisave 3 роки тому +2

      @@gurufabbes1 If AfD didn't want to attend, that says more about the party than it does about DW.

  • @fourthright
    @fourthright 3 роки тому

    If i send a coal miner from my country. The climate activist will lose the debate in a instant. Seeing the poverty and that his family will starve to death without the mine.

  • @sozialeidentitaet2045
    @sozialeidentitaet2045 3 роки тому

    Hormons

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

    We should care more about all the space junk our Mars missions are dumping on Mars.

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      Before you set out to make space a better place, make sure your own house is cleaned up 😉.

  • @SeeLasSee
    @SeeLasSee 3 роки тому +2

    She seems very intrigued and attracted to the coal miner. Perhaps they’ll end up as a happy couple. :)

  • @gabi6898
    @gabi6898 3 роки тому +1

    Where is the representation for people who think climate change is yet another political and corporate game?

    • @gabi6898
      @gabi6898 3 роки тому +1

      Where is the distinction between pollution( which is a problem we could solve) and the climate change as an ideology?

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

    We all know what happens whenever the Tutonics put mind into gear; nothing good ever comes out of it.

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

    I’ve always wondered how we could weaponise the climate. Imagine the power we’d have if we could bring draught and famine on our enemies, or sending typhoon after typhoon like hurling bowling balls at them.

  • @riddledriddler3933
    @riddledriddler3933 3 роки тому +10

    the overly emotional chick seems brainwashed too much and a bit delusional on her aggressive narrative.

    • @Marvid236
      @Marvid236 3 роки тому +7

      your comment seems overly emotional

    • @TheTeaParty320
      @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому

      @@Marvid236 so what about it?

    • @Marvid236
      @Marvid236 3 роки тому +5

      @@TheTeaParty320 "overly emotional chick" " brainwashed" "aggressive narrative"

    • @riddledriddler3933
      @riddledriddler3933 3 роки тому

      @@Marvid236 and yours seem overly simplistic

    • @raresmircea
      @raresmircea 3 роки тому +5

      @@riddledriddler3933 You’re a monument of rationality, honesty and composure! Fight on ye mighty warrior!

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому +1

    I always wondered what ever happened to all those people who flunked out of science class; guess they’ve all become climate junkies and hang out in sites like this.

  • @TheTeaParty320
    @TheTeaParty320 3 роки тому +2

    We can cool the planet with nuclear winter, but then you’d say that’s politically incorrect.

    • @elenorfighter2190
      @elenorfighter2190 3 роки тому +1

      Did you have something to say that really matters or did you have to much time to kill and must trolling on the internet?

    • @flipwinks5387
      @flipwinks5387 3 роки тому

      Too much time, just like me. Only that we tend in different directions.

  • @diamond3106
    @diamond3106 3 роки тому

    the girl's hot

  • @yoloswaggins1579
    @yoloswaggins1579 3 роки тому

    Wenn Paulines Eltern ihr kein Geld mehr geben und ihr Twitter nicht mehr funktioniert, dann findet sie Verzicht auf einmal nicht mehr so gut.