either one, not both. yes, classic move needs a finisher other than heimdall and alioth, but being a multiple-use cannonball with more stats and less downside is very dangerous.
I haven't completely thought this through but I feel like the enchantress buff would be way to strong. Because whilst it is true that shutting down activate cards could be nice, just changing it to "ongoing and activate" instead of "remove text" is way better imo. If she removes text she can not only target ongoing and activate cards, she can shut down any move card like dagger, torch, or vulture. She can shut down any destroy card like nimrod, wolverine, bucky, deadpool and x-23. Thats already shutting down 2 entire archetypes. On top of that she also gains tha ability to shut down targets that you would normally need red guardian for, like dracula making her significantly better against discard. She also shuts down on reveals from being triggered again completely; if you play her on top of a wong, your opponent would be able to still odin and retrigger their on reveals with the normal enchantress, but with this version she completely shuts that down as well.
I understand what you are saying but think about how common that would happen it would take getting use to but it would be similar to how you don't stack 10 powers in 1 lane cause of Shang but I did think that would be on the strong side
Enchantress would joust be like unnerved Alioath. But just better, because just costing 4 und removing negativ abilities on your side and also applying for all turns. Easy 2nd most broken card ever
Namor: +5 power if you have 1 or less other cards here Colossus: 1/3 Nakia: +2 power to the leftmost and rightmost card in your deck Gorr: 6/-3 Hydra Bob: 1/4 Red Guardian: give the card affected -1 power Arishem: now starts in your hand Iron Patriot: give the created card -3 cost Master Mold: 4/6, activate Corvus Glaive: 3/6 Hulkling: 5/9 Wiccan: 4/6 Adam Warlock: 4/4 draws a card if your opponent plays a card here Victoria Hand: 2/1 Bruce Banner: 2/3 Rework to Uatu, Kang, Howard, and Agatha but I don't know what
these changes are actually amazing and makes sense, but i absolutly can't stand Scream, because I was otp move deck player, so yeah, that one i don't like but i understand it. This concept of video is amazing and I want more
Don't have her, but whats the point of Pixie, honestly? Saw your vid on the Pixie deck and found it funny that half of the time her changes were either irrelevant or it didnt swap any stats at all. Must be reworked.
I like the mantis change, I don't think it'll make people play her a lot more, but hey, a little tiny bit more is better than practically never. The orka change is great and hilarious, give him +10, fuck it we ball; if people make a stink, +8 or 9 is fine too. Good pixie change no notes, whatever is under that cards hood now confuses and scares me, a little more reliabilty in its operation would be so welcome. The enchantress change could be extremely powerful actually, almost reminds me slightly of old leech. She'd have to be like a 4/3, maybe even a 5/5. I also think many players' knee-jerk reaction to seeing that would be frothing-at-mouth rage so maybe don't hold your breath. The scream change is neat, but maybe she could still be a 2/3 that only steals 1 power everytime? As for kraven, that change could really unlock his potential, but I would need to see it playtested to make sure it's not too strong, cuz paired with heimdall? yeesh
That Enchantress change would be way too strong and get insta nerfed. And imo they aren’t making Scream the Luke Cage of Move because having one card that counters an entire deck is just bad design, which is why Luke will get reworked eventually. It also doesn’t help that Scream decks are probably the most annoying decks to play against. I do really like your proposed change to Kraven though. I feel like Kingpin could also be a 1/3 and it wouldn’t be crazy.
I like many of these, but the Enchantress suggestion is outright insanely busted. Imagine if you had a Red Guardian that affects the entire lane. Holy molly. I also disagree with Scream. Scream decks usually lose when they cant play Scream on turn 2. Increasing the winconditions cost would nerf the deck. Also lets not promote archetype shutdown cards. Also why nerf Kraven? He is so much harder to activate than Angela.
Spider man 2099 needs to destroy highest power card and be able to trigger at least twice too
Nope!!
either one, not both. yes, classic move needs a finisher other than heimdall and alioth, but being a multiple-use cannonball with more stats and less downside is very dangerous.
I haven't completely thought this through but I feel like the enchantress buff would be way to strong. Because whilst it is true that shutting down activate cards could be nice, just changing it to "ongoing and activate" instead of "remove text" is way better imo. If she removes text she can not only target ongoing and activate cards, she can shut down any move card like dagger, torch, or vulture. She can shut down any destroy card like nimrod, wolverine, bucky, deadpool and x-23. Thats already shutting down 2 entire archetypes. On top of that she also gains tha ability to shut down targets that you would normally need red guardian for, like dracula making her significantly better against discard. She also shuts down on reveals from being triggered again completely; if you play her on top of a wong, your opponent would be able to still odin and retrigger their on reveals with the normal enchantress, but with this version she completely shuts that down as well.
I understand what you are saying but think about how common that would happen it would take getting use to but it would be similar to how you don't stack 10 powers in 1 lane cause of Shang but I did think that would be on the strong side
Enchantress would joust be like unnerved Alioath. But just better, because just costing 4 und removing negativ abilities on your side and also applying for all turns. Easy 2nd most broken card ever
Namor: +5 power if you have 1 or less other cards here
Colossus: 1/3
Nakia: +2 power to the leftmost and rightmost card in your deck
Gorr: 6/-3
Hydra Bob: 1/4
Red Guardian: give the card affected -1 power
Arishem: now starts in your hand
Iron Patriot: give the created card -3 cost
Master Mold: 4/6, activate
Corvus Glaive: 3/6
Hulkling: 5/9
Wiccan: 4/6
Adam Warlock: 4/4 draws a card if your opponent plays a card here
Victoria Hand: 2/1
Bruce Banner: 2/3
Rework to Uatu, Kang, Howard, and Agatha but I don't know what
The real wishlist in the comments
Knowing 2nd dinner they will nerf Adam Warlock and Buff Doom 2099
these changes are actually amazing and makes sense, but i absolutly can't stand Scream, because I was otp move deck player, so yeah, that one i don't like but i understand it. This concept of video is amazing and I want more
Don't have her, but whats the point of Pixie, honestly? Saw your vid on the Pixie deck and found it funny that half of the time her changes were either irrelevant or it didnt swap any stats at all. Must be reworked.
It's high roll card like Hela. Can do incredible and unexpected combos or do absolute nothing. This is her appeal.
I was waiting for this video 🔥
"Do nothing at all" 😂
I like the mantis change, I don't think it'll make people play her a lot more, but hey, a little tiny bit more is better than practically never. The orka change is great and hilarious, give him +10, fuck it we ball; if people make a stink, +8 or 9 is fine too. Good pixie change no notes, whatever is under that cards hood now confuses and scares me, a little more reliabilty in its operation would be so welcome.
The enchantress change could be extremely powerful actually, almost reminds me slightly of old leech. She'd have to be like a 4/3, maybe even a 5/5. I also think many players' knee-jerk reaction to seeing that would be frothing-at-mouth rage so maybe don't hold your breath. The scream change is neat, but maybe she could still be a 2/3 that only steals 1 power everytime? As for kraven, that change could really unlock his potential, but I would need to see it playtested to make sure it's not too strong, cuz paired with heimdall? yeesh
Heimdall with kraken is a very good point
That Enchantress change would be way too strong and get insta nerfed. And imo they aren’t making Scream the Luke Cage of Move because having one card that counters an entire deck is just bad design, which is why Luke will get reworked eventually. It also doesn’t help that Scream decks are probably the most annoying decks to play against. I do really like your proposed change to Kraven though. I feel like Kingpin could also be a 1/3 and it wouldn’t be crazy.
Change enchantress to activate to get under cosmo.
I like many of these, but the Enchantress suggestion is outright insanely busted. Imagine if you had a Red Guardian that affects the entire lane. Holy molly. I also disagree with Scream. Scream decks usually lose when they cant play Scream on turn 2. Increasing the winconditions cost would nerf the deck. Also lets not promote archetype shutdown cards. Also why nerf Kraven? He is so much harder to activate than Angela.