Prisons don't work (1/3)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лют 2018
  • The Open University’s Dr David Scott explains why he believes Prison doesn’t work.
    Free learning from The Open University
    www.open.edu/openlearn/society...
    (Part 1 of 3)
    Playlist link - • Prisons don't work (1/3)
    Transcript -
    Study Human Rights and the Law free at the Open University
    www.open.edu/openlearn/society...
    Study BA (Honours) Criminology www.open.ac.uk/courses/qualifi...
    The Open University is the world’s leading provider of flexible, high quality online degrees and distance learning, serving students across the globe with highly respected degree qualifications, and the triple accredited MBA. The OU teaches through its own unique method of distance learning, called ‘supported open learning’ and you do not need any formal qualifications to study with us, just commitment and a desire to find out what you are capable of.
    Like us on Facebook: / ouopenlearn
    Follow us on Twitter: / oufreelearning

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @WorthlessWinner
    @WorthlessWinner 6 років тому +6

    I agree that prison doesn't work, but I don't think it's IMPOSSIBLE to fix someone's personality coercively. If it was, then rehabilitation would be an impossible goal; if you can't make someone stop being a criminal, any social system to make someone stop being a criminal can't work, so rehabilitation is impossible. Prisons should, if rehabilitation can't happen, focus on deterrent, which is what they do.While rehabilitation is one goal of prison, deterring first offenses is another goal, and it's odd that this professor totally ignores that purpose . Since more rehabilitative systems in other countries like Norway tend to work quite well to reduce recidivism, this professor is not empirically supported.

  • @Joy-TheLazyCatLady
    @Joy-TheLazyCatLady 3 роки тому +4

    Then what does? What will make people feel justice has been served and save the criminals soul at the same time? Why should I care about the life of someone who has raped and murdered a child, for instance? Or killed their grandmother for money? Or raped and/or murdered a girl or guy they met in a bar? These victims had their lives taken so tell me why I should care about the murderer being bored and drugged out in prison? I bet those victims would have liked to have had an opportunity to be bored and/or drugged out, too. I'm OK with rehabbing a petty thief, drug dealer, or burger or whatever but not rapists, abusers of any child or vulnerable adult, pedophiles, and murderers. They can rot.

    • @jeongminkimlucian
      @jeongminkimlucian 2 роки тому +2

      cause in the end we're all humans. you know you can never understand one person fully. i agree that a person like hitler or a rapist did a bad thing. but think about the situatiion or circumstance they did so the stuff they did. i'm not asking for forgiveness just a opportunity as everybody should have an equal part of it right? you never know what you would do if you were in anyone's shoes. a person is built by the society around them yes there may be born psychopaths but it's not inevitable. people are strange creatures morality and justice idk but you never know

  • @arturdent5168
    @arturdent5168 6 років тому +7

    so what the hell do you want us to do

    • @floordoctor
      @floordoctor 3 роки тому +4

      Be more motivated to change society, for one. Prevention should always be the primary focus. We also need to change legislation that isn't effective....like the bullshit war on drugs. Divert that wasted money into programs that help economic conditions - which is directly correlated to crime. Prisons have to exist for the worst offenders, but they should be revamped to help those who will be getting out and living among us again. It's currently a form of modern slavery, and a for-profit system. It's inherently wrong from the ground up.

  • @fiImatography
    @fiImatography 8 місяців тому +1

    Can I have permission to use this video for a university project please? 🤞🏻

    • @OpenLearn_OU
      @OpenLearn_OU  8 місяців тому +1

      Yep as long as you credit the Open University :)

  • @importantname
    @importantname 6 років тому +1

    What should happen to a person who commits a crime?

    • @eveshute5107
      @eveshute5107 8 місяців тому

      the Norwegian model!! 😁

  • @FitziCal
    @FitziCal 3 роки тому +1

    Prisons (in their current form) do not work. Although I believe incapacitation is a necessary form of punishment, an emphasis on rehabilitation in almost all cases would benefit society at large.

    • @Dachaser322
      @Dachaser322 Рік тому

      This is my take. I certainly think it can be morally justified to contain someone away from society where they pose an ongoing threat to others, but ideally we would focus on what is causing their behaviour and trying to rectify that. We also need to make reintegration back into society easier so that reoffending rates remain as low as possible

  • @goosehow1950
    @goosehow1950 Рік тому

    Whereas, Nordic countries have only 20% reoffending rate and they have much more complete rehabilitation system in their prisons.

  • @lukapopovic6668
    @lukapopovic6668 5 років тому +1

    Some criminals simply must be jailed for life!

  • @j.thomas7128
    @j.thomas7128 2 роки тому +1

    Incarceration is not a deterrent when prison life is more comfortable than their homelife.
    Thug1: Took a holiday.
    Thug 2: Where'd ya go?
    Thug1: Prison. Had cooks, maids, laundry service...

  • @rodmailley-smith5998
    @rodmailley-smith5998 3 роки тому

    If the main purposes of UK prisons are to:
    a) get criminals out of society in order to protect society
    b) provide a humane but unpleasant deterrent to reduce recidivism
    c) rehabilitate criminals.
    Then it seems to me that:
    a) they are fairly good at this but would be better if release on licence was abandoned
    b) as Dr Scott says that 50% of prisoners reoffend within one year of release it is equally true to say that prisons reduce recidivism by 50%!
    c) rehabilitation would probably be much more successful if there were more and better prison facilities and staff for training, education and counselling.

    • @j.thomas7128
      @j.thomas7128 2 роки тому

      It really took two months for somebody to point out how illogical and factless this comment is? No, you cannot say it... It is NOT equally true to say that prison reduces recidivism by 50%.
      What about years: two, three, four, etc.?
      What about those in their first year that are on limited release or haven't yet been able to commit a crime?
      How are councilors going to prevent a repeating hardened rapist/murderer from raping and killing again, talk; with milk and cookies? Writing letters to Santa, together?

  • @xenym
    @xenym 6 років тому +2

    While the scoundrels are locked up they are prevented from inflicting their criminal behaviour on the rest of us.

    • @WorthlessWinner
      @WorthlessWinner 6 років тому +4

      Unless someone is going to stay in jail forever, they will be exposed to the general population again one day. If people aren't 'fixed' so they don't do crimes again, they will only make more victims. Unless you think people should stay in jail forever for all crimes, you should want to rehabilitate people so they don't do future crimes. Though containing criminals is one benefit of prisons this video overlooked.

  • @wallywally8282
    @wallywally8282 7 місяців тому

    If there’s no deterrent then crime will explode! Do gooders are the real criminals in our society!🤮😂