Angular momentum addition

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2024
  • The process of adding angular momentum in quantum mechanics is a rich topic, one that we can only briefly touch on, but it is an important topic that you should be aware of. Here there be Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. (This lecture is part of a series for a course based on Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. The Full playlist is at www.youtube.com...)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @Mew__
    @Mew__ 4 роки тому +53

    Two weeks short of being 7 years old, this video is still among the best on UA-cam to explain the horrific "Addition of Angular Momenta" paragraph in Griffiths. Brilliant.

  • @QuantumOverlord
    @QuantumOverlord 10 років тому +46

    Adding angular momentum is one of the most difficult things I have come across in physics so far. I hate how hard it is.

    • @QuantumOverlord
      @QuantumOverlord 2 роки тому +1

      @eh6794 I think I got a 2:1 in it which would be in the 60-70% range. In the UK that's considered good. Good luck with your finals!

  • @dalmudi3539
    @dalmudi3539 5 років тому +6

    Thank you for explaining this in a way that finally makes sense. One of the best videos ever.

  • @Valeria-ib6gj
    @Valeria-ib6gj 4 роки тому +3

    Finally!, as a mathematician that is trying it's way into physics I can finally use my knowledge on freaking representation theory from my tesis hahah sorry it is just that it was really hard for me to understand those topics when I was developing my tesis but now I can use it, actually I stopped the video several times bc I was connecting the dots already and when he said exactly what I was thinking I was so happy. Haha well have fun in life and wish me luck on my master in physics bc I am going to need it :3

  • @the-fantabulous-g
    @the-fantabulous-g 4 роки тому

    Brant Carlson you da MVP, I wouldn't understand any of this without watching and rewatching your videos. Thanks for sticking through with completing this lecture set!

  • @MrJespur
    @MrJespur 8 років тому +13

    Brant, thank you for saving my semester!

  • @SR-pi8qt
    @SR-pi8qt 3 роки тому

    Thanks to you, I've spared 2 hours trying to study it from the books, alone. Your explanation is very clear ! Merci !

  • @guitar0wnz
    @guitar0wnz 3 роки тому

    This is the greatest video on this topic I have ever seen

  • @ferox7878
    @ferox7878 6 років тому +2

    you're a good guy, Brant, I appreciate it a lot.

  • @charmendro
    @charmendro 3 роки тому +1

    Bro how did u explain this so well, still unsure about some things but i think i understand a lot more than before the video

  • @ivanvargas1522
    @ivanvargas1522 9 років тому

    Class has started to go over this, This helps so much! Thank you !

  • @aeglos07
    @aeglos07 10 років тому +3

    What is the reason to use the lowering operator here? As far as I can tell, it does not provide any further information, since we already know the S_z Momenta. We also know the possible spin combinations. I'm confused....

  • @rubindasgupta9462
    @rubindasgupta9462 4 роки тому +1

    What if the two particle interact with each other and the coupling constant is a non zero quantity (J). How will the J be incorporated in the addition of angular momentum?

  • @159abdellah
    @159abdellah 8 років тому +3

    thank you very much you just helped me a lot !

  • @amedeodeamicis1957
    @amedeodeamicis1957 2 роки тому

    with CG coefficients i don't understand because my teachers writes when s1=1 and s2=1/2 ...... |3/2 -1/2> = sqrt (2/3) |1 0> |1/2 -1/2> + sqrt(1/3) |1 -1> |1/2 1/2>

  • @lorenzofiordaliso8839
    @lorenzofiordaliso8839 4 роки тому

    Thank you this really helped!

  • @joaobernardo5593
    @joaobernardo5593 7 років тому +2

    Perfekt. Danke !

  • @gabrielgonzalezdominguez6746
    @gabrielgonzalezdominguez6746 6 років тому +2

    Thank you very much indeed.

  • @redowanahmedniloy6978
    @redowanahmedniloy6978 3 роки тому +1

    ... and they are bloody complicated, I got scared after hearing this, and when I understood, I got that complicated is an understatement :(

  • @spacedoggo352
    @spacedoggo352 5 років тому +1

    briliant

  • @zoomalkchannel
    @zoomalkchannel 5 років тому +3

    Can you explain me how you got the state at 7:30 ?

    • @HankGussman
      @HankGussman 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/xeYysQWLXqE/v-deo.html - Check this video to understand how the fourth state is derived from orthogonality argument.

  • @md65000
    @md65000 4 роки тому +1

    At 4:35 where is the factor of h-bar?

    • @JayAyyWhy1231
      @JayAyyWhy1231 4 роки тому

      Very often angular momenta are given in units of h-bar -- otherwise h's would be abound.

  • @maxinatorborderls
    @maxinatorborderls 4 роки тому +4

    Better than Griffiths

  • @aracelial9188
    @aracelial9188 11 років тому +1

    Thank you! now i think i understand it!

  • @rafsanjani9207
    @rafsanjani9207 8 років тому +1

    You are the best :)

  • @krishnadhakal5246
    @krishnadhakal5246 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @reehji
    @reehji 11 років тому +1

    omg, very helpful :3
    Thanks