RepublicOfPlay I know this is three years ago but this was the biggest reason why I didn't like it. the enemy is passive, it doesn't recapture, you cannot outsmart the pegs of enemy strength, you are forced to face 5 strength armies at the end. all in all its rather underwhelming
1. 1m distance firefights makes me want to shut it down with task manager 2. Too arcade 3. If they combine Company of heroes and Men of War i pay double.
I like Men Of War, but there's some serious issues with that game sometimes. The AI can be total garbage. The number of times a squad gets stuck behind a moving AT gun on a 2 car wide road is disgusting. I'll take 3 foot firefights over entire squads determining that only 1 section of a fence is jumpable and waiting for the previous guy to jump it every time.
picassopainter2 Agree to both of your points plus soldiers feel like bricks (along with animation). I don't know why the hell I should be the one to heal manually a bleeding soldier or order another one to take cover or go prone while in a huge battle...That's why i want a combination of those 2 games. :)
To be fair, depending on the situation and weapons in use 1m firefights that arent instantly over are actually fairly realistic, a lot of german soldiers were just issued with the Kar 98K a bolt action rifle with 5 round capacity. If you order a squad of these guys to go running around a corner and bump into some americans, them missing some shots is to be expected. The americans had semi auto rifles so in close quarters this put them at a huge advantage (even at longer range a lot of people argue that the M1 Garand was a huge factor in winning the war). But ofcourse its a balance decision. and while it can seem arcady in CQB, i don't mind it, I see it as panic, forced movement, physical uncomfort, etc.. btw in Men of War there are simply a lot more LMGs and SMGs used, throw two squads with bolt action rifles at each other around a corner and see how long it takes there. If they hit every shot, its MoW thats unrealistic. imo the most arcade thing in CoH is tank battles, because they work with a health system. But once again it's a compromise. Either way i'm not sure a combo would work so well, since i feel you would want individual control of soldiers when 1 guy with an MG can be so powerful, and if you take away the squad system of CoH, all you end up with is a MoW with smoother control/animation, which I would like to see though.
ForeverDoubting That's also true. Wait didn't Germans had Sturmgewehr 44 and MP40 ? Americans took them as loot since they were superior ! They could put a melee system just for the VERY close fights. Exactly what you said in last paragraph.
Johan Dale The STG-44 was really given to the SS and Hitler's elite battalions. The Mp40 yes was issued to Standard troops but in terms of power, it is inferior to the thompson.
I wanted to close this video from the beginning cause he says this is an expansion but its not, it's a stand-alone game and there is no way to upgrade ur current game to have this added without paying the full price for it.
How does reuqisitoin work for company expereience? I know I can upgrade abilities but what happens when I spend requisition points on abilities instead of not spending it? I heard you can reinforce troops as well?
Idk if I should get COH2 or ardennes ive never played a company of heros game and it looks fun i like snowmaps and i like the campaign in 2 i dont know if ardennes hes a good story or its just fights any response would be grate 👍
if u can really only choose one then I suggest u choose CoH2 or even the the standalone multiplayer Western front whcih has all of the playable factions. The multiplayer is by far teh crown jewel of all CoH games
Roadbike vlogs/reviews It depends on what you like about Company of Heroes. Ardennes Assault only lets you play the campaign. You cannot play any multiplayer/skirmish games. But the campaign is really good. COH2 gives you a campaign on the eastern front and lets you play multiplayer as the Soviets or the Germans.But the campaign on that one is not that good. There is another DLC called the Western Front Armies that unlocks the US forces and the Germans for multiplayer. But that has no campaign. So you need to decide what you like best and choose that
For a stand alone game , its sooo stupid of em that the tutorial is non existant.So basically all new blood to the franchise will rage quit.I ll buy it when its at a logical price.
I got massively bored with this expansion, it's just boring and irritating and it doesn't have the ability to save in the middle of a game so I don't have time for it.
I always felt like they should make a Pacific Theater campaign.
Can you lose territory? Seems like you hunt down territories, but they don't attack you.
RepublicOfPlay I know this is three years ago but this was the biggest reason why I didn't like it. the enemy is passive, it doesn't recapture, you cannot outsmart the pegs of enemy strength, you are forced to face 5 strength armies at the end. all in all its rather underwhelming
I've been playing this game since I was 7 and I'm so amazed that they're still making new ones.
miss games like this... damn you consoles,,,,
Man even in easy mode, this particular one is hard of all installments...
1. 1m distance firefights makes me want to shut it down with task manager
2. Too arcade
3. If they combine Company of heroes and Men of War i pay double.
I like Men Of War, but there's some serious issues with that game sometimes. The AI can be total garbage. The number of times a squad gets stuck behind a moving AT gun on a 2 car wide road is disgusting. I'll take 3 foot firefights over entire squads determining that only 1 section of a fence is jumpable and waiting for the previous guy to jump it every time.
picassopainter2 Agree to both of your points plus soldiers feel like bricks (along with animation). I don't know why the hell I should be the one to heal manually a bleeding soldier or order another one to take cover or go prone while in a huge battle...That's why i want a combination of those 2 games. :)
To be fair, depending on the situation and weapons in use 1m firefights that arent instantly over are actually fairly realistic, a lot of german soldiers were just issued with the Kar 98K a bolt action rifle with 5 round capacity. If you order a squad of these guys to go running around a corner and bump into some americans, them missing some shots is to be expected. The americans had semi auto rifles so in close quarters this put them at a huge advantage (even at longer range a lot of people argue that the M1 Garand was a huge factor in winning the war).
But ofcourse its a balance decision. and while it can seem arcady in CQB, i don't mind it, I see it as panic, forced movement, physical uncomfort, etc..
btw in Men of War there are simply a lot more LMGs and SMGs used, throw two squads with bolt action rifles at each other around a corner and see how long it takes there. If they hit every shot, its MoW thats unrealistic.
imo the most arcade thing in CoH is tank battles, because they work with a health system. But once again it's a compromise.
Either way i'm not sure a combo would work so well, since i feel you would want individual control of soldiers when 1 guy with an MG can be so powerful, and if you take away the squad system of CoH, all you end up with is a MoW with smoother control/animation, which I would like to see though.
ForeverDoubting That's also true.
Wait didn't Germans had Sturmgewehr 44 and MP40 ? Americans took them as loot since they were superior !
They could put a melee system just for the VERY close fights.
Exactly what you said in last paragraph.
Johan Dale The STG-44 was really given to the SS and Hitler's elite battalions. The Mp40 yes was issued to Standard troops but in terms of power, it is inferior to the thompson.
Games like this make me want a PC instead of a ps4
I wanted to close this video from the beginning cause he says this is an expansion but its not, it's a stand-alone game and there is no way to upgrade ur current game to have this added without paying the full price for it.
Awesome game that no one will play.
sad but true, thing is, I will play this.
Yea, nobody but me will be playing this.
battlefield and cod is better
Carpe Diem obviously you've never played RTSes before boy....
its actually very very good. and i used to prefer coh1 not anymore.
How does reuqisitoin work for company expereience? I know I can upgrade abilities but what happens when I spend requisition points on abilities instead of not spending it? I heard you can reinforce troops as well?
Kind of devastating when all companies got KIA. Cmon, atleast have save files...
a modern company of heroes... now that would be cool.
Meh.. would just be a bunch of drones and artillery lol
I really want this.
"Call to arms" is kinda similiar
It's one of my fav games but animations are broken af
1:40 hahaha, completely disregards his question.
How to unlock m26 pershing tank in CoH2?
Man power is unforgiving... Has 1400 Man power at the end of the vid
If you don't know what you are doing
Idk if I should get COH2 or ardennes ive never played a company of heros game and it looks fun i like snowmaps and i like the campaign in 2 i dont know if ardennes hes a good story or its just fights any response would be grate 👍
if u can really only choose one then I suggest u choose CoH2 or even the the standalone multiplayer Western front whcih has all of the playable factions. The multiplayer is by far teh crown jewel of all CoH games
Roadbike vlogs/reviews It depends on what you like about Company of Heroes. Ardennes Assault only lets you play the campaign. You cannot play any multiplayer/skirmish games. But the campaign is really good.
COH2 gives you a campaign on the eastern front and lets you play multiplayer as the Soviets or the Germans.But the campaign on that one is not that good.
There is another DLC called the Western Front Armies that unlocks the US forces and the Germans for multiplayer. But that has no campaign. So you need to decide what you like best and choose that
is this game has water?
can you explain that water joke pls i don t get it?
Stevan Savic they put like '' too much water'' as one of the minus points of the new pokemon ruby and saphire or something im not entirely sure tho
lol thx bro
Does you has grammar
can you play skirmish in this one?
I am thinking of getting this!
For a stand alone game , its sooo stupid of em that the tutorial is non existant.So basically all new blood to the franchise will rage quit.I ll buy it when its at a logical price.
But spamming conscripts was real guys...
I am obama
I got massively bored with this expansion, it's just boring and irritating and it doesn't have the ability to save in the middle of a game so I don't have time for it.
ahummm
do you guys really want to spend 30 pounds on a stupid singleplayer compain
Wargame is better, hands down best rts.
cough....warcraft 3.....cough........starcraft 2.......cough
***** Wargame Red Dragon has lots of water....
Red Eyed Banshee cough cough warcraft ... cough cough for nerds and wankers.
Jericho Effect What if I told you there was such thing as an opinion?