Regarding the contentions over the Indo-Aryan origins. I have posted based on what I have known so far (keyword: so far), I wasn't aware of the credibility of the Out of India Hypothesis, my understanding so far was of a slow and continuous migration of the Aryas here. Regardless, I shall improve on my reading, any mistakes in the translation of the hymn will be appreciated.
@@Avicerox You are a laymen on this topic. The Rigvedic hymns have nothing to do with the other Indo-European languages except few linguistic similarities. These hymns were composed in Punjab and kurukshetra region by the Vedic sheers. This book is a religious book of Bharta- puru and those who believed in Vedic karamkand. It doesn't matter you speak indo- European languages or not. If you didn't believe in Vedic karamkand and respect the Brahamanas then you were despised by them. The Rigvedic grammar, and syntax and many words are not related to the other language except some vocabulary. Other Indo-European people didn't have any literary tradition and especially sposhiticated advanced grammatical poetry tradition. Only Indo- Iranians had literary tradition older than the 1500 BCE. The other side don't have literary tradition older than the 500 BCE. European and Eastern- European fascination with Arya's began during the time of European nationalism when they wanted to get rid of the Jewish influence from the Christianity.
@Malecchavinashak I am a layman, yes, as is why I am not claiming authority here. However I don't see what the uniqueness of the Rigvedic language has to do here, languages are very separate even within same classes.
@@Avicerox Linguist knows what importance holds Sanskrit and especially the Vedic Sanskrit. It's most advanced and sophisticated language compared to other languages, panini who mastered this language presented this language like mathematical formulas. If we dig deepers than we know that entire humanity belongs to the same family and at some point they had same tongue. We are all still related to eachother, the difference which we see is caused by the seperation, migration and endogamy where environment made us to evolve us bit diverse
@Avicerox Aryan was never European or Iranian or for that from outside India. Indo Aryan theory was a baseless propaganda spread by Europeans. Now when the same has been challenged by Present day Indian scholars specially after discovering Saraswati River such propagandists both insiders and outsiders are clueless and lack evidence to prove their theory ...
It's Indigenous Arya, It doesn't belong to the Barbarians of Europe who keep appropriating other cultures. The Indian people were great scholars, warrior and traders. They migrated to the other part of the world. That's why you we can see indian cultural tracess in Southeast Asia and central Asia. The Xinjiang province of china became Buddhist under the exiled son of Ashoka.
@@yj9032What's even dreaming about it? You commented "Great Aryan race" in one of the comment but you look entirely opposite of what's considered as "Aryan Race". Lol
Aryas, our ancestors were the great warriors. They were follower of vedic customs and rituals and religions. The wrote thousands of shalokas, kavyas, mahakavyas on the glory of this great land named bharat. They rise from this soil and they will be here until the end of time. Nobody can stole our history and manipulate it according to them, no matter what the world say, we were from here, we are here and we will be here. Jai aryavart🕉🌺
I checked your channel. Assuming you are Pakistani, it warms my heart our people are remembering their ancestral faith🙏🏽 Whenever i hear the vedas in sanskrit, it gives me goosebumps because when you understand the depth of those words you will see how english translations dont do justice.
Aryans are indigenous to India and Europeans are not Aryans . All of Indians are infact Aryans and all of India is Dravidian . India being already conducive to agriculture, people moved outwards instead of inwards
Exactly...indologists like max mueller theorized Aryan invasion in order to stamp western supremacy on Indians...classic divide nd rule strategy by creating aryans nd dravidians
There are lot of commonalitoes between Sanskrit and other European languages like Lithuanian, Latin etc., hence the Aryan invasion theory. But no solid proof though. And sanskrit is significantly different from languages of South India. South indian languages only added Sanskrit words slowly into their lexicon.
Rig veda has 10 mandala( volume) This Agni Mantra is not the oldest because we can see this mantra in the 1st mandala. Whereas mandala 2,3,4,6,7, oldest than mandala 1,5,8,9,10. So it was written 7000 years ago.
It is difficult to be certain about RIGVEDA time . But it was certainly " written " before 2500 BC . Its PLACE-TIME coincides with those of SINDHU-SARASWATI CIVILIZATION .
Vedas are very subtle and esoteric. "अग्निमीळे पु॒रोहितं यज्ञस्य देवमृत्विजम्। होतारं रत्नधातमम्॥" "We, the people (यज्ञस्य) praise the God (ईळे), the giver and receiver (होतारम्) of the hospitality, glory and deeds of scholars (पुरोहितम्), the one who sustain the creation before the time of creation (ऋत्विजम्) and the creator of the physical creation at the time of repeated creations, the one who is worthy of being worshiped in every season (रत्नधातमम्) and wear beautiful earth, gold etc. gems by desire (देवम्) and who illuminates all things(अग्नि)".
I'll tell you what's the truth of Aryan migration. Hinduism is native to India and India is the birthplace of humanity and civilization. During previous yugas there was a time when the ruling class called Kshatriyas became so corrupt that God had to take an avatar called parshuram. This avatar of God called Parshuram mercilessly started slaughter all of the corrupt ruling class and they had to flee India. The ruling class fled to the western parts of world and consequently wherever they went they built civilizations after all they were still the noble ones. After some time these very Aryans who fled India came back to it and this particular event people started calling Aryan invasion when it's just them coming back and fighting the people who had settled in their place. Their migration to west is also the reason why you'll see similarities in all religion.
Words have been twisted specifically in this part of history. I disagree with something like "indo-aryan RACE/PEOPLE", and multiple migrations happened in Indian subcontinent but whatever religious batshit you wrote is crazy stupid.
Arya is Sanskrit Word for Noble and Sanskrit is Indian/Bhartiya/language of Aryawart from thousands of years. According to Vedas evryone is Arya who follow Vedic way. Follow of Vedas and Speaker of Sanskrit is Arya.Aryo Sarvatra vijayate (आर्यः सर्वत्र विजयते,Victory to Arya everywhere), कुर्वन्तः विश्व अर्यम् (Make Everyone Arya).Jay Aryawart 🙏🏼⚔️🕉️🚩
This is pure gem. It perfectly depicts how fire was important to us as a premitive society. True, our ancestors were not just dancing around fire and roast animals but it's also seems like they were.
Repeating same bullshit over and over again won't work. Aryans came from outside, that's a fact. It's widely accepted by every historian who isn't a Hindutva propagator.
It is your dear God, movies propaganda of eugenics, and a superior race, justifying caste divisions through this. The truth is that the vedas' authority is not recognized and flat out denied by so many Hindus, who have been marginalized and discriminated through your apartheid foe generation... Jai Bhim! Jai bahujan!
The oldest surviving gods. Only india has claim to the the aryan tradition as the desert conmen have converted all that may lay claim to this ancestry. The last pagan stronghold. The abode of the ancients.
Nice video. Glad you're not another wignat "Aryan" larper. From veda to saṃskṛta to all our pitṛ Arya mahāpuruṣa, are rightfully the children of Indian civilization.
How beautiful.. we are all living but still we are made up of non living matter, we eat food which is non living. What makes us living? The divinity is in us all.. Bhagwan Agni.. tatparya (meaning) the innate character of matter to release energy by moving from complex to simpler compounds, is the reason we have life. So praise this obvious but most important character of the nature, a part of the divine. Praise and appreciate bhagwan Agni.. and realise everything you ever need to appreciate is within you and the nature around you, because you are also a part of it.
Translation error in 0:43 the word "agnimidla" is used but the "ld" is more of marathi which existed after sankrit .if it is to describe the sound then it is fine but the orignal may not have the same.other gramatical errors are there but they have been mentioned in the comments.
No, actually the ld U r talkinng about is used marathi but it exists in Vedic sanskrit too and not just in marathi , pahadi lnaguages ( garwali, kumaoni, himanchali have it too) , odia and lastly haryanvi use it too Its used in Vedic sanskrit
The 1st mandala of the Rigveda is not chronologically first. The 6th mandala is chronologically the first one. (6.1.1) त्वं ह्य॑ग्ने प्रथ॒मो म॒नोता॒स्या धि॒यो अभ॑वो दस्म॒ होता॑ । त्वं सीं॑ वृषन्नकृणोर्दु॒ष्टरी॑तु॒ सहो॒ विश्व॑स्मै॒ सह॑से॒ सह॑ध्यै ॥ त्वं ह्यग्ने प्रथमो मनोतास्या धियो अभवो दस्म होता । त्वं सीं वृषन्नकृणोर्दुष्टरीतु सहो विश्वस्मै सहसे सहध्यै ॥ “You Agni, are the first of the gods; a deity to whom their minds are devoted; plural asing of aspect, you are the invoker of the deities at this rite; showerer (of benefits), bestow upon us unsurpassable strength, where with to sustain all (hostile) prowess.”
I know what you mean but no brother we are sons of sidhu + sarwati ganga and Brahmaputra in north, narmada krushna godavari kaveri in south. there are many millennium old city buried on banks of these river unfortunately we didn't put enough efforts to find them
@@Avicerox I guess he is just trying to deny Aryan invasion theory that we are foreigner who occupied most of India, which try to divide north and south india. They are trying to make us show the same as European did in americas
@@Yazzpatel56 I mean it was a migration tbh, and why should it be a big deal that a "foreign" group came and assimilated, also that Indo Aryans are still closer to South Asia than they are to Europe
@@Aviceroxstill there is no strong evidence through genetics that such a large migration happened or specially so called invasion" so that the people already living in north were forced to move in south as their propaganda says...u can't say with such a confidence when its not proven still..it was created by Max Muller and here it was propagated as propaganda by people like Periyar in Tamil Nadu whose ideology is in form of DMK today which even today divide us. all that matters is proof there isn't enough..i have read research papers of Indian and foreign universities and the only thing they say very unlikely any migration happened. It can be true that there was a small migration but nothing like invasion on native people ever happened..this invasion thing was very cleverly created to establish hate in hindus of South for hindus of North part of Bharat.
South Asia has been a land that has seen tonnes of migrations and invasions over the years. But the beauty of this part of the world is that, every foreign interaction only influenced us, it never uprooted our past and made us completely subservient to something foreign Aryans did come to India from Central Asia, and before that, Dravidians came to India from Western Iran. But in both these migrations, whatever was pre existing in the South Asian subcontinent has always persevered. We have cultural practices going as far back as the Indus Valley Civilization happening even today. We also have extremely old languages like the Great Andamanese languages and old Austroasiatic ones which pre date the Aryan and Dravidian languages by thousands of years. This proves that South Asia has always preserved its past well and allowed it to flourish into the future. We don't have the 'destroy and replace mentality', we have the 'mix and create new out of the old' kind of mentality. So yeah, no need to become insecure just because you hear that Aryans migrated to India.
So you people also started claiming rigveda as yours.😅 Sure Rigveda also belongs to european(at least ancient european) but not in racial superiority based Aryan theory. European genes originate in India(check the paper), which means europeans ancestors are Indians. The reason why Greeks had Gods from Rigveda, because it was their culture too😑
@@Avicerox I don't understand this narrative of Indo-aryan why it is still being continued. You will clearly find evidence based on science, this is just a racist theory. This nonsense create internal conflicts in our country so I am very concern anyone using this term.
@@Jint55metalhead sir, who the hell on earth would invade some country and would glorify them but would not even mention one little thing about their origins? It was imposed by Britishers on us to justify their invasion and if it is proved worldwide and acknowledged by scholars,I suggest you to go read once what DNA has to say about it.
@@VatsPranjali Madam,Whatever the deuced reason that may have been as to their omission of any inkling about their provenance we have not been revealed explicitly thereof. But these modern concepts of 'own country ' others' country, demarcation should best be dispensed with whilst discussing about ancient folks. Moreover I should far from using the term 'invasion' as it has not been backed by any anthropologic and archeological research. Brits didn't IMPOSE it rather a philogist hight William James in his endeavour of learning himself Indian classical language FOUND striking similarities between Sanskrit with other European languages. His finding was found to be consistent with the scholars of succeeding generations. As to the DNA and genetics, almost all of the latest studies corroborated the idea that there have been migrations of people with R1a haplogroup into south asian subcontinent round about bronze age. The origin of R1a1 haplogroup is estimated to have been originated in Eurasian Stepps. This is the prevalent haplogroup in the European population. Plus it's sister haplogroup R2 happens to be the dominant genetic predisposition amongst Indian populace has it's origin in Southasian subcontinent. Had there been any chance of migration from South Asia towards west this R2 haplogroup would surely have found in the populace of European nations.Meanwhile, it's already been proved that the haplogroup R1 is present in varying degrees in the genetic make up of Indian populace especially those of higher castes. It's time you were started doing your own homework tofore extending suggestion to others.
@@VatsPranjali Madam,Whatever the deuced reason that may have been as to their omission of any inkling about their provenance we have not been revealed explicitly thereof. But these modern concepts of 'own country ' others' country, demarcation should best be dispensed with whilst discussing about ancient folks. Moreover I should far from using the term 'invasion' as it has not been backed by any anthropologic and archeological research. Brits didn't IMPOSE it rather a philogist hight William James in his endeavour of learning himself Indian classical language FOUND striking similarities between Sanskrit with other European languages. His finding was found to be consistent with the scholars of succeeding generations. As to the DNA and genetics, almost all of the latest studies corroborated the idea that there have been migrations of people with R1a haplogroup into south asian subcontinent round about bronze age. The origin of R1a1 haplogroup is estimated to have been originated in Eurasian Stepps. This is the prevalent haplogroup in the European population. Plus it's sister haplogroup R2 happens to be the dominant genetic predisposition amongst Indian populace has it's origin in Southasian subcontinent. Had there been any chance of migration from South Asia towards west this R2 haplogroup would surely have found in the populace of European nations.Meanwhile, it's already been proved that the haplogroup R1 is present in varying degrees in the genetic make up of Indian populace especially those of higher castes. It's time ew were started doing ewr own homework tofore extending suggestion to others.
great video! instant subscribe! Imo these are the first words of the veduc/indo aryan civilization though and not of the indian civilization as a whole as the scripts of indus valley remain undeciphered to this day! thank you!
Its not a song, its a hym and a verse. So called Ar yans never exis ted and they never went to India. Indian civilization, Rig Vedas, Vedas were created by Indians and Indians alone. Western li es and pro paganda to ste al Indian history is not going to work anymore. Rig Veda isn't thr first Veda and nor it is the only Veda.
I think arya is the correct word for Vedic PPL like how aryaman is used by Iranians. It's a shared heritage between europeans eurasiana and west south Asians. I don't know why anyone is being all exclusive
Assalamu alaikum my brdr in islam. Saw you on many channels regarding islam and Muslims as well Philosophy (especially the Nietzschean Existentialist one) . Really happy to see Life affirming Guys like you...
0:22 O my friend, if the spirit of a true Aryan resides within you, if you have descended from that mighty Aryan tree, set ablaze this misconception of yours in the eternal Agni. There is no use for lies for an Aryan. Appreciate the way of Truth (Out of India Migration), for Agni may lead us to the Truth.
To dispel your Aryan migration theory ignorance please watch the findings of Saragarhi which negates the popular misconception of Aryan theory. ARYA is a way to address any noble/educated men in Vedic Bharat, but people from foreign countries have manipulated the concept ARYA and have tried to teach us how we have migrated from other part of the world and are Aryans, when people from these respective region itself were still in primitive stage.
there was no migration or invasion into india all the records show that the rig ved is 8000 years old and the rakhi gari site itself belongs to the IVC and is estimated to be 8000 years old. kids never believe in an into india theory by some random youtuber its false
Sancrit is not Indus valley civilization language it is Aryan language vedas all books are written in other language which are before Sanskrit Sanskrit don't have it's it's own script
Lot of misconception of Vedas and what they teach prevail amongst Hindus and also their priests. The name Gods/Goddesses are used as metaphors when addressed as Agni, Indra, etc. and actually not any human or humanlike beings.
LolReally,,, The picture is clearly showing Homa,,,, yagnapeople from continuous lineages older than Islam still teaching sanskrit and concepts of vedas and you claim to know more than them... . Amazing😂😂
@@Cutestar6757 illogical argument. You don't even know what "Islam" means. Go and check every scripture on earth and you will find the same Faith preached- submission to one reality(ekam sat, Rigveda) by following universal natural laws. See, your Rigveda also tells you to follow Islam. So do your Gita(18:66). Besides,Your dad is older than you doesn't mean he knows a particular subject more than you. If blindly following your ancestors was "dharma" than Krishna would not come after Vedas were revealed. Always the last one not the first one is to be followed whether it is your school syllabus, medical prescription, weapons and war tactics, law. Earlier ones are for reference and if relevant then to be followed BUT on the basis of present reality. You don't even know the name of your religion. Show me a verse from Veda that shows the name. Don't come and say, it's Sanatan because Sanatan doesn't give a subject/theme, it means "ancient". I send our warm Dawah to you and all so you find the True Faith which is Sanatan and also remains eternal by studying and understanding scriptures not through blind belief. Peace/Shanti
There is ZERO evidence that supports this whimsical notion which suggests Indians have no genetic admixtures from another source other than the one that originated in India. Early humans had always been migrating and intermating before they learnt to settle down at a specific spot. That's the pattern common to all humans across the globe. Why should India be different? If OIT were true people outside South Asian subcontinent ought to have genetic admixture that matches with Indians but there's zero evidence in this regard. Barring certain dyed-in-the-wool pseudo-nationalists, it's not rocket science for anyone to comprehend that the claim that Indians have no foreign genetic admixtures is tenuous.
I take this as an opportunity to invite all the indo-aryans of the subcontinent to return back to their roots, return back to Dharma, discard the Arabic desert cult with has nothing to do with this land. Do what Iranians are doing today, discarding Islam and going back to their Persian roots back to Zoroastrianism.
@@Alice-7777 There were no Zoroastrian invasions not and wars. Most Zoroastrians took shelter in India after invasion which are called Parsis today, who have built multi billion dollars businesses in India like Tata. Anyways the point is, just like Iran is converting to Zoroastrianism, Indian subcontinent people should return to Dharma.
I understand the need for history (written by invaders) but let the people who own and preserve it now live with owing sense (brings responsibility and keep country clean).. why keep on trying to prove you guys couldn’t have done it.. if it really happened did anyone preserve the knowledge like India did ? One of the reasons knowledge survived and grew was geography not humans. No major natural disaster tropical weather rich soil allowed India to pass on generational knowledge
Rig Veda dates back to 200000 BC, as old as Saraswati River, British said that river was mythical when they colonized us 😂😂 Vedic civilization is eternal ☝🏽
Agni is worshipped in sanatan dharam,Persian worship it as holy and in puriest form... Sanatan dharam there is God's and in Greek they worshipped God a
@@dushyanthihoole3340 Fire represents Energy in essence, that is also what Nuclear energy is. Still, I don't worship fire, this is more of a civilizational and historical thing here
Bhaiji jo jitna powerful rehta hai uska hi jyada dabdaba rehta hai Tabhi yeh theory hai , woh log soche bhavishya sabko yeh maalum hona chhaiye ki ham se hi sabka utpatti hua hai😂😂😂 aryan log ko khud sikhne mai nani yaad aagya tha phir usko apne hisab se dhal diye woh log😂😂
They were Indians ।।। Aryans as understood by Europeans never existed there was no migration or invasion from Europe to India ।।।rather the other way round is more probable
rig veda is not even ancient, the aryan(iranian) migration to india and ganges happend around 1st century ad thats why vedas even talk about ghandara cultures, the aryans were persian who were mix of native iranian farmes and caucasian migrants
It is older than 1500 years BC, that is ancient by all standards. Gandhara is also a tribe, as were the Bharatas. Nevertheless, it is still the first scripture of the Indian civilization.
@@Avicerox nope, there is no evidence that rig veda dates back to 1500 bc, its all made up claim with trustmebro sources, even the present day oldest rig veda dates back to 1464 ad, even younger then sikhism
@@Avicerox my other comment was deleted, i said, no, there is no evidence that rig veda dates back to 1500 bc, its all made up claims, even the oldest rig veda ever found dates back to 1464 ad, even younger then sikhism
Regarding the contentions over the Indo-Aryan origins. I have posted based on what I have known so far (keyword: so far), I wasn't aware of the credibility of the Out of India Hypothesis, my understanding so far was of a slow and continuous migration of the Aryas here. Regardless, I shall improve on my reading, any mistakes in the translation of the hymn will be appreciated.
@@Avicerox You are a laymen on this topic. The Rigvedic hymns have nothing to do with the other Indo-European languages except few linguistic similarities. These hymns were composed in Punjab and kurukshetra region by the Vedic sheers. This book is a religious book of Bharta- puru and those who believed in Vedic karamkand. It doesn't matter you speak indo- European languages or not. If you didn't believe in Vedic karamkand and respect the Brahamanas then you were despised by them. The Rigvedic grammar, and syntax and many words are not related to the other language except some vocabulary. Other Indo-European people didn't have any literary tradition and especially sposhiticated advanced grammatical poetry tradition. Only Indo- Iranians had literary tradition older than the 1500 BCE. The other side don't have literary tradition older than the 500 BCE. European and Eastern- European fascination with Arya's began during the time of European nationalism when they wanted to get rid of the Jewish influence from the Christianity.
@Malecchavinashak I am a layman, yes, as is why I am not claiming authority here.
However I don't see what the uniqueness of the Rigvedic language has to do here, languages are very separate even within same classes.
@@Avicerox Linguist knows what importance holds Sanskrit and especially the Vedic Sanskrit. It's most advanced and sophisticated language compared to other languages, panini who mastered this language presented this language like mathematical formulas. If we dig deepers than we know that entire humanity belongs to the same family and at some point they had same tongue. We are all still related to eachother, the difference which we see is caused by the seperation, migration and endogamy where environment made us to evolve us bit diverse
@@Malecchavinashak I know of that
@Avicerox Aryan was never European or Iranian or for that from outside India. Indo Aryan theory was a baseless propaganda spread by Europeans. Now when the same has been challenged by Present day Indian scholars specially after discovering Saraswati River such propagandists both insiders and outsiders are clueless and lack evidence to prove their theory ...
It's Indigenous Arya, It doesn't belong to the Barbarians of Europe who keep appropriating other cultures. The Indian people were great scholars, warrior and traders. They migrated to the other part of the world. That's why you we can see indian cultural tracess in Southeast Asia and central Asia. The Xinjiang province of china became Buddhist under the exiled son of Ashoka.
Keep dreaming 😂
@@yj9032 Keep coping
Ashoka never exiled any son. Wrong word.
Who said anything about Europe?
@@yj9032What's even dreaming about it? You commented "Great Aryan race" in one of the comment but you look entirely opposite of what's considered as "Aryan Race". Lol
Arya is not a ethnic or racial term. It's a Sanskrit word which means noble. People whose social conduct is noble/good is called Arya.🧐👍
aryan migration might have happened but the indian culture and sanatana dharma is indigenous to the indian subcontinent.
@@aditya_asundi Yes
Of course, no one will take that away from you, don't worry
India migrated to europe. Not europe migrated to india.
@@Harsh_2006e The evidences for that theory are quite vague and politically based though
@@mohanadasa2268 europe just want to divide us in aryans and Dravidians.
We shouldn't listen to them.
Aryas, our ancestors were the great warriors. They were follower of vedic customs and rituals and religions. The wrote thousands of shalokas, kavyas, mahakavyas on the glory of this great land named bharat. They rise from this soil and they will be here until the end of time. Nobody can stole our history and manipulate it according to them, no matter what the world say, we were from here, we are here and we will be here.
Jai aryavart🕉🌺
Dont confuse with Aryan and word Aryavrat, which have wrongly been translated to aryan-people.
@@ikd404 I know that.........
How's ancestors
I checked your channel. Assuming you are Pakistani, it warms my heart our people are remembering their ancestral faith🙏🏽
Whenever i hear the vedas in sanskrit, it gives me goosebumps because when you understand the depth of those words you will see how english translations dont do justice.
Before the Islamization of Pakistan, they used to be the followers of dharma.
It is to subverge you to accept the aryan invasion theory
Aryans are indigenous to India and Europeans are not Aryans . All of Indians are infact Aryans and all of India is Dravidian . India being already conducive to agriculture, people moved outwards instead of inwards
Exactly...indologists like max mueller theorized Aryan invasion in order to stamp western supremacy on Indians...classic divide nd rule strategy by creating aryans nd dravidians
There are lot of commonalitoes between Sanskrit and other European languages like Lithuanian, Latin etc., hence the Aryan invasion theory. But no solid proof though.
And sanskrit is significantly different from languages of South India.
South indian languages only added Sanskrit words slowly into their lexicon.
South Indian is indian language sanskrit is celestial language@@Garkatrah
@@sachinpotdar7798 Celestial? Who is speaking Sanskrit in space?
@@sachins5784wow, you just had to show off your ignorance with the stupidest question you had?
Europeans don't even know Aryan is not an European word it's Sanskrit word for noble
All Hindus Are Aryan (Who accepts Vedas & Reads, hears) for me 🇧🇩🕉️
Exactly
all dharmic followers are....including buddhists and jains
That is exactly what Aryans are, btw, are y'all safe in Bangladesh rn? Ive seen some horrible videos, just wanna make sure
Hope you are safe there bud?!
Rig veda has 10 mandala( volume)
This Agni Mantra is not the oldest because we can see this mantra in the 1st mandala. Whereas mandala 2,3,4,6,7, oldest than mandala 1,5,8,9,10.
So it was written 7000 years ago.
@Dunnowhattonem
Still better than flat earth creared 1450 yra ago 🤣
@Dunnowhattonemcry harder 😂
It is difficult to be certain about RIGVEDA time . But it was certainly " written " before 2500 BC . Its PLACE-TIME coincides with those of SINDHU-SARASWATI CIVILIZATION .
Vedas are very subtle and esoteric.
"अग्निमीळे पु॒रोहितं यज्ञस्य देवमृत्विजम्। होतारं रत्नधातमम्॥"
"We, the people (यज्ञस्य) praise the God (ईळे), the giver and receiver (होतारम्) of the hospitality, glory and deeds of scholars (पुरोहितम्), the one who sustain the creation before the time of creation (ऋत्विजम्) and the creator of the physical creation at the time of repeated creations, the one who is worthy of being worshiped in every season (रत्नधातमम्) and wear beautiful earth, gold etc. gems by desire (देवम्) and who illuminates all things(अग्नि)".
Please dont' subscribe to this video's aryan-invasion fake theory
I'll tell you what's the truth of Aryan migration. Hinduism is native to India and India is the birthplace of humanity and civilization. During previous yugas there was a time when the ruling class called Kshatriyas became so corrupt that God had to take an avatar called parshuram. This avatar of God called Parshuram mercilessly started slaughter all of the corrupt ruling class and they had to flee India. The ruling class fled to the western parts of world and consequently wherever they went they built civilizations after all they were still the noble ones. After some time these very Aryans who fled India came back to it and this particular event people started calling Aryan invasion when it's just them coming back and fighting the people who had settled in their place. Their migration to west is also the reason why you'll see similarities in all religion.
Pjeet
There's absolutely no genetic or chronological evidence of literally anything you have written
Words have been twisted specifically in this part of history. I disagree with something like "indo-aryan RACE/PEOPLE", and multiple migrations happened in Indian subcontinent but whatever religious batshit you wrote is crazy stupid.
@@sonekapanchi6457 who cares lmao. You can't have evidence for everything.
This makes sense to me. It may be possible. Experts in these matters should make research to find the truth.
Arya is Sanskrit Word for Noble and Sanskrit is Indian/Bhartiya/language of Aryawart from thousands of years. According to Vedas evryone is Arya who follow Vedic way. Follow of Vedas and Speaker of Sanskrit is Arya.Aryo Sarvatra vijayate (आर्यः सर्वत्र विजयते,Victory to Arya everywhere), कुर्वन्तः विश्व अर्यम् (Make Everyone Arya).Jay Aryawart 🙏🏼⚔️🕉️🚩
This is pure gem. It perfectly depicts how fire was important to us as a premitive society. True, our ancestors were not just dancing around fire and roast animals but it's also seems like they were.
Don't be the part of their Aryan invasion propaganda....if u are using it then explain its validity through a video.
He isnt a part of any propoganda
Repeating same bullshit over and over again won't work. Aryans came from outside, that's a fact. It's widely accepted by every historian who isn't a Hindutva propagator.
It is your dear God, movies propaganda of eugenics, and a superior race, justifying caste divisions through this. The truth is that the vedas' authority is not recognized and flat out denied by so many Hindus, who have been marginalized and discriminated through your apartheid foe generation... Jai Bhim! Jai bahujan!
The oldest surviving gods. Only india has claim to the the aryan tradition as the desert conmen have converted all that may lay claim to this ancestry.
The last pagan stronghold.
The abode of the ancients.
Nice video. Glad you're not another wignat "Aryan" larper. From veda to saṃskṛta to all our pitṛ Arya mahāpuruṣa, are rightfully the children of Indian civilization.
Aryan is not a race. Arya in Sanskrit means noble. Hinduism wasn't brought by any foreign invaders. Hinduism existed in Bharat for millenniums.
How beautiful.. we are all living but still we are made up of non living matter, we eat food which is non living. What makes us living? The divinity is in us all.. Bhagwan Agni.. tatparya (meaning) the innate character of matter to release energy by moving from complex to simpler compounds, is the reason we have life. So praise this obvious but most important character of the nature, a part of the divine. Praise and appreciate bhagwan Agni.. and realise everything you ever need to appreciate is within you and the nature around you, because you are also a part of it.
Hail the fire
Translation error in 0:43 the word "agnimidla" is used but the "ld" is more of marathi which existed after sankrit .if it is to describe the sound then it is fine but the orignal may not have the same.other gramatical errors are there but they have been mentioned in the comments.
@@A.DWIVEDI Thank you
No, actually the ld U r talkinng about is used marathi but it exists in Vedic sanskrit too and not just in marathi , pahadi lnaguages ( garwali, kumaoni, himanchali have it too) , odia and lastly haryanvi use it too
Its used in Vedic sanskrit
जयतु जयतु आर्यावर्त! 🕉️🚩🚩🚩
The 1st mandala of the Rigveda is not chronologically first. The 6th mandala is chronologically the first one.
(6.1.1)
त्वं ह्य॑ग्ने प्रथ॒मो म॒नोता॒स्या धि॒यो अभ॑वो दस्म॒ होता॑ । त्वं सीं॑ वृषन्नकृणोर्दु॒ष्टरी॑तु॒ सहो॒ विश्व॑स्मै॒ सह॑से॒ सह॑ध्यै ॥
त्वं ह्यग्ने प्रथमो मनोतास्या धियो अभवो दस्म होता । त्वं सीं वृषन्नकृणोर्दुष्टरीतु सहो विश्वस्मै सहसे सहध्यै ॥
“You Agni, are the first of the gods; a deity to whom their minds are devoted; plural asing of aspect, you are the invoker of the deities at this rite; showerer (of benefits), bestow upon us unsurpassable strength, where with to sustain all (hostile) prowess.”
We Hindus are sindhus not Aryans.
I know what you mean but no brother we are sons of sidhu + sarwati ganga and Brahmaputra in north, narmada krushna godavari kaveri in south. there are many millennium old city buried on banks of these river unfortunately we didn't put enough efforts to find them
@@worldcurrenttimes7350 Arya is a sanskrit word, no?
@@Avicerox I guess he is just trying to deny Aryan invasion theory that we are foreigner who occupied most of India, which try to divide north and south india. They are trying to make us show the same as European did in americas
@@Yazzpatel56 I mean it was a migration tbh, and why should it be a big deal that a "foreign" group came and assimilated, also that Indo Aryans are still closer to South Asia than they are to Europe
@@Aviceroxstill there is no strong evidence through genetics that such a large migration happened or specially so called invasion" so that the people already living in north were forced to move in south as their propaganda says...u can't say with such a confidence when its not proven still..it was created by Max Muller and here it was propagated as propaganda by people like Periyar in Tamil Nadu whose ideology is in form of DMK today which even today divide us.
all that matters is proof there isn't enough..i have read research papers of Indian and foreign universities and the only thing they say very unlikely any migration happened. It can be true that there was a small migration but nothing like invasion on native people ever happened..this invasion thing was very cleverly created to establish hate in hindus of South for hindus of North part of Bharat.
Its not the first hymn which was composed the sixth mandala is the oldest one then 3rd then 7th etc...
South Asia has been a land that has seen tonnes of migrations and invasions over the years. But the beauty of this part of the world is that, every foreign interaction only influenced us, it never uprooted our past and made us completely subservient to something foreign
Aryans did come to India from Central Asia, and before that, Dravidians came to India from Western Iran.
But in both these migrations, whatever was pre existing in the South Asian subcontinent has always persevered.
We have cultural practices going as far back as the Indus Valley Civilization happening even today. We also have extremely old languages like the Great Andamanese languages and old Austroasiatic ones which pre date the Aryan and Dravidian languages by thousands of years. This proves that South Asia has always preserved its past well and allowed it to flourish into the future. We don't have the 'destroy and replace mentality', we have the 'mix and create new out of the old' kind of mentality. So yeah, no need to become insecure just because you hear that Aryans migrated to India.
We are Arya, not invaders but Indians 💪🚩
Jay Hind 🇮🇳
Can you please uplode a video of dialogue in 'Vedic Sanskirt' , the oldest version of sanskirt.
The hymn is in Old Indo Aryan already I think
@@Avicerox i mean if you can make a dialogue in Low pitched old Vedic sanskirt , it was older form of Sanskirt. , this is hymn .❤
Please dont' subscribe to this video's aryan-invasion fake theory
So you people also started claiming rigveda as yours.😅 Sure Rigveda also belongs to european(at least ancient european) but not in racial superiority based Aryan theory. European genes originate in India(check the paper), which means europeans ancestors are Indians. The reason why Greeks had Gods from Rigveda, because it was their culture too😑
@@sagarpatel3043 I am not claiming anything here, this is just a basic video.
Pjeet
@@Avicerox I don't understand this narrative of Indo-aryan why it is still being continued. You will clearly find evidence based on science, this is just a racist theory. This nonsense create internal conflicts in our country so I am very concern anyone using this term.
@@sahilsingh6048 tera baap bhi pjeet he hai.😎
@@sahilsingh6048 tera baap bhi pjeet he hai😎
First hymns of rig veda are not these. These are classified as later additions to original family books of Bharata and purus.
The first hymns are from the mandala 2nd not the first. First is said to be later addition
Thanks for this
There is no aryan migration.... 😂😂 We indians are the only aryans....
Add disclaimer: based on European propoganda and hypothesis to destroy Bharatiya culture
Info-aryans? Indians and Aryans are the same. No race came from outside with the Vedic knowledge
There is nothing as indo aryans
Perhaps getting your facts checked might help
Exactly !!
Living in denial won't help. It's a fact universally proven and acknowledged by all the scholars.
@@Jint55metalhead sir, who the hell on earth would invade some country and would glorify them but would not even mention one little thing about their origins?
It was imposed by Britishers on us to justify their invasion and if it is proved worldwide and acknowledged by scholars,I suggest you to go read once what DNA has to say about it.
@@VatsPranjali Madam,Whatever the deuced reason that may have been as to their omission of any inkling about their provenance we have not been revealed explicitly thereof. But these modern concepts of 'own country ' others' country, demarcation should best be dispensed with whilst discussing about ancient folks. Moreover I should far from using the term 'invasion' as it has not been backed by any anthropologic and archeological research. Brits didn't IMPOSE it rather a philogist hight William James in his endeavour of learning himself Indian classical language FOUND striking similarities between Sanskrit with other European languages. His finding was found to be consistent with the scholars of succeeding generations. As to the DNA and genetics, almost all of the latest studies corroborated the idea that there have been migrations of people with R1a haplogroup into south asian subcontinent round about bronze age. The origin of R1a1 haplogroup is estimated to have been originated in Eurasian Stepps. This is the prevalent haplogroup in the European population. Plus it's sister haplogroup R2 happens to be the dominant genetic predisposition amongst Indian populace has it's origin in Southasian subcontinent. Had there been any chance of migration from South Asia towards west this R2 haplogroup would surely have found in the populace of European nations.Meanwhile, it's already been proved that the haplogroup R1 is present in varying degrees in the genetic make up of Indian populace especially those of higher castes. It's time you were started doing your own homework tofore extending suggestion to others.
@@VatsPranjali Madam,Whatever the deuced reason that may have been as to their omission of any inkling about their provenance we have not been revealed explicitly thereof. But these modern concepts of 'own country ' others' country, demarcation should best be dispensed with whilst discussing about ancient folks. Moreover I should far from using the term 'invasion' as it has not been backed by any anthropologic and archeological research. Brits didn't IMPOSE it rather a philogist hight William James in his endeavour of learning himself Indian classical language FOUND striking similarities between Sanskrit with other European languages. His finding was found to be consistent with the scholars of succeeding generations. As to the DNA and genetics, almost all of the latest studies corroborated the idea that there have been migrations of people with R1a haplogroup into south asian subcontinent round about bronze age. The origin of R1a1 haplogroup is estimated to have been originated in Eurasian Stepps. This is the prevalent haplogroup in the European population. Plus it's sister haplogroup R2 happens to be the dominant genetic predisposition amongst Indian populace has it's origin in Southasian subcontinent. Had there been any chance of migration from South Asia towards west this R2 haplogroup would surely have found in the populace of European nations.Meanwhile, it's already been proved that the haplogroup R1 is present in varying degrees in the genetic make up of Indian populace especially those of higher castes. It's time ew were started doing ewr own homework tofore extending suggestion to others.
great video! instant subscribe! Imo these are the first words of the veduc/indo aryan civilization though and not of the indian civilization as a whole as the scripts of indus valley remain undeciphered to this day! thank you!
Jai Shri Hari
Hail Aryavart ☀️🐎
Humans became humans because they harnessed fire, it's obvious they dedicated the first verses to AGNI
Not to forget the fact that this was North Western India slightly after the Ice age, so Agni was the only chance of their survival
Its not a song, its a hym and a verse. So called Ar yans never exis ted and they never went to India. Indian civilization, Rig Vedas, Vedas were created by Indians and Indians alone. Western li es and pro paganda to ste al Indian history is not going to work anymore. Rig Veda isn't thr first Veda and nor it is the only Veda.
I think arya is the correct word for Vedic PPL like how aryaman is used by Iranians. It's a shared heritage between europeans eurasiana and west south Asians. I don't know why anyone is being all exclusive
It's Indian migration to Europe with their package
Assalamu alaikum my brdr in islam. Saw you on many channels regarding islam and Muslims as well Philosophy (especially the Nietzschean Existentialist one) . Really happy to see Life affirming Guys like you...
0:22 O my friend, if the spirit of a true Aryan resides within you,
if you have descended from that mighty Aryan tree,
set ablaze this misconception of yours in the eternal Agni.
There is no use for lies for an Aryan.
Appreciate the way of Truth (Out of India Migration),
for Agni may lead us to the Truth.
@Vijaya7225 I am a learner, my friend, and also new to this, so this was based on my knowledge so far. I shall study more.
I also Used to believe OIT but its just an whataboutry accuse against AMT , but after deep research i stopped believing OIT .
To dispel your Aryan migration theory ignorance please watch the findings of Saragarhi which negates the popular misconception of Aryan theory. ARYA is a way to address any noble/educated men in Vedic Bharat, but people from foreign countries have manipulated the concept ARYA and have tried to teach us how we have migrated from other part of the world and are Aryans, when people from these respective region itself were still in primitive stage.
Aryans were Indians who migrated
there was no migration or invasion into india all the records show that the rig ved is 8000 years old and the rakhi gari site itself belongs to the IVC and is estimated to be 8000 years old. kids never believe in an into india theory by some random youtuber its false
it was written by native Indians not by Europeans
I call it BHARATH civilization not british named Indian because they ruled here & name a country we should call BHARATH
If there were Aryans invaders,they are Pakistanis now...end of the discussion..
Writing indo-europ;ean group is wr;ong. Be;cause e;ven ar;yan migration n;ever tells th;at ved;as were wri;tten by those who came from Eu;rope.
Sancrit is not Indus valley civilization language it is Aryan language vedas all books are written in other language which are before Sanskrit Sanskrit don't have it's it's own script
Peak level illiteracy 😂😂😂
Sanskrit not being the language of Indus valley civilization is only true thing but other part of your comment is crap
@@Akira-dm3tjwhat evidence do you have the other thing is crap
Lot of misconception of Vedas and what they teach prevail amongst Hindus and also their priests. The name Gods/Goddesses are used as metaphors when addressed as Agni, Indra, etc. and actually not any human or humanlike beings.
LolReally,,, The picture is clearly showing Homa,,,, yagnapeople from continuous lineages older than Islam still teaching sanskrit and concepts of vedas and you claim to know more than them... . Amazing😂😂
@@Cutestar6757 illogical argument. You don't even know what "Islam" means. Go and check every scripture on earth and you will find the same Faith preached- submission to one reality(ekam sat, Rigveda) by following universal natural laws. See, your Rigveda also tells you to follow Islam. So do your Gita(18:66). Besides,Your dad is older than you doesn't mean he knows a particular subject more than you. If blindly following your ancestors was "dharma" than Krishna would not come after Vedas were revealed. Always the last one not the first one is to be followed whether it is your school syllabus, medical prescription, weapons and war tactics, law. Earlier ones are for reference and if relevant then to be followed BUT on the basis of present reality.
You don't even know the name of your religion. Show me a verse from Veda that shows the name. Don't come and say, it's Sanatan because Sanatan doesn't give a subject/theme, it means "ancient".
I send our warm Dawah to you and all so you find the True Faith which is Sanatan and also remains eternal by studying and understanding scriptures not through blind belief.
Peace/Shanti
Arya Samaj had a similar interpretation
There is ZERO evidence that supports this whimsical notion which suggests Indians have no genetic admixtures from another source other than the one that originated in India. Early humans had always been migrating and intermating before they learnt to settle down at a specific spot. That's the pattern common to all humans across the globe. Why should India be different? If OIT were true people outside South Asian subcontinent ought to have genetic admixture that matches with Indians but there's zero evidence in this regard. Barring certain dyed-in-the-wool pseudo-nationalists, it's not rocket science for anyone to comprehend that the claim that Indians have no foreign genetic admixtures is tenuous.
You guys are still dreaming 😂😂😂
I take this as an opportunity to invite all the indo-aryans of the subcontinent to return back to their roots, return back to Dharma, discard the Arabic desert cult with has nothing to do with this land. Do what Iranians are doing today, discarding Islam and going back to their Persian roots back to Zoroastrianism.
According to scriptures Persians were our enemy
@@Alice-7777 Politically maybe, but not religious. Today Islam has plagues both Persia and the subcontinent
@@warpdrive9229 I'm talking about religiously Zoroastrians were not good
@@Alice-7777 There were no Zoroastrian invasions not and wars. Most Zoroastrians took shelter in India after invasion which are called Parsis today, who have built multi billion dollars businesses in India like Tata.
Anyways the point is, just like Iran is converting to Zoroastrianism, Indian subcontinent people should return to Dharma.
NO
the layers of misinformation run so thick in every aspect of this content. Study history before pretending to make content about history.
I understand the need for history (written by invaders) but let the people who own and preserve it now live with owing sense (brings responsibility and keep country clean).. why keep on trying to prove you guys couldn’t have done it.. if it really happened did anyone preserve the knowledge like India did ? One of the reasons knowledge survived and grew was geography not humans. No major natural disaster tropical weather rich soil allowed India to pass on generational knowledge
Rig Veda dates back to 200000 BC, as old as Saraswati River, British said that river was mythical when they colonized us 😂😂 Vedic civilization is eternal ☝🏽
Agni is worshipped in sanatan dharam,Persian worship it as holy and in puriest form...
Sanatan dharam there is God's and in Greek they worshipped God a
So this is what you've been yapping all the time
I had totally forgotten that you lurked on my UA-cam too bruh
Still worshipping the fire? What about nuclear?
@@dushyanthihoole3340 Fire represents Energy in essence, that is also what Nuclear energy is.
Still, I don't worship fire, this is more of a civilizational and historical thing here
Great Aryan race
Arya is not a ethnicity 😂😂
first go check ur history bro
Aryan theory is a myth 😂...indo - Aryan....😂
Bhaiji jo jitna powerful rehta hai uska hi jyada dabdaba rehta hai
Tabhi yeh theory hai , woh log soche bhavishya sabko yeh maalum hona chhaiye ki ham se hi sabka utpatti hua hai😂😂😂 aryan log ko khud sikhne mai nani yaad aagya tha phir usko apne hisab se dhal diye woh log😂😂
For how long will this fake and false story of Aryans coming to India continue?
THE FIRST WORD SPOKEN shouls be AAGG.
🌞 Ag 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥💯💯WeAreAllTurks!!!!1!11!!!💪💪
Niga blew with the most larp ass video
@@AncientBulldozer Video banatay hue aapka Soch Raha tha isi liye chal para
How tf did you find my message out of 100s dawg 😭@@Avicerox
@@AncientBulldozer It speaks to me, whispers into my ears about your every move.
They were Indians ।।।
Aryans as understood by Europeans never existed there was no migration or invasion from Europe to India ।।।rather the other way round is more probable
Shame
Jainism prevailed in Bharat India before the aryans came to this land
😂
Not true
Stop spreading this bullshit theory 😡.
we wuz
@@angrypotato9504 larp
rig veda is not even ancient, the aryan(iranian) migration to india and ganges happend around 1st century ad thats why vedas even talk about ghandara cultures, the aryans were persian who were mix of native iranian farmes and caucasian migrants
It is older than 1500 years BC, that is ancient by all standards. Gandhara is also a tribe, as were the Bharatas. Nevertheless, it is still the first scripture of the Indian civilization.
@@Avicerox nope, there is no evidence that rig veda dates back to 1500 bc, its all made up claim with trustmebro sources, even the present day oldest rig veda dates back to 1464 ad, even younger then sikhism
@@Avicerox plus persian avesta is way older then rig veda
@@NotiBoii-c6l I know, and Avestan is an Iranic scripture, not specifically IA per se.
@@Avicerox my other comment was deleted, i said, no, there is no evidence that rig veda dates back to 1500 bc, its all made up claims, even the oldest rig veda ever found dates back to 1464 ad, even younger then sikhism
Bro are u pakistani ??
If yes then why do u support this aryan culture
Im just curious
Race, perhaps