A History of the Infinite

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 37

  • @Philosophy_Overdose
    @Philosophy_Overdose  3 роки тому +8

    00:00 Horror of the Infinite
    13:30 Aristotle's Rapprochement
    27:07 The Infinite & the Divine
    40:35 The Infinite & Human Experience
    53:57 The Mathematics of the Infinitely Small
    1:07:28 The Mathematics of the Infinitely Big
    1:20:13 Crisis & Uncertainty
    1:33:39 The Cosmos
    1:47:13 Death & Immortality
    2:00:43 Where Does This Leave Us?

    • @garystevenson5560
      @garystevenson5560 Рік тому

      Maybe this will help you figure out your equations
      God as Mathematical ensembles would make no sense if we could not confer them to concrete reality. Thus, the unique infinity of all infinities is a relative absolute as it opens up on an absolute infinity of relative infinities. This is how the absolute infinities of infinities is paradoxically relatively infinite, thus on account of the infinity of finite infinities that are all longer and shorter than one another that comprise it. This infinity of infinities which is paradoxically relatively absolute bears as middle number 0. 0 being space-less, matter-less, timeless light (or void) that has all these mathematical proprieties as light but not absolutely for by movement (kinetic mass) and ''consciousness'' it can create matter infinitely thus making it paradoxically absolute - as light- and not absolute- as matter. In other words everything comes from nothing because if something is to exist, it must exist where nothing exist. Coming back to our relatively absolute infinite infinity, we will point out that it is constructed with an infinity of sub sets and sub sets of sub sets of mathematical infinities. This gives us a picture of how the spatially finite infinity of this universe is such on account that space cannot exceed space and is enclosed by Black holes whereas at the same time it can be infinite,-or not- in a given space-time universe in it's transformation of matter that opens up on a possible withering away of it or a swallowing up of it -or even a spitting out of it- by black holes giving the duel or paradoxical nature of matter that is essentially matter-less and of space that is essentially space-less. We will also posit here the interconnections of universes in there space-time nature in the same way we will posit the interconnections of the mathematical ensembles in the space-less and time-less nature. Using numbered slide scales and moving them by mathematical calculations to the left or right of 0, thus to calculate what exploded out of black hole, for instance, in terms of gravity's push-pull duel nature, we can have an idea of the shredding away of matter in a newly created universe and have an idea of how gravity in its duel nature shreds matter into dark matter. Always within this frame of reasoning implying mathematical infinities, we will posit that a sub set of a sub set also explains how a quantic particle can be clocked but not spotted or spotted and not clocked. We would consider here the stretching of numbers in a slide scale going in both direction along an ensemble- thus calculation in this way the movement of the energy particle in space and time along space-less and time-less void as a backdrop, for instance. The sliding numbers on the sliding scales could come to annul one another through a certain alignement let's say. Shifting back one of these sub sets to it's departure number or conferring one sub set to another and sliding the two scales one against the other we may have a mathematical indication of the stretching of the particle as ambiguous matter-enery ( essentially light -void) or the freezing of it at any given number as when it is seen - in this way we would be aligning one sliding scale or scales in a particular way as to catch this mathematical moment. Now, if we consider the electroweak fusion theory and represent the 3 bosons as finite infinities working through the matter-less, space-less, timeless void of light we may represent the weak nuclear force as a 3 sided pyramid which summit joins in light and branches out into an inverted pyramid which base runs infinitely.

    • @DangoDangoNothingWrongo
      @DangoDangoNothingWrongo 7 місяців тому

      ​@@garystevenson5560schizo babble

  • @languagegame410
    @languagegame410 3 роки тому +17

    yes!... MORE... feed me MORE... i need this, Philosophy Overdose... until my eyes roll back into my chronically curious head... FEED ME NOW!!!

    • @smsog2236
      @smsog2236 2 роки тому +2

      Cant get enough of this program. Surprised its got low views. Great program, very revealing

    • @anunturipubli7997
      @anunturipubli7997 Рік тому

      R u ready for god

  • @DonaldPesavento-vs6qq
    @DonaldPesavento-vs6qq 6 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for this. There are things in here I had never heard before.

  • @hakim_alrooh
    @hakim_alrooh Рік тому +2

    Thank you very much. Very interesting.

  • @into_abyss
    @into_abyss Рік тому +1

    Excellent

  • @FormsInSpace
    @FormsInSpace Рік тому +5

    "ultimately mathematics is metaphysics" U.G. Krishnamurti

  • @waynedarronwalls6468
    @waynedarronwalls6468 2 роки тому +4

    And then along came Kurt Gödel, and everything was never the same...

  • @CandidDate
    @CandidDate Рік тому

    How many times must I bang my head against the unyielding wall of infinity before I throw my arms up and exclaim, "I don't know!?!"

  • @ShahulHameed-nf1wz
    @ShahulHameed-nf1wz 2 роки тому +4

    Excellent! Not overdose, sustainable dose.

    • @anunturipubli7997
      @anunturipubli7997 Рік тому +1

      R u ready for god

    • @ShahulHameed-nf1wz
      @ShahulHameed-nf1wz Рік тому

      @@anunturipubli7997
      If you can't prove someone exists, it doesn't mean it is non existent and if you can't prove someone exists it doesn't mean it exists.
      * I doubt, sincerely doubt God's presence but not pretty sure as concludes.*

    • @anunturipubli7997
      @anunturipubli7997 Рік тому

      @@ShahulHameed-nf1wz what do u mean someone,god doesnt have a penis

  • @ReflectiveJourney
    @ReflectiveJourney Рік тому +1

    Plotinus didn't say the one was infinite. It is beyond predication. The one is both finite and infinite (both cancel out)

  • @runforestrun5537
    @runforestrun5537 2 роки тому +1

    19:05 We could think of potentially infinite space, similar to how we could running on a circle forever even though the circle is actually finite

    • @Mtmonaghan
      @Mtmonaghan Рік тому +2

      That would be something geometrically finite, existing for infinity. Could be any shape, same thing. The analogy fails.

  • @lostinthought4354
    @lostinthought4354 Рік тому +2

    The universe is infinite for one simple reason ... its existence and extent cannot be comprehended by any mind but God.

    • @rl7012
      @rl7012 Рік тому +1

      It cannot be infinite if it had a beginning. It cannot have existed an infinite amount of time either or the universe would be in much more entropy.

    • @davidwright8432
      @davidwright8432 6 місяців тому

      Speak for yourself.

  • @MeisterBeefington
    @MeisterBeefington Рік тому +1

    and inside that tiny bit of honey and beans....

  • @John-pn1px
    @John-pn1px 4 місяці тому

    The example with the nun: There cannot be a nun who prays for all the nuns who do not pray for themselves. I disagree. The nun prays for all nuns who do not pray for themselves AND for herself OR she prays for all nuns who do not pray for themselves AND she does not pray for herself too. Such a nun exists. In the example there is only a lack of information wheter the nun prays for herself or not. Add this information and everything is ok.

  • @garystevenson5560
    @garystevenson5560 Рік тому +1

    Maybe this will help you figure out your equations
    God as Mathematical ensembles would make no sense if we could not confer them to concrete reality. Thus, the unique infinity of all infinities is a relative absolute as it opens up on an absolute infinity of relative infinities. This is how the absolute infinities of infinities is paradoxically relatively infinite, thus on account of the infinity of finite infinities that are all longer and shorter than one another that comprise it. This infinity of infinities which is paradoxically relatively absolute bears as middle number 0. 0 being space-less, matter-less, timeless light (or void) that has all these mathematical proprieties as light but not absolutely for by movement (kinetic mass) and ''consciousness'' it can create matter infinitely thus making it paradoxically absolute - as light- and not absolute- as matter. In other words everything comes from nothing because if something is to exist, it must exist where nothing exist. Coming back to our relatively absolute infinite infinity, we will point out that it is constructed with an infinity of sub sets and sub sets of sub sets of mathematical infinities. This gives us a picture of how the spatially finite infinity of this universe is such on account that space cannot exceed space and is enclosed by Black holes whereas at the same time it can be infinite,-or not- in a given space-time universe in it's transformation of matter that opens up on a possible withering away of it or a swallowing up of it -or even a spitting out of it- by black holes giving the duel or paradoxical nature of matter that is essentially matter-less and of space that is essentially space-less. We will also posit here the interconnections of universes in there space-time nature in the same way we will posit the interconnections of the mathematical ensembles in the space-less and time-less nature. Using numbered slide scales and moving them by mathematical calculations to the left or right of 0, thus to calculate what exploded out of black hole, for instance, in terms of gravity's push-pull duel nature, we can have an idea of the shredding away of matter in a newly created universe and have an idea of how gravity in its duel nature shreds matter into dark matter. Always within this frame of reasoning implying mathematical infinities, we will posit that a sub set of a sub set also explains how a quantic particle can be clocked but not spotted or spotted and not clocked. We would consider here the stretching of numbers in a slide scale going in both direction along an ensemble- thus calculation in this way the movement of the energy particle in space and time along space-less and time-less void as a backdrop, for instance. The sliding numbers on the sliding scales could come to annul one another through a certain alignement let's say. Shifting back one of these sub sets to it's departure number or conferring one sub set to another and sliding the two scales one against the other we may have a mathematical indication of the stretching of the particle as ambiguous matter-enery ( essentially light -void) or the freezing of it at any given number as when it is seen - in this way we would be aligning one sliding scale or scales in a particular way as to catch this mathematical moment. Now, if we consider the electroweak fusion theory and represent the 3 bosons as finite infinities working through the matter-less, space-less, timeless void of light we may represent the weak nuclear force as a 3 sided pyramid which summit joins in light and branches out into an inverted pyramid which base runs infinitely.

    • @CandidDate
      @CandidDate Рік тому

      Have you ever thought this solution to Zeno's Paradox. Nothing ever is anywhere, it is always moving at a rate "r." So in the equation d = r x t (distance = rate times time) time = 1, or infinity/infinity, and d = r. A distance is a rate, not a position. Relative rates are all we can measure, so in the infinite number of infinities, there are only comparisons of the infinite relative to the absolute Infinite Infinity.
      Also, if time were to be passing at a very fast rate, and all energies are the only measurable quantity, then all "events" of energy can be ordered in order of strength, from strongest, or causing the most effect, down to the smallest, or causing the least effect. Each tick of the time clock a new set of calculations from strongest to smallest "event" effect occurs. So, an exploding quasar may be calculated as the strongest event, and this event sets the measure of all other events which occur in fractions of this event. All the way down to the flapping of a butterfly's wing or the falling of a piece of dust into a coffee cup. Then the next time tick happens and all the relative events are recalculated according to their strength. Only randomness occurs when two events have the same strength. But of course they are separated by space, therefore this can occur.
      This could only occur in a finitely sized universe, however. The Big Bang COULD have happened or not. Do you want it to have happened? It would not be infinite in energy strength though. But maybe mathematically infinite in time for calculation purposes? Got it all figured out.

  • @countingfloats
    @countingfloats Рік тому

    The number of measly comments is an indication that this entire video makes zero sense.

  • @DSTH323
    @DSTH323 3 роки тому +1

    In the Beginning God... Gen. 1:1. It is telling thst mankind cannot forget these words.

    • @waynedarronwalls6468
      @waynedarronwalls6468 2 роки тому

      God did not create Man, Man created God...

    • @samantarmaxammadsaciid5156
      @samantarmaxammadsaciid5156 2 роки тому

      ​@@waynedarronwalls6468
      Where is the God you mention that man himself created?
      Answer: none except imagination!

    • @waynedarronwalls6468
      @waynedarronwalls6468 2 роки тому

      @@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156 that is my point...This 'God' only truly 'exists' in your imagination...

    • @waynedarronwalls6468
      @waynedarronwalls6468 Рік тому

      @@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156 I suggest the use of the term "God" as a metaphor for control, a means by which to brainwash the people by the use of fear as a tool of conformity to a certain way of thinking.

    • @toonyandfriends1915
      @toonyandfriends1915 Рік тому +1

      @@waynedarronwalls6468 how edgy are these answers

  • @ahmedmahmud4238
    @ahmedmahmud4238 4 місяці тому

    Yeah no you missed it