Hi Chris, cool to see you have comparable values to the fg 60 r3. Made a magnet ring and timed to 32 degrees I.s.o. the idiotic 40 of Saito, which immediately improved the run characteristics. Funny to see cylinder 3 having difficulty coming on line…. Same as on the fg 60, so I went for a negative pressure crankcase solution. All 3 cylinders now run very equal. Like you say, it’s strange Saito is not addressing these relative small issues on their otherwise splendid made engines!
That idle. Wow 😲. Great running engine. How difficult would it be do you think to add another row behind these engines. Essentially two of these together to make a twin row 6 cylinder, just using the same magnet ring, and a second ignition pick up mounted 180° from the first?
Hi Chris, cool to see you have comparable values to the fg 60 r3. Made a magnet ring and timed to 32 degrees I.s.o. the idiotic 40 of Saito, which immediately improved the run characteristics. Funny to see cylinder 3 having difficulty coming on line…. Same as on the fg 60, so I went for a negative pressure crankcase solution. All 3 cylinders now run very equal. Like you say, it’s strange Saito is not addressing these relative small issues on their otherwise splendid made engines!
That idle. Wow 😲. Great running engine.
How difficult would it be do you think to add another row behind these engines. Essentially two of these together to make a twin row 6 cylinder, just using the same magnet ring, and a second ignition pick up mounted 180° from the first?
In my opinion mpossible, you can’t connect the cranks……