QUILBOAR VS GHOUL-ACABRA?! - Hearthstone Battlegrounds
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Hearthstone Battlegrounds - The ultimate duel had a surprising end!
Kripp’s Hearthstone Stream ⭐ / nl_kripp
Sub to our IRL channel ⭐ www.youtube.co...
Sub to our clips channel ⭐ / @casualkripp
💗 Subscribe bit.ly/KrippSub
💗 Twitter / kripparrian
💗 Instagram / casualkripp
💗 Xtrfy Kripp Mouse xtrfy.com/mice...
💗 AdvancedGG Partner advanced.gg/?r... (KRIPP for 10% off)
💗 Kripp’s Amazon www.amazon.com...
VOD: / 2175530096
Thank you for watching and continuously supporting the channel 😊
#HearthstoneBattlegrounds #kripp
hsreplay.net/b... - Ігри
Kripp played this game live on stream about 12 days ago (on 6/18/2024).
It seems the game starts at around 04:25:00 in the Twitch VOD. Check the video description for the link!
I think the ghoul acabre deserved a buff not an nerf to give like 10/10 every time a deathrattle is activated would be balanced
Eh, that feels a bit weak. Maybe it should activate whenever a deathrattle is triggered on any player's board in the lobby, not just the owner of the ghoulabarbara
@@AeirusTV this is what using a 100% of your brain looks like
It should also stack permanently from game to game.
Nah that's not quite there. Anytime a deathrattle triggers in any game being played at the same time regardless of which lobby it's in.
it should spawn death rattle frogs that infinitely stack.
Hey look at that. Another beast build with a card that’s since been nerved. Bravo
Was this not a demon build? He had two beats on the board
Thanks for 2 in a row groul acabra builds after its nerf! :SeensGood:
he's still showing pre-patch builds
Enjoy the video, everyone!
well deserved loss. Failed to make the baron golden when he had the chance via hero power. Would have had 50% higher stats for the last fight.
Not only that, but for the other player to even get that kind of Quilboar setup is rare
krippy spent half the game talking about harry potter lmao
"yeah i get big blood gems then what?" Gets beaten up by big blood gems. Good ol' kripp
😂
I haven't seen him get the positioning of anything as often as wrong as Cultists across all his games. It's painful to watch.. KEKW
Including not taunting them!
Gem smuggler is back in the pool as of 6/27
This is just a leapfrog build with no leapfrog in the game 😂😂
Kripp "Ghoulacabre needs to be nerfed, this meta is imbalanced and you only win if you are a beast build. Blizz won't nerf it though because they love beast meta"
Blizzard a week ago, We nerfed beasts and made quilboar good again.
Kripp "i will keep releasing videos talking about the "current" meta from a week ago"
He's in Iceland right now
Don’t feel bad for a pre nerf ghoulacabra build losing. Though getting sniped twice in a row sucks
Why didn't he taunt the Cultist?
8:8 (Watched 3 battles, Duo mode card delivery, Health 240)
2vs2 2vs2 VS 2vs2 2vs2
2vs2 VS 2vs2 (fast because of damage)
2 VS 2 (fast because of damage)
Kripp is 37
in 2002 (Harry Potter movie release) he was 14-15. How can you not enjoy Harry Potter as a teenager
Its satisfying watching ghoulacrapras lose.
I definitely agree with the high likelihood to lose in the last fight. Sure, attacking first would have helped, but the guy had two minions in 4 digits with the rest in 3. Kripp had 6 in 3 digits, with one barely being have their average health. Sure he'll summon a lot of that demon, but it's in 2 digits. He'll need to summon 4 in addition to the original for that to equate the opponents smallest minion. And he could summon 10 without it actually effecting break points against the biggest minion.
His only chance of winning was to have additional health pump his triple digit minions to perfectly attack over the triple digit quillboar (maximum of one miss), then crash 4 low health triple digit minions into the 2 quaddigits, and then he could win by a leftover tiny demon. 5/7×4/6x3/5x2/4= 14ish percent chance to win. Going first almost doesn't matter, since the controlling factor is how long he can go without diving into the biggest minions.
Don't forget that if he goes first, whenever a cultist dies and drops multiple imps, they can stack onto eachother, and that can get recursive really fast. (example stats) 100/100 demon can make the other demon have 500hp (baron+golden imp=4x hp), then that demon can give 2000 hp to something else. So it's not exactly correct to say his "only chance of winning" was to pump his other minions to perfectly attack over. He could've just gotten lucky and gained thousands of hp from any one of like 8? imp summons
@kirinashia567 That's incredibly unlikely. Remember, my scenario already expects every single one of his big minions to gain more that 100hp to simply be larger than the opponent at all.
The likelihood that every opponent hit avoids one of the first summoned imps, and that every earlier imp also buffs that one several times.... is basically negligible. And the Imp has to got above 300hp before that actually affects anything.
@@___i3ambi126 it doesn't have to avoid the first summoned imp at all. The only thing that matters is where the hp lands. Which yes. Is unlikely to repeat stack... if you look at individual instances. But again, there's quite a few imps especially later down the line. The last one will summon 4 imps and the only hp targets are imps, baron, and cabra.cobra. Your scenario is expecting hp to land on big minions, the one I am talking about is NOT landing on big minions where possible, then stacking one to high heaven. And I'm not talking about every imp landing on one imp, I'm talking about every proc of one imp landing on another. 1 imp can give a 2nd imp 4x it's own hp. The 2nd imp would then give 4x that.
@@kirinashia567 That's still absurdly unlikely. If there isn't more than 2 imps on the board at once, then they're giving out 140hp at a time. Also known as 10% of the highest enemy attack. Have 3 cascade perfectly and you gain 20% of their attack in health. It starts becoming a big deal after it cascades 4 times for a couple instances of 40% of the enemy attack. That cascade (which is the most important to happen perfectly) on a board of 4 imps has a 1 in 840 chance of working out. There's also the chance of a 5th being on the board due to a snipe, but that has about equal odds when you add back in the odds of that snipe. So a 1 in 420 chance of your win scenario? That's a margin of error difference.
@@___i3ambi126 you're making the assumption the imps need to land in a specific way when there's multiple. 1 in 840? When there's 4 imps and 2 non imps, you have 3/5 for each hit, because landing on any imp is acceptable. Each imp triggers 4 health gains. Then repeat for 2/4 imp targets, then 1/3 imp targets. You do not need every health gain to land on an imp, but you do need several. A higher than average amount to be sure, but not enough to require a 1/840.
Also, with 2 golden cultist and 1 regular, macaw notwithstanding, there is a good chance with the right order for there to be 4 on the board not once but twice. Kripp did do the wrong board order once though.
Edit: For example there's 4 imps at 70 (closer to kripps actual stat) 1 imp lands all 4 hits across the other 3 imps. A little lucky, but not incredibly so. This gives an additional 280 health to imps. Now any imp that was hit once will give out 640 total health, 140 4 times. If two of those land on imps (at 2/4 targets) then imps gain 320 hp. The remaining imps are already looking at a minimum (one landing from initial, one landing from step 2) 280 hp, and grant 1120 hp to allies. That's enough to make a notable difference, especially if any of that hits the final imp. As a reminder, I've also deleted a bunch of gained hp from the equations above, taking minimums of landing on imps which accounts for several misses.
Current meta? Are you sure about that?
“It’s for kids and stuff,” says the guy playing video games. Oof ❤❤❤❤
Trigore nerfed and Ghoulacabra nerfed. There is hope after all.
tired of watching freshly released videos that were recorded 2 weeks prior... time to unsub :(
Kinda maddening to never get the demon consumes the tavern spell or a golden baron.
The consume spell wouldn't have done anything. First, his tavern was completely unbuffed, so the benefit would have been minimal. Second, his opponent had a Bramblewitch, so it could have been a 1000/1000 and it wouldn't have mattered.
@@billybegood466 I mean, his demon was barely 60/60, a consume could've given it like 80% more stats. Even more % difference a few rounds before the end, which tied.
Also, bramblewitch is great sure, but if the demon was bigger he could've won the fight vs 1st place prior to the final round which was a tie. Given the opponent is at 2 hp, that would've been game over, and the final fight never would've happened.
The tie match only overkilled Kripp's minion by 40 hp, so even a little extra buffing could've made the difference. If the demon was 1000/1000 Kripp instantaneously wins the fight at 22:53.
"Its for kids" while playing a online card game...😂
Going demons with what his opponent was playing is the biggest mistake. If Kripp had gone beasts instead he would've won by turn 14-15
Star wars, lord of the ring, harry potter all made for kids
Doesn't mean they're not great movies, though.
@@remliqa for kids
@@Zabam Great movies for all ages. Some say those type of movie are more quintessential cinema than one that are gated for certain brackets and demographics.
You know what else is for kids ? Hearthstone.
@@remliqa Listen man, Im not trying to say your enjoyment of that media is wrong. I just think its something you gotta grow up with. Everybody still likes some things they found and loved in their teens. But these days theyre a bit cliche at best, or harry potter in particular, were really aimed at a child audiance. Maybe if I had kids getting into these things Id see it different but its not easy to get into stuff like that as an adult if you have matured tastes as well. Also bro Kripp has mentioned his metrics here its mostly dudes around 30 not sure about the game being for kids 😂
@@Zabam I was pretty much fully grown adult when I watched the Harry Potter series and even then I can can appreciate good story telling when I see it. The one thing anyone who ever watched the films and/or read the books would notice is that the tone and "maturity" of the series grew as teh chatters goes older. The tone of the last few movies/books is vastly different from Philosopher's Stone
Maybe you can say that I have nostalgia goggles about Star Wars since I grew up with the Original Trilogy but even then mys point still stands. The purposes of the cinematic medium is to tell stories and entertains, by that metric timeless classic that all ages can enjoy and appreciate is what your generation would say " knew their assignments" , hence I stand my ground on them being quintessential cinema .
Ironically , Hearthstone is far more child oriented than the Harry Potter series in general, and unlike HP, the game "kid friendly" themes ramps up as the game grows older. I mean just look at the art changes (Mistress of Pain anyone?) or the latest expansions vs the earlier ones. This is why the hypocrisy is rather cringe.
i know super late. host = swarm. host of locust
Host of problems.