Great job, gentlemen. Yes, I have asked the important question "what was I before I was born?". I feel that this question is more important than asking "what will become of me when I die?". If one asks the later question, It kind of suggests that the questioner isn't sure about his/her present life. But if one asks the former question, it suggests that the questioner wants to know what is his/her purpose for incarnating in this life. The later question suggests that the questioner is hoping for something better than the life they have currently. In my experience, when I pondered this question many years ago, I found that I became more and more alert to the present moment. I became attentive, and then more attentive. I attained a level of hypersensitivity that was unbearable. I couldn't go near other people. Luckily I had a job where I worked alone. The attentiveness and hypersensitivity started to make my brain unstable. I literally thought that I was going mad. To make a long story short, I found that I was not who I thought I was. The questions became irrelevant as I had the realization that before birth and after death actually both exist now and here. The question is "are we actually all here". Are we fully cognizant of ourselves, here and now? But you are already aware of this. There's my two cents.
Why couldn't it be simpler, still, correspondence, perhaps. If there are plliars from posts and a crack of light to begin with, matter is a byproduct in the most intensely agreed to sense there is, via the rest of baryonic matter being dark, and, back in time as Godlike ancestry. That is, of forward moving 'contemporary' baryonic matter there is a definite patina (Reimann numbers..., 27.2 eV per transition indicates a plethora of new statespace to get on with), the periodic chart of the elements. Nothing nihilistic about it. Remember, the 1st law is net neutrality. However, the dynamics of spacetime is, definitely, calibrated in our own R-sphere 4 *current* cognitive exercises properly distributed as such, vis a vis hydrino in this instance. What is the problem with resolving 85 orders of magnitude with Newton and J. Clerk Maxwell causing (?) closure to occur (occupy?) on its own. You do the math.
Great job, gentlemen. Yes, I have asked the important question "what was I before I was born?". I feel that this question is more important than asking "what will become of me when I die?". If one asks the later question, It kind of suggests that the questioner isn't sure about his/her present life. But if one asks the former question, it suggests that the questioner wants to know what is his/her purpose for incarnating in this life. The later question suggests that the questioner is hoping for something better than the life they have currently. In my experience, when I pondered this question many years ago, I found that I became more and more alert to the present moment. I became attentive, and then more attentive. I attained a level of hypersensitivity that was unbearable. I couldn't go near other people. Luckily I had a job where I worked alone. The attentiveness and hypersensitivity started to make my brain unstable. I literally thought that I was going mad. To make a long story short, I found that I was not who I thought I was. The questions became irrelevant as I had the realization that before birth and after death actually both exist now and here. The question is "are we actually all here". Are we fully cognizant of ourselves, here and now? But you are already aware of this. There's my two cents.
Elevator? Mr. Barnwell, I missed that point.
Facing evil? Or conquering ignorance? Be it our own, in others?
Where's part 1?
ua-cam.com/video/Or4zfe2qhjo/v-deo.html
Why couldn't it be simpler, still, correspondence, perhaps. If there are plliars from posts and a crack of light to begin with, matter is a byproduct in the most intensely agreed to sense there is, via the rest of baryonic matter being dark, and, back in time as Godlike ancestry. That is, of forward moving 'contemporary' baryonic matter there is a definite patina (Reimann numbers..., 27.2 eV per transition indicates a plethora of new statespace to get on with), the periodic chart of the elements. Nothing nihilistic about it.
Remember, the 1st law is net neutrality. However, the dynamics of spacetime is, definitely, calibrated in our own R-sphere 4 *current* cognitive exercises properly distributed as such, vis a vis hydrino in this instance. What is the problem with resolving 85 orders of magnitude with Newton and J. Clerk Maxwell causing (?) closure to occur (occupy?) on its own. You do the math.
😊💚💚💚👍