As for child support grants most mothers are working earning well thier grandmother takes care the mother also five money its better to investigate the child support grants better late than never
There is a better way. Parental custody of children is actually a very simple matter to solve given the true desire of “What is best for the child”. We need to separate and discard marriage from family law as they no longer seem to be connected and "Marriage makes people treat each other as articles of property and no longer as free human beings. Einstein". We can develop protocols that confer (over time) equal parental rights and responsibilities,…..once parentage is proven. Children’s natural maturation process has 3 essential stages of need. A.The unconditional love of the mother from birth until about 7 years of age. The mother to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance. B.The conditional love of the father, who takes his children out into the world, gives security and teaches social boundaries from 7 until about 13 years of age. The father to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance. C.The friendship and respect of peers from 13 until 18 years of age. The child to have “thefinalsay”. If these 3 stages are not gone through in order, maturation is unlikely to be satisfactorily achieved and mental resilience reduced. This has now become generational. Such a regime of equal parenting rights (over time) would bind parents into a co-operative relationship, because (over time) each will hold the power of “thefinalsay” sequentially when they are best favoured to use it. Such family protocols would be the default position, (allowing love, courtesy and humour to prevail) but could in exceptional cases be varied by the court. Buckminster Fuller said:- “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete”. To alleviate suffering is worthy. To prevent it is divine, but thankless.
How does Sole Physical Custody Dependency Withholding Adjudication with the Parenting Plan renacted with the shared Legal Rights defined in the Parenting Plan? Also, CPS Shelter occurred by Fraudulent DV Battery charges Dismissed, followed by DVI based on Battery charges, but the Dependency Court had Rescinded Reunification without Investigation. Had the DV Battery evidence been considered, which was the basis of Shelter, the reality of the matter would have been substantiated. Naturally, the Law Violations committed for Shelter was the exact reason that no fair trial was offered in State vs Parent Cases, and not of the reporting CoParent. Best Interests seems to be a farce as no Court Parties or Professionals care to be objective, even interested really.
There is no equal footing. I saw it with my own eyes. The judge Rubberstamped the mother for primary custody on the 1st day of court in a temporary order that lasted 3 years. The judge never bothered to review the best interest factors that they are required to consider. Only because I hung in there for a 3 year trial, only then was I able to force the court to consider the best interests of the child, via my 28 hours of testimony. And only then did I, the father, get custody. If I had quit any time before that, the mother would have ended up with default custody without anybody actually considering the best interests of the child. The genderbias is obvious. There is no equal footing.
I agree with you! It is true that the judge never bothered to review the best interest factors. On my case, my 7 years old special needs child was given to his dad because he had a lawyer and I am was unable to get one. His dad never was on charge of him! Never change his diaper or anything; he just wants him to not be paying child support which is high because his medical needs. It is less expensive to pay a baby sitter.
Cost of living is far more then 2100 instead of 5000 together have a good change in progress for poor old aged people and disability grant mental illness patients unfit to work
You two and your linguistic gymnastics. The court is no place for a family. Family court is racketeering. And the cottage industry that it supports.
As for child support grants most mothers are working earning well thier grandmother takes care the mother also five money its better to investigate the child support grants better late than never
There is a better way. Parental custody of children is actually a very simple matter to solve given the true desire of “What is best for the child”.
We need to separate and discard marriage from family law as they no longer seem to be connected and "Marriage makes people treat each other as articles of property and no longer as free human beings. Einstein".
We can develop protocols that confer (over time) equal parental rights and responsibilities,…..once parentage is proven.
Children’s natural maturation process has 3 essential stages of need.
A.The unconditional love of the mother from birth until about 7 years of age. The mother to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance.
B.The conditional love of the father, who takes his children out into the world, gives security and teaches social boundaries from 7 until about 13 years of age. The father to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance.
C.The friendship and respect of peers from 13 until 18 years of age. The child to have “thefinalsay”.
If these 3 stages are not gone through in order, maturation is unlikely to be satisfactorily achieved and mental resilience reduced. This has now become generational.
Such a regime of equal parenting rights (over time) would bind parents into a co-operative relationship, because (over time) each will hold the power of “thefinalsay” sequentially when they are best favoured to use it.
Such family protocols would be the default position, (allowing love, courtesy and humour to prevail) but could in exceptional cases be varied by the court.
Buckminster Fuller said:-
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete”.
To alleviate suffering is worthy. To prevent it is divine, but thankless.
Increase social grants for old aged people and disability benefits
How does Sole Physical Custody Dependency Withholding Adjudication with the Parenting Plan renacted with the shared Legal Rights defined in the Parenting Plan?
Also, CPS Shelter occurred by Fraudulent DV Battery charges Dismissed, followed by DVI based on Battery charges, but the Dependency Court had Rescinded Reunification without Investigation.
Had the DV Battery evidence been considered, which was the basis of Shelter, the reality of the matter would have been substantiated.
Naturally, the Law Violations committed for Shelter was the exact reason that no fair trial was offered in State vs Parent Cases, and not of the reporting CoParent.
Best Interests seems to be a farce as no Court Parties or Professionals care to be objective, even interested really.
There is no equal footing. I saw it with my own eyes. The judge Rubberstamped the mother for primary custody on the 1st day of court in a temporary order that lasted 3 years. The judge never bothered to review the best interest factors that they are required to consider. Only because I hung in there for a 3 year trial, only then was I able to force the court to consider the best interests of the child, via my 28 hours of testimony. And only then did I, the father, get custody. If I had quit any time before that, the mother would have ended up with default custody without anybody actually considering the best interests of the child. The genderbias is obvious. There is no equal footing.
I agree with you! It is true that the judge never bothered to review the best interest factors. On my case, my 7 years old special needs child was given to his dad because he had a lawyer and I am was unable to get one. His dad never was on charge of him! Never change his diaper or anything; he just wants him to not be paying child support which is high because his medical needs. It is less expensive to pay a baby sitter.
Cost of living is far more then 2100 instead of 5000 together have a good change in progress for poor old aged people and disability grant mental illness patients unfit to work