Biden issues PRE-EMPTIVE PARDONS for his ENTIRE cabal despite promising he would NEVER do so
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
- Wow.
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
➡️UA-cam Memberships: bit.ly/39yRdh8
➡️PayPal: www.paypal.me/...
➡️Patreon: / antoniochavez
OTHER CHANNELS
➡️Memology 102: / @memology102
➡️DSP Tries It - Memology 101: / @dsptriesitmemology101
➡️M101 News: / @m101news
ADDITIONAL CREDITS
➡️Memology 101 Netflix Intro:
/ pleasesubscribedad
Trends: #unitedstates #news - Розваги
Pardoned for which crimes committed and charged with?
The wording for Hunter's was "all crimes, known and unknown". Wonder if the rest of the gang are getting the same dispensation.
What are you gonna do about it? Nada
@@Bond-gz6vg
Good God, putting him in his place, AND Using the language of the migrants?!
Brutal takedown, man.
Not just charged, but **convicted**. Pardoning is not supposed to work unless the conviction has been delivered.
All crimes committed previously and from now.
So can we all admit now that the "conspiracy theorists" were right all along now?
We are undefeated at this point.
Yes for the 119th time
Conspiracy Theorists have a better record than the Kansas City Chiefs over the last 3 years.
"This was called a conspiracy theory, but as I like to call it, coming attractions."
- James Morrow
No, because it's much worse.
Why do you need to pardon someone if a crime was never committed? 🤔
Your comment is gold!!!
They're framing it as protection from political prosecution even though we all know it's BS
Their excuse will be 'so that Trump cant wrongfully weaponize the justice system against them'
im curious to see how the legality of this pans out.
I'm surprised Joementia didn't pardon himself for treason
He can still investigate them if there is no crime
Never in my life have I seen “pardons” for crimes that were never committed…
but the media is just ignoring that fact shows you which side they’re on
Ya but,,,, he knows and we know that Lizzy and the gang committed treason
" never committed" mmmhm.. def didn't do anything.. uh huh...
If you follow the money you find a WHOLE LOT of SHIT these people have been doing! Surprise, they found the MONEY!
No, there where crimes commited, this is how hes protecting them.
If you've done nothing wrong why do you need pardoning?
Tell that to the Jan 6th people.
@@billybatts8283you mean the FBI
@billybatts8283 but they did nothing wrong, they're what is called political prisoners
@@billybatts8283 How about what happened
during the summer of 2020? Remember that?
@@billybatts8283 room temp iq demtard
He's trying to protect his fellow corrupt swamp creatures.
If they go down he probably would too.
Well as an American I think I'm denying his pardon for his crimes against America because from what it looks like to me he is competent to stand trial am I right he is still signing papers am I right just saying 🙄👍
Hes trying to protect himself.
Duh.
Even Nixon had more pride and respect when leaving the office.
And he didn't necessarily have to be forced out either (debatable), he simply walked away.
-🇺🇸
Nixon was actually a based president might want to do some research
Nixon isn't the bad guy the media/left made him out to be.
Nixon wasn't that bad.
Watergate was NOTHING compared to the shenanigans of Joe Biden!
Just a total admission of guilt.
Keep in mind, he wasn't pardoning Hunter, he pardoned himself.
Well the way I see it wasn't he supposedly proved incompetent to sign any more paperwork just saying so pardon denied and that's not a joke Jack c'mon man 😎👉🍦
@@ronboerste1813 Can't have it both ways.
@@flipper184 but yet we just let him get away with it so whose fault is it really just saying 🙄👍
By pardoning Hunter Hunter can now be called to testify against his father. Hunter having been pardoned, cannot use the fifth amendment as a defense.
He'll just Hillary Clinton it... "I cannot recall"
She almost said that 200 times in a couple of hours
Corrupt to the very end.
Preemptive pardons? That’s a new one on me. Maybe the SCOTUS should look that one over.
It should be addressed for sure but as it stands he can do it.
I was thinking the same.
It's 100% illogical. I'll be furious if they don't. That cannot be allowed. They need a conviction and specific details of the crimes and dates committed. There should be special circumstances triggered for stunts like this that turns the pardon to an admission of guilt and allows imprisonment until we find the crime they're trying to pardon and convict them on it.
Basically, it makes government limitless in what they can do. That's unconstitutional as it gets!
It seems kind of Un-American.
And we may see a turn towards "Old Fashioned Thinking"
Shouldn't you be convicted to be pardoned?
Don't have to be. There are cases like Vietnam draft dodgers who were pardoned even though they were never tried. The pardon meant that their offense was deemed to be no crime, thus not subject to prosecution.
See also: Richard Nixon. Pardoned by Ford. Never tried.
Doesn't state it since the founders were only thinking of morally sound people running the republic.
The offence is pardoned, not the charge.
An important and _intentional_ distinction.
@@edwardcullen1739 I see... Sneaky...
So what's the offense being pardoned? Shouldn't the offense be stated to begin with?@@edwardcullen1739
This is going to be challenged in court. You can't pardon someone that hasn't been found guilty of a crime.
Watch the courts agree to not take any cases on it. They don't have to judge anything they don't want to.
@@rh906But how much longer? The tide is turning and they can only do so much.
Indeed. This is actually granting people immunity, not pardoning. Just by that nonsense alone they should be invalidated.
Not true, Nxon stepped down before he was impched, let alone c0nvcted, and GeraIdFord still pard0ned him.
@@spk1121 That was symbolic. Nixon was never going to face criminal charges.
Day 1...reverse pardons.
1st job.
Prison biden, fau-chi-na and milly for being traitors.
It'll be interesting if 47 takes this to the SC to establish the limits of presidential pardons.
Invoking the Insurrection Act would obliterate Biden’s pardons.
Doesn't work that way.
@@siegga7125also doesn't work pardoning people for crimes that they haven't been accused of or convicted of yet. They find 4 half eaten babies In fauccis sex dungeon next week... Oh he's been pardoned already
We never committed any crimes but we need to pardon ourselves for any and every “non crime” over the past decade - Democrats
If they aren't guilty of crimes, what's the pardon for?
So no one can investigate the crimes they never did. Don't you get it lol?
Evil protecting Evil.
Pre-emptive pardons are not legal. Period.
I don't think anything Biden did while in office was legal. Everything he has done that goes to court he loses, every time. It's deemed either unconstitutional or down right illegal.
So are they admitting they are guilty of crimes ?
yes
There's no way that he has the ability to do that, right?
This basically gives government workers unlimited power to do whatever they want without consequences.
It doesn't get any more unconstitutional than that!
An innocent person doesn't need a pardon.
So everyone biden locked up for j6th are mass murderers?
An innocent person doesn't need a PRE EMPTIVE pardon. This is not a pardon, this is granting immunity retroactively.
Come on we all know there are plenty of innocent people in jail who could do with a pardon but they are way too insignificant to get one.😢
On the other hand there are probably even more people who have committed crimes that aren't in jail who should be.
Then we have those that already have their pardons in advance, well that's a new one the democrats just made up.😮
This is going to backfire on them spectacularly:
They no longer have their 5th Amendment protection, so now they HAVE to confess to all their wrongdoings if brought in to testify, otherwise they can be arrested for Contempt of Congress and/or Perjury, which means they could very well be locked up in the Federal-level bootyhouse for a long-ass time.
IF charges are brought which they won't be. Republicans will not allow their allies to be held to any kind of account.
Are you serious?
How many politicians lied under oath and nothing happened to them.
And you think this will put them in jail?
If only Trump holds them accountable
bro he already lied multiple times, what r u on about "muh confession". You think this is some NPCs in a game?
See, I actually think the Trump admin might do this. It would be DELICIOUS
There is no pardon for treason and crimes against humanity.
Pardons for what? I thought it was conspiracy theories and far right wing talking points.
There are so many people deserving of a pardon over these politicians and criminals
Correct. DJT let Assange and Snowden rot. These folks are not for us!
pardon for the innocent ? what crimes did the innocent ones commit ? exposing crime ?
@@unplugfromthematrix1688 In a potentially interesting twist, his son Barron might be an influential voice in this regard. Barron is the one who convinced his father to do those podcasts, to reach unconventional voters in a different way. He seems fairly in the know about such matters, so he might sway DJT... but probably not until the end of this term, if ever.
This precedence needs to be decided on by the US Supreme Court and struck down as over reach.
To hell with the pardons. Get them all.
Of course, gotta cover the criminals. Doesn't stop us from learning the truth though.
Doesn’t stop anyone from doing anything. This is open war. Pardons mean nothing
What matters is what is done with knowledge.
I think the State of Texas should file charges against Anthony Fauci.
Look if your deemed incompetent to stand trial then your pardons should be nullified.
EXACTLY!!!
I predict SCOTUS will be asked to rule on the constitutionality of pardons for crimes not yet charged.
I hope so.
Liars lie. That's what they do.
This is the opposite of Justice. If the legal system has failed this badly, why should anyone else follow it?
Technically it is legal. Which says something about the "Justice" system.
Powers regarding pardons have always been broad, but the Supreme Court has to realize this precedent will be used to justify the most heinous things in the future. If DJT doesn't challenge this and/or the Supreme Court doesn't address it, the Republic is officially over.
Kinda proves how corrupt and vile they were from the outset
The People didn't pardon anyone.
So they are admitting that they did something wrong
It would have been more surprising if he didn't do this. The last "Fuck You" before disappearing forever.
So it's a litteral get out of jail free card.
Only the convicted are eligible to receive presidential pardons. Pre-emotive pardons are not a thing and are illegitimate. What it does-It confirms these individuals are guilty of criminal conduct and treason. They must be prosecuted immediately. 🤗❤️🇺🇸
Fauci for jail
Of course they would get in the last minute pardons for all of those “innocent” people.
He lies as naturally as he sleeps.
If he pardoned these ghouls doesn't that imply crimes were committed?
Crimes were definitely committed, these preemptive pardons are to shield them from prosecution that's coming.
I called that a long time ago. POS
What a strange thing to do
Illegal pardons
This changes nothing.
How can you be pardoned when you haven't been charged, arrested and convicted of any crime. These preemptive pardons are unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court should vacate all of those pardons at midnight tonight.
This surprises nobody.
This is his final "Up Yours" to everyone.
Nothing says innocence like a Presidential pardon for people who haven't been charged with a crime.
The most enraging thing about this is all of these pardons are being done to protect the Big Guy.
These pardons should be null!
It's totally unconstitutional. You can't pardon for crimes they haven't been charged with.
So he basically admitting what everyone has known, but also saying they are infact "above the law."
Ironic huh....
The Supreme Court has to recognize this will be used to justify the most heinous things if allowed to stand. The Republic is officially over if DJT doesn't challenge this and/or the Court doesn't intervene, particularly when Biden was declared unfit for trial a while back, calling his authority into question even further.
The law is not the greatest force in the land. The American people are.
Arrest and charge them regardless.
At least make them sweat for a while...
Invalid pardons.
They are desperate to cover up their schemes
If people aren't guilty of anything, why do they need a pardon?
Some people brought up some really good points, how can a preemptive pardon hold up if there were no charges to pardon against? Innocent people don’t need pardons because the assumption is that no crime was committed. So that begs the question; what specifically are these people being pardoned from? We all know the answers and I sincerely hope that the Supreme Court considers this question very carefully.
He's not pardoning. He is declaring immunity.
I would say I'm shocked, but that would be a lie. It has been years of accusing others of doing exactly what they are doing.
It’s afraid.
They are all guilty.
Well that should just about sum it up. Pardons for criminals
Well, we all knew they were criminals.
me to the Biden Administration: *"Can't you go 5 seconds without being a blatant hypocrite?"*
*they pardons the moment i finish to say that*
them: *"how long was that?"*
Admission of Guilt, that is all this proves.
Kash Patel.
Offenses have been pardoned.
We need a new law, that couldn't have been pardoned. Then start the trial.
Thank you Alvin Bragg for showing us the way to get these ACTUAL CRIMINALS.
This saves them from federal prosecution but not state prosecution.
Admission of guilt for conspiring to target a political rival.
Are pre emotive pardons legal? How can you be pardoned before you even were charged with a crime?
You can't and they put the ball in our court to do something about it.
It is, unfortunately, well established. Somehow, everyone is forgetting GeraIdFord pardoned RichrdNixon, who stepped down before he was impched (formally charged), let alone convcted. The key thing here, though, was ol'Joe being declared unfit-for-triaI a couple years ago. It's a small-crack that could be used in a situation that would otherwise have zero chance.
"You hear that, Johnny? We've been pardoned!"
"Oh, that's a gas! We ain't even been arrested yet!"
"This was called a conspiracy theory, but as I like to call it, coming attractions."
- James Morrow
We all knew he was going to do that.
There should still be investigations and prosecutions even if there is no possibility of punishment. Its imprortant that the curtain is pulled back on the actions of these people, especially as they are taxpayer funded civil servants.
100% agree. May even be able to take them to civil court but would probably need to hear from SCOTUS first.
@calvinhobbes6118 if that doesn't happen it sets a precedent whereby government are effectively outsourcing all the illegal actions they wish to commit by putting their bent people in roles and then pardon them. Legalising criminality. That is not a democratic society, its a mafia state.
US Dept. of Justice Office of Pardon Attorney
Lawyers should be challenging the constitutionallity of these kinds of pardons, no question. The President has never been able to pardon people in such a perverse way.
LoL!! No one is above the law just got thrown out the window!!😳🤣😆🍻
I guess anybody is above the law
He just pardoned his own family too!
I don't think this will hold up in court. You can't just issue a general pardon? What time frame does it cover? Which crimes? Past crimes or crimes they may commit? A pardon should be issued specifically for crimes you have been convicted of.
Uh, you can't pardon someone unless they've been charged and convicted of a crime already.
This is how you know he lied about everything he's been accused of. He is incapable of telling the truth.
In order for pardons to work there must be a crime that has been committed…otherwise you walk into a legal paradox….
That can't be legally permissible. You can't be pardoned or aquitted if never charged with a crime. A "pardon in case of crime" isn't legally possible. Now the real question is, "will the courts and right challenge this to make things right or let it stand as precedent for their own corruption later"
So, the last minute pardons for the people who we were told did no wrong was for what?
What a weasel
The blatant corruption on display….
Thanks Obama
If it wasn't for a double standard, they would have no standards at all
How do you pardon someone who has not been persecuted or convicted?
Thats exactly what they are. The world knows it.
How interesting. Why would you pardon our lord and savior, Dr Fauci?
Liars do what liars do.
LIAR IN CHIEF
Has Joe ever told the truth.
Accepting a pardon by definition means you accept an imputation of guilt, and accepting it is a confession of it.
Why pardon DC Metro cops who testified at the BS Jan 6th hearings???
He also pardoned members of his -crime- family.
Bent as $3 bill