Nuclear Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 514

  • @EugeneKhutoryansky
    @EugeneKhutoryansky  5 років тому +26

    To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available).
    --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable.
    --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video.
    --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

    • @firestormjupiter
      @firestormjupiter 4 роки тому +1

      Hearting your own comments lmao

    • @nathansos8480
      @nathansos8480 3 роки тому

      Hi I’m not new

    • @nunjahBitnes
      @nunjahBitnes 2 роки тому

      The entangled pair, is it created from some form of particle-gravity assisted reorganization of its more scattered energy? Does the pair re orients it path

    • @ldsyaya1283
      @ldsyaya1283 2 місяці тому

      🎉hl

  • @spartacusmills
    @spartacusmills 8 років тому +260

    I love watching things like this, it makes me feel intelligent for a few minutes before the inevitable decay starts. :)

  • @thambupm
    @thambupm 5 років тому +24

    I am really loving revisiting my old Physics classes with such new clarity, and without the stress of a looming exam! Great Channel.

  • @EugeneKhutoryansky
    @EugeneKhutoryansky  6 років тому +34

    Important Correction: At 13:57, the proton is converting into a neutron.

    • @newpussle
      @newpussle 6 років тому +1

      First thank you so much for such great video, second I wonder in the video you mentioned when electron capture decay occurs it emits neutrino but what I know is that it emits gamma rays. So can you pls explain this. Thanks

    • @virginiagarridogenestaseco9706
      @virginiagarridogenestaseco9706 6 років тому +1

      don't worry,
      everyone makes mistakes.

    • @MrMegarag
      @MrMegarag 4 роки тому

      Thank you so much for this video. Can u explain how is possible for a proton to convert into a neutron, which is a little bit heavier and still emitting a positron and an electron neutrino?

    • @smokey04200420
      @smokey04200420 3 роки тому

      Thank you, that made me so confused. Had to turn to Google but this correction helps a lot in ensuring that I was reading google correctly.

    • @nathansos8480
      @nathansos8480 3 роки тому

      ANTI MATTER ALERT!

  • @FocusReborn44
    @FocusReborn44 8 років тому +119

    Can't tell you how appreciative I am of these videos. I love the visual illustrations. Thanks again.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +14

      +FocusReborn, thanks. It is nice to be appreciated. And thanks for the compliment on my visual illustrations. I am glad that you like them.

    • @FocusReborn44
      @FocusReborn44 8 років тому +2

      Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky You're welcome. Keep up the great work. I was wondering; I'm new to physics and while I love learning about it as much as I can I often struggle with where to start. Can you recommend a good starting point for a beginner? What should I learn about first? I want to learn physics in a very A-B-C fashion, I just don't know where to begin.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +14

      +FocusReborn, I am not sure if there is necessarily only one answer to your questions. The order in which physics is typically taught is first by learning Newton's Laws of Motion and then Maxwell's Laws of electromagnetism, before moving on to topics like Quantum Mechanics and the Theory of Relativity. Though, it may be better to go in the opposite direction, and learn about the more interesting topics first (Relativity and Quantum Mechanics). This is the way I have my videos set up. My main videos on Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are among the first videos I made, and I made them in a way so that people could understand and follow them even if they have no prior knowledge of physics or mathematics.

    • @FocusReborn44
      @FocusReborn44 8 років тому

      Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Awesome!! Thank you so much. That's helped me out a lot.

    • @gamestuff8213
      @gamestuff8213 8 років тому +3

      +FocusReborn I agree with you 10 times over. Eugene's videos are the reason I have such a profound interest in Physics. Thank you so much Eugene.

  • @albertdumont4977
    @albertdumont4977 4 роки тому +2

    Fantastic. I'm 52 years old but watching this channel i feel like a teenager learning interesting subjetcs as in my school days. Believe it, science is a trully fountain of youth.

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific 2 роки тому +2

    I don't think there's anywhere else to get this kind of depth of knowledge about the inner workings of atoms without pouring through tons of hard-to-understand pages full of formulae. You give an easy to understand overview that is rare elsewhere. Thanks!

  • @theuniverse5096
    @theuniverse5096 8 років тому +26

    You must be some special kind of genius to create such awesome videos!
    Great work!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +4

      +mehvish mujawar, thanks for that really great compliment.

  • @EugeneKhutoryansky
    @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +85

    If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their UA-cam search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +1

      +TheExaltedPheonix, yes those are topics I would like to also eventually make videos on. Thanks.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +1

      +TheExaltedPheonix, there are a number of other topics I would like to do videos on first, so I am not sure how long it will be before I get to those topics. Thanks.

    • @tonywells7512
      @tonywells7512 8 років тому +2

      +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky You shouldn't say 'the mass disappears from the universe'. Surely that would confuse some people.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +2

      +Tony Wells, but that is exactly what happens.

    • @tonywells7512
      @tonywells7512 8 років тому +2

      +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky No, mass energy is transformed into photon energy, neutrinos and kinetic energy of daughter particles. Saying that mass disappears is incorrect, and confusing for lay persons. And also, if you do an experiment where you weigh a lead box (which absorbs neutrons and gamma rays for example) containing a lump of radioactive material its mass does not decrease (ignoring the tiny amount of energy lost by neutrinos that the lead box cannot stop of course). It may be pedantic but you have to be careful how you phrase things. Don't you agree?

  • @ershadtantry5774
    @ershadtantry5774 7 років тому +6

    I just love watching these wonderful videos.These have made me love physical sciences, more than ever..Thank you, Eugene for this great work.

  • @radiotv624
    @radiotv624 7 років тому +49

    I started laughing for some reason when the particle became excited and the guitar music started playing 😂😂

  • @himajatejaswini7457
    @himajatejaswini7457 4 роки тому +3

    Talking precisely it may be Fe(iron) that stops further fusion and starts fission for elements heavier than iron but it is the Nickel that has more binding energy per nucleon than Fe making it the most stable element

  • @bigbrother4932
    @bigbrother4932 8 років тому +6

    Great video. Excellent choice of background music.

  • @146fallon
    @146fallon 3 роки тому +1

    I am so happy to watch this video. I have listened to my school physic teacher and asked many tutorial teachers and still don't understand, but I finally know after watching it. I am just so excited. thank you so much for creating this kind of video.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks. I am glad my video was helpful and that you liked it.

  • @TheStarcraftJACKAL
    @TheStarcraftJACKAL 7 років тому +10

    Watching video - brains become excited.
    Finished - decay starts.
    Result? A C+ in physics.

  • @hazemmmm9105
    @hazemmmm9105 3 роки тому

    I wonder if anyone would love these videos more than me. I have been addicted to the way of illustration and visualization presented here. Many thanks. 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹

  • @RubALamp
    @RubALamp 8 років тому +12

    It would be much appreciated if you'd make a video about string theory (I don't know if you've made one already, if so I'll go see it). And thank you again for an amazing and thorough video.

  • @onesppiegel
    @onesppiegel 8 років тому +2

    I love physics and these videos are just gold. Thanks, Eugene!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +1

      +onesppiegel, you are welcome and thanks. I am glad that you like my videos.

  • @talalzero1418
    @talalzero1418 3 роки тому +3

    Nothing better than studying physics while listening to Beethoven

    • @bryanseare2704
      @bryanseare2704 2 роки тому

      Omg this THIS!!!! I watched this video to answer this very homework question, which my professor completely glossed over! I was NOT disappointed. Praise the efforts of the man over this channel.

  • @pjosip
    @pjosip 7 років тому +4

    I am so glad I found this channel

  • @nicos1097
    @nicos1097 Рік тому

    Eugene this is a great video. The animations and concise narration make learning physics very enjoyable.

  • @SOBIESKI_freedom
    @SOBIESKI_freedom 8 років тому +4

    Marvelous! I always enjoy your videos and keep looking forward to more installments.
    [BTW, "phenomenon" is the singular form and "phenomena" is the plural form.]

  • @eskilforsberg3544
    @eskilforsberg3544 8 років тому

    Eugene you're the best. I'm in the 9th (I'm 15) grade of elementary school in Sweden (last grade of elementary school). I'm really interested in physics, and the things we learn in scool are just not enough. Far from enough. We're just scratching the surface of something I'm really curious about and I want to see what's in under, but they won't/can't show me. That's why your videos are life savers.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +eskil forsberg, Thanks for the compliment, and yes I agree that we can't trust the schools to cover the subject matter that they should. I am glad that you have found my videos helpful.

  • @ZoeTheCat
    @ZoeTheCat 8 років тому +1

    It might be nice to show the difference between alpha & beta decay at 12:25, but once again - great job Eugene!

  • @vobulate
    @vobulate 8 років тому

    I really enjoy your videos, the clear explanations coupled with the brilliant animations give a really intuitive view of what's happening.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +Vincent O Brien, thanks for the compliment on my videos. I am glad that you enjoy my explanations and my animations.

  • @fezatrontron1576
    @fezatrontron1576 7 років тому +2

    Thank you so much!
    Your videos makes the topics to be in an excited state :)

  • @Pseudonym77
    @Pseudonym77 8 років тому +7

    Nice. This helped me understand nuclear physics better.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +1

      +Fat Jesus, Thanks. I am glad that you found my video to be useful.

    • @Pseudonym77
      @Pseudonym77 8 років тому

      +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky You should do a video on string theory to.

  • @DCFusor
    @DCFusor 7 років тому +6

    Photons do not leave the universe. Energy is not always carried off by them, as spin must be conserved. Most energy in a thermo nuke is from fast fission of a tamper of U238, driven by neutrons created in the fusion part which is ignited by the original fission part. DT fusion-~16 megavolts. Fission ~ 200 megavolts. Beta decay after that due to products above the neutron drip line. Yes, I'm an actual nuclear physicist. Much of this doesn't rate "not even wrong".

    • @CuroxX
      @CuroxX 6 років тому

      Doug Coulter
      Hello Doug.
      Is there any way I could get in touch with you? I’d like to learn about nuclear physics from a “profesional”
      I’m in 8th grade, middle school, and I’m advancing a lot quicker then my class. I feel like I’m waiting for the teacher to catch up, as they are teaching about ionic compounds, ores, atomic structure, etc while I have moved onto nuclear energy and it’s properties.
      I have many questions about things such as positrons, and the antimatter of which it is classified. And other things such as how the subatomic particles are classified and why.
      Any ideas or tips?
      -Thanks from a wondering 8th grade.

    • @notsoclearsky
      @notsoclearsky 6 років тому

      Is there even a "sort" of autism?

    • @pontyclundistrictdepot3377
      @pontyclundistrictdepot3377 6 років тому

      Clear Sky yes there is. Low functioning autism, high functioning and Asperger

  • @PolluxPavonis
    @PolluxPavonis 8 років тому +1

    This is amazing, with great educational value. Thanks for these videos!! The quatum world is incredible.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +Pollux Pavonis, you are welcome, and thanks for the compliment.

  • @VeganSemihCyprus33
    @VeganSemihCyprus33 7 років тому +2

    Can you prepare an episode on the Noether's theorem and the least action as well? Keep up the good work!

  • @BuchouKuruta
    @BuchouKuruta 8 років тому +2

    I needed your videos, now I am understanding the concepts behind a lot of formula or equiation. Thank you very much.

  • @playerscience
    @playerscience 3 роки тому

    This explanation is way better than all the other explanations I have heard so far.
    It's a highly detailed explanation. 👌👌
    Thank you. 🙏

  • @kasaramsudhakar5273
    @kasaramsudhakar5273 4 роки тому

    So much complicated things...explained very very simply and effectively.
    Thanking you.

  • @amaaneeismail5256
    @amaaneeismail5256 3 роки тому

    This is definitely one of the best physics channel out there

  • @kcakca7044
    @kcakca7044 3 роки тому

    glad to see the description corrects the video at 14:00, where the correct process is proton decaying to neutron in Beta-plus decay

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  3 роки тому

      The animation is actually correct, but the text & narration is where the mistake is.

  • @AshishVerma1001
    @AshishVerma1001 3 роки тому +1

    Why atoms lighter than iron releases energy during fusion but atoms heavier than iron absorbs energy during fusion?

  • @insylem
    @insylem 7 років тому +2

    Are you sure about the Gama ray photons from Nuculeas? I thought a Gama Ray was just a high enegery electromatic wave (Photons) just shorter wavelengh than X-Rays. Or is it impossible for an electron going down an enegery level to make a Gamma Ray because there is too much enegery?

  • @sulmansohailfarooqui
    @sulmansohailfarooqui 6 років тому

    A very I formative video for the general interested lay person. Explained in a straightforward manner with very good animations to help us visualise the processes described. Obviously the reality is much more complex but this video is perfectly pitched at general public.

  • @dukeofwellington2931
    @dukeofwellington2931 3 роки тому

    This and PBS SpaceTime are two of my favourite UA-cam channels

  • @RajeshKumar-sd4pj
    @RajeshKumar-sd4pj 4 роки тому

    Best scientific videos on youtube. Just wonderful

  • @OnlineElvis
    @OnlineElvis 8 років тому

    You make complicated subjects easy to understand, great work!

  • @bryanseare2704
    @bryanseare2704 2 роки тому

    Very Cool! It goes along perfectly with my chemistry course, and clarifies some misconceptions I was taught, and gave some clarifications too. Your videos are Truly amazing! This goes over rules that clarify why other things are the way they are, which my professor didn’t bother or just didn’t have the time to go over.

  • @MonteNegroMCMLXXXV
    @MonteNegroMCMLXXXV 6 років тому +3

    Thank you for the amazing video. I have one question re statement at 2:43 - if elements heavier than metal experience the opposite effect (consuming mass and energy in order to fuse), should then not the graph, instead of a decreasing trend in mass, indicate the column in the negative (ie below the bottom line)?

    • @pilgrimonthelongroad2875
      @pilgrimonthelongroad2875 3 роки тому +2

      no, since what is being graphed is the missing mass per nucleon in that atom. When an atom fuses, the energy released or consumed is based on the difference of the missing mass of the nuclei that are fusing and the nucleus that is formed. thus, if the fusing nuclei have a higher missing mass per nucleon than the resulting nucleus, it consumes energy. It is the same as saying "if you start with a higher speed, and end with a lower speed, you have decreased in speed". your speed never goes negative, but you have still decreased.

  • @zdx1484
    @zdx1484 7 років тому +1

    this channel is made by a physics god. No textbook or guidebook i've seen have been able to explain this clearly. Didnt expect the politics tho

  • @ian6083
    @ian6083 2 роки тому

    I love your videos so much. As always, thank you, and keep up the excellent work!

  • @RapiBurrito
    @RapiBurrito 8 років тому

    Another excellent video, its an embarrassment for the UA-cam's "community" that this channel sub count is not much higher. Keep up the good work!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +RapiBurrito, thanks. Hopefully in the future, more people will share my videos, allowing me to get more subscribers.

  • @tghelper0796
    @tghelper0796 3 роки тому +1

    This video is soo much good that my physics teacher has set an quiz competition on just this video, thats why i came here by the way nice video.

  • @deenrqqwe6794
    @deenrqqwe6794 5 років тому +1

    I really appreciate your work. It’s so intuitive ☺️

  • @charleshudson5330
    @charleshudson5330 2 роки тому

    Oh, how I wish your channel existed back in the '60s when I was a physics major. Back then we had to visualize everything in our imaginations. And calculations.

  • @LetsPlayCodx
    @LetsPlayCodx 6 років тому +1

    How do you start nuclear fission with uranium? How do you add the initial neutron?

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  6 років тому +1

      Nuclear fission can occur on its own, thereby releasing a few neutrons. If you do not have a critical mass of enriched uranium, although a spontaneous fission event may produce a few other fission events, overall the number of neutrons available will quickly decrease as the neutrons get absorbed by other nuclei that do not produce fission. On the other hand, once you have a critical mass of enriched uranium, after your first spontaneous fission event, the number of available neutrons will get bigger and bigger, causing a chain reaction. By the way, instead of relying on a spontaneous fission event, neutrons can also be produced by accelerating deuterium into tritium, as is described in my video at ua-cam.com/video/1sQX1st5bbw/v-deo.html

  • @איתיסמואלוב
    @איתיסמואלוב 7 років тому +1

    good video with a great visual explaining, the information is focused and right!

  • @iancrone2906
    @iancrone2906 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing, this is why I subbed.

  • @parjohansson3118
    @parjohansson3118 8 років тому

    As always, a very beautiful and informative video. For unknown reasons, it felt as an introduction to the Pound-Rebka experiment.

  • @srpenguinbr
    @srpenguinbr 7 років тому +4

    Wait...
    there is a PBS Space Time video that says that the statement ''mass is a form of energy'' is completly wrong. The Hoster of the show said that mass is just a consequence of energy... Which is right?

  • @Weston29406
    @Weston29406 8 років тому

    You're awesome for all of these videos. I appreciate it!

  • @EugeneKhutoryansky
    @EugeneKhutoryansky  6 років тому +8

    You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link:
    ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_video?ref=share&v=r40h66qiF5I
    You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately.
    Details about adding translations is available at
    support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en
    Thanks.

  • @migfed
    @migfed 8 років тому

    Superb videos Eugene. Your content keeps always such a high quality and clear concept explanation as well. I love physics more whwn i watch your videos. Thanks for those worthy lectures!!!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +migfed, thanks for the compliments about my videos. I am glad that you enjoy them.

  • @araouf47
    @araouf47 Рік тому

    The fact that you learned all of these things and you can explain them in such an easy and fun way without watching your videos is amazing 😂Big Respect .. 👏🖤

  • @ddopson
    @ddopson 2 роки тому

    At 5:20, the statement "fusion only plays a role in the secondary explosion" has a significant caveat. In many bombs, the fission primary uses a small puff of D+T gas injected into the middle of the Plutonium critical mass. This D+T gas fuses at roughly the same time that the fission reaction is peaking, releasing a burst of surplus neutrons that increases the percentage of the Plutonium in the primary that undergoes fission. In other words, the primary is a fission+fusion synergy, mostly fission, with a small amount of fusion to boost fission efficiency.
    In contrast, the "secondary", where the vast majority of fusion happens, is composed of Lithium-Deuteride (Lithium, when hit by a neutron, releases the Tritium needed for fusion). Xrays from the fission+fusion primary compress the Li-D secondary to fusion pressure / temp.
    And then the dirty secret of thermonuclear bombs is that more than half of the yield comes not from clean fusion, but rather from one final fission stage, that uses the neutrons released by fusion to fission natural Uranium (ie, mostly U238, not "weapons-grade" U235).

  • @janekk_
    @janekk_ 5 років тому

    it's explained unbelieveable well
    i couldn't find such good video like this one

  • @ilikemitchhedberg
    @ilikemitchhedberg 4 роки тому +1

    11:40 The nuclei do be vibin doe 😳

  • @MukashfiNaiemAbdAllah
    @MukashfiNaiemAbdAllah 7 років тому

    At 14:02 the correct is that a proton turns into a neutron .. known as Positron emission or beta plus decay (β+ decay)
    Great job with the video 👍🏾

  • @adnanshahriar4435
    @adnanshahriar4435 8 років тому

    Please state the starting times of each topic in the description, so that if someone wants to learn about Alpha decay, he don't have to search the whole video for it.
    Great work btw.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 7 років тому

    It should be looked into why there is no time in the subatomic world within the atoms only the movement of part charge or fractions of charge? But in our everyday
    life we have the continuous movement of positive and negative charge as part of
    an interactive process.

  • @cafeinst
    @cafeinst 6 років тому

    Excellent visual presentation.

  • @larbicherifsaid99
    @larbicherifsaid99 4 роки тому

    i have seen almost all your videos, you are the best.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  4 роки тому

      Thanks for the compliment and I am glad you like my videos.

  • @Thehopsalot
    @Thehopsalot 8 років тому +1

    you should mangle more videos that go into more detail on this. I am very curious about why atoms smaller than iron release energy during fusion and why atoms bigger than iron release energy during fission. thanks for the videos btw. they keep my mind active when I have nothing else to do.

  • @kristelpopovic3473
    @kristelpopovic3473 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for your work! :-) and no music it's great

  • @justcallmemaster4190
    @justcallmemaster4190 7 років тому +1

    keep going really good animated explaining

  • @szjozsi
    @szjozsi 3 роки тому

    according to newest theories the frequency of supernova explosions do not explain the quantity of heavy elements in the Universe nor they are capable to produce large amount of elements heavier than 35-40 protons (up to approx Krypton). the heavy elements mostly are created by neutron star collisions.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  3 роки тому

      This video does not contradict what you are saying, since the video does not say where "most" of the heavy elements come from.

  • @qotaibai5112
    @qotaibai5112 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for the Arabic translation. God bless you

  • @away5534
    @away5534 7 років тому +2

    can you do a video on types of matter we discovered?

  • @cesarcamacho8072
    @cesarcamacho8072 3 роки тому +1

    Currently taking nuclear chemistry for my degree and this is very helpful!

  • @yuuum6738
    @yuuum6738 4 роки тому +1

    What is the y-axis at 2:43?
    It still said missing mass and releasing energy. If total mass will increase, the graph should indicate 0 around Fe and negative later. It doesn't make sense

    • @nmarbletoe8210
      @nmarbletoe8210 2 роки тому

      the y-axis is "missing mass" Yeah it is reversed from normal orientation, because as you go up the y axis the total mass of the nucleus decreases.
      The usual picture of a stable valley is flipped.

  • @addul1996
    @addul1996 8 років тому

    This topic was long overdue, thanks :)

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +Amer Amodi, Thanks and sorry for taking so long to get to this topic.

  • @kingdomofknowledge5960
    @kingdomofknowledge5960 6 років тому +3

    Make a video about string theory... please

  • @glasschem3294
    @glasschem3294 7 років тому +1

    I love these videos, thank you !

  • @mikkel715
    @mikkel715 Рік тому

    Hi again Eugene and Kira. Nice science history facts.
    Have a great day.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  Рік тому +1

      Thanks. And thanks for your support! I very much appreciate it.

    • @mikkel715
      @mikkel715 Рік тому

      ​@@EugeneKhutoryansky wouw. It should have been comment on your new short video.
      Ok, my comment arrived here to the linked video😄

  • @aquimicadomecanico6132
    @aquimicadomecanico6132 5 років тому

    Very good explanation about fission and mass. Fanatastiv!

  • @anastatianeromanijournalis8894
    @anastatianeromanijournalis8894 6 років тому +1

    Thank you for your time is valuable to me and

  • @egapistrebor
    @egapistrebor 5 років тому

    I hope you get good money for making these videos... if not I owe you something for slapping me with this knowledge.

  • @BushCampingTools
    @BushCampingTools Рік тому

    Damn good videos where you can really learn.

  • @DedeFerdianto
    @DedeFerdianto 2 роки тому

    this channel should get more subscribers

  • @JH-ux1re
    @JH-ux1re 2 роки тому

    Animation is super cool! Love it!

  • @MrPedropollo123
    @MrPedropollo123 4 роки тому

    Keep up making videos! i love then and find them really helpful :D

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks. I am glad my videos are helpful. More videos are on their way.

  • @cidshroom
    @cidshroom 8 років тому +1

    If the energy is converted to photons, how does it completely disappear from the Universe?
    Isn't it just being converted to photons? With some of the energy going into heat, which becomes dissipated via entropy?

    • @simoputtonen2799
      @simoputtonen2799 8 років тому +1

      +cidshroom *The mass* disappears. The mass isn't there anymore because it has converted to energy.

    • @cidshroom
      @cidshroom 8 років тому +1

      Simo Puttonen Completely misunderstood, makes more sense.
      I thought he was saying, mass, and its energy disappeared.

  • @E--Drop
    @E--Drop 5 років тому +1

    Could you give me the names of the songs on this video?
    ...Particularly the 1st one and the one at 8:15
    Thanks again for giving me the song names on the other video I commented on.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  5 років тому +1

      All the music in this video is from the free UA-cam audio library, and the names of the songs are the following.
      Road_to_Moscow
      Blue_Danube_by_Strauss
      Moonlight_Sonata_by_Beethoven
      Double_Helix
      Allemande
      Stale Mate

  • @harshsinghal4342
    @harshsinghal4342 7 років тому +1

    then answer my one question.consider the following things that happen during decay of nucleus through several methods.
    n0 - p+ + e- + v*e
    n0 - p+ + e+ + ve
    p+ + e- - n0 + ve
    here, n0 = neutron
    p+ = proton
    e- = electron
    e+ = positron
    ve = electron-neutrino
    v*e = anti electron-neutrino
    then combine the above three equations to get
    e+ + 2ve - e-
    does this suggest that an electron is made up of a positron and two electron neutrino (which contradicts with the fact that an electron is an elementary particle)??

    • @tobyhardcastle6830
      @tobyhardcastle6830 7 років тому

      In the second equation neutrons don't decay into a proton, positron and neutrino. Instead a proton can decay into a neutron a positron and a neutrino (p+ -> n0 + e+ + ve)

  • @cgeiger2479
    @cgeiger2479 7 років тому +2

    what software is used for these physics simulations?

  • @terraeri2801
    @terraeri2801 2 роки тому

    Eugen you are a legend sir. Thanks. ...

  • @MasterShot-ke1mr
    @MasterShot-ke1mr 8 років тому +1

    They need to explain the situation.
    Alpha decay Beta decay Beta+ decay

  • @akramfaiza3017
    @akramfaiza3017 7 років тому +1

    What is source of strong nuclear force?

  • @JohnSmith-en9yb
    @JohnSmith-en9yb 7 років тому +3

    First of all, thanks for the great videos! better than many professors :)
    Maybe I'm confused about something here, but it seems like the graph at 1:34 isnt entirely correct. You described it as how much mass is missing per nucleon when they are first combining together. So for helium, the mass is actually lower than 2 protons and 2 neutrons. Nothing wrong or confusing here, but when we get past Iron, the graphs slowly starts declining, but is still positive (!), which would imply that for an element heavier than Iron there must still be less mass in the Nucleus than the sum of the mass of the Protons and Neutrons together, because the graph is still "above the x-axis". But then you go on to explain how Nuclear fusion with heavy elements requires energy instead of releasing it. I think the actual graph that you should have used is the derivation of the one you showed.
    Perhaps I'm missing something here, but something doesn't seem to be adding up here, quite literally :D.
    Great Video though!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  7 років тому +2

      What is shown in the video is correct. Even for the heavier elements, the total mass is always less than the mass of the same number of nucleons that are independent of each other. So there is always a missing mass. When the heavy element splits apart, the amount of missing mass becomes even more, end hence energy is released because some of the mass is transformed into other forms of energy.

    • @JohnSmith-en9yb
      @JohnSmith-en9yb 7 років тому

      Right, because only the difference between the amount of "missing mass" actually matters! Wow thank you, you made me love another area of physics!

    • @CuroxX
      @CuroxX 6 років тому

      Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Reply to Doug Coulter please.

  • @ednorton3026
    @ednorton3026 4 роки тому

    to say this extrodinary is a large large understatement

  • @dzulqornaindzulqornain3516
    @dzulqornaindzulqornain3516 2 роки тому +1

    Thankyou so much cause teach me with knowledge like diamond.. thanks again . Im really love physics

  • @dezkelz
    @dezkelz 8 років тому

    I wish this video was available last semester when I took an introductory nuclear engineering course. Great stuff!

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому

      +Dez Kelz, I am glad you liked my video. Sorry I didn't have it ready yet in time for your class last semester.

    • @dezkelz
      @dezkelz 8 років тому

      +Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky No worries, I'm going to share it with my classmates who might take the course next year. The beta decay is one of the things that took a while to wrap my head around So I know this should help them out with a lot of the different concepts.

    • @EugeneKhutoryansky
      @EugeneKhutoryansky  8 років тому +1

      +Dez Kelz, actually Beta decay is the one part of the video I made a mistake on, as there is one sentence where I accidentally reversed the words "Proton" and "Neutron."

    • @abhirajsingh960
      @abhirajsingh960 2 роки тому

      @@EugeneKhutoryansky at 13:54 right?
      I was also puzzled because that way charge wouldn't be conserved

  • @TheNavalAviator
    @TheNavalAviator 3 роки тому

    Finally someone who understands that nuclear fission is to be explained over a heavy metal track.

  • @MasterShot-ke1mr
    @MasterShot-ke1mr 8 років тому +2

    6:39 AHH! stop it with your thermal neutrons! your releasing gamma rays every time you do that.

  • @joshtimmins4410
    @joshtimmins4410 5 років тому +1

    What an amazing video!

  • @zakirhussain-js9ku
    @zakirhussain-js9ku 2 роки тому

    How mass transforms into energy in fission, fusion, annihilation etc. & energy of photon into mass in pair production as per E=mc2.