Ansys Fluent: CFD simulation of compressible flow in a convergent divergent nozzle

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @elhassenaliomer2191
    @elhassenaliomer2191 Рік тому +1

    Hi ... How thrust can be calculated by such simulation?

    • @kgengineeringsolutions
      @kgengineeringsolutions  Рік тому

      Hi, unfortunately I do not know

    • @clementb1951
      @clementb1951 7 місяців тому

      Hi, if you want to get the thrust I recommend you to do a 3d simulation of the nozzle. You set your pressure or mass flow initial consitions (you can only do a half of the nozzle and apply a symmetry).
      Then on fluent you have in the configuration tab : Solution > Report definition. Here right click and add a new force report and select force. Then choose the axis of this force and the surface where the force should be calculated (here it is the divergent of the nozzle for a rocket) You will have a good estimation of your thrust.
      Or use massflowrate*EjectionSpeed (and normally + (Ejection pressure - Atmospheric pressure) * SurfaceAreaExit
      This formula gives you a good estimation.
      To get the ejection speed you can refer to the Isentropic flow chart that gives you the mach at the exit for a given pressure differential.
      Have a nice day

  • @travisjude2450
    @travisjude2450 Рік тому

    Hi, should not the NPR be 6 here. How come it is 7?

    • @kgengineeringsolutions
      @kgengineeringsolutions  Рік тому

      Hi, the absolute pressure is 7 bar and the outlet pressure is 1 bar=>the ratio is 7

    • @정해찬-v1l
      @정해찬-v1l 4 місяці тому

      @@kgengineeringsolutionshi but you didn’t put outlet pression as 1 bar isn’t it ?

    • @kgengineeringsolutions
      @kgengineeringsolutions  4 місяці тому

      @@정해찬-v1l Hi, the gauge pressure in outlet is 0 bar, see 13:25

  • @elhassenaliomer2191
    @elhassenaliomer2191 Рік тому

    Hello .... How the NPR can be changed ?

  • @METUSHARTAMHANE
    @METUSHARTAMHANE 2 роки тому

    According to paper corrount no is to be 5 so why you selected 0.5

    • @kgengineeringsolutions
      @kgengineeringsolutions  2 роки тому

      With the courant number of 5, the simulation was not stable (I think the authors made a typo). Did you get a stable simulation with c=5?