Universal Audio Golden Reverberator Pedal Demo
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 гру 2024
- More videos like this Universal Audio Golden Reverberator Pedal Demo 👉 • Guitar Demos & Reviews
Shop for the Universal Audio Golden Reverberator Pedal at Sweetwater 👉 imp.i114863.ne...
If you’re wondering what video gear we use, check it out 👉 imp.i114863.ne...
Packed with three reverb types - Spring 65, Plate 140, and Hall 224 - the Golden Reverberator pedal can instantly go from splatty and splashy to lush and atmospheric, and anything in between. While the Golden Reverberator is built on the classics, it leverages its powerful DSP to expand the capabilities of the original units, delivering several modulation options, stereo and dual-mono operation, and the ability to switch between presets while allowing the effects to spill over and keep their tails intact.
After you watch, check out Sweetwater.com today for all your music instrument and pro audio needs! 👉 imp.i114863.ne...
#Sweetwater #UAFX
Enrich your tone in a wash of golden radiance✨More sonic riches await you when you like, comment, and subscribe!
Fantastic review, exactly as I like it, not fancy playing but short explanation of all features and the sound bites show the sound and especially the decaying tails!
When Mitch talks i listen.
Fact.
love this demo and looove listening to this dude talk
I support the philosophy of doing one, or a few things REALLY well. I have owned and used several high end reverbs but didn't use half or more of the modes (Ventris, Empress, Strymon, etc.) after I lived with them for a year, or so. It's fun hearing the back story, guys! Thanks Mitch. Thanks Sweetwater!
I wish they made this in a rack mount unit!
You can still use it in post though.
I wish there were more contemporary pedals that simply focused on doing one thing great, and that one thing only. So many new pedals with multiple effects built in, but I imagine most of us find the setting/sound we prefer and just stick with that one 99% of the time. Am I wrong?
I wouldn't spend $400 for one of these, but I would probably buy just the Spring reverb by itself for $250. And don't even get me started on the EHX stuff...where you get 11 different modes and they're all mediocre sounding at best...
You think the Oceans Twelve sounds mediocre?
It doesn't cost them less to include fewer effects, so the pricing you suggest probably doesn't fit with their business model. They are very expensive though.
Spot on about EHX.
@@Stoffendous the Oceans 11 absolutely does. I returned it after a few days.
Wow, actually one of the better reviews!
I would have really like to hear that with a synth. Good job guys and straight forward
nah, this pedal isn't for synths if you are thinking of using it for ambient music, you'd use this to mimick some old record that might have had a vintage ARP or Moog synth bass or something (I doubt that a record like that even exists)
also, no MIDI/Expression input, no stereo, and not that great sounding for the asking price, this should have been $200-250 or something
uncompetitive product for the price, just lol
Check out vintage kings demo. Sounds epic with a synth.
@@Jason75913 This pedal is 100% capable of being an ambient pedal for ambient music. If you don’t believe me go watch vintage king audios demo of the hall setting. The reverb tails last 58 minutes....
@@ChrisPBacon-fu4dw holy sh1t, also, I was wrong about it not being stereo, they simply skimped a bit and went with TRS jacks
If UA just did a less expensive version with the mere spring reverb, I would very likely hearken to it as reverb pedals go, I either just pick one between spring, plate and hall and stick to it even on my multi-FX units I have and spring has always been the one lacking in authenticity on those things whereas the plate and hall were well enough. And now with a couple more amps w/o actual springs, I'm missing that ole sound. Granted there are some decent spring reverb pedals available with some actually using springs beyond that behemoth spring reverb head from Fender, they just don't quite make and based on this quick demo, I'd say UA did a very good job of recapturing that magic in this pedal; I just don't need all the extra stuff I'll likely seldom if ever use and that is too often an issue with today's pedal makers is they don't cater to niche, but mass marketing ideas.
Good quality audio processing isn't done with cheap components. By the way: The UAFX Dream '65 is the unit for you, I think - although not less expensive.
Hasn't Digitech offered the Lexicon chip on their reverbs for years?
I want one for vocals!! Are there any that allow such control on vocals?
You can convert XLR to TS with a cable to get your signal through pedals. Keep in mind you'll be outputting the same level as any signal from a guitar would after this, so DI it before going into a mixer or something.
@@Sledger721 DI?
If you use the pedal as outboard gear through an interface you can send whatever you want through this pedal. Keyboard,synth,guitar, vocals. The pedal does line levels as well. If you’re using a mixer you can send to the the pedals and return back in the mixer.
@@plalelal Direct Input/Direct Injection - www.fender.com/articles/tech-talk/why-you-should-consider-using-a-di-box
hey, kenny rogers.. TURNOFFTHEMOD
I wanna be Mitch Gallagher when I grow up
GREAT PEDAL, but still no mention of: Input / Output Impedance, Bit depth, or Sampling frequency. In another UA post they stated that the algorithm was the SAME as the Plugin, and tweaked for the pedal.
@UCKTQROb4IchK0h5P0So29Fw
"Same core algo, tweaked for the pedal. The quality is the same."Not hating here, but what's going on? Is it the same algo or is it a new design.
They are not the same algorithms. They say that on their livestream. Also, the Jack’s can accept line levels and high impedance levels as well.
@@ChrisPBacon-fu4dw Check out their response to the question posted on their channel. I believe the live comment was damage control. Either way, no excuse for not posting the specs. It is becoming a trend these days, and plays on peoples GAS rather than real facts.
400.00 bucks ?
400 bucks? sounds great but not 400 bucks great...especially now. You could buy a new analog synthesizer or a guitar forr that money.
True There’s also hardware reverbs that sound way better for the same price
400 on a digital pedal with zero midi implementation. Ummmm, no thanks.
@Alex W. the blue sky pedal’s sound is by the best I’ve heard of any pedal.
@Alex W. well I think my big sky sounds better. But that’s just my opinion. There’s the dvr 250, but I haven’t tested it on guitar but it looked super promising for vocals and synths.
Yeah $100 more than Strymon? Forgeddaboudit
Lmao $400? You can get everything this can do with the boss reverb rv-6 for $150, and if you're feeling a little adventurous you could even settle on a walrus audio fathom/slo for half of Goldens price tag.
Yup I got the RV-6. Its great. I prurposly listened to this to see if I might want to think about replacing it. but the RV-6 doesn't show any aging yet.
@@GreccPerspective now?
Too many knobs
LOL, what?!
For who? You? You want something with just a footswitch and a verb dial? Plenty of options out there.