Video chapters: * 4:00 Clips of Salafis Speakers saying that Allah has a shin * 7:45 - Do the Shia reject the attributes (siffat) of Allah? * 9:45 - A question to salafis who take all attributes literal * 11:11 - The 3 Shia narrations explaining what ‘the shin’ of Allah * 12:00 - The 1st narration where Imam Sadiq was asked if Allah has a shin * 15:00 - What do the experts of language say about the expression of the shin being laid bare?
Unrelated to your video but I would like your opinion on this play in words or istilah. What is your opinion on some Sunnis (maybe athari/salafi) who say the word yatafaraq in hadith thaqalayn is bil ajsam and. Not bil kalam. So it seems they’re saying it just means there is no physical separation and not a word(word of Quran so I assume it means spiritual) separation. So I belief they’re belittling Ahlul Bayt. But the hadith says “حتى يردا علي الحوض”. This Al haudh is not in this physical world. So how is the jism in this hadith associated with jism in the afterlife. There is no jism in the afterlife. I feel this reasoning is faulty. It’s just to downplay ahlulbayt. What is your opinion?
Video chapters:
* 4:00 Clips of Salafis Speakers saying that Allah has a shin
* 7:45 - Do the Shia reject the attributes (siffat) of Allah?
* 9:45 - A question to salafis who take all attributes literal
* 11:11 - The 3 Shia narrations explaining what ‘the shin’ of Allah
* 12:00 - The 1st narration where Imam Sadiq was asked if Allah has a shin
* 15:00 - What do the experts of language say about the expression of the shin being laid bare?
MashaAllah sheikh. Your videos certainly deserve more viewers.
JazakAllah Khayr, Please share
Muhammad Hijab made a good point
Indeed, however he must not call himself Salafi anymore
what's the nasheed in the beginning?
Unrelated to your video but I would like your opinion on this play in words or istilah. What is your opinion on some Sunnis (maybe athari/salafi) who say the word yatafaraq in hadith thaqalayn is bil ajsam and. Not bil kalam. So it seems they’re saying it just means there is no physical separation and not a word(word of Quran so I assume it means spiritual) separation. So I belief they’re belittling Ahlul Bayt. But the hadith says “حتى يردا علي الحوض”. This Al haudh is not in this physical world. So how is the jism in this hadith associated with jism in the afterlife. There is no jism in the afterlife. I feel this reasoning is faulty. It’s just to downplay ahlulbayt. What is your opinion?