Peter Pan & Wendy Ended Racism
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- The trailer for Peter Pan & Wendy has been released, so let’s react to it, shall we?
-Second channel: Movie Cynic After Dark-
@cynicafterdark
-Patreon-
/ themoviecynic
-Social media-
Twitter: / moviecynicyt
TikTok: / themoviecynic
Instagram: / moviecynic
-Friends of the channel-
@TheLittlePlatoon
@MrBrownAlliance
@Dylasophical
#disney #disneyplus #peterpan #trailerreaction #mcu #review #filmreview
The saddest part of the trailer is that "So?!?!" part. Its basically shouting "Yeah we changed alot of this story! Call it out! See what happens!" Its like the abusive lover who knows they're caught but wants the fight.
@k Bee about as dramatic as your comment is original. I pointed out how lame and narcissistic the trailer is in the first 30 sec. You're the one being dramatic lol
@k Bee it wasn't that deep but go off lol
The entonation of defiance is unmistakeable. They didn't even try disguising this jab. Reminds me of the Velma trailer insulting the audience b4 the series was even out. We know how THAT turned out!
This is so true!
I will never see this film. But can not wait for Wendy's reply.
As a poc I'm tired of seeing movies where instead of actors being put in movies for their acting skills that would fit the character they're acting as, but they're put there just for their race, and then make it all about their race. Its literally more offensive then if they just left the characters the damn same, I just hate being pandered to and being seen more like a money making device than a person.
I always thought it would be more offensive to be cast for race and not because the actor is the right fit for the role too. I mean acting is cut throat and all, but how much mental gymnastics do you have to do to ones self to make that okay in ones own head? it means you aren't the best for the role, its not even that your are good enough for the role, you just check the right box on the forms.
original roles, built from the ground up to reflect the specialness, uniquiness and amazingness of each race is what we need, not just hey look at this. leave that for fan fiction.
It's not only pandering, I think. I think that reducing a person to its skin colour, ethnicity or any other arbitrary attribute is the ultimate racist mindset. Racism in the name of anti-racism, that's the woke game.
Obviously they would cast a talented poc, not just any. The question is why would they have a bunch of minorities come for the casting of white characters in the 1st place. Same with Ariel, if they make a new mermaid movie entirely, there wouldn't be outrage, but a black girl plays Ariel, red hair, Part of your world, her yellow fish friend, Sebastion....everything identical to the original 1989 except the race. The excuse of casting for only talent isn't reasonable, cus not sure what did the mermaid in the book look like but Ariel sure as hell white as fuck, then if you arent a bias person and just simply want to make a remake without giving a shit about virtual signaling, you would cast a white girl, and there shouldn't be any poc in the 1st place. And dont tell me this black girl acts better than a bunch of white girl, it could be both ways, a place where white is the majority u tell me u couldn't find a white that can act and can sing at the same time? And man, i could tell from thousands of miles away the prince is sure as hell stay WHITE. U gotta have pay back to the old time movie, when a white man comes to a foreign country, save them then have the native love interests or someshit. Im East Asian btw, not sure that count poc but atleast im not white.
Thats the thing thou, anything with a huge fanbase is smartest to stick as close to the source material as possible.
So whar you do for divetsity is create new unique stories and characters.
Some work like Samu L Jackson as Nick fury if the actors get picked cuz they nail the role and its possible within the context of the univetse.
Like medieval europe doesnt habe much black or brown people. Yet instead of diving into the cool ideas of african or middlr eastern folk talrs and mitthos in terms of movies, games or a seties they keep forcing it into alrready exsusting stories.
Like whete were the black people and hispanics in the mulan remake? But in the european ones they HAVE to be there.
@Don't Look @ Me To show that people on the left also hate the woke scheme.
Well said! It is an understatement that Disney has literally lost every shred of originality and are incapable of making anything on the level of their older productions. Bill Burr is a legend.
@@suzygirl1843 Disney was original in adapting those films, because for the most part, they actually adapted them faithfully into animation with a more happy tone. Compared to these newer films, where it's just their adaptions again, but change races and genders, so you can claim it's original.
Bill Burr is a cuckhold self loathing weak White man with an angry black wife
@@michaelfireheart8300 the Disney "Peter Pan" animated movie is fantastic but it is nothing like the 1906 book "Peter and Wendy" whereas the 2003 Universal film "Peter Pan" is a direct 1 to 1 retelling of the novel.
It is a brilliant film if you have not seen it with Jason Issacs as Captain Hook. Great special effects, casting, acting. It is a magical film
@@thegadflygang5381 Haha! Seethe much?
@@camb9319 you must be in MENSA. The person who "loves Bill Burr" the man whose entire act is 55 minutes of "seething". Truly a genius with a grasp of irony with that comment
As a "POC", hate being called that, i hate it when they change the race of an already established character and call it diversity and inclusion... It's actually insulting... if you actually want to be inclusive then give us ORGINAL characters who are well written and can stand on their own and make people fall in love with them
I don't want them to turn an already established character into a brown person just so that people like me can "see ourselves on the screen" nope give me a new original character who just happens to be brown and his skin colour isn't his only character trait
Same here.
As a white person. I say to you. The fact that you even care about it irritates me. Perhaps you haven't heard.
These characters are not real. Stop being so bothered just because they changed the characters skin colour. At least kids that are minority can actually identify with them.
It's the same frikken character! They didn't change their personality! Stop making issues where there are none.
@@LadyOfTheEdits ah yes a white saviour HAS to show up 😂 go away and stop telling people of colour how to feel abt topics that concern them you get to have no say in this these studios do this shite supposedly for US and OUR kids, so YOU need to keep your nose out of this
@Miss Cosmos AMV's i grew up as a kid looking up to Superman and Batman even though they're white i didn't need them to be my skin colour to imagine myself as a superhero
@@LadyOfTheEdits ah yes the white liberal savior to all of the blacks.
Do you realise how fucking stupid you sound
Um yeah having girls as lost "boys' literally defeats the purpose of Wendy in the story as they never had a mother figure too help them grow up and nurture them hence why Pan brought her too Nevrland
Yep
And it completely misses what's in the book, the lost boys fell out of their prams as babies and were lost and brought to Neverland, Peter remarks that girls were far to clever to let that happen to them. So congrats on that change
@@suzygirl1843
Again, stupid?
@@Rawen1982 Great Point
I disagree with that entirely you can still have Winnie be a mother figure to lost boys or girls so it doesn't really matter if the children are all boys or all-girls or even mix of the two
Creativity in Hollywood died a long long time ago, it's now solely about activism and ticking those diversity checkboxes.
Activism and recycling old IPs.
It's unfair to us sometimes though. We don't want to be "replacements" for white characters. We want our own!✋️
@@katgreer6113 but Peter Pan is a public domain they can pretty much do whatever they want
@@katgreer6113 I agree just make a good movie first
Idk about that wasn’t that new Puss in Boots movie like an absolute smash hit or whatever
Personally, I'm just happy that Milla Jovovich's daughter is keeping to the family legacy and starring in horrible adaptions. Seriously, she looks just like her mother.
That her real daughter?
@@Drawnartist Holy shit, just looked it up and OP is right. Ever Anderson: daughter of Milla and Paul W. S. Anderson.
@@Drawnartist No it's her fake daughter. What?
For real. Those eyes are unmistakably hers lmao
Yep. The last good movie her mom did, was, The Fifth Element.
I remember back in the 80's 90's and 00's when no one gave 2 craps about what race you were. Consciously noticing someone's race was rare, because we had moved past that, and we were all just people. Now it's it's the complete opposite, if you aren't hyper aware of what race the people around you are, you might find yourself victimizing an oppressed minority with a micro aggression!
Yes! Eddy Murphy starred a lot of action movies, alongside many other black actors, and nobody cared! It was very well received! But now it feels so forced, even for movies that are not adaptations. When you see todays teenage shows, there's an asian, a black person, a ginger and a non binary person. Like, WHERE tf do you live that you think that group of friends exist?????
Gods I miss those days. Bring those days back!
It wasn't an utopia back then. But I'd take that over today's nonsense.
@@marcbrown6582 You clearly don't understand the CRT is a form of National Socialism.
Blame the Left.
*Here’s an idea for a Peter Pan movie, cos I’m bored* : instead of remaking the old story with little change… have Peter rescue several children from the horrors of Blitz London.. he takes them to Neverland - as a semi distraction from the war - and has to struggle being a father figure to children - when he hasn’t and NEVER will finish growing up himself… Hook, is a pirate who’s glory days have long gone since he escaped to Neverland after the pirate age died out so he can live a never ending life of piracy - clinging onto old accomplishments- he isn’t even that much of a bad guy as much as he is a reminder to Peter of adult responsibilities - which makes him a reflection of what Peter is afraid of - thus they are enemies by a mere misunderstanding… in the end - Peter goes back to living in London and accepts responsibilities of living in the real world - as he undertakes the job of escorting children and families to Air Raid shelters.. while Tinkerbell, visits the dead bodies of those who died in the Blitz and sprinkles fairy dust on their bodies - so their souls can fly away..
They fact you came up with a better idea in I’m guessing a few minutes, shows how lazy Disney is. They have thousands of writers 💀 sounded very interesting though, I’d love to watch it
On me bruh that’s something interesting 😂
It’s almost like the direct to video sequel that was made in the early 2000’s with many changes
That sounds depressing and perfect. Are you thinking Guillermo del Toro for directing duties?
too much work for them though. copy paste all story and just race swap whatever u can XD
I’ve been a huge Disney fan all my life. But nowadays I want their movies and theme parks to fail so that the executives can get a clue that their fans are NOT happy.
I'm a huge fan myself and I want the company to get their act together but I don't want them to keep having failure at the failure
That won’t happen anytime soon. Disney makes billions yearly, it honestly doesn’t matter how many race swaps they do or adaptations they create, they are a huge company and will continue to make a shit load of money.
Disney: (Releases yet another race-swap liveaction adaptation.)
Internet: "How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?"
@@suzygirl1843
U are stupid?
don't forget woke feminist
I like to think Disney doesnt even do auditions. They just go outside and find the first black person they see and are like "see that media, we're not racist, we have a black person in our movie"
“They’re fictional characters,” I loathe this statement.
Yes, they are fictional characters but that means VERY little when you take into account the abstract nature of the written word. History, from far enough back, is no different than a character in a fictional story (if said character is grounded in some reality).
We know George Washington was a real person BUT how often do we find things to idolize, admire, or even hate things about him? Pretty often. His triumphs are still recognized today and the fact that he owned slaves is equally acknowledged and yet, if you changed his name, his story could easily become something of fiction because that’s all his story is today; a memory. It is a written account of a life that requires imagination as much as it does an ability to read.
Fictional characters like Ariel, Wendy or so many countless others are all important just as they were written because they represent the legacy of the author who penned them into existence. In light of Roald Dahl's works recently being tampered with, this is made even more apparent because ANY changes to them suddenly remove that work from the true story. Did ancient man need to know that the gods had X-colored skin in order to relate to their struggles, heroics, and tragedies? No. Because that's the beauty of stories. They transcend race. Like music, stories can speak directly to the heart because as a species - we can project ourselves into a situation and for a brief moment, become one with that story.
When reality is abstracted by time, the two become the same. Both are stories, both provide lessons, and both can carry the weight that individual people can relate to; sometimes more so than figures living to this day.
So no, they are not “just fictional characters”, they are stories. Stories that should remain just as they were intended with only the slightest of changes, if any at all per new telling. Stories are timeless and to change them like Hollywood has been doing only dilutes their importance.
I'll say what you said in an even quicker version:
They're fictional characters and worlds that you (woke people) *didn't create.* So you have no right to ruin them to push identity politics. You want to push propaganda onto people, create your own characters and spend years getting them to be liked by millions of people first.
Ariel's skin color wasn't described in the story. Her name wasn't even Ariel. Sometimes, fictional characters can change over time every time there's an adaptation.
@@Leo-Galaxy then change it for your interpretation of the story not someones elses who put their efforts energy time investment on a visual medium like animation which tells stories by how their characters look on screen because even drawing characters on paper for different races does take a lot of effort during that time so it's wasn't as easy as now to randomly change races for them and coming up with right headlining character design who going to sell your movie takes a lot of risk and effort by their animation team especially when they were working for Disney when it's was close to being bankrupt and even the slightly mistake would've made them lose their jobs and that's why Ariel is important in Disney's legacy since she was one of the characters that saved that company made by creators and artists who was under constant pressure to get a profitable film and let them keep their jobs so by raceswapping its not just the creators of the story that you are disrespecting its also animators and artists who had took lots of hours to make sure that Ariel will look and feel like a memorable character when she gets animated on screen and the red hair green tail are not random choices that was made by animators because they felt like it rather it was made after a lot of trail and errors to come up with the most recognizable look for the character so if you don't understand their pain and efforts while making this movie don't touch it and do you know a fun fact of little mermaid the music for that movie was written by a gay man name Howard ashman and by todays standards of wokeness he would've only been pushed to write songs for stories with LGBT relationships because how the hell will he be able to write songs for stories with straight relationships since it's not a kind of relationship that he has experienced in real life and most of these woke activists doesn't even know that part of history of movies like the little mermaid or beauty and the beast and that fact that his name is not even mentioned by any of the cast of these movies shows how hollow their preach for LGBT rights or gender equality is when you don't even know the works of the community people your trying to support
@@rittataylor_2000 IT'S A MERMAID. A MYTHICAL CREATURE. YOU'RE WHINING OVER A SKIN COLOR.
@@Leo-Galaxy dude I'm not whining about a mermaid being black even cinderella has been black Asian and literally every other recognizable race but for doing it to someone else's interpretation of the story and downplaying their creations as them being stories that needed updating because they didn't fit today's standards after conveniently making millions out of their story and selling the character using their designs and artwork and I can tell you if Disney wasn't the one making this movie no one would've batted an eye for the raceswapping since those companies won't be re-adpating the same story while trying to sell it as something else and Ariel and the little mermaid are not the same characters Ariel was an original character created by Disney inspired off the little mermaid fairytale besides them falling in love with a human and some parts in the beginning nothing of the 2 stories matches so saying it's just a mermaid story are people who don't understand where the hate is coming from and if it's just a mermaid story then leave the ip alone like you said and if no one cares about race of the characters then leave the originals alone by not giving it forced reupdations to a them when they needed none plus if Disney is the one holding the rights to both movies they hold the power to replace one with the other that's also adds fuel to the fire
I love the part where ghetto tinkerbell told Hook "you need to do better senator.. I mean captain!"
And this is where the racism comes in. Calling Tinkerbell "ghetto" just because she's black in this movie. I think YOU need to do better.
Ghetto? What makes you think this Tinkerbell is ghetto? 🤔
@@archangeljophiel2019 Racial bias clearly. Criticise the casting and come up with other valid points but to use derogatory racial sterotypes is clearly showing where the"leftists" have a point when it comes to saying that certain critics of this casting are racist.
cant wait when they make live action of chicken little
That shi would be terrifying
Uhhhhh🤮
Sounds like a great horror movie
They could use the original concepts of Chicken Little for the remake.
Well, they'll probably swap-race chicken little for duck little or something like that. A chicken, specially a little one could be... problematic.
This is part of the remnants of diversity and inclusion hires. Hired for diversity NOT actual skill, talent or just a shred of professionalism.
I absolutely loved Hook as a kid. We had originally borrowed it from our neighbours and because we borrowed it so much our parents eventually had to get us our own copy. I really do hope that the live action Disney movies just stop and go away. They're empty of any kind of impact on the world. Does anyone actually remember these films beyond when they were released? Someone reminded me that there was a 'Live action' Lady and the Trap movie that I totally forgot happened.
Did they race swap the dogs in that movie ? Maybe a cat gets with a dog.
This movie will be an absolute train-wreck. Remember when Disney made movies people actually wanted and were willing to pay for? Like Frozen? Wasn't even that long ago. Now it's just one woke box office bomb after another.
I've given up on Disney for a while now. The Japanese, for example Studio Ghibli, are doing what Disney once did much better
I don't know about that
I loved the part where Disney lost hundreds of millions of dollars and still didn’t manage to learn their lesson.
I remember movies being fun and different. You always looked forward to summer blockbusters like Total Recall, Back to the Future, The Goonies, Poltergeist, Commando and more and you knew that they would be original and fun. Now, with Disney running the lion's share of entertainment, its' a dark age of rehashed ideas rebranded with race-swapped characters and emasculated males. It's pandering to the lowest denominator to get, I don't know, culture points? I think this age will do down in history as some of the worst movies ever to come out.
I agree
Disney was always weird though wasn’t it? I hate when older generations reminisce about how everything was much better as if no movies today are good despite many recent movies being incredibly received.
I'll just rewatch the Peter pan movie from 2003
I am glad that racism is now ended.
Thanks movie
I read on Twitter somewhere that Disney should dare to make a black Tarzan movie
They can make every fucking movie imaginable except for the Spawn sequel we're still waiting on god dammit
I'm offended there no Tick-Tock the Crocodile
The most annoying thing about all this is that when i got angry that they made ariel black, all people thought was " oh hes just racist and he doesnt realize " when in reality im just sitting here thinking " why? why on earth do they need to make a race swap when so many people loved Princess and the frog? " oh yeah thats right cuz if they made that movie, these woke morons would find a way to call it racist. They would see the movie as stereotypical and racist and wouldnt accept it, no matter how true or loved it is. The truth is, these people need something to hate and dont want diverse things they want anti-white things.
As a black person I too gonna have to agree that Disney’s race swapping method is stupid as well. It’s nothing but a tool to make a poor excuse while making it seem like they care about "diversity" but reality they only care about the money.
why neverland looks like a Nuclear wasteland?
That intro was absolutely hilarious. Well done
I just love this type of sarcastic introto the video Cynic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣Please do more of this 🙏
They are hostage to the diversity departments they implemented back in the day, those call all the shots on the final product. Hopefully those are included in the 7k layoffs, because i'm tired of my only source of entertainment being a bunch of people trashing something they produce.
Here’s the thing! Disney used to be FANTASTIC at adaptations. Frankly, most of their most popular shows ARE adaptions of something (fairytales or classic novels), and they’ve done well adapting stories to a new environment or with a whole new take (e.g. treasure planet adapted from treasure island). It is OKAY to make adaptions and take excessive liberties with portrayal, environment, and characters. There is absolutely no issue with that. The problem comes from these “remakes” that straddle the line between rehashing an old beloved take on a previous adaption, and writing something new. They need to pick one and stick to it, but they’re too focused on the easy cash grabs from nostalgia, and too stubborn not to make what they see as “much needed mordernization” to do so. If they re-adapted some of the same stories WITHOUT rehashing the old adaptions, much of the issues people have with them would for the most part cease to be issues imho.
That KJU golf joke got an actual lol, well played
Well said man. Thank you. Greetings from Norway.
I feel so bad for Jude Law…. He takes big roles and probably did an amazing job as Hook, but no one will know because the movie is boycotted 😂
Just one more Disney movie that I will never see. One more movie that my family will never go to see.. one more example of activists, taking a blow torch to the shareholders profits
Disney has seriously lost its credibility, 2022 was one of the worst years in the company's history, it makes the the mid 2000s more nostalgic.
Yeah I'll stick with Hook and 2003's Peter Pan. I was watching the OG Disney versions, though the Native American scene hasn't aged the best, the rest of the experience is Gold.
I can't believe Sonic Boom of all things has a more thought provoking message about feminism and gender equality in a single line, than anything from these Disney's Live action remakes.
I totally forgot about that. You’re talking that scene with knuckles chattering on about feminism 😂
As far as Disney live-action adaptations go, Jungle Book 2016 was well-received and made a billion bucks, I thought that one was pretty good. But that was kinda before the Woke Wave started hitting hard, and anyway they never would've race-swapped an Indian lead. I guess in retrospect we should be thankful they didn't make Mowgli a girl. 😅
When I was a little kid I was in hospital a lot in the kids section, Often for a week at a time, I loved the Peter Pan curtains even though i had never seen the movie just short sections on Disney's wonderful world, At least Current Disney cant take away the original not matter what vile trash they make now.
i just want a movie about peter pan and tinkerbell only like how they meet and so on
Can you imagine if they didn't remake everything and just made original new characters that are actually well written
I entirely disagree that diversity is a noble goal in these creations.
Taking a character of one race and race swapping it for some political purpose is bad, period.
There's actually a black fairy they can use instead of race swapping
Same here, and it's not like me to want a business go under but sometimes a tough lesson is the only way to teach someone.
There is only one Peter Pan movie for me. Hook with Robin Williams..💯❤️
movie/TV/game show that did diversity extremely well were Aliens (1986), Mortal Engine (2018), The Expanse series (2015-2022), and Horizon Zero Dawn
and the primary reason is that at no point in the entire film/6 season TV show, game, did they belittle anyone due to race or gender,
every character both good and evil are intelligent, pragmatic, and competent. and they are being judged for their character and actions, not the color of their skin
it also helps that all 4 are set in the future too.
Pray for Disney's bankruptcy. Rest in peace.
Disney has two problems . One is the blunt social engineering. But just as dire is looking at movies as franchises and putting out repetitive bland "content" that becomes as stale as a Big Mac. Franchises sell commodities like soy beans and pork bellies.
Just found your channel on a live stream with the Critical Drinker. Instant like and sub! Thanks for the crystal clear analysis! You're right on the spot there!
look, if disney want more inclusion and diversity, do something like Coco. i mean, it was their product, with Mexican culture, good character, and good story. Why cant we get more like that. if they want more story about strong women, then make a new story about strong women with GOOD STORY. not a mary sue that can do everything and "all man r bad" crap.
The sad fact is they have tried to make new characters, especially...........ethnic characters. No one wants them. Including non-whites. Classics were made by Western Civilization. Sorry nearly every Western hero is white (or Mediterranean). But that's how it goes when you CREATE THE BEST CULTURE ON EARTH.
Lol. Warrior wendy ? Not mom figure? Yeuck
Someone who is racist isn't going to be changed a by a children's cartoon. This is work for actors not a solution for real world problems.
That clip of Griner not being able to dunk while wide open was pathetic and shes 6 foot 9 inches tall for God's sake. Spud Webb could dunk and he was only 5' 6".
They could've even done a live action of Tinkerbell and her friends in pixie hollow. Continue the story but with humans and good cgi. But noooooo let's do this.
i only watched this movie for Black Tinkerbell and that’s it, i skipped most the scenes she wasn’t in 😂
then you missed the fantastic scene where Wendy slapped Peter Pan for no reason
Can we also talk about how ass all of these Disney remakes look? There's literally no effort being put in any more. I thought only all the good writers were gone but apparently all the good cinematographers are too. I can't wait until the cycle finally breaks and good films like Puss In Boots 2 actually get the money they deserve.
Why Peter Pan is not a villain in this story? Why?
I would LOVE to see Book Peter come to life,
it would be just as shocking as Lord of the Flies.
What bothers me the most is that when there’s a race swap it’s always white to black as if no other races exist. It’s almost never white to Asian or white to Hispanic.
What? Hook ist still a white old cis dude?! Where is the young black (at least not white) lesbian captian we wanted too see? And why ist Tinkerbell just a tiny fairy? Make her an average sized woman and bi. Don´t be shy. Do it. I wanna see the new lesbian captain and the new bisexual Tinkerbell make out the whole movie. That would be brave...
Great video, succinct and to the point......cheers.
Every movie is gonna do this now. Just gonna keep happening and only get worse. The woke won.
5:30 *Calls something racist*
*Refuses to elaborate*
*Casually moves on*
Sigma grindset behavior
I just don't understand. You want to make Tinkerbell black, sure whatever, but why isn't she blonde? There is absolutely no reason for her to not be blonde. The entire point of acting is to be someone you're not, and by not making her blonde you are showcasing almost zero character features of tinkerbell, you are showing a woman in cosplay.
“Where did all the gay people go?” What - you mean the 3% of the population, max?
Yes. That’s exactly what I meant. Because if 9.9 million gay people went to see the movie, it would’ve made $100 million. Which it didn’t.
Here is where I think everyone gets confused when people complain about certain castings. Lets use Live Action Ariel as an example. It all depends on purpose. If they held auditions where they had many women wanting to play the role of many different races but Halle Bailey was found to be the best of all that auditioned, then that's amazing because they got the best actress available who also just happened to be a woman of color. But what more than likely happened was they either had in their minds that the casting had to be a woman of color or it was on the casting card "has to be a woman of color". They more than likely had all these different women of different races and when they had to narrow it down their first criteria was "is she white? Yes. then she is out." As you mentioned, Billie Dee Williams being cast as Harvey Dent in 1989 was hardly talked about. This is probably because they held auditions and found him to be most what they were looking for and not to fill some quota. The issue stems from how they market it. They cast certain people in lead roles so that when their horribly written movie or TV show bombs they can just claim sexism or racism. Most movie goers have no issues with strong women or women/men of color as leads. Aliens, Mulan, V For Vendetta, Kill Bill, Black Panther, Silence of the Lambs, Everything Everywhere All At Once. One of the best modern examples of how a movie should be is, say it with me, Top Gun: Maverick. A diverse cast without making it the focus. I remember reading that they originally had a scene where Phoenix was pointed out as a female pilot hanging with the boys but when they discussed it with real female pilots, they were told by the pilots that what they want to depict never happens. So instead they have Phoenix, Payback, Fanboy, and Coyote in the story without ever mentioning their race or gender because in our everyday lives its normal. By calling attention to someone who is breaking the gender/race stereotypes, they are ultimately undermining the very concept of equality by implying that this is the exception and not the status quo. So in the context of Top Gun, if they said "whoa Phoenix is a girl among men" then they are ultimately saying that women pilots are not normal or at the level of men, but by not pointing it out then it sends the message they ultimately wanted to send that women are on the same level as men to the point where no one cares because of how normal it is. Same goes for race.
lmao...disney sudokuing itself is good for the world. i don't mind seeing them torch their remaining goodwill on dumb shit like this. it just hastens their fall.
did u guys notice that ALL of the pirates are white lmao
couldn't be more obvious./..
I’m upset they didn’t turn the dog into a cat. Real woke.
They’re gonna fuck up Robin Hood I just know it 😭
The ongoing growth of race and gender hustling: Peter Pan - Peter Pan & Wendy - Wendy & Peter Pan- Wendy & the Lost Diversity Boys - Ebony Wendy vs the Ivory Patriarchy...
It’s be hilarious if Guillermo del Toro did a Peter Pan animated film and became critically acclaimed and better received than the live action remake .
Again lol
Critical Drinker made an interesting point about this movie
he said that in the original story the author said the Lost Boys were babies who fell out of their prams
but a girl would be too smart to let that happen
he pointed out that even in the original story they paint the picture that girls are smarter and more mature than boys
but now Disney wants to undermine that in this new live action remake for woke points or whatever
by making some of the Lost Boys girls, not only is it complete nonsense but you also completely remove that commentary that girls would be too smart to end up lost
so in way Disney's actually doing the inverse of what it claims it's doing
they say it's empowering women and creating diversity but at the same time you're taking away women's competence
what does that really say about you as a company and how you view women
Drinker points out that Wendy is the mature one who makes all the boys realize they can't be children forever and they need to grow up
but in this live action remake she's just another Hollywood "strong woman" stereotype
just acting like all the other boys
and what does that say about how you view women
you took away what made Wendy Wendy
in the name of female empowerment you're taking away empowering women
it's becoming more and more obvious the more they do this
Suggestion to the writers of these motion pictures. Just have the narrator say "Not what the history books record. But what we think really happened." Chespirito (RIP) approves of this project.
I've been to art school and this is what they teaching. Everything coming out of recent Disney screems "Fresh graduate." Woke is the norm in art school.
Peter Pan & Wendy sends the message that cultural appropriation is OK.
Peter pan was my childhood crush and my favorite movie when I was little so I always have really high expectations when a new movie comes out.
I watched the trailer and this movie looks awful. I don't like that they tried to make it "woke" by adding a bunch of stuff and also a lot of actors don't look like their characters.Since most people remember the appearance of the animated characters,I think that they should have tried to find actors that somehow look like them. But that's just my opinion. The 2003 live action did a great job with the casting for example.
Personally,my favorite peter pan movies will always be "Peter pan 2: Return to Neverland" and the 2003 live action. I'm going to rewatch "Hook " because I haven't seen it for a very long time and I noticed that a lot of people say that they like it in the comments.
Pointing everything out constantly comes from this new generation. They won't do what they can't get credit for.
I think people should just ignore what they don't like instead of just calling it out because of my honest opinion this is nothing more than that ugly cycle keep repeating over and over and over again
Both party get their benefit. Disney gets free publicity and this guy gets the ad revenue. Win-win.
go out of business disney.
The thing about Peter Pan is that it is always going to be a tricky story with a paradox. At first, it is about the desire to be children who always want to play in fantasy land without responsibility. At the end, the clock is ticking and adulthood will come inevitably. Disney with their constant nagging of adults how to live their lives while remaking their past glories, is already a mockery of the points of Peter Pan.
@@suzygirl1843 GenX are middle-aged adults now, and I don' t know wtf alpha gen is. When Walt Disney, Avery and other legendary animators were alive, they don' t made animation just for children. Entire families, old and young went in to the theatres and watch Tom killing Jerry. The original film, ended with the father gather around his family, remisniscing the dreams and fun he used to have as a child. That' s acknowledgement that the time children playing fantasy should be treasured, is an age-old principle that most parents know or adults already came with on their own.
And what principles did Disney, the giant conglomerate, been trying to teach that everyone hasn't already been taught in elementary school? Edit: Frankly, I could not cared about Peter Pan. Just point out the contradiction between what the story is about and what the company are doing. Having Disney teaching principles, like having an adult video site teaching safe sex.
I loved when Peter Pansexual tore down the Pirate Flag and raised a Trans Flag in its place. So Powerful!
I guess I don’t really get why people care that much about this. Disney is a fucking machine everyone should want to fail. Also David Lowery is a good director, and Yara Shahidi is hot. Also, this movie is made for children.
Why does everything have to be about race? The reason it will always be a problem is because people are always bringing it up for whatever reason
Peter Pandering
It's funny that a story written almost 200 years ago managed to be more progressive for women than today's adaptation.
When you point out the “difference “ it stays different , it doesn’t fit in , “ you’re not all boys “ yea we can see that too as the audience , that didn’t need to be a part of the script it’s unnecessary and little comments like that here and there is what makes the message forced
Great video.
Subscribed! 🙃
I loved the part where everyone assumes anyone who dislikes these changes MUST be white and male...because somehow:
A. Only white people are intelligent enough to spot blatant pandering apparently.
B. White and Men has somehow become synonymous with 'opinions that don't count as much as other races/genders', furthering sexism and yes, RACISM.
C. This method of mental gymnastics somehow makes it easier for folks to ignore the fact that these thought patterns make them BIG *FAT* HYPOCRITES.
I noticed a lot of folks 'nettled' by the 'Diversity is a noble goal' remark', and what I have to say to this is I feel good stories, good actors, that make for good movies is a noble goal.
Because in the 90's, and yes even the 80's, Diversity was EVERYWHERE...it just wasn't the damn focus of the film. There where just great actors, great characters, who happened to be of varying ethnicity.
Just going to end this with Winston was my favorite ghostbuster as a kid, and he still is, that is all.
Love the Kim Jong-Il golf joke!
diversity and inclusion for their own sake are never good. Having a chinese actor in a production about vikings would be completely stupid. Black actors playing european fairly tale characters makes as much sense as Nicholas Cage playing black panther. Don't do either of those things.
My Mom wanted to see The Little Mermaid remake in theaters because it was a "win" for us black people.
I said, no I'd rather see Puss in Boots 2 or the Mario movie 💀💀 Know why??? CUZ I KNOW THEY AREN'T GONNA MESS UP THE PREVIOUS IP!!!!!
the problem is not necessarily actor being black but the problem is twisting the story against the original story like lost boys and girls which is opposite to the story and reason for boys and girls in the actual story
woke disney did it again
The Mario movie has made a better adaptation from game to movie than disney ever will with live-action. Why tf is there a Tanisha Bell shouldve had Tink and then her friends from the animated movies theyy all sorts of looks and it wouldve fit better a fairy for each lost boy.
The girl at the beginning sounded very insecure about the fact that she wasn’t a boy
I want to know, do POC in America actually enjoy seeing raceswapped characters?
No, we don't. Neither do women like seeing angry toxic masculine females marketed as "strong independent women" who can do no wrong. Some people like to think we want this, but the overwhelming majority of us hate this as much as everyone else, despite what one or two crazies on Twitter says.
I actually met one idiot who liked it, I asked him why and he never gave me an actual reason but kept attacking me
Actually those woke community are just a minor, but somehow they manage to talk so big on the internet that made them looks massive. That's why woke produce never succeed, cuz there's barely an audience who spend money on it.
I feel compelled to downvote this video for never using the phrase "Peter Pandered To..."