@JW Still, many insights into Doig's psyche are actually exposed in this awkward interview. Understanding the visual experience as an artist sees it, is abstract by definition and difficult to communicate in one's native language. Now imagine, struggling with translation nuances from German to English. They both at least gave it a chance.
What does snow mean to you? I think had he not been to Antwerp he would have sledged his way to an imperial dogma of ice cream type imprint. He (Doig) has a similar name to 'dog' meaning the animal. Amongst other essential things, it goes 'woof' and can be very faithful or violent. I think he likes cooking and relating the 'fry ups' to an almost liquid transparency of lakes/ ponds/ China and maybe even Beaconsfield. Its just a personal view and will not affect your statutory rights.
This is just showing the huge discrepancy between artists and art curators/gallerists/historians. There is the creative process and there is the cold analysis of something that cants be explained in words. The painting artists expresses himself in images
I don't know much about the artist. But he seems quite awkward when the interviewer is asking him about his work like he doesn't want to explain it. He seems a strange character.
This artist has no real feeling with his art, he takes a photo and alters the colors as he sees fit. There was no “feeling” there’s no real meaning. He just likes what he sees. To be fair, I don’t think was ready for this obviously because the interview came in with some questions that to the person who doesn’t really study doesn’t know. I almost feel like he was trying to expose him
I am feeling too this is a difficult interview. Peter Doig very patient and honest.
Just realized Doig is the perfect dog name.
I love his artwork because although its beautiful visuals theres something mysterious and lonely about his paintings
@JW
Still, many insights into Doig's psyche are actually exposed in this awkward interview. Understanding the visual experience as an artist sees it, is abstract by definition and difficult to communicate in one's native language. Now imagine, struggling with translation nuances from German to English. They both at least gave it a chance.
THE SOUND >
Those paintings are the most profound of our time? Show you where we’re at
hi peter would you like to come out to BLUEKNOB its a beautifull place for artist we dont get to meet many known artists kind regards JENNIFER EDWARDS
the interviewer was awaful and had no idea what to ask him. Peter doig was patient
What does snow mean to you? I think had he not been to Antwerp he would have sledged his way to an imperial dogma of ice cream type imprint. He (Doig) has a similar name to 'dog' meaning the animal. Amongst other essential things, it goes 'woof' and can be very faithful or violent. I think he likes cooking and relating the 'fry ups' to an almost liquid transparency of lakes/ ponds/ China and maybe even Beaconsfield. Its just a personal view and will not affect your statutory rights.
This is just showing the huge discrepancy between artists and art curators/gallerists/historians. There is the creative process and there is the cold analysis of something that cants be explained in words. The painting artists expresses himself in images
I don't know much about the artist. But he seems quite awkward when the interviewer is asking him about his work like he doesn't want to explain it. He seems a strange character.
what a bored and boring interviewer........ Doig deserves someone who actually is interested
The interviewer is terrible but the thing is even if the questions are shit the artist needs to sense it and make the interview interesting. Its not.
poor Doig this interview felt so wooden! I could of done a far much better job at interviewing him!!!
What does snow mean to you? ….aaaand next video
But the interviewer has an accent. That means he's important. Right?
Bad sound can ruin this kind of media
Peter Doig's work is completely soulless.
i cant watch this the interviewer is so awful
Very poor interview. Badly prepared. DO YOUR JOB!
Painful for an artist...
Art historian?
The interviewer is completely unprepared, the questions are without any depth or consequence. What a lost opportunity.
This artist has no real feeling with his art, he takes a photo and alters the colors as he sees fit. There was no “feeling” there’s no real meaning. He just likes what he sees. To be fair, I don’t think was ready for this obviously because the interview came in with some questions that to the person who doesn’t really study doesn’t know. I almost feel like he was trying to expose him
you're not very intelligent