4. Writing and Running Quantum Programs - Part 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @cerendemir9977
    @cerendemir9977 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much for putting this online. I feel so lucky to have come across this series. I wish Qiskit and Elisa the best!

  • @vishalb.1749
    @vishalb.1749 4 роки тому +16

    This lecture series is just awesome! I have yet to find a comprehensive series like this. Please do let us know how to join the next Qiskit Summer School, I will be really happy to join this :)

  • @makwanabhavin8089
    @makwanabhavin8089 4 роки тому +4

    This is the best lecture series I've seen so far. Thank you so much to Qiskit.

  • @MrAlex1601
    @MrAlex1601 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks so much for this series of lectures. Elisa really explains this well.

  • @shamanbhattacharyya9285
    @shamanbhattacharyya9285 3 роки тому

    Best lecture ever. Thanks to Elisa and IBM

  • @InfiniteQuest86
    @InfiniteQuest86 3 роки тому +2

    I read this in Nielsen and Chuang, but didn't really understand the details until watching this lecture. Thanks!

    • @alexba88ify
      @alexba88ify 2 роки тому

      Same. It’s an amazing textbook, but man do they cover this early and briefly.

  • @joseph_i256
    @joseph_i256 3 роки тому

    Amazing! Learning so much I can feel my brain growing with each lecture

  • @failure795
    @failure795 8 місяців тому

    14:01 since f(x) is either 0 or 1, why would we still write (-1)**f(x)

  • @abhir9302
    @abhir9302 2 роки тому

    At 35:04 - the output can be all 1s too right? - with U_f maps input only to 1

  • @anuragpateriya787
    @anuragpateriya787 4 роки тому +1

    thank you Ellisa.

  • @physicalanish
    @physicalanish 4 роки тому +4

    It's me, Mario!

  • @robertion8235
    @robertion8235 3 роки тому

    thank you very much for these wodnerfull lectures

  • @sangarqader6521
    @sangarqader6521 4 роки тому

    Wonderful explanation ... BIG THANKS

  • @kandesuraj528
    @kandesuraj528 3 роки тому

    at 6:44 why again take m qubits as input when we already use n qubits for inputs.?

    • @kimjongun5073
      @kimjongun5073 3 роки тому +2

      We need n inputs and m output bits. But because the operation is unitary (i.e. reversible, #inputs = #outputs), we need to keep additional n output bits for input, and m input bits for the output.

    • @kandesuraj528
      @kandesuraj528 3 роки тому

      @@kimjongun5073 Thanks

  • @jurgenanklam3226
    @jurgenanklam3226 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much for this great lecture! However, I am confused by the term at minute 40:18: 1/sqrt * sum (-1)^f(x) * sum (-1)^(k dot x). Shouldn't the 2nd sum read: .. sum (-1)^(k dot |psi>_2)? As this whole exponent will become zero anyway, it won't turn out in the end, still I would appreciate if you could clarify, if I misunderstood something.

  • @Said-kv7mp
    @Said-kv7mp Рік тому

    brillant!! keep going

  • @eniolademichael5632
    @eniolademichael5632 3 роки тому

    Input---| Oracle f(x) |----Output

  • @kantzhang3339
    @kantzhang3339 4 роки тому

    well done