Your lectures are really great. I"m going to give them to my graduate students here in the US to cover a lot of ground clearly that I won't have to go over myself in class! Thanks so much!
you're making such a good point! unfortunately there's still this idea that teachers have to make it all up on their own, when there are so many well thought-through resources out there which can save so much time in the classroom. if I may just suggest: why don't you give them to your undergraduates? I for my part would have been absolutely thrilled to have lectures like these in my years 1 or 2.
Honestly this has to be the best channel at explaining things like this. This is the second time i get confused with concepts and only understand them when i find your videos.
Thank u it was really helpful. I have read in a book that some structuralists sought to recover literature and even language from the isolation in which they had been studied and to show that laws that govern them govern all signs, from road signs to articles of clothing. what does that mean ?
So essentially a thing's identity (being comprised of values that are defined collectively yet also binary in that it is supported by anti-definition) is contextual?
Search for structure; you can investigate what a sentence means, and you can investigate its grammatical structure; analyze the structure of the poem, and then compare the structure of the one to others; an approach interested in meaning/interpretation and an approach interested in different type of structure; Saussure: what is linguists all about? You can study the history of language; can study how talking works in the human body; but linguistics studies the structure of language itself. What is the structure of language? focus on sound and phonemes; interested in different sounds of different language and dialects; interested in sounds insofar as the are relevant for language, insofar as the make a difference for meaning; phonemes are determined by the entire structure of phonemes they are a part of, not by some paradigmatic example; phonemes are what they are because they are surrounded by other phonemes; perhaps the central idea of structuralism: a thing's identity is defined, not by its intrinsic properties, but by the larger structure that it is a part of; a fairytale hero is not a fairytale hero because of their intrinsic properties like strength or wits that they themselves have, but because they stand in certain relations to a villain and a princess in need of being rescued.
Once we substitute "identity" with "interpretation of identity", what's the difference between the core tenet of structuralism and the hermeneutic circle discussed in 4.1?
I think the difference is exactly that. That it’s not about interpretation. There are clear things we can research to find structures, but we don’t have the tools to research experiences. That’s why we research experiences though expression using the hermeneutic circle. So the one is about interpretation, the other’s about structure.
Hi! To answer your example. He was talking about the sounds /k/ and /g/ (these are their IPA symbols). The spelling of bang is with a 'g' but its sound is /ŋ/ (a velar nasal). It's important to separate spelling from sound. As for your main question, I can't answer with certainty
What is the reason that 'O' sound and loud long 'OO' sound belong to the same phoneme in English, but the dutch sound 'UI' or 'UU' belongs not to this phoneme; Although both sounds 'OO' and 'UI' do not exist in English?
The stress emphasizing “ooo” vs “OOO” in moon, does because of its difference convey or “evoke” a varied signified...the moon as object vs moon as indication of spooky night, for instance.
Thanks for making but consider picking up the pace. There’s no need, for example, to tell us that the moon is a celestial body and that noon is a time of day.
Sausurre likely got this idea of phoneme and its relationship to structure of language from Sphotvaad, the Uttar Mimansak school of language . Phoneme is same as "sphot".
You elaborate tough things in a very simple manner and there lies your depth
Your lectures are really great. I"m going to give them to my graduate students here in the US to cover a lot of ground clearly that I won't have to go over myself in class! Thanks so much!
you're making such a good point!
unfortunately there's still this idea that teachers have to make it all up on their own, when there are so many well thought-through resources out there which can save so much time in the classroom.
if I may just suggest: why don't you give them to your undergraduates? I for my part would have been absolutely thrilled to have lectures like these in my years 1 or 2.
Thank you for your clear pronunciation.
Really helps to understand those things better
Honestly this has to be the best channel at explaining things like this. This is the second time i get confused with concepts and only understand them when i find your videos.
Your lectures are great! Very clear presentation and wonderful clarifying examples. Bravo
Why isn’t everyone watching these lectures? They are so informative!
thank you so much! I was really lost in structuralism but this video is a great way to start understanding this topic.
This guy is great, really clear.
The explanations are clear and easily understandable.
OMG, I just love that little moon ghost! Nice distraction, but helps to learn
Thank you, Very clear explanation. Well done.
your lectures are great !
the best explanation ever
Thank u it was really helpful.
I have read in a book that some structuralists sought to recover literature and even language from
the isolation in which they had been studied and to show that laws that govern them
govern all signs, from road signs to articles of clothing.
what does that mean ?
i miixed up the meaning of sructuralism with hermeneutics until i saw this video. thank you so much.
Perfectly explained. Thank you!
The best explanation ever!!
So essentially a thing's identity (being comprised of values that are defined collectively yet also binary in that it is supported by anti-definition) is contextual?
Your pronunciation is great, Sir
Literature is the part and parcel of everyone's life.
Search for structure; you can investigate what a sentence means, and you can investigate its grammatical structure; analyze the structure of the poem, and then compare the structure of the one to others; an approach interested in meaning/interpretation and an approach interested in different type of structure; Saussure: what is linguists all about? You can study the history of language; can study how talking works in the human body; but linguistics studies the structure of language itself. What is the structure of language? focus on sound and phonemes; interested in different sounds of different language and dialects; interested in sounds insofar as the are relevant for language, insofar as the make a difference for meaning; phonemes are determined by the entire structure of phonemes they are a part of, not by some paradigmatic example; phonemes are what they are because they are surrounded by other phonemes; perhaps the central idea of structuralism: a thing's identity is defined, not by its intrinsic properties, but by the larger structure that it is a part of; a fairytale hero is not a fairytale hero because of their intrinsic properties like strength or wits that they themselves have, but because they stand in certain relations to a villain and a princess in need of being rescued.
Would this mean that structuralists denies the aristotle principle of identity?
Once we substitute "identity" with "interpretation of identity", what's the difference between the core tenet of structuralism and the hermeneutic circle discussed in 4.1?
I am wondering to understand your point, what do you mean by interpretation of identity? in which part he speaks about it?
I think the difference is exactly that. That it’s not about interpretation. There are clear things we can research to find structures, but we don’t have the tools to research experiences. That’s why we research experiences though expression using the hermeneutic circle. So the one is about interpretation, the other’s about structure.
Thanks a lot, this is very helpful!
7:09 are they really no words in dutch where the difference between G and K sounds, makes a difference in meaning?! for example 'banK' and 'banG'!
Hi! To answer your example. He was talking about the sounds /k/ and /g/ (these are their IPA symbols). The spelling of bang is with a 'g' but its sound is /ŋ/ (a velar nasal). It's important to separate spelling from sound. As for your main question, I can't answer with certainty
Thanks teacher. You look like Jesus
By explaining this, he became Jesus.
haha Jesus
Lol!!!
Man. You foiled his disguise. He was attempting the Clark Kent trick that worked so well for Superman.
Hahahhahahahahaha
What is the reason that 'O' sound and loud long 'OO' sound belong to the same phoneme in English, but the dutch sound 'UI' or 'UU' belongs not to this phoneme; Although both sounds 'OO' and 'UI' do not exist in English?
The stress emphasizing “ooo” vs “OOO” in moon, does because of its difference convey or “evoke” a varied signified...the moon as object vs moon as indication of spooky night, for instance.
its very tough
@@farihakayani2168 Hello Fariha were you able to understand?
@@despicableone4495 yes i have done my Masters
Great explanation
Sound variations are much related to moloch and before that unknown killings?
Moloch? What does a pedo God has to do with this video?
The man loves the goat.
Thank you so much 👍
Thanks for making but consider picking up the pace. There’s no need, for example, to tell us that the moon is a celestial body and that noon is a time of day.
Um we use to, that's old, all these pathological ontologies in assemblages running around, each one was different.
VERY GOOD.
Excellent
GOOD LESSON
It was as if the spirit of Jesus appeared. I mean, was it conscious... anyway, thank you, it was a very good explanation.
but what makes a villian a villlin? Isn't the properties of EVIL.
I cannot understand the name he gives the interpretative approach(( can anyone spell it for me please?
Hermeneutic
@@ghany.3 man of course. i feel ashamed i didnt recognize that haha thanks!
Thanks a lot
I wonder if it exists: a pair of languages... that DO share all identical phonemes......?
I'm nearing apprehension thanks.
Sausurre likely got this idea of phoneme and its relationship to structure of language from Sphotvaad, the Uttar Mimansak school of language . Phoneme is same as "sphot".
The man loves the goat🤣🤣
Nices
Vader says, "No, I am your father!" Nobody says, "Luke, I am your father." in Star Wars. :P
Lucas Griggs Everyone says the latter.
FnA :\
True! It's a common case of the 'Mandela Effect'
intro music sound like pron
Present structure is Condom?Middle class prostitue?
Oooooooooooo
All crimes are paid
Gand hain moon nahi 😅😅😅😅
How to make humanties boring!