Two great mics! I own both, and actually the MXL990 was my first mic, bought it in 2001, I still have it and it sounds amazing. I now have the Rode NT1A and it has become my daily-driver most of the time (I also have the SM7B with a Fethead which I use, depending on the situation). Now, the quality of the 990 has degraded in newer versions, the floor noise is higher now, it's a shame. For people who are just starting, the MXL990 is the best choice, IMO. You can use the extra buck you save in a good preamp and decent interface.
Based upon this demonstration (and my budget), I decided to buy an MXL 990 tonight ... found a kit with Mic, Shock Mount, Pop Screen and XLR cable for $84.95. Fantastic, thank you.
@@SOCOMJOHN Happy with the Mic, but the (included) shock mount was absolute trash. This is a very heavy mic (which I like), the shock mount could not hold it steady & in desired set position without limping. Tried to tighten it repeatedly, fifth time, the cheap plastic broke. Found several identical complaints on this shock mount. SO: Great Mic, BYO Shock Mount ... and again, great review, good info, thank you.
@@benmobi Was it the official MLX metal shockmount (model MXL90), included in hard plastic MXL carrying case? Or else was it a 3rd-party shockmount (you mention it's plastic), included in a bundle with the pop filter (which isn't included from MXL)?
I don’t care how many times Mike explains to me what a cardioid pattern is, what phantom power is, or what the difference between condenser and dynamic microphones are I love every second of every video on this channel and they all make me want to record something. I’m addicted, badly.
I used to have an MXL 990, worked like a champ. I used it mostly in live stage productions so the relatively high noise floor wasn't a big deal to me, and it's solid. I've dropped it once from about 1.5m (4.9ft) and it was fine. Still, don't recommend dropping it though.
This is exactly what I was looking for. I have a MXL 990 and was looking to see it against possibly getting the Rode. Thank you! I don’t need or want more bass for my characters and I do need less room noise. Cheers! You’ve helped me make the purchase!
MXL 990 - if your voice is like Booth's Junkie. If your voice is more high pitched, has less bass, but more high mid / treble freqs - go with the RØDE NT1. AKG is utter crap.
@@gameon2000 You could go 100% Rode and do the NT1-A for higher resonating voices, BoothJunkie himself has said thats why he likes the NT1 more than the NT1-A. Idk, I think MXL and AKG are equally "crap". Neither have a perfect track record, while I've had consistently great experiences with Rode.
Went thru a few diff preamps and cables before I realized that noise was just my mic! I have the MXL 990 and a similarly priced AKG mic. Both of them hiss the way you showed in this video. Been thinking of upgrading to the Rode because I record a lot of vocals for music and I want to be able to crank the compression on them without bringing up that noise. Also most of my instrument tracks are recorded direct so I get spoiled by the cleanliness of those. That hiss is like the opposite of ASMR for me. Drives me nuts! Thanks for the video.
Not a voice actor, But I am into making gaming news videos/streaming. Just reached 1k subs. Need suggestions! I want a mic that will last me 3+ years atleast
Hard to tell the difference with my setup. main difference for me is nt-1 a had a slightly deeper bass. i can only hear the noise on the 990 if i really crank my headphone amp.
yes boss, I was just suggesting ways to make it suit your purpose, where you could eq it after the fact to make it more bassy. I'm not saying the nt1 isn't good
Way back when - working toward a Degree in Audio Production, in first semester labs, the MXL 990 was the ONLY condenser mic we ever laid hands on - and for good reason. I've never seen a group of people so guilty of microphone manslaughter in my life! Could you imagine if those students were that reckless with a Neumann? The Commercial Music Department would go bankrupt! LOL. However - when I broke out on my own, to open my recording studio, the Rode NT1a was one of the first mics I purchased. It sounds good on anything!
Mike, Thx a lot! MXL 990 is still my best and only pro mic although I have been recording explainers and narrations (and even one audio guide for a museum lastly) for quite a few yrs. Thanks for the comparison. And I also have a booth which is a must in my opinion regardless of the mic. I built it inspired by your videos by the way. :)
Wow. I could really tell what you don't like about he NT1A for your voice. The MXL990 sounds way better for you, but the noise is untenable! I bought a RØDE NT1A, and really wish I would have known about the CAD e100 vintage mic, because I think that could be my "forever until I can get a Sennheiser MKH416" mic, and I've seen quite a few on eBay for less than I paid for the RØDE.I wish I'd had discovered your channel first. What a tremendous resource! I probably should stop plugging the e100 so much, or they'll all get snatched up before I can get my hands on one. I really think it would be a service for you to mention the RØDE NT1 whenever you talk about the anniversary addition because that is a screaming deal and way better than the NT1A because of the smoother frequency response and the quality of the included pop screen and shock mount. I find I have issues with the NT1A because you can't EQ it for presence for even run it though a gentle condenser without ending up with out of control sibilance, at least for my voice. I find I have to use a dynamic EQ and De-Essers layered throughout my effects chain to get a sound I'm happy with.
Very well done, to the point. I have a 13 yr. old 990/991 combo that came with a Pro Tools M-Audio bundle, just pulled it out of a mic case I used when I was still doing live sound. It was somehow with the 57's and 58's, someone (wife) just tossed in the open mic clip/hardware side of the box, that's been full of beer and other stuff after 15yrs in the New Orleans music scene. Checked them all for the first time since '09 and the MXL 990...well, sounded freakin awesome. I like it better than say the AKG 220 which costs at least double. I've listened the best my vocal recording (IMO) and thought about that mic but never purchase another. I should have, to me it sounds better than the NT-1a. The noise should not be a deal breaker. Good job on the video, just subscribed.
I've been using the 990/991 Combo for about 15 years now, best money I've ever spent on mics, I bought another kit. So I have 2 of each. I also have the V63 and 770. All great mics, I also own a SM7B as well as AT 2020. The MXL 990 and 770 are always being used in my studio
Thanks Mike. Really helpful, clear review and a great voice you have there. I set up home recording during lockdown. Have recorded a few voice overs in the past and intending to record a demo to see if I've still got what it takes. MXL 990 seems the way to go.
I just got the mxl 990 but im a music engineer going on 11 years now so my presets make this mic sound like a thousand dollar mic when it comes to vocals . i love it . i also have the rode nt1a i bought it in 2014 when the bundle was just a lil over 200$ , putting my presets on there sounded even more amazing . but i swear it doesn't compare to the bluebird SL of course. But the mxl 990 is a perfect studio mic for those thats thinking about buying one.
Your voice is incredible so you'd probably sound good on any mic! ;-) My preference in this case is the MXL990 in this incredible side by side test,.The noise difference is a good point though. Great video.
That note you quickly mentioned of the 990 being a bit much on the high end is the reason why I prefer the 770. A bit flatter over all out of the box and even comes in a bit cheeper due to not having the pre bundled pencil mic.
Have you checked frequency response charts? 770 has HUGE bump in high freq., far more than 990. 990 chart is otherwise also flatter overall. Plus better s/n ratio.
Hey Mike, I was wondering if you ever plan to digress into other aspects of voiceover, such as techniques to achieve different moods with your voiceover, tips for loosening up and having fun while you record something awesome? Some people swear by honey and hot tea, I tend to like a cup of coffee... Anything you can offer as far as advice on delivery and technique, rather than just equipment? I mean, the equipment side is great and all, but I bet you have a lot you could teach a guy like myself. :)
Great video from the vault. I've been immersed in tech all my life and can't recall before now someone using the word "componentry." It's a real word so thanks for the education. I plan to use it often since I am a wizard of componentry and other secret arts. I love my MXL 990 which I have had for many years. I ordered an RK-47 capsule for it that I'll get around to one of these days. I went for the Rode NT1 instead of the NT1a because I like it better for my voice. I'm also rocking my Stellar X2 which makes my voice come alive. Thanks for the many great reviews which have helped me so much with stocking my mic locker. I'm done at this level for dynamic and condenser mics. The rest of my wish list is all high end now.
Hey Mike, new fan of your channel, love the amazing content! Have really learned a lot from watching and i swear, your voice naturally sounds high broadcast quality even on the cheapest mics haha
I bought the 990 today because I'm upgrading from a Neewer usb microphone that I ended up rebuilding and minimized some of that noise floor, it's decent, but I'm still waiting on my audio interface so i can test this mic. I'll come back and update thoughts once I receive the interface. Purpose: Voice over.
@@charlespancamo9771 I used the MXL 990 for a couple years, and it's amazing if you have a good interface, something like a scarlet solo or something along those lines or above. Lots of voice work was recorded with that mic and it did me proud
Excellent video. I was just trying to figure out which of these two to start with. A VO coach recommended the 990 in one of his workshops. I had never heard of it, and already had staked out the NT1-A as my preference. Now I will go back and review. Thanks, Mike...another 'on-time, on target' video!
Chance White Kind of that low-fi, vintage vibe? When I was a radio DJ on an AM station, I used it like the sound of the carrier signal. For professional recording, most clients and almost all producers and directors won’t like any noise.
Put my headphones at 100% and I heard nothing that couldn't be solved with a decent noise gate. Especially for those recording music/vocals, I've used $20 mics (not ideal I know) plus a good noise gate just to record demos. At $80, I love the sound of the MXL, and am purchasing one this week to save some money.
A noise gate does nothing for the noise you have in the tiny parts between words or when you get slightly quieter while talking. Unless you have such an aggressive noise gate that it starts clipping off your first and last syllables, which is even worse than noise.
I have owned both of these mics for years. IMO, in terms of build quality and sound quality, the Rode NT1-A is in a different league. The Rode is much less noisy and the top of my 990 can easily unscrew. Subtle movement in the top of the 990 introduces a terrible buzz. The Rode is also built like a tank you could run over that mic with a truck and record on it minutes later. Save your change for a bit and splurge on the Rode.
the mxl 990 is not a large diaphram..... its like an electret but they put a big ring around it so from the outside it looks big, that being said, i like mine.
That noise floor is quite noticeable. I wonder how the ribbon version or the HE version compares. In Norway, they're just between the MXL 990 and the NT1 in price, and the MXL 990 is about half the price of the NT1.
I believe that the MXL 990 is a medium diaphram mic, not a large diaphram mic. It's 17.1mm (or .67") in diameter. The Rode NT1a is different. It is actually a large diaphram mic. It has a 1" diaphram. So, this video is comparing a large diaphram mic with a medium diaphram mic. Generally smaller diameter diaphrams give a flatter frequency response. Larger diameter diaphrams tend to emphasize bass frequencies. In this video he does a good job of explaining characteristics of condenser microphones. Use a good pair of headphones when listening to this video, and you'll be able to hear the subtle differences between the mics. The NT1a , on just listening not looking at specs, appears to have a flatter frequency response. It has less bass and treble coloration than the MXL 330. So, the NT1a sounds clearer, and just a tad more nasaly. The MXL 330 is flattering in that it beef up that bass a bit and has a little high end sizzle. However, it is not as clear sounding. To hear this, you probably need a set of good headphones, or some very expensive speakers.
Man you are awesome Thanks for these videos.. Before I found your channel I was going to get a AT2020 for my stream. Now, with a little bit of digging and learning from you I've decided on this MXL 990! Seems like a way better choice for my voice and quality of my content! Yeah, you're a real one man
Hey Mike, love your videos man! I just discovered them about a week ago and I've been watching them everyday. I have a quick question I was hoping youd be able to answer for me. I've been thinking about getting a dynamic mic like the RE320 or Procaster for livestreaming as my cheap condenser is just too harsh on sibilants and picks up all the room noise. I plan on getting a USB interface, and I know pretty much everybody recommends you get a Cloudlifter or Fethead if you're using a broadcast mic. As I understand it after doing some quick research, all I can see that a device like that does is boost the gain of the microphone. So my question is this: what's the difference between using a Cloudlifter or Fethead as opposed to just boosting the gain in software? Is there going to be a noticeable difference in quality for an application like livestreaming? I'd love to see (or hear) your answer to this!
Hi cbjunior 94. Mike seems to be on hiatus, so I will attempt to answer your question. Yes, there is a difference between using a Cloudlifter/Fethead and just boosting the signal in software. When you use a Cloudlifter or Fethead, you are boosting the signal BEFORE the preamp/interface and your computer. This provides an extra 22-25 Db of very clean amplification. This means that you can drive your interface's preamp less hard and therefore avoid amplifying the noise that all preamps produce (to one extent or another). If you don't use a Fethead or Cloudlifter and don't drive your interface gain hard, you will get a VERY low signal for which you will have to provide a lot of gain in software, which will also amplify the noise inherent to your interface, mic cables, USB signal, and microphone. I'm afraid there is no way around this if you want a clean and audible recording/stream. A recommendation is to treat an area of your room and use a good directional condenser microphone such as the very reasonably priced AT875R short shotgun microphone (www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-AT875R-Gradient-Condenser-Microphone/dp/B000BQ79W0), which sounds good, is quite directional, and does not require much gain from your interface. If you treat the area behind and above you and keep the mic away from both your reflective desktop and humming computer, you should be able to get a good-sounding signal. There are a lot of reviews for this microphone on UA-cam, so there is ample information about it out there.
Actually, i believe the 990 is actually a small diaphragm in the format of a large diaphragm mic. I own one myself and pulled out the innermost layer of the mesh. Same diameter as my 991's, which are pencil condensers.
I just found this channel, I think its great. As a new buyer in the microphone world. It would be great if you did a series on what to get for a variety of price ranges (Including if an AMP is needed). So for example, if you had $100 what would you get? And go up to 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000. I would say the majority of new people (well me anyway), set a price limit they want to spend on capturing their voice, and then look for the best option they can find. Your reviews are great but don't fulfill the need where there is a set budget and you want to know the best option across the market instead of just comparing 2-3 mics at a similar price range and ignoring how much should be spend on additional equipment such as an amp etc
I am a singer and currently using SAMSON C01u USB Condenser Microphone and want to upgrade my home vocal recording setup. I am confused with the following microphones: 1. Lewitt LCT 240 PRO 2. Lewitt LCT 440 PURE 3. MXL 770 4. MXL 990 Note : I don't have a treated room. Looking forward for your suggestion.
I replaced the capsule in my NT1-A with a RK-47 and it's now my go to mic for just about everything. The problem with the NT1-A is that it and a lot of other mics were designed around using a copy of the Neumann K-67 capsule. But the Neumanns that used that capsule had an EQ circuit that cut down a lot of the high end, and the copies don't. Using a capsule that doesn't have the exaggerated high end makes the NT1-A sound like a completely different mic. The are even a few videos where it compares well with the Neumann U87Ai. For what I use it for, the smooth, warm tone can't be beat without shelling out some serious big bucks. Once I get my recordings caught up, I'll see about sending it in.
It's almost like you were reading my mind. I picked up a pair of MXL 990 mics for a little experiment. (Musician's Friends recently had a Stupid Deal of the Day with them.) Once I got started I was going to ask if you wanted to get involved. The MXL 990 doesn't sound bad on your voice for the price. I wonder how it will sound once my experiment is finished.
Now, it's time to get another NT1A to compare with the modified version! While there are still plenty of mic out there to compare, spending a few hundred dollars to get the sound of a $1k mic would be amazing! I will look into.the upgrade folks out there too and see how they stack up with their mods.
Excellent idea for a comparison. Thank you. Thanks to your teaching about noise floor from the past, this video validates my conclusion to purchase a 990 kit as a starter microphone.
Hi Mike. Love your videos. When you do a side by side microphone comparison, could you sustain a note when switching between Mic A and Mic B? Like maybe a low hum for bass and an "s" sound for the high end. That way those of us that don't have sensitive hearing can hear the difference better (how it adds color or muddles your voice). Keep up the great work and educating us! More power to you!
BOYS IM MAKING MY DECISION WHILE LISTENING TO THIS VIDEO WITH " SHURE SRH 440 HEADPHONES" I CAN HEAR SO MUCH FLOORNOISE FROM THE MXL THAT I GOT A HEADACHE!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR REVIEW BOSS!!! YOU ROCK!! IM GOING WITH THE RODE NT1A!!
I have a Rode nt1a that I just set up in my closet booth... I'm looking for your video on the inexpensive mobile mount set up to get the link for that pcm mobile recorder mic mount for my tascam dr40
Behringer TM1 (it used to be Tannoy TM1), I think this mic might pick your interest for "noise battle" vs Rode NT1a. Spec wise it claims to rival NT1a in term of noise level.
Most of the time in music mixing you will cut out the lower frequency just below the sub because those frequencies just make the track sound muddy so 30Hz with a piano shouldn't be a problem since your most likely going to cut those frequencies out anyways.
With the 990, would you suggest buying it over the nt1a in a untreated room using a EYEBALL to take out some of the noise?. Do you think that it would be good enough for recording vocals with Music, because I am thinking of going with the 990. Thanks
For vocal recordings in music, the NT1A sits better in the mix, than the mxl 990. Voiceover acting may be different, but in music, there is a difference between these 2 mics.. I can say from experience because ive had both... i loved my mxl 990, but i was still anxious to upgrade.
Mike, I almost watched all your videos. You deserve way more subscribers than you have. Just one thing mate, if someday you feel people don't need your channel anymore, know that they always will :) Barely anybody explains so well nowadays. Please stay and grow for us all who have much respect for you. Good luck :) Awesome comparison, I would anyday go with the Marshall :) (knowing it is not a true large diaphragm), because nt1a will always sounds like a sh*t.
Avi D Gupta For what it’s worth, this Marshall mic is rather noisy (self-noise = 20dB). Marshall does make some better mics. Not sure why they’re so affordable. Maybe because people don’t know MXL is the Marshall amp company? Not sure but some of their mics are really good.
Mike, thanks for the comparison. That noise floor is almost ‘whistling’ quietly behind your voice so I did wonder if it has some kind of problem. It almost sounds like a refrigerator ...... The difference between the Rode and MXL in noise was quite significant and it’s a pity about that. There’s not a computer behind it is there? Also the polar pattern states cardioid, but the diagram on the spec sheet shows slightly super cardioid! That’s why I was wondering about a computer behind it? The other odd thing is that noise is quoted twice. 80dB and -20dBa which doesn’t exactly add up. You’d expect a mic at -20 to be 74dB, not 80. Very puzzling. Cheers Ian
If you can get your hands on one, try and check out the MXL 770 as well. I'd loan you mine but shipping it from the UK would probably be more hassle than it's worth, plus I kind of need it for VA :P
I narrated 5 seasons of Restaurant Stakeout with the XML990. Was very happy with it.
Two great mics! I own both, and actually the MXL990 was my first mic, bought it in 2001, I still have it and it sounds amazing. I now have the Rode NT1A and it has become my daily-driver most of the time (I also have the SM7B with a Fethead which I use, depending on the situation).
Now, the quality of the 990 has degraded in newer versions, the floor noise is higher now, it's a shame.
For people who are just starting, the MXL990 is the best choice, IMO. You can use the extra buck you save in a good preamp and decent interface.
Based upon this demonstration (and my budget), I decided to buy an MXL 990 tonight ... found a kit with Mic, Shock Mount, Pop Screen and XLR cable for $84.95. Fantastic, thank you.
happy? yes or no?
@@SOCOMJOHN Happy with the Mic, but the (included) shock mount was absolute trash. This is a very heavy mic (which I like), the shock mount could not hold it steady & in desired set position without limping. Tried to tighten it repeatedly, fifth time, the cheap plastic broke. Found several identical complaints on this shock mount. SO: Great Mic, BYO Shock Mount ... and again, great review, good info, thank you.
@@benmobi Was it the official MLX metal shockmount (model MXL90), included in hard plastic MXL carrying case? Or else was it a 3rd-party shockmount (you mention it's plastic), included in a bundle with the pop filter (which isn't included from MXL)?
this guy has such a badass radio voice.
Omar Mat yes it‘s so incredible 😂
I would listen to his radio, just because of his voice.
he should make a podcast
He should try becoming a Voice actor.
@@soulfulbtw5956 not saying he can't deliver good content, but there's more to a podcast than your voice man...
I don’t care how many times Mike explains to me what a cardioid pattern is, what phantom power is, or what the difference between condenser and dynamic microphones are I love every second of every video on this channel and they all make me want to record something. I’m addicted, badly.
this guys voice sounds good on any mic, hes got a broadcaster voice
Love the fact you explained a lot of details, especially considering how "mic noobs" are looking for those two ! Great vid as always !
5:28 start
KOD Thanks bro
Thanks bro
I used to have an MXL 990, worked like a champ. I used it mostly in live stage productions so the relatively high noise floor wasn't a big deal to me, and it's solid. I've dropped it once from about 1.5m (4.9ft) and it was fine. Still, don't recommend dropping it though.
Wow, the MXL is throaty and smooth. I dig it.
This is exactly what I was looking for. I have a MXL 990 and was looking to see it against possibly getting the Rode. Thank you! I don’t need or want more bass for my characters and I do need less room noise. Cheers! You’ve helped me make the purchase!
Sir ... which Microphone is best for Voice over ?
Akg p420
Mxl 990
At 2035
akg p420 definitely
MXL 990 - if your voice is like Booth's Junkie. If your voice is more high pitched, has less bass, but more high mid / treble freqs - go with the RØDE NT1. AKG is utter crap.
@@gameon2000 no mxl 990 sux
@@gameon2000 You could go 100% Rode and do the NT1-A for higher resonating voices, BoothJunkie himself has said thats why he likes the NT1 more than the NT1-A. Idk, I think MXL and AKG are equally "crap". Neither have a perfect track record, while I've had consistently great experiences with Rode.
@@GabrielVXIX AKG is pretty eh while MXL is decent
I have used my 990 USB for my home VO and radio work for years. It was refreshing to see this review. Thank you.
Went thru a few diff preamps and cables before I realized that noise was just my mic! I have the MXL 990 and a similarly priced AKG mic. Both of them hiss the way you showed in this video. Been thinking of upgrading to the Rode because I record a lot of vocals for music and I want to be able to crank the compression on them without bringing up that noise. Also most of my instrument tracks are recorded direct so I get spoiled by the cleanliness of those. That hiss is like the opposite of ASMR for me. Drives me nuts! Thanks for the video.
Not a voice actor, But I am into making gaming news videos/streaming. Just reached 1k subs. Need suggestions!
I want a mic that will last me 3+ years atleast
You know, this channel gets a lot less attention then it deserves. Keep it up, awesome information you don't find very easily.
Thank you for covering the noise floor aspect of the mics and in general. I really needed to know that information.
Rei Kon
The specs for the MXL 990 list the self-noise at 20dB. Seems pretty loud to me.
totallyfrozen it is
@@reekrodriqguez6552 Most definitely. I heard it right away with my headphones. I does sound nice all things considered.
Hard to tell the difference with my setup. main difference for me is nt-1 a had a slightly deeper bass. i can only hear the noise on the 990 if i really crank my headphone amp.
Yeah i gues that, noise test is a lil bit misleading cuz it makes people think mxl is trash but it just not
I love my MXL990 - totally worth the money, as long as you have an interface.
Me too Jennifer.😊
Which interface do you have?
Had the NT1-A. Had a 10 year warranty. Yay, 10 years of that horrendous sibilance. :)
I had one too . A tad bit too bright for my taste also
Is it too bright? I want my mic to be bassy. Is it wrong choose?
just eq it, it's just bright out of the box
@@mrkeydeed i got myself a nt1 and its fine
yes boss, I was just suggesting ways to make it suit your purpose, where you could eq it after the fact to make it more bassy. I'm not saying the nt1 isn't good
Way back when - working toward a Degree in Audio Production, in first semester labs, the MXL 990 was the ONLY condenser mic we ever laid hands on - and for good reason. I've never seen a group of people so guilty of microphone manslaughter in my life! Could you imagine if those students were that reckless with a Neumann? The Commercial Music Department would go bankrupt! LOL. However - when I broke out on my own, to open my recording studio, the Rode NT1a was one of the first mics I purchased. It sounds good on anything!
Bravo- lots of education here and fantastically broadcasted-
Mike, Thx a lot! MXL 990 is still my best and only pro mic although I have been recording explainers and narrations (and even one audio guide for a museum lastly) for quite a few yrs. Thanks for the comparison. And I also have a booth which is a must in my opinion regardless of the mic. I built it inspired by your videos by the way. :)
Wow. I could really tell what you don't like about he NT1A for your voice. The MXL990 sounds way better for you, but the noise is untenable! I bought a RØDE NT1A, and really wish I would have known about the CAD e100 vintage mic, because I think that could be my "forever until I can get a Sennheiser MKH416" mic, and I've seen quite a few on eBay for less than I paid for the RØDE.I wish I'd had discovered your channel first. What a tremendous resource! I probably should stop plugging the e100 so much, or they'll all get snatched up before I can get my hands on one. I really think it would be a service for you to mention the RØDE NT1 whenever you talk about the anniversary addition because that is a screaming deal and way better than the NT1A because of the smoother frequency response and the quality of the included pop screen and shock mount. I find I have issues with the NT1A because you can't EQ it for presence for even run it though a gentle condenser without ending up with out of control sibilance, at least for my voice. I find I have to use a dynamic EQ and De-Essers layered throughout my effects chain to get a sound I'm happy with.
Very well done, to the point. I have a 13 yr. old 990/991 combo that came with a Pro Tools M-Audio bundle, just pulled it out of a mic case I used when I was still doing live sound. It was somehow with the 57's and 58's, someone (wife) just tossed in the open mic clip/hardware side of the box, that's been full of beer and other stuff after 15yrs in the New Orleans music scene. Checked them all for the first time since '09 and the MXL 990...well, sounded freakin awesome. I like it better than say the AKG 220 which costs at least double. I've listened the best my vocal recording (IMO) and thought about that mic but never purchase another. I should have, to me it sounds better than the NT-1a. The noise should not be a deal breaker. Good job on the video, just subscribed.
with mxl mic and its background noise, you could lower gain and bring it closer to eliminate the background noise, its hardly noticeable anyways
I've been using the 990/991 Combo for about 15 years now, best money I've ever spent on mics, I bought another kit. So I have 2 of each. I also have the V63 and 770. All great mics, I also own a SM7B as well as AT 2020. The MXL 990 and 770 are always being used in my studio
Thanks Mike. Really helpful, clear review and a great voice you have there. I set up home recording during lockdown.
Have recorded a few voice overs in the past and intending to record a demo to see if I've still got what it takes. MXL 990 seems the way to go.
I just got the mxl 990 but im a music engineer going on 11 years now so my presets make this mic sound like a thousand dollar mic when it comes to vocals . i love it . i also have the rode nt1a i bought it in 2014 when the bundle was just a lil over 200$ , putting my presets on there sounded even more amazing . but i swear it doesn't compare to the bluebird SL of course. But the mxl 990 is a perfect studio mic for those thats thinking about buying one.
Also the plugins i use in my presets are expensive but ive also used free plugins as well that works just fine.
This is one of my favorite channels about voice over.
You're a Voiceover Angela! Like the UA-cam channel!
Absolutely fabulous video for a beginner. Probably the best I've seen. I wish it had been available when I started.
Your voice is incredible so you'd probably sound good on any mic! ;-) My preference in this case is the MXL990 in this incredible side by side test,.The noise difference is a good point though. Great video.
That note you quickly mentioned of the 990 being a bit much on the high end is the reason why I prefer the 770. A bit flatter over all out of the box and even comes in a bit cheeper due to not having the pre bundled pencil mic.
Have you checked frequency response charts? 770 has HUGE bump in high freq., far more than 990. 990 chart is otherwise also flatter overall. Plus better s/n ratio.
Hey Mike, I was wondering if you ever plan to digress into other aspects of voiceover, such as techniques to achieve different moods with your voiceover, tips for loosening up and having fun while you record something awesome? Some people swear by honey and hot tea, I tend to like a cup of coffee... Anything you can offer as far as advice on delivery and technique, rather than just equipment? I mean, the equipment side is great and all, but I bet you have a lot you could teach a guy like myself. :)
Great video from the vault. I've been immersed in tech all my life and can't recall before now someone using the word "componentry." It's a real word so thanks for the education. I plan to use it often since I am a wizard of componentry and other secret arts. I love my MXL 990 which I have had for many years. I ordered an RK-47 capsule for it that I'll get around to one of these days. I went for the Rode NT1 instead of the NT1a because I like it better for my voice. I'm also rocking my Stellar X2 which makes my voice come alive. Thanks for the many great reviews which have helped me so much with stocking my mic locker. I'm done at this level for dynamic and condenser mics. The rest of my wish list is all high end now.
Guitar Center has a new mic setup where you can test out all the Mike's in my city
Hey Mike, new fan of your channel, love the amazing content! Have really learned a lot from watching and i swear, your voice naturally sounds high broadcast quality even on the cheapest mics haha
I bought the 990 today because I'm upgrading from a Neewer usb microphone that I ended up rebuilding and minimized some of that noise floor, it's decent, but I'm still waiting on my audio interface so i can test this mic. I'll come back and update thoughts once I receive the interface.
Purpose: Voice over.
how'd it go?
@@charlespancamo9771 I used the MXL 990 for a couple years, and it's amazing if you have a good interface, something like a scarlet solo or something along those lines or above. Lots of voice work was recorded with that mic and it did me proud
@@OriginalMrE Ah that's awesome. I'm about to buy one so I figured I'd ask. I have a behringer umc404hd so I hope it will do it justice
@@charlespancamo9771 that'll do just fine, at first I ran the Uphoria Um2 with it, was still good, but lacked clarity so I upgraded
@@OriginalMrE Great! Yea I read up on the UM2 beffre i bought the umc. The preamps aren't as good if I remember right.
Excellent video. I was just trying to figure out which of these two to start with. A VO coach recommended the 990 in one of his workshops. I had never heard of it, and already had staked out the NT1-A as my preference. Now I will go back and review. Thanks, Mike...another 'on-time, on target' video!
"VO coach" - does it mean voiceover coach?
It's incredible how background noise disappears with NT1-A.
James K
That MXL 990 is a noisy little thing, isn’t it? The specs show the self-noise at 20dB. Yikes!
It's not really background noise, if that's the case 990 did better than NT1. The noise you hear is internal to the microphone.
So does your money, lol
@@agambhasin lol, nothing but facts here
Call me crazy, but a little bit of mic noise adds a certain ambience that I actually enjoy.
Chance White
Kind of that low-fi, vintage vibe? When I was a radio DJ on an AM station, I used it like the sound of the carrier signal. For professional recording, most clients and almost all producers and directors won’t like any noise.
crazy
Your not crazy I own an AKG C414 and always add background ambience to my tracks. I enjoy it too
What the heck? You looked like Luke Skywalker
yep
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Put my headphones at 100% and I heard nothing that couldn't be solved with a decent noise gate. Especially for those recording music/vocals, I've used $20 mics (not ideal I know) plus a good noise gate just to record demos. At $80, I love the sound of the MXL, and am purchasing one this week to save some money.
A noise gate does nothing for the noise you have in the tiny parts between words or when you get slightly quieter while talking. Unless you have such an aggressive noise gate that it starts clipping off your first and last syllables, which is even worse than noise.
im actually proud this guy mentioned mic mods.
Loved the info thanks.. I'm thinking on purchasing an mxl 990... Your voice tone pattern gave me anxiety, such a ride. Love it.
Sending the Røde to be upgraded?
Get another Røde NT1-A to compare with when it comes back, please.
hello! do you recommend the MXL990 for recording the violin? I have a nice audio interface and I know editing but I don't have money for the NT1 :D
we have had good results with Roswell Pro audio mini k 87 for violin!
Thank you dear..I purchased 1 990 today..Heavy voice..Thank you..From India..❤️❤️❤️
This men has a sincere and real opinion helping the peoples in the world. You are the Best. You gained a new subscriber, me.
Sonically, very similar.
However, the MXL has a way higher noise floor.
#BoothJunkie Having withdrawls I need my #BoothJunkie fix!!! Hope your having a good summer , I am looking forward to your next set of videos.
Excellent review man. You kept my attention and i learned alot. God bless!
THANK YOU! Exactly the information I was looking for!
I have owned both of these mics for years. IMO, in terms of build quality and sound quality, the Rode NT1-A is in a different league. The Rode is much less noisy and the top of my 990 can easily unscrew. Subtle movement in the top of the 990 introduces a terrible buzz. The Rode is also built like a tank you could run over that mic with a truck and record on it minutes later. Save your change for a bit and splurge on the Rode.
the mxl 990 is not a large diaphram..... its like an electret but they put a big ring around it so from the outside it looks big, that being said, i like mine.
That noise floor is quite noticeable. I wonder how the ribbon version or the HE version compares. In Norway, they're just between the MXL 990 and the NT1 in price, and the MXL 990 is about half the price of the NT1.
This is a great mic description and demo. You got a very listenable voice.
I believe that the MXL 990 is a medium diaphram mic, not a large diaphram mic. It's 17.1mm (or .67") in diameter. The Rode NT1a is different. It is actually a large diaphram mic. It has a 1" diaphram. So, this video is comparing a large diaphram mic with a medium diaphram mic. Generally smaller diameter diaphrams give a flatter frequency response. Larger diameter diaphrams tend to emphasize bass frequencies. In this video he does a good job of explaining characteristics of condenser microphones. Use a good pair of headphones when listening to this video, and you'll be able to hear the subtle differences between the mics. The NT1a , on just listening not looking at specs, appears to have a flatter frequency response. It has less bass and treble coloration than the MXL 330. So, the NT1a sounds clearer, and just a tad more nasaly. The MXL 330 is flattering in that it beef up that bass a bit and has a little high end sizzle. However, it is not as clear sounding. To hear this, you probably need a set of good headphones, or some very expensive speakers.
I think the mlx990 sound better and I just got one. Happy with it... thanks
Own mxl 3000 (900 series variant) used nt2a a lot..good mics
Mxl 990 was my first home condenser mic while I liked the MXL V69 mogami edition even better
Man you are awesome
Thanks for these videos.. Before I found your channel I was going to get a AT2020 for my stream. Now, with a little bit of digging and learning from you I've decided on this MXL 990! Seems like a way better choice for my voice and quality of my content!
Yeah, you're a real one man
Hey Mike, love your videos man! I just discovered them about a week ago and I've been watching them everyday. I have a quick question I was hoping youd be able to answer for me.
I've been thinking about getting a dynamic mic like the RE320 or Procaster for livestreaming as my cheap condenser is just too harsh on sibilants and picks up all the room noise. I plan on getting a USB interface, and I know pretty much everybody recommends you get a Cloudlifter or Fethead if you're using a broadcast mic. As I understand it after doing some quick research, all I can see that a device like that does is boost the gain of the microphone.
So my question is this: what's the difference between using a Cloudlifter or Fethead as opposed to just boosting the gain in software? Is there going to be a noticeable difference in quality for an application like livestreaming? I'd love to see (or hear) your answer to this!
Hi cbjunior 94. Mike seems to be on hiatus, so I will attempt to answer your question. Yes, there is a difference between using a Cloudlifter/Fethead and just boosting the signal in software. When you use a Cloudlifter or Fethead, you are boosting the signal BEFORE the preamp/interface and your computer. This provides an extra 22-25 Db of very clean amplification. This means that you can drive your interface's preamp less hard and therefore avoid amplifying the noise that all preamps produce (to one extent or another). If you don't use a Fethead or Cloudlifter and don't drive your interface gain hard, you will get a VERY low signal for which you will have to provide a lot of gain in software, which will also amplify the noise inherent to your interface, mic cables, USB signal, and microphone. I'm afraid there is no way around this if you want a clean and audible recording/stream.
A recommendation is to treat an area of your room and use a good directional condenser microphone such as the very reasonably priced AT875R short shotgun microphone (www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-AT875R-Gradient-Condenser-Microphone/dp/B000BQ79W0), which sounds good, is quite directional, and does not require much gain from your interface. If you treat the area behind and above you and keep the mic away from both your reflective desktop and humming computer, you should be able to get a good-sounding signal. There are a lot of reviews for this microphone on UA-cam, so there is ample information about it out there.
Actually, i believe the 990 is actually a small diaphragm in the format of a large diaphragm mic. I own one myself and pulled out the innermost layer of the mesh. Same diameter as my 991's, which are pencil condensers.
I just found this channel, I think its great. As a new buyer in the microphone world. It would be great if you did a series on what to get for a variety of price ranges (Including if an AMP is needed). So for example, if you had $100 what would you get? And go up to 200, 300, 400, 500, 750, 1000.
I would say the majority of new people (well me anyway), set a price limit they want to spend on capturing their voice, and then look for the best option they can find. Your reviews are great but don't fulfill the need where there is a set budget and you want to know the best option across the market instead of just comparing 2-3 mics at a similar price range and ignoring how much should be spend on additional equipment such as an amp etc
I am a singer and currently using SAMSON C01u USB Condenser Microphone and want to upgrade my home vocal recording setup. I am confused with the following microphones:
1. Lewitt LCT 240 PRO
2. Lewitt LCT 440 PURE
3. MXL 770
4. MXL 990
Note : I don't have a treated room.
Looking forward for your suggestion.
Hi Mike I love your videos! Thank you so much! What are your thoughts on the MXL770? I would love to hear your opinions Thanks Paul
no need, if you can have 990 for nearly the same price.
How about mxl 990 with compressor would that eliminate noise floor?
I’m using the mxl and it’s got horrible noise floor
I replaced the capsule in my NT1-A with a RK-47 and it's now my go to mic for just about everything.
The problem with the NT1-A is that it and a lot of other mics were designed around using a copy of the Neumann K-67 capsule. But the Neumanns that used that capsule had an EQ circuit that cut down a lot of the high end, and the copies don't.
Using a capsule that doesn't have the exaggerated high end makes the NT1-A sound like a completely different mic. The are even a few videos where it compares well with the Neumann U87Ai.
For what I use it for, the smooth, warm tone can't be beat without shelling out some serious big bucks.
Once I get my recordings caught up, I'll see about sending it in.
With my voice and the equipment I use, a stock NT1-A and an NT1 are so close I can't really tell the difference.
It's almost like you were reading my mind. I picked up a pair of MXL 990 mics for a little experiment. (Musician's Friends recently had a Stupid Deal of the Day with them.) Once I got started I was going to ask if you wanted to get involved.
The MXL 990 doesn't sound bad on your voice for the price. I wonder how it will sound once my experiment is finished.
Now, it's time to get another NT1A to compare with the modified version! While there are still plenty of mic out there to compare, spending a few hundred dollars to get the sound of a $1k mic would be amazing!
I will look into.the upgrade folks out there too and see how they stack up with their mods.
Great videos! Looking forward to seeing a review of a Joley modified NT1-A!
you are so incredibly helpful and informative. i love you. this helped me so much
Excellent idea for a comparison. Thank you.
Thanks to your teaching about noise floor from the past, this video validates my conclusion to purchase a 990 kit as a starter microphone.
Excellent excellent explanation.
Hi Mike. Love your videos.
When you do a side by side microphone comparison, could you sustain a note when switching between Mic A and Mic B? Like maybe a low hum for bass and an "s" sound for the high end. That way those of us that don't have sensitive hearing can hear the difference better (how it adds color or muddles your voice).
Keep up the great work and educating us! More power to you!
I just got this with the 991 in a case for $50.00. I'm glad it wasn't a waste.
BOYS IM MAKING MY DECISION WHILE LISTENING TO THIS VIDEO WITH " SHURE SRH 440 HEADPHONES" I CAN HEAR SO MUCH FLOORNOISE FROM THE MXL THAT I GOT A HEADACHE!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR REVIEW BOSS!!! YOU ROCK!! IM GOING WITH THE RODE NT1A!!
I have a Rode nt1a that I just set up in my closet booth... I'm looking for your video on the inexpensive mobile mount set up to get the link for that pcm mobile recorder mic mount for my tascam dr40
Behringer TM1 (it used to be Tannoy TM1), I think this mic might pick your interest for "noise battle" vs Rode NT1a.
Spec wise it claims to rival NT1a in term of noise level.
Hey Mike! I love the videos, but I was wondering if you could do a review/comparison of the AKG P420 Condeser microphone!
I got a 990 and bought a kit from Silent Sky Studios for cheap. Made it a touch less harsh. But still looking at an SM-7B.
Most of the time in music mixing you will cut out the lower frequency just below the sub because those frequencies just make the track sound muddy so 30Hz with a piano shouldn't be a problem since your most likely going to cut those frequencies out anyways.
With the 990, would you suggest buying it over the nt1a in a untreated room using a EYEBALL to take out some of the noise?. Do you think that it would be good enough for recording vocals with Music, because I am thinking of going with the 990. Thanks
For vocal recordings in music, the NT1A sits better in the mix, than the mxl 990. Voiceover acting may be different, but in music, there is a difference between these 2 mics.. I can say from experience because ive had both... i loved my mxl 990, but i was still anxious to upgrade.
The MXL sounds crisper but it's also a bit harsher. I find the Rode's highs smoother. I wonder how an AKG C3000 or P420 would fare against those.
Thank you. This is the video I needed to make up my mind 👌🏼
Can you test the MXL 770? Does it have the same noise that the 990 has?
the case for the rode is a welded case, the MXL case is milled, I could probably make a copy of it on an industrial lathe if i had the CAD data
Mike, I almost watched all your videos. You deserve way more subscribers than you have. Just one thing mate, if someday you feel people don't need your channel anymore, know that they always will :) Barely anybody explains so well nowadays. Please stay and grow for us all who have much respect for you. Good luck :)
Awesome comparison, I would anyday go with the Marshall :) (knowing it is not a true large diaphragm), because nt1a will always sounds like a sh*t.
Avi D Gupta
For what it’s worth, this Marshall mic is rather noisy (self-noise = 20dB). Marshall does make some better mics. Not sure why they’re so affordable. Maybe because people don’t know MXL is the Marshall amp company? Not sure but some of their mics are really good.
Mike, thanks for the comparison. That noise floor is almost ‘whistling’ quietly behind your voice so I did wonder if it has some kind of problem. It almost sounds like a refrigerator ......
The difference between the Rode and MXL in noise was quite significant and it’s a pity about that. There’s not a computer behind it is there?
Also the polar pattern states cardioid, but the diagram on the spec sheet shows slightly super cardioid! That’s why I was wondering about a computer behind it?
The other odd thing is that noise is quoted twice. 80dB and -20dBa which doesn’t exactly add up. You’d expect a mic at -20 to be 74dB, not 80.
Very puzzling.
Cheers
Ian
I got mine out Mike, and I don’t get that high pitched sound either. Maybe quality control?
I have a bunch of 990's. They are a great utility mic.
I think they sound Realy The 100% same xD? the MXL are like 5% different in the highs
thanks for the massage in my hears with this voice and the tips
Very helpful review, thanks so much!
Great comparison Sir
If you can get your hands on one, try and check out the MXL 770 as well. I'd loan you mine but shipping it from the UK would probably be more hassle than it's worth, plus I kind of need it for VA :P
Nt1a is just so quiet. When turned up you can really hear the noise floor on the xml.
Could you do a review of the Shure PG27? I know it's discontinued but I figure one of the other booth junkies has one you could borrow.
Really well done Good information great attitude wonderful spirit for what should be such a bland topic I was interested the whole time thank you