@@PiefacePete46 From the video, it’s clear that the Chinese robotic dog wins. Without any preconceived notions, acknowledging the facts and giving some praise isn’t that hard.
@PiefacePete46 This is a competition carefully designed to test their capacity in difficult situation. As I know, BD Spot won Go1 several years ago. But this time Go2 not only improved a lot its capacity, but also reduced half of its cost. In this video, Go2 is faster, and after fell down, it jumped up immediately well Spot is vevy difficult to stand up. But the price of a BD Spot is 50 times more expensive than a Unitree Go2!
@PiefacePete46 I'm not sure in Olympic Games if u can ask judge and other athletes repeat again and again. But this competition is designed to test their capacity to pass unfamiliar terrain. If u run again and again, it may pass the obstacles by "memory" o "program", instead of by its own observations and judgment.
@@henrykum-nr7bw : Spot: from 74,500 U.S. dollars + unknown cost of arm. VS B2: from 100,000 U.S. dollars VS Go1: from 3,700 U.S. dollars. There are three robots shown here.
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
It's not even about "which robot is better" in the comment section. If Boston Dynamics' models are 30 times more expensive than the Chinese peers' while being of same level of product. It's just trash.
The Uni tree dogs are being deployed in real world situations. Carrying supply up mountains, being SWAT team member of police, retail consumer use etc. this level of penetration means refinement and feedback will be orders of magnitude higher for Unitree. It’s already better than BD in some aspects. It will become light years better in a year or two!
@@angquang2804 At the prices BD charges for its robots, I wonder how many police departments can actually afford to buy them. The US has a real problem with making things affordable even for industrial use.
For supply carrying up mountain. Best are mules. Those toys run on batteries only... mules run on grass... However those robots could be useful with weapons for assaults or amo supply on front lines. My 5cts
Unitree ha sviluppato il suo dog partendo da quello della Boston Dinamic traendo il vantaggio di non partire da zero. Non vedo perchè debba denigrare coloro che hanno creato la base dei concetti dalla quale è potuta poi nascere Unitree ed i suoi prodotti eccellenti.
It sure is impressive. The price of $1300 in some other comments is not correct. The Go1 is from $2700 + $1000 freight. The B2 is from $100,000. The Spot is from $74,500.
@@DccAnhand come back BD much more precise movement while china version are clumsy always hit the wall and noisy movement u can still see the quality over mass produce here
@@ainz1325 bd take forever to stand up, I prefer my robot not fall in the first place. And bd performance do not justify its prices, for the prices of one bd robot, I can buy 10 Unitree robot, why would a consumer choose bd robot when it can't even walk without tripping on itself and 10x more expensive ?
вопрос, как им удалось, так сильно снизить стоимость? если это реальный успех Unitree r&d, то чем и хвала компании и Китаю, а если это очередной промышленный шпионаж, то они просто снимут сливки, конкурент возможно уйдет с рынка, и разработка в целом застопорится на этом. Unitree дата основания 2016. BD - 1992.
Китайские роботы Unitree, похоже, не обладают сложной нейронной сетью. Они больше похожи на детскую игрушку, преодолевающую препятствия, или на роботизированный пылесос. С другой стороны, Spot от Boston Dynamics обладает развитым пространственным восприятием и тщательно планирует каждое движение.
@@50Herosim они сильно различаются. Китайские в основном с упором на маркетинг. Они были внешне слизаны с американских, а по управлению и близко не стоят. Сразу делались маркетологами как игрушка и для образовательных целей. Американские имеют многодесятилетнюю эволюцию развития, сначала от научной разработки, потом к промышленному применению.
Obviously, this road barrier is designed for BD.Appropriate height，The B2 radar is on the back.The horizontal line of radar scanning is inaccurate, while the radar of GO2 is below.It's about to hit the ground.
The cost difference between the BD and Unitree is 1:57. We all know that based on Lanchester's square law, to compensate for 1:3 numerical deficiency, it requires 9x in quality. So 1:57 in cost difference means the BD war hound has to be OVER 3,000 TIMES better just to equalize. In other word, IMPOSSIBLE. Based on cost effectiveness, Unitree is BY FAR the superior war hound.
Impressive performance by BD, but due to the sheer price alone I think the GO2 will have a lot more community developed software in the future (an in turn find more use in real life projects). Often times a large community trumps enterprise grade hardware/software.
Unitree Go2 can only judge the terrain in real time from the ground. It lacks two asynchronous auxiliary terrain detectors. When it walks, the terrain detector first detects whether there is enough space to rise, and then starts to rise 5 meters. In order to support each other, the two detection auxiliary devices should have 1. A mode in which one of the devices fails 2. A mode in which all (two) detection devices work together 3. A mode in which all detection devices fail Back to the topic, the terrain detector scans the surroundings, puts the terrain data into the auxiliary storage for analysis, and then puts it down and retracts the main body. At this time, it is still walking, waiting for the data of the auxiliary device.
Cool video. The Boston dog is more accurate but slower. I think the Boston dog must be scanning multiple times more than the unitree and and so the processing is also longer. The unitree looks faster but not as accurate. Prioritizing recovery from trips vs avoiding mistakes to begin with. I would say if these were weaponized and chasing me. I would not be scared of the Boston dog as much because it's slow. I'll just throw a bunch of junk on the floor and it'll take longer to get past it but the unitree I'd be terrified of because it just scrambles over whatever it is, not caring if it trips or what, and just keeps coming.
It's not really about accuracy, Unitree algo use leg movements in a trial and error way, because it can manage and hold its position much more steadier upon tumbling and tripping.
@ДмитрийЛицкевич-ю1ю But even if a human does not have relevant experience, it is often difficult to tell that it is a swamp from its appearance. I often know when I step on it. The robot may need something else to determine the swamp.
Unitree has a much better price point, but it's wild to me how many people commenting here don't recognize that Spot is actually thinking about what it's doing. Both great machines, but very different from each other besides the form factor.
Boston dynamics has been researching on its robots for at least 20 years. I wonder why they don't come up with some commercially affordable dogs (I do know they have some industrial and military products). To say in another way, even if the BD dog is "smarter", it's still too far away from the general public.
Why BD doesn't have cheap robots? Because like you yourself said, they have been doing research for more than 20 years, bearing all the costs for R&D. China just uses industrial espionage to pillage BD's IP, so of course they can do it cheaper without the research costs. I hope this answers your question.
@dapje2002 I'm afraid that it doesn't answer the whole question. (1) If Unitree did infringe BD's IPs, BD should have filed lawsuits, but I can only find BD tried to sue Ghost robotics. And it brings to (2) If that's not easy to define IP theft in the robotics field, then that's probably explain why BD's ownership has been shifted around. And (3), probably the most important point, high research budget doesn't prevent it from coming up with some commercially affordable products.
@@dapje2002 Whenever China come up with something equivalent or better, we'll see this same old accusation of espionage & IP theft, without presenting any evidence. Go and get yourself understand the actual China, how many STEM graduates & PhDs they produce every year & how much they spend in R&D each year.
Wow boston dynamics your spot's movie are better and smooth and the backward walking is amazing i don't know what happened in the first minute. The other one which similar to your spot's design it's also good
机器狗或机器人的足的形状设计一般有平板，无脚垫，轮式，和圆弧形。弧形的脚垫被实践验证是机器狗最合适各种地形的形状，例如脚不易被卡住，传感器可以多方位感知，减少关节等。不同的脚垫形状适合不同的地形，而且两足或四足对脚垫的要求也不一样。例如，双足机器人用平板脚垫可能比弧形更稳定。Professor Robert J. Full of UC Berkeley专门研究足型设计，如果有兴趣可以看一看： vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/robert-full
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
How many years have you developed from a button mobile phone to the current smartphone? What you think is not impossible. Maybe we may not be able to experience it in our lifetime, but the semi-finished product must also be a very good existence.😂
BYD doesn't beat Tesla in pure EV, they just sells a whole lots of hybrids .....also Starship is a different beast all by itself, China cannot leapfrog from 25 ton payload to 300 ton payload Starship, China haven't master reusability landing from space let alone chopstick catch
Unithree is harder to control it has not so much autopilot helpers. BD spot looks like its easier to control,easier to rotate left/right while standing. On video I see that unitree have problems with rotating on difficult terrain.
Мне интересно другое какая дальность управления в городской застройки. Я бы ещё на них добавил трёх осевую стабилизационную камеру на верху с углом поворота 300°
NS, there is no even such thing as US tech today, every tech and parts even the parts of BD robots are chinese built parts, unitree uses its own tech and software, thats why it is better in performance, while BD one is far behind, also Nvidia is chinese tech, jeson huang is chinese and he found nvidia and every chip and software is developed by chinese there
@@xinyiquan666 China doesn't innovate; they copy what the U.S. already creates. GPUs? Purely an American invention, with Nvidia leading the way. Anyone thinking ethnicity equates to national innovation is delusional. China had zero clue about GPUs until the U.S. developed them first...plain and simple
The differences between the real original genuine robot vs the Chinese copy cats are obvious. The Go2 walked like a drunken cat. The Spot walked with cautions and stabilities.
Only based on the video, Boston Dynamics Spot has waaaaay more refined and elegant movements than the other chinese copycats. It even went backwards at the end! Does spot has rear cameras too? It just looks more refined and better than the competition, truly reflects the quality of it's price. I wouldn't pay less for a teemu robot dog lol.
BD has been around for quite a while, and it’s likely that Chinese researchers have tried to learn from it. However, it’s unclear if BD researchers have made efforts to learn from the Chinese in return.
The founding country of the BD brand has launched many wars and has more than 300 military bases around the world. It is obvious that there is something wrong with one of your organs.
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
China robot dogs have begun to be installed on the battlefield, as well as more advanced combat robot wolves and robot cows. You can search related videos on youtube.😅😅😅
I don't agree with most of comments in this video. i think BD has more mature Robo-Dog technology than Unitree. But, it doesn't mean Unitree is bad, because they have different target market. If we looking at the old Boston Dynamic video about their robodog, we can see that they develop it with AI that make the robot to act like a real dog. I think US army doesn't need a utility robot to act like a real dog with a price tag like BD.They will prefer a simple, cheap Unitree Robot. So, the reason why BD has a pricetag like that is because they aim to reach the scifi level of robot technology like in Sci-fi movies. And their target market are Billionaire's children. That's why they give their robot with real dog AI behavior, etc, that enable their robot to become the family friend at home. But Unitree robot aims for utility and industrial use. So they don't give a lot of nonsense to their robot. As long as their robot proof useful in the field, it's good enough for them. That's why, if US DOD / US Military really need a robot dog, they will ask for a cheaper version of robo dog with cheap price tag and doesn't has real dog AI behavior like what BD have.
![Evolution of Boston Dynamic’s Robots [1992-2023]](/img/n.gif)
Very impressive! The 1300 dollars Go2 is better than the 74500 dollars BD. Unitree will be the next DJI.
@@PiefacePete46 From the video, it’s clear that the Chinese robotic dog wins. Without any preconceived notions, acknowledging the facts and giving some praise isn’t that hard.
@PiefacePete46 This is a competition carefully designed to test their capacity in difficult situation. As I know, BD Spot won Go1 several years ago. But this time Go2 not only improved a lot its capacity, but also reduced half of its cost. In this video, Go2 is faster, and after fell down, it jumped up immediately well Spot is vevy difficult to stand up. But the price of a BD Spot is 50 times more expensive than a Unitree Go2!
@PiefacePete46 I'm not sure in Olympic Games if u can ask judge and other athletes repeat again and again. But this competition is designed to test their capacity to pass unfamiliar terrain. If u run again and again, it may pass the obstacles by "memory" o "program", instead of by its own observations and judgment.
It's typical American product. Over hyped, over priced and ripping off people@@PiefacePete46
@@santiagoH-vo6soObviously, you got a point 👍💪if Olympic rerun all the games .it needs to extend one more month😅
This kind of competitions, no matter you are win or lose, it is good to the whole robotic development and improvement.
Definitely, it's an interesting competition
80,000 U.S. dollars VS. 13,000 U.S. dollars
@@henrykum-nr7bw : Spot: from 74,500 U.S. dollars + unknown cost of arm. VS B2: from 100,000 U.S. dollars VS Go1: from 3,700 U.S. dollars. There are three robots shown here.
but different when the tech is on different hands
Surely there are three robots shown in the video?
0:03 to 3:40 Boston Dynamics Spot
3:41 to 6:00 Unitree B2
6:01 to 8:35 Unitree Go2
Unitree serials got the top medal.
videos?
unitree dog is smaller than spot too, so it has a harder time navigating the course. still, it did a great job, even when its foot got stuck.
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
@@leosv0 BD hype advance can't do better than a toy
@@leosv0 u just cannot accept the failure of BD, hahah, UT algorithm is much better than BD's, BD turn to e-control for short period
It's DJI vs Skydio all over again.
It's not even about "which robot is better" in the comment section. If Boston Dynamics' models are 30 times more expensive than the Chinese peers' while being of same level of product. It's just trash.
Looks like Boston dynamics will be killed by unitree, just as DJI killed skydio.
The Uni tree dogs are being deployed in real world situations. Carrying supply up mountains, being SWAT team member of police, retail consumer use etc. this level of penetration means refinement and feedback will be orders of magnitude higher for Unitree. It’s already better than BD in some aspects. It will become light years better in a year or two!
BD is also deployed in some of US police force too. Beside, BD is designed for industrial, not consumer oriented though.
@@angquang2804 At the prices BD charges for its robots, I wonder how many police departments can actually afford to buy them. The US has a real problem with making things affordable even for industrial use.
For supply carrying up mountain. Best are mules. Those toys run on batteries only... mules run on grass...
However those robots could be useful with weapons for assaults or amo supply on front lines. My 5cts
@@chryoko your american is showing.
But it still doesn't dare to install a payload like the BD dog. Too bad.
One is still at experimental stage, the other is marketed as consumer electronics. You'd know the unit price difference.
Unitree Go2 : 1.600$ and Boston Dynamics spot : 75.000$ 😅
Like electric cars, BYD vs Tesla 😂😂
@@DIY_RC-j2g Tesla has already mass-produced
@@DIY_RC-j2gyou can’t compare Boston D with Tesla . lol BD is not that good. It’s more like DJI vs skydio …
one has an robotic arm payload, one has nothing.
6:08 this is shocking
exactly!! such a cool move and flip back within 1s
BD took 10s to get up
@@dogymal7260 More like 45 seconds from 0:13 to 0:58
Chinese kongfu
Thast also unsettling moves for me... Lol
Biden VS Jackie Chen😂
2016年宇树科技成立时，波士顿动力的机器狗已经会翻跟斗了，几年过去，宇树科技的机器狗已经可以上战场了，波士顿动力的机器狗还在翻跟斗😂😂😂
宇树一直用的电机驱动，波士顿动力这几年才由液压转的电机，波士顿更弱一点很正常
@@正义执行-j1z hydraulic motors are less optimal for electronic robots. they also damage more easily.
波士顿动力走错方向了以前用的液压 现在电池电机技术报复 电力驱动才是未来。
@@正义执行-j1z 洗的真恶心 技术路线出现错误 难道不是落后吗
Unitree ha sviluppato il suo dog partendo da quello della Boston Dinamic traendo il vantaggio di non partire da zero.
Non vedo perchè debba denigrare coloro che hanno creato la base dei concetti dalla quale è potuta poi nascere Unitree ed i suoi prodotti eccellenti.
If I ever need a robot dog to drag me out of a bad situation, I’m calling China - that is one impressive $1300 piece of kit
@@hatchermoney same, if you need drones, you buy DJI. Rather than spending 10x money on other US companies’ models that don’t operate
It sure is impressive. The price of $1300 in some other comments is not correct. The Go1 is from $2700 + $1000 freight. The B2 is from $100,000. The Spot is from $74,500.
BD looked clumsy. That Unitree flip was impressive.
Coz Unitree was much smaller body thus more space
What do you say? BD doesn't hit walls at all.
@@hobit-j4o BD literally trip and fall lol
@@DccAnhand come back BD much more precise movement while china version are clumsy always hit the wall and noisy movement u can still see the quality over mass produce here
@@ainz1325 bd take forever to stand up, I prefer my robot not fall in the first place. And bd performance do not justify its prices, for the prices of one bd robot, I can buy 10 Unitree robot, why would a consumer choose bd robot when it can't even walk without tripping on itself and 10x more expensive ?
Obviously, GO is better than BD, and the price is cheaper
BD is better
Go look at the Chinese robo wolves! This dog is miserable!
@@franklee9353
🤭🤣🤣😂😂
Fail to understand why GO is better? Go has hard time to find the right path and struggle to move smoothly and efficiently.
Sorry. BD is much better. If there is no wall, the Go2 is allready fall dowan outside.
Unitree B2 is a quadruped robot product released by China Unitree Technology on November 3, 2023
Учитывая что китаец в 10 дешевле то он более перспективный
вопрос, как им удалось, так сильно снизить стоимость? если это реальный успех Unitree r&d, то чем и хвала компании и Китаю, а если это очередной промышленный шпионаж, то они просто снимут сливки, конкурент возможно уйдет с рынка, и разработка в целом застопорится на этом. Unitree дата основания 2016. BD - 1992.
60倍便宜
Китайские роботы Unitree, похоже, не обладают сложной нейронной сетью. Они больше похожи на детскую игрушку, преодолевающую препятствия, или на роботизированный пылесос. С другой стороны, Spot от Boston Dynamics обладает развитым пространственным восприятием и тщательно планирует каждое движение.
@leosv0 они не сильно отличаются, всё отличие в уровне маркетинга
@@50Herosim они сильно различаются. Китайские в основном с упором на маркетинг. Они были внешне слизаны с американских, а по управлению и близко не стоят. Сразу делались маркетологами как игрушка и для образовательных целей.
Американские имеют многодесятилетнюю эволюцию развития, сначала от научной разработки, потом к промышленному применению.
Obviously, this road barrier is designed for BD.Appropriate height，The B2 radar is on the back.The horizontal line of radar scanning is inaccurate, while the radar of GO2 is below.It's about to hit the ground.
It was stunning to see the Boston Dynamic dog going backwards and recalling its precise successful steps to its point of origin.
without thinking in logic too, like a train
00:14 Very impressive performance from the now-Korean Company Boston Dynamics after 20 years of R&D.
The cost difference between the BD and Unitree is 1:57. We all know that based on Lanchester's square law, to compensate for 1:3 numerical deficiency, it requires 9x in quality. So 1:57 in cost difference means the BD war hound has to be OVER 3,000 TIMES better just to equalize. In other word, IMPOSSIBLE. Based on cost effectiveness, Unitree is BY FAR the superior war hound.
Impressive performance by BD, but due to the sheer price alone I think the GO2 will have a lot more community developed software in the future (an in turn find more use in real life projects). Often times a large community trumps enterprise grade hardware/software.
Impressive how?
Unitree Go2 can only judge the terrain in real time from the ground. It lacks two asynchronous auxiliary terrain detectors. When it walks, the terrain detector first detects whether there is enough space to rise, and then starts to rise 5 meters. In order to support each other, the two detection auxiliary devices should have
1. A mode in which one of the devices fails
2. A mode in which all (two) detection devices work together
3. A mode in which all detection devices fail
Back to the topic, the terrain detector scans the surroundings, puts the terrain data into the auxiliary storage for analysis, and then puts it down and retracts the main body. At this time, it is still walking, waiting for the data of the auxiliary device.
GO2 is too small, so the obstacles are too high
Boston Dynamics seems more precise, but the different of price between both is too high.
Разный размер роботов и соответственно масштаб полигона. Трасса полосы препятствий должна быть в одинаковом масштабе пропорционально.
You can choose the size of the robot，but you can't change the size of the real life
@@无人区玫瑰 Ты можешь выбрать любые слова для комментария, но не можешь поменять уровень своего интеллекта.
3:42 is Unitree B2, not Unitree GO2
Thanks! You are right! I made a mistake.
80,000 U.S. dollars VS. 13,000 U.S. dollars
what was the first robot doing after falling 😂
Cool video. The Boston dog is more accurate but slower. I think the Boston dog must be scanning multiple times more than the unitree and and so the processing is also longer. The unitree looks faster but not as accurate. Prioritizing recovery from trips vs avoiding mistakes to begin with. I would say if these were weaponized and chasing me. I would not be scared of the Boston dog as much because it's slow. I'll just throw a bunch of junk on the floor and it'll take longer to get past it but the unitree I'd be terrified of because it just scrambles over whatever it is, not caring if it trips or what, and just keeps coming.
是的 小黄狗从来没踩在木梁上。尽管木梁可以足以支持行走。
This road path barrier are build for BD . lol it definitely had practice many time .
It's not really about accuracy, Unitree algo use leg movements in a trial and error way, because it can manage and hold its position much more steadier upon tumbling and tripping.
А если впереди болото? то китайская собачка не раздумывая побежит в отличие от BD
@ДмитрийЛицкевич-ю1ю But even if a human does not have relevant experience, it is often difficult to tell that it is a swamp from its appearance. I often know when I step on it.
The robot may need something else to determine the swamp.
Unitree has a much better price point, but it's wild to me how many people commenting here don't recognize that Spot is actually thinking about what it's doing. Both great machines, but very different from each other besides the form factor.
Boston dynamics has been researching on its robots for at least 20 years. I wonder why they don't come up with some commercially affordable dogs (I do know they have some industrial and military products). To say in another way, even if the BD dog is "smarter", it's still too far away from the general public.
Why BD doesn't have cheap robots? Because like you yourself said, they have been doing research for more than 20 years, bearing all the costs for R&D.
China just uses industrial espionage to pillage BD's IP, so of course they can do it cheaper without the research costs.
I hope this answers your question.
@dapje2002 I'm afraid that it doesn't answer the whole question. (1) If Unitree did infringe BD's IPs, BD should have filed lawsuits, but I can only find BD tried to sue Ghost robotics. And it brings to (2) If that's not easy to define IP theft in the robotics field, then that's probably explain why BD's ownership has been shifted around. And (3), probably the most important point, high research budget doesn't prevent it from coming up with some commercially affordable products.
@@dapje2002 by saying china doing industrial espionage to pillage BD's IP, can you your proof?
Agree with u
@@dapje2002 Whenever China come up with something equivalent or better, we'll see this same old accusation of espionage & IP theft, without presenting any evidence. Go and get yourself understand the actual China, how many STEM graduates & PhDs they produce every year & how much they spend in R&D each year.
Unitree feel like drunken step😂
just like you
Which of them is better on getting petted?
0:06 😅 出门就爬不起来了，波士顿动力这些年都在干嘛
人家忙着开源，把代码翻译成简体中文呢😏
@@gushui China must have took out the part of the code where the dog falls down and can't get up for 45 seconds.
Wasn't it sold to the koreans?
波士顿的狗老了
he walked like J.B 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@robertxu5489 哈哈哈哈,Biden is almost get down from the stage
If they are similar, then the price will determine who win
omg they are adorable
擺明強迫機械狗勞動,大家一定要成立一個,保護機械動物協會,禁止強迫勞動,虐待機械動物💪💪💪
😂😂😂
你整天刷手机，手机要罢工了
智械危机的时候：留这个人类一条命😂
@@alxvideos6634 哈哈哈 虐待手机。 不对是出轨手机，老婆快提出离婚hh
the small one is my favorite
Wow boston dynamics your spot's movie are better and smooth and the backward walking is amazing i don't know what happened in the first minute. The other one which similar to your spot's design it's also good
评论区里的老美太幽默了，要么是硬睁着眼说瞎话说宇树不行，宇树抄袭。要么干脆甩锅韩国人，说韩国公司投资了20年就这本事。另外评论区里没有一个科普两种技术路线的区别的，西方这快乐教育真是害人不浅
BD is better for now as GO is struggling with recognizing lateral horizontally spatial obstructions
NS， BD is no match to none of unitree
ypu mean BD had the idea but failed to work
We already know whos the winner if there’s no wall to stop the robots from falling 😂
Hyundai’s dog is quite expensive 😂
腳墊是不是可以換成可以抓住障礙的關節結構？
机器狗或机器人的足的形状设计一般有平板，无脚垫，轮式，和圆弧形。弧形的脚垫被实践验证是机器狗最合适各种地形的形状，例如脚不易被卡住，传感器可以多方位感知，减少关节等。不同的脚垫形状适合不同的地形，而且两足或四足对脚垫的要求也不一样。例如，双足机器人用平板脚垫可能比弧形更稳定。Professor Robert J. Full of UC Berkeley专门研究足型设计，如果有兴趣可以看一看：
vcresearch.berkeley.edu/faculty/robert-full
World people say that Boston Dynamic spot is really like devil.
Is this pre-trained with same setup or zero-shot?
Asia eating the USA in plain view.
Meanwhile, American diapers have been doing an outstanding job. Job's done!
Aisa stealing American tech again.
Wrong Boston dynamics robot place it feet correctly on surface.
Chinese robot don't know where to place feet
@@Player2blood A matter of weeks.
Keep dreaming and playing poker :)))
Which year did you become a racist?
They are copying USA in plain view, while unable to innovate on their own, i bet the diapers you talk about are yours own.
Go look at the Chinese robo wolves! This dog is miserable!
stay on the topic
有可比性吗？
Boston Dynamics 🔛🔝
Spot was all the rage! When it was revealed back in the days. Sorry Pops
It's obvious BD has an advanced algorithm for Parkinson syndrome and Elderly dementia build in. That's why it's selling for so high.😂
😂😂😂
LOL🤣
the high cost is for Parkinson meds
Inflation is a serious threat to all US products. That 1300$ is very attractive
Unitree wins, perfect.
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
@leosv0 child's toy wins so called advanced spatial awarenesses, lol
Только у меня впечатление, что этим машинкам до живого организма еще с десяток поколений?)
Самые передовые боевые роботы Китая и боевые волки уже начали присоединиться к армии, и поиск на UA-cam включает видео.😅😅😅
How many years have you developed from a button mobile phone to the current smartphone? What you think is not impossible. Maybe we may not be able to experience it in our lifetime, but the semi-finished product must also be a very good existence.😂
Now put someone medieval armor and send him trough😁
我認為黃色更能自動修正運算與穩定性，這是個人認定，黃色更高一籌。
For Moon and Mars explorer they are ready)))
Unitree giving natural dog/animal vibes! Boston Dynamics, NO!
wow, unitree is so impressive. bd is on the other hand, a little disappointing.
Все это еще очень далеко от совершенства. Только представьте насколько легко реальная собака справится с этим. А если еще и спешащая к цели?😂
I think that even if Boston fell once his movement look most precise ….
Thats teleoperated ,not autonomous , see the radiocontrol
sad no US companies....own by chinese and Korean even though BDynamic used to be own by Google.
There is a some guy holding the controller
It's only a matter of time before they beat Starship like BYD beat Tesla🎉😊
BYD doesn't beat Tesla in pure EV, they just sells a whole lots of hybrids .....also Starship is a different beast all by itself, China cannot leapfrog from 25 ton payload to 300 ton payload Starship, China haven't master reusability landing from space let alone chopstick catch
Most of BYD's sales are inside China. When BYD sells more outside of China than Tesla sells outside the US, then we'll talk.
@@aj2228 BYD just began after thy won in China
Unithree is harder to control it has not so much autopilot helpers. BD spot looks like its easier to control,easier to rotate left/right while standing. On video I see that unitree have problems with rotating on difficult terrain.
Can’t you see the price difference?
BD is a luxury toy, only.
god damn, let them fight
I wanna see oil
oilbath fight😂
They are powered by batteries, not gasoline engines.
第一个避开了几乎所有障碍物，第二个踩在障碍物上但不会摔倒
silver one was garbage in comparison to the yellow one !
Need to see lynx from deeprobotics.
Spot robot = weak, intelligent, smart and fragile
Unitree b2 = strong, ability to recover and dumb and roque
现在双方都有更聪明的产品了。视频里的算法太过老旧过时。
Unitree B2-W is way ahead
Unitree is less precise and looks tipsy 😂
Course build for BD
Мне интересно другое какая дальность управления в городской застройки. Я бы ещё на них добавил трёх осевую стабилизационную камеру на верху с углом поворота 300°
If BD is so good why they sold it to the Koreans?
Unitree look more intelligent
Unitree robot is blind?
like You?
All of them are american tech, unitree also rely on american tech eg:LeRobot software, Nvidia Orin
你说出了事实的真相
NS, there is no even such thing as US tech today, every tech and parts even the parts of BD robots are chinese built parts, unitree uses its own tech and software, thats why it is better in performance, while BD one is far behind, also Nvidia is chinese tech, jeson huang is chinese and he found nvidia and every chip and software is developed by chinese there
@@xinyiquan666
China doesn't innovate; they copy what the U.S. already creates. GPUs? Purely an American invention, with Nvidia leading the way. Anyone thinking ethnicity equates to national innovation is delusional. China had zero clue about GPUs until the U.S. developed them first...plain and simple
more like made in Taiwan
@@kkdirafung1489就像台湾自研的无人机飞控系统和马达吗？😂😂😂
Spot is way better and natural.
Modi and Jaishankar can just run their mouths and then all is well.
Four legged animals place there back paw where the front has stepped
如果有下届比赛，波士顿的狗估计连参赛资格都没有了
The differences between the real original genuine robot vs the Chinese copy cats are obvious. The Go2 walked like a drunken cat. The Spot walked with cautions and stabilities.
The sizes are different, so the difficulty of the obstacles is also different.
lmao western copium is crayz
BD dog walked like J.B 🤣🤣🤣🤣
bro’s cooked by copium
Only based on the video, Boston Dynamics Spot has waaaaay more refined and elegant movements than the other chinese copycats. It even went backwards at the end! Does spot has rear cameras too? It just looks more refined and better than the competition, truly reflects the quality of it's price. I wouldn't pay less for a teemu robot dog lol.
Patriotism is a really bad measure of performance.
now we all know how to trap robot dogs hahaha
江山代有才狗出，各领风骚数百年
Go is better
COPY CAT... I MEAN, DOG 😂
Someone is controlling the Unitree dog?
Yes, advanced AI ...United Snakes has NONE!
Right, because everyone is blind
@@blackknight4996 why denigrate Snakes . S for Sneaks
absolutely，BD lost the game
go 2 data is changed by japanese, so it is not fluent
莫名其妙
@@chinagod1 确实是，本来很流畅，他做研究的，一直改里面的数据，研究，弄得很不协调
@@cloverpower4662 only Toyan Hardins
BD has been around for quite a while, and it’s likely that Chinese researchers have tried to learn from it. However, it’s unclear if BD researchers have made efforts to learn from the Chinese in return.
这是两个公司的理念不一样，bd的理念就是造一个产品让更多的人投资，这样公司就非常值钱。宇树的理念是必须要造一个能卖出去的产品，这样公司才能活下去。
To prevent ww3. We should award Boston Dynamics as the champion. MaGA
BD now is a Korean company...
The founding country of the BD brand has launched many wars and has more than 300 military bases around the world. It is obvious that there is something wrong with one of your organs.
很多宇树的水军
很多老米的狗
你买了哪个？🤣就狗叫
The Chinese Unitree robots don't seem to have a sophisticated neural network. It feels more like a child's toy navigating obstacles or a robotic vacuum cleaner. Boston Dynamics' Spot, on the other hand, has advanced spatial awareness and carefully plans each movement.
you mean Child's toy beat BD
China robot dogs have begun to be installed on the battlefield, as well as more advanced combat robot wolves and robot cows. You can search related videos on youtube.😅😅😅
难道是中国抄袭波士顿吗？😅😅😅😅
波士顿动力92年就成立了，研发走液压驱动，后来发现根本涉及不出来，宇树是16年成立，直接用电机驱动，现在已经有3款消费级机械狗了，后来波士顿动力看到在23年把技术路线换成电机，你说谁抄的谁😅😅😅
I don't agree with most of comments in this video. i think BD has more mature Robo-Dog technology than Unitree. But, it doesn't mean Unitree is bad, because they have different target market. If we looking at the old Boston Dynamic video about their robodog, we can see that they develop it with AI that make the robot to act like a real dog. I think US army doesn't need a utility robot to act like a real dog with a price tag like BD.They will prefer a simple, cheap Unitree Robot.
So, the reason why BD has a pricetag like that is because they aim to reach the scifi level of robot technology like in Sci-fi movies. And their target market are Billionaire's children. That's why they give their robot with real dog AI behavior, etc, that enable their robot to become the family friend at home. But Unitree robot aims for utility and industrial use. So they don't give a lot of nonsense to their robot. As long as their robot proof useful in the field, it's good enough for them. That's why, if US DOD / US Military really need a robot dog, they will ask for a cheaper version of robo dog with cheap price tag and doesn't has real dog AI behavior like what BD have.
The US government will never allow a non-allied country to be a supplier of military equipment.