Hi Hendrik, I have 2 steps in the POSC - OB01 and OB04. OB01 somehow has dest bin that of Door(Y940 st type) I maintained SEBA for starting bin as the Staging bin. While confirming OB01 task using GUI(/SCWM/TO_CONF) the dest bin changes to the staging bin while saving and creates OB04 task. But same process when executed with RF, the Starting bin from SEBA is ignored and dest bin deposits HU in Door(Y940 St type). So no OB04 task is created. Why is the system acting differently with GUI and RF environment for same process? Note - TU is not assigned to ODO and I expect to deposit HU to Door bin after OB04)
...having some issues to fully follow your description. Sounds a bit like POSC is not setup accurately. In general, desktop and mobile transactions might behave differently in the context of storage control as the HU as such (here the pick-HU) is the object that can carry storage process related information throughout the different steps (sitting in the header). Might not be applicable in case you simply confirm product WTs via the desktop tx. Would need to understand your process E2E but I do not have capacity to provide more consulting via this platform these days. Sorry about that!
Hi, Thank you for sharing your insights. Did you consider ASR in Loading Process? Complex Loading via WTs is now supported in ASR 2023 if I remeber correctly (might be earlier - not sure). As we also can register the arrival at a door in ASR via App "Load or unload Freight Orders" I am curious if WT creation also works in one way or the other as PPF-Action for TU cant work because we do not have a TU. During writing I recognise that this question is not related to bin-determination - more to WT creation in POSC but maybe you already had an eye on this topic. BR Benjamin
Hi Benjamin. Thanks for your follow-up here. I did not consider any kind of TM integration at all while looking at the options here. Good point actually. Should have mentioned this - I assume you are not the only one missing some hints in that direction...
Thanks for making the video
Hi Hendrik, I have 2 steps in the POSC - OB01 and OB04. OB01 somehow has dest bin that of Door(Y940 st type) I maintained SEBA for starting bin as the Staging bin. While confirming OB01 task using GUI(/SCWM/TO_CONF) the dest bin changes to the staging bin while saving and creates OB04 task.
But same process when executed with RF, the Starting bin from SEBA is ignored and dest bin deposits HU in Door(Y940 St type). So no OB04 task is created. Why is the system acting differently with GUI and RF environment for same process?
Note - TU is not assigned to ODO and I expect to deposit HU to Door bin after OB04)
...having some issues to fully follow your description. Sounds a bit like POSC is not setup accurately. In general, desktop and mobile transactions might behave differently in the context of storage control as the HU as such (here the pick-HU) is the object that can carry storage process related information throughout the different steps (sitting in the header). Might not be applicable in case you simply confirm product WTs via the desktop tx. Would need to understand your process E2E but I do not have capacity to provide more consulting via this platform these days. Sorry about that!
Hi,
Thank you for sharing your insights.
Did you consider ASR in Loading Process?
Complex Loading via WTs is now supported in ASR 2023 if I remeber correctly (might be earlier - not sure).
As we also can register the arrival at a door in ASR via App "Load or unload Freight Orders" I am curious if WT creation also works in one way or the other as PPF-Action for TU cant work because we do not have a TU.
During writing I recognise that this question is not related to bin-determination - more to WT creation in POSC but maybe you already had an eye on this topic.
BR
Benjamin
Hi Benjamin. Thanks for your follow-up here. I did not consider any kind of TM integration at all while looking at the options here. Good point actually. Should have mentioned this - I assume you are not the only one missing some hints in that direction...