@@CrazyDee279 What is happening in Ukraine is on scope and scale which NAT0 was not even able to imagine and has no answer to it. NAT0 has almost no ammo left, no artillerry , no tanks, no missilles to stand up Russia. Imagine, U. K. , or some people in U.K. want to fight Russia directly while only having 40(!) Chalanger tanks in working order :) Ridicul*us NAT0 is a paper tiger. NAT0 spent 2O years learning how to fight Afghan wedding parties and Iraqi villagers, because that is pretty much what NAT0 was doing. NAT0 forgot how to do a large scale ground combat. NAT0 even has no means to do large scale combat. China is there for Russia, Russia is there for China.... Who is there for USA? United Kingdom with their 40(!) Chalenger tanks in working order ??? Or Germany? Germany is not only 100% out of ammo, but on the top of that Germany was even bombed by USA!!!!(Nord Stream) Ridicul*us NAT0, unfortunately still able to make mess around the globe !!! Recently we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world..
LOL. Thank you for a good laugh. This day was dragging, but then I read your comment about NATO being unable to "stand up to Russia" and I couldn't help but laugh. The conflict with Ukraine has shown Russia to be both a belligerent but inept foe. No wonder why Putin is so afraid of NATO approaching Russia's (expanding) borders - NATO would CRUSH them in a conventional conflict. (In a nuclear conflict, Lord-forbid, we'd all die. Hopefully, Australia would save the world, cause they would be the only ones left.) @@mirekslechta7161
@@AnthonyCelata What is happening in Ukraine is on scope and scale which NAT0 was not even able to imagine and has no answer to it. NAT0 has almost no ammo left, no artillerry , no tanks, no missilles to stand up Russia. Imagine, U. K. , or some people in U.K. want to fight Russia directly while only having 40(!) Chalanger tanks in working order :) Ridicul*us NAT0 is a paper tiger. NAT0 spent 2O years learning how to fight Afghan wedding parties and Iraqi villagers, because that is pretty much what NAT0 was doing. NAT0 forgot how to do a large scale ground combat. NAT0 even has no means to do large scale combat. China is there for Russia, Russia is there for China.... Who is there for USA? United Kingdom with their 40(!) Chalenger tanks in working order ??? Or Germany? Germany is not only 100% out of ammo, but on the top of that Germany was even bombed by USA!!!!(Nord Stream) Ridicul*us NAT0, unfortunately still able to make mess around the globe !!! Recently we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world..
Russia always had flat nozzles through yak-36/38/141 program but never implemented, Read the internal report from Lockheed's purchase of yak vtol/stovl thrust vectoring technology and Soyuz Corp who built many components of yak.
At 2:47...do they test these aircraft against dud missiles? Wouldn't that be dangerous since the kinetic energy of the dud missile could still damage the aircraft and cause it to crash.
the philippines and russia are friend country if the ukrine and russai are have war the philippines are out for that conflict betwen russia and ukrine the philippines are good friend to every country thats why if the philippines are buying to acquire that SU 57 of russia there is no problem becouse its part of buiseness only nothig else but i was thinking can you ask the russia if there are offer the SU 57 if the philippines want to acquire and buy the SU 57 can russia aggree and approve for selling and transfer for the philippines that SU 57 advance fighter jet🤔
Плоское сопло имеет на 15% хуже эффективность и регулируемый вектор тяги только в одной плоскости.Для сохранения тяги нужно форсировать двигатель что в свою очередь снизит ресурс.Что и произошло с F22.Польза от плоского сопла только одна меньшая заметность в инфракрасном диапазоне.Так что вряд ли на СУ57 будет такое сопло. The flat nozzle has a 15% lower efficiency and an adjustable thrust vector in only one plane.To maintain traction, you need to boost the engine, which in turn will reduce the resource.Which is what happened with the F22.The advantage of a flat nozzle is only one less noticeable in the infrared range.So it is unlikely that the SU57 will have such a nozzle.
Так что же произошло с Раптором?Насколько уменьшился ресурс двигателя?Вот почитай сначала,а потом сделай вывод.И что это за "15% хуже эффективность",-это что еще за зверь по имени "эффективность"?Снижение тяги есть,но снижение заметности является приоритетом для самолета 5-го поколения.И самое главное,-именно в ходе СВО и появилось понимание того,что плоское сопло действительно необходимо,а изменение вектора в вертикальной плоскости достаточно для сохранения высоких маневренных характеристик.Так что абсолютно понятно,что если не выявят критичных недостатков конструкции такого сопла,то именно с ним и будет производиться изд.30.
@@ПавелДов-п1ц Ради этих 15 процентов пришлось форсировать двигатель уменьшив термозазоры что привело к ограничению температуры эксплуатации, Раптор как и F35 можно использовать только в сухую погоду не ниже +15, ресурс двигателя сократился в два раза, для запуска в холодную погоду используется машина подогрева, большой фен. Это и объясняет крайне малые часы налёта этих самолётов и неиспользование в боевых условиях.У F35 ещё большие проблемы? Так как у него один двигатель то при попадании большого количества воды двигатель выходит из строя, им запрещено летать в дождливую погоду и пересекать океан. А всего та какие то 15% тяги.
@@sermoz2362 Что за чушь вы тут написали?Посмотрите на базу базирования F-22 Элмендорф-Ричардсон, Анкоридж на Аляске.О Боже,с кем я говорю.Не пиши больше,что бы не выставлять себя полнейшим идиотом.
If these are real changes, the robbing of Russia's upgrade budget for the Su-57 GUARANTEES that the new Su-57 will experience major failures due to the substitution of inferior parts and materials just as has been done to Russia's tanks, cannons, warships, airplanes, ammunitions, etc. Russia is a nation that can't even provide her soldiers with decent food, weapons, ammunition, uniforms, and training. How can Russia actually improve the Su-57? Did Russia farm this out to the Iranians? Actually. this story is very likely cheap propaganda Russia spews out, just like they hide the 300,000 Russian soldiers who already have died in the Ukrainian invasion.
@@Gusfer-ze8lw Только полный идиот может считать,что самолет с внешними подвесками может иметь ЭПР ниже чем самолет с внутренними отсеками вооружения.Передавайте привет "американским агенствам".С пропагандистами и идиотами вести разговор бесполезно.Не отвечайте мне больше.
interesting that this propaganda piece ignores the Su-57's major stealth design and manufacturing weaknesses. The flat nozzles are not a major factor or improvement in the area of stealth or air dominance. Make no mistake to ignore that the Su-57 remains a medium observable jet that can still be detected from over 100 miles away while F-22, F-35, F-15, F-16 jets with the new AIM-260 missiles can see, launch, and hit the Su-57 before it knows a missile is coming to destroy it. Under modern aerial warfare missions, aerial dogfights no longer occur because missiles are so much faster, accurate, and deadlier. Those who can see first, shoot first, will kill first. EVEN with the new engines and exhaust design, the Su-57 remains median observable which means it will be shot at, hit first, and destroyed first. This is why aerial dogfights have become extinct.
Ты сам замерял ЭПР СУ-57?Он реально действует в боевых условиях ,при этом очень эффективен против ПВО,включая ЗРК Петриот.Это тебе о чем то говорит?Твой комментарий,это ничем не обоснованное мнение дилетанта,а значит просто пропаганда.
Russian tanks were supposed to be the most powerful in the world but they blow up like biscuits with toy drones. Kinzal missiles were impregnable but they are shot down like ducks. ???????
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 so it copied the f22 raptor. Su57 fellon will not be 3D trust vectors it will be 2D trust vector like the raptor. Flat nozzle only goes 2D vector
NATO fanboys when they realize that 2 aircraft having the same very specific needs, and having to deal with the same laws of physics will inevitably look similar:
"Копия" в реальных боевых условиях уничтожает ПВО,включая ЗРК Петриот,а у F22 только две победы,-одна это уничтоженный аэростат,а вторая это бюджет США.
I Think Previous Su57 Engines was better in Manouver because new engine maybe more stealthy but less maneuverable (just look at shape of first engine vs new ones) Because the previous Engines were round and narrow and widen and rotate in infinite directions, but the new motors may be quieter and stealthier, but they are not round and only rotate on 6 axes, so its maneuverability will definitely decrease.
Unlike the repair shop workers known as 'F', this is not made from recycled US. nylon stockings but from Putin-Bear-titanium.
im not wonders RUSSIA will increasing su57 productions speed soon coz Russian industries having lots expertise and can solving all issues soon
The key is shit what are you talking about
Russia is huge superpower and will always be !!!!
LMAO
@@CrazyDee279 What is happening in Ukraine is on scope and scale which NAT0 was not even able to imagine and has no answer to it. NAT0 has almost no ammo left, no artillerry , no tanks, no missilles to stand up Russia. Imagine, U. K. , or some people in U.K. want to fight Russia directly while only having 40(!) Chalanger tanks in working order :) Ridicul*us NAT0 is a paper tiger. NAT0 spent 2O years learning how to fight Afghan wedding parties and Iraqi villagers, because that is pretty much what NAT0 was doing. NAT0 forgot how to do a large scale ground combat. NAT0 even has no means to do large scale combat. China is there for Russia, Russia is there for China.... Who is there for USA? United Kingdom with their 40(!) Chalenger tanks in working order ??? Or Germany? Germany is not only 100% out of ammo, but on the top of that Germany was even bombed by USA!!!!(Nord Stream) Ridicul*us NAT0, unfortunately still able to make mess around the globe !!! Recently we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world..
LOL. Thank you for a good laugh. This day was dragging, but then I read your comment about NATO being unable to "stand up to Russia" and I couldn't help but laugh.
The conflict with Ukraine has shown Russia to be both a belligerent but inept foe. No wonder why Putin is so afraid of NATO approaching Russia's (expanding) borders - NATO would CRUSH them in a conventional conflict. (In a nuclear conflict, Lord-forbid, we'd all die. Hopefully, Australia would save the world, cause they would be the only ones left.) @@mirekslechta7161
@@mirekslechta7161 LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh shit I almost fell off my chair laughing so hard!!!!
@@AnthonyCelata What is happening in Ukraine is on scope and scale which NAT0 was not even able to imagine and has no answer to it. NAT0 has almost no ammo left, no artillerry , no tanks, no missilles to stand up Russia. Imagine, U. K. , or some people in U.K. want to fight Russia directly while only having 40(!) Chalanger tanks in working order :) Ridicul*us NAT0 is a paper tiger. NAT0 spent 2O years learning how to fight Afghan wedding parties and Iraqi villagers, because that is pretty much what NAT0 was doing. NAT0 forgot how to do a large scale ground combat. NAT0 even has no means to do large scale combat. China is there for Russia, Russia is there for China.... Who is there for USA? United Kingdom with their 40(!) Chalenger tanks in working order ??? Or Germany? Germany is not only 100% out of ammo, but on the top of that Germany was even bombed by USA!!!!(Nord Stream) Ridicul*us NAT0, unfortunately still able to make mess around the globe !!! Recently we could see the "quality" of USA´s weapons in counterofensive in Ukraine. The only things which are remarkable about those guns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which these are being wiped out... Russian weapons are superior at all levels. USA only has the most expensive military in the world, while Russia has the strongest army in the world and the most experienced army in the world..
Russia always had flat nozzles through yak-36/38/141 program but never implemented, Read the internal report from Lockheed's purchase of yak vtol/stovl thrust vectoring technology and Soyuz Corp who built many components of yak.
The beauty of mother Russia 🇷🇺 technology 😎
엄청난 기술의 Su-57
At 2:47...do they test these aircraft against dud missiles? Wouldn't that be dangerous since the kinetic energy of the dud missile could still damage the aircraft and cause it to crash.
AL-51F1 not 31 only the 51f1 have the 2D nozzle!
Super Sukhoi SU-30SM-2 is the best.
Mother Russia 🇷🇺 ❤️
uraaa
Too many ads to delete the app itself no other way
😂🎉😂🎉here the comments are Ginius
the philippines and russia are friend country if the ukrine and russai are have war the philippines are out for that conflict betwen russia and ukrine the philippines are good friend to every country thats why if the philippines are buying to acquire that SU 57 of russia there is no problem becouse its part of buiseness only nothig else but i was thinking can you ask the russia if there are offer the SU 57 if the philippines want to acquire and buy the SU 57 can russia aggree and approve for selling and transfer for the philippines that SU 57 advance fighter jet🤔
WTF you talking about ?
Плоское сопло имеет на 15% хуже эффективность и регулируемый вектор тяги только в одной плоскости.Для сохранения тяги нужно форсировать двигатель что в свою очередь снизит ресурс.Что и произошло с F22.Польза от плоского сопла только одна меньшая заметность в инфракрасном диапазоне.Так что вряд ли на СУ57 будет такое сопло.
The flat nozzle has a 15% lower efficiency and an adjustable thrust vector in only one plane.To maintain traction, you need to boost the engine, which in turn will reduce the resource.Which is what happened with the F22.The advantage of a flat nozzle is only one less noticeable in the infrared range.So it is unlikely that the SU57 will have such a nozzle.
Так что же произошло с Раптором?Насколько уменьшился ресурс двигателя?Вот почитай сначала,а потом сделай вывод.И что это за "15% хуже эффективность",-это что еще за зверь по имени "эффективность"?Снижение тяги есть,но снижение заметности является приоритетом для самолета 5-го поколения.И самое главное,-именно в ходе СВО и появилось понимание того,что плоское сопло действительно необходимо,а изменение вектора в вертикальной плоскости достаточно для сохранения высоких маневренных характеристик.Так что абсолютно понятно,что если не выявят критичных недостатков конструкции такого сопла,то именно с ним и будет производиться изд.30.
@@ПавелДов-п1ц Ради этих 15 процентов пришлось форсировать двигатель уменьшив термозазоры что привело к ограничению температуры эксплуатации, Раптор как и F35 можно использовать только в сухую погоду не ниже +15, ресурс двигателя сократился в два раза, для запуска в холодную погоду используется машина подогрева, большой фен. Это и объясняет крайне малые часы налёта этих самолётов и неиспользование в боевых условиях.У F35 ещё большие проблемы? Так как у него один двигатель то при попадании большого количества воды двигатель выходит из строя, им запрещено летать в дождливую погоду и пересекать океан. А всего та какие то 15% тяги.
@@sermoz2362 Что за чушь вы тут написали?Посмотрите на базу базирования F-22 Элмендорф-Ричардсон, Анкоридж на Аляске.О Боже,с кем я говорю.Не пиши больше,что бы не выставлять себя полнейшим идиотом.
If these are real changes, the robbing of Russia's upgrade budget for the Su-57 GUARANTEES that the new Su-57 will experience major failures due to the substitution of inferior parts and materials just as has been done to Russia's tanks, cannons, warships, airplanes, ammunitions, etc. Russia is a nation that can't even provide her soldiers with decent food, weapons, ammunition, uniforms, and training. How can Russia actually improve the Su-57? Did Russia farm this out to the Iranians? Actually. this story is very likely cheap propaganda Russia spews out, just like they hide the 300,000 Russian soldiers who already have died in the Ukrainian invasion.
it´s not even really stealthy. it's just a pretty 4th gen jet
Ты сам замерял ЭПР?Твой комментарий,-это просто сотрясение воздуха.
@ПавелДов-п1ц The size of the radar's cross section has already been calculated by American agencies and is larger than the old F15
@@Gusfer-ze8lw Только полный идиот может считать,что самолет с внешними подвесками может иметь ЭПР ниже чем самолет с внутренними отсеками вооружения.Передавайте привет "американским агенствам".С пропагандистами и идиотами вести разговор бесполезно.Не отвечайте мне больше.
interesting that this propaganda piece ignores the Su-57's major stealth design and manufacturing weaknesses. The flat nozzles are not a major factor or improvement in the area of stealth or air dominance. Make no mistake to ignore that the Su-57 remains a medium observable jet that can still be detected from over 100 miles away while F-22, F-35, F-15, F-16 jets with the new AIM-260 missiles can see, launch, and hit the Su-57 before it knows a missile is coming to destroy it.
Under modern aerial warfare missions, aerial dogfights no longer occur because missiles are so much faster, accurate, and deadlier. Those who can see first, shoot first, will kill first. EVEN with the new engines and exhaust design, the Su-57 remains median observable which means it will be shot at, hit first, and destroyed first. This is why aerial dogfights have become extinct.
Твое очередное бла бла может сыграть злую шутку в украине, только пожалуйста приезжай туда.
Ты сам замерял ЭПР СУ-57?Он реально действует в боевых условиях ,при этом очень эффективен против ПВО,включая ЗРК Петриот.Это тебе о чем то говорит?Твой комментарий,это ничем не обоснованное мнение дилетанта,а значит просто пропаганда.
Russian tanks were supposed to be the most powerful in the world but they blow up like biscuits with toy drones. Kinzal missiles were impregnable but they are shot down like ducks. ???????
Už si sa zobudil alebo ešte stále snívaš.😂
@@54jenzen Что бывает с человеком, когда он добровольно начинает есть говно, потому что так мухи сказали. подарим ему цветок на могилку.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 so it copied the f22 raptor. Su57 fellon will not be 3D trust vectors it will be 2D trust vector like the raptor. Flat nozzle only goes 2D vector
The su57 nozzles already only move in a single axis
Ну что там предсказатели? Как же вы достали, знаете больше конструкторов этих самолётов.
How can you copy something you already had?
Hmmm F22 copy
Not at all by all technical/military solutions/purposes.
Price?
NATO fanboys when they realize that 2 aircraft having the same very specific needs, and having to deal with the same laws of physics will inevitably look similar:
Copy? Ahahahaha!
"Копия" в реальных боевых условиях уничтожает ПВО,включая ЗРК Петриот,а у F22 только две победы,-одна это уничтоженный аэростат,а вторая это бюджет США.
Fake news about russ n others delete the utube appa support 😮
cry cry
I Think Previous Su57 Engines was better in Manouver because new engine maybe more stealthy but less maneuverable (just look at shape of first engine vs new ones) Because the previous Engines were round and narrow and widen and rotate in infinite directions, but the new motors may be quieter and stealthier, but they are not round and only rotate on 6 axes, so its maneuverability will definitely decrease.
What crap !