Alauddin Khaliji famous Afghan warlord of medieval times with his massive empire which stretched throughout the Indian Subcontinent. He was an Afghan who came from the infamous Ghilzai tribe of Pashtuns and at the time of his reign was denounced by Turkic people and labeled as an Afghan (for all of the pan Turk crybabies) he came from the same tribe as Mirwais Hotak, founder of the Hotak dynasty which conquered most of Iran and even defeated the Ottomans, considered by many as the Grandfather “nika” of Afghanistan. Other legendary ruler from this tribe were Sher Shah Suri who formed the Suri empire and Ibrahim Lodhi the founder of Lodhi dynasty, one of the many dynasties of the delhi sultanate.
One of my pet peeves is the rampant miss use of the word "decimated" by that account the force being discussed was annihilated. Decimation was originally a Roman mass punishment for an entire unit; every tenth man was executed. Decimation now more accurately used would imply a unit took heavy casualties but was still more or less intact as a unit.
Dlso you mean Mongols were annihilated or decimated in India? Sometime they were decimated while others they were annihilated when their commanders were captured and brought to Dehli. Their entire force was annihilated at the battle of Amroha.
At this point in time, it's really a contronym, a word that is its own opposite, like sanction, literal, let, cleave and many other examples. Words can change their meanings over time
@@srshahwaziri7750 Kya vo akamak Gangez khan(1206- 1227) Yani Gangeshwar 🔱Quan tha? Ya Islam ☪️ parivartit? Asli Khan tho Mongol hein. Baki jo unse parajit vo huen Naqli khan. Aslii Khan ki Astha Sanatan Tengrism 🔱.
There's no evidence of khalaj tribes turkic They were living in India from past 900 years also the khalji dynasty mostly consisted of khokhar and jat army. They followed buddhism and shavaism before their convertion to Islam. They were converted during arab and Mahmud of ghazni conquest.
You shohld have discussed battle of Amroha also where Mongols were annihilated. The Battle of Amroha was a significant conflict that took place in 1305 in the town of Amroha, located in northern India, during the Delhi Sultanate period. It was fought between the forces of the Delhi Sultanate, led by General Malik Kafur, and the Mongol invaders. Background During the reign of Alauddin Khilji (1296-1316), the Delhi Sultan Alauddin was determined to repel these invasions and secure the northern borders of his sultanate. The Mongols had previously conducted raids into the Delhi Sultanate, which often led to severe losses for both sides. After a recent series of incursions, Alauddin assigned General Malik Kafur and other commanders to launch a decisive defense against the Mongols. The Battle The Mongols, under the leadership of Ali Beg and Tartaq, advanced into the Delhi Sultanate territories and reached Amroha. However, Alauddin's forces, led by prominent generals such as Malik Kafur and Ghazi Malik (later known as Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq), were well-prepared for the confrontation. The Delhi Sultanate army strategically positioned itself and managed to surround the Mongol forces, preventing their escape. The battle was brutal and marked by intense close-quarters combat. The Sultanate's forces decisively defeated the Mongols, capturing and executing many of them. This victory at Amroha was instrumental in weakening Mongol ambitions in the Indian subcontinent and reinforced Alauddin Khilji’s reputation as a powerful ruler capable of defending his realm. The battle highlighted the strategic and military capabilities of the Delhi Sultanate and helped solidify its dominance in the region for years to come.
We never credit the Delhi sultanate of protecting the Hindi mainland from the mongols for over 100 years, yes they imposed taxes including religious tax but to what end , to keep mongols from spreading the savagery
The Delhi Sultanate period was marked by episodes of violence, religious persecution, and economic exploitation. Temple Destruction: Many rulers, such as Alauddin Khilji and Firuz Shah Tughlaq, destroyed Hindu temples and idols as acts of religious dominance. Notable sites like the Somnath temple were plundered for wealth. Forced Conversions and Persecution: Non-Muslims faced persecution, including forced conversions to Islam. The imposition of the jizya tax on Hindus and other non-Muslims further marginalized them. Firuz Shah Tughlaq is known for forcibly converting thousands. Massacres: Military campaigns often led to mass killings. Alauddin Khilji’s conquest of Chittor resulted in the slaughter of thousands of civilians. Timur's sack of Delhi in 1398, though during a weakened Sultanate, resulted in over 100,000 deaths. Economic Oppression: Heavy taxation under rulers like Alauddin Khilji impoverished farmers and common people. Revenue systems often exploited rural populations to fund military campaigns. Slavery: Firuz Shah institutionalized slavery on a large scale, establishing a department specifically for managing enslaved Indians. He is said to have enslaved over 180,000 individuals during his reign. The Hindu Kush mountain range, located in modern-day Afghanistan. The name "Hindu Kush" is translated as "Hindu Killer." This name is believed to have originated due to the high mortality rate of Hindu slaves transported through these mountains. Many slaves, captured during Sultanate campaigns in northern India, were marched across the treacherous terrain to be sold in Central Asian markets. Probably our ancestors have credited more than enough.........
@@warmsurfing This is a excuse for all invaders That the climate was unsuitable from Alexender to the Muslim invaders , Indian were losing there shine after being on Top for 15000 years, Muslims only ruled for less than 800 years & were defeated, look at there condition now , Hindus adapted to the circumstances & came out on top, but we had one weakness that is we had self serving traitors amongst us , though the congress did good in the beginning, but lost it shine & did the same what others had done before them.
Salut to zafar Khan..and Aladdin khilji.. Blanket statement No body in East or in West..did what's India did..is Right..100% Right Ain jalut.. didn't face invasion..they were dealing with a unit of Halagu Khan.... Here tremors in every body hearts..as if tsunami is heading towards India..this described that situations correctly...one like to them
@@user418-kn3nh you should not be proud & happy all these guys were forgin invaders, it was a dark period in Indian all the Muslim invaders forced conversion that’s why we have so many people following Forigen religion
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about several invaded attempted by Mongolian campaigns towards India north India...and failed....thanks for sharing this magnificent video
Indian Sultans had better equipped and well trained militatary that inhiliated mongol forces. There may be ktger factors too but the main strong reason mongols got defeated was they faced a superior enemy first time. Not only India, Mongols were beaten in Levant by Egyptian Sultan because of the same reason, the suprior military of Sultan was successful against savage Mongols who merdly relied on superior numbers. Egypt and Indian kings adopted the brilliant strategy of nuetralising Mongols' superior numbers and surprise attacks. Neither superior numbers nor their surprise attacks worked on both fronts.
@anandawijesinghe6298 Nope. They had small band for pillage, chaos and fein retreat while gheir main force js always waiting for ambush when the enemy force chase them. They usually came in 30000 to 300000 in numbers depending on the area of opponent. In case of India they could not outnumber their enemy. Instead they were trapped and surrounded and annihilated at tge battle of Amroha. Other than history books people still talk about mongols who were like an evil force coming in huge numbers, they were so dirty that people could smell them from 20 KM away.
Mahabharat was compiled in around BCE 3. Its existence can be traced to even older dated but final compilation finished in BCE 3. The sanskrit name of India is Bharat. Lets move on, BCE 300, Chandragupta maurya ruled all over India from modern day afghanistan to mayanmar. What you believe is a narrative, what i have just mentioned is history. Do a google search. Do you just care about narratives or do you really follow history? I mean, why this need to prove that India never existed when we literally have books written in BCE 3 referring Bharat as a country bound by sea to the south and himalayas to the north. Why do you feel this urge to deny us our own history when it's literally out in the open and you can literally read about it right now as i type this. India is not indian language, India is english used by britishers to refer bharat. Again, where do you get all this info about "hindutva" narrative? You are literlly making a joke of your historical knowledge. I invite you to do a google search about "Bharat" and many many books written on it near 5BCE TO 250CE.
reference of Jalal Uddin Khaurizmi in the beginning. after initially losing to Mongols and escaping to Punjab, Jalal Uddin spent rest of his life fighting and winning little skirmishes against Mangols and requested help from across Asia and Arabia but was turned down by Beghdad Sultan. he died in obscurity.
There was no India then . It was a later British colonial invention. No Indian subcontinent, rather South Asia Muslim rulers who brought civilized behavior and human equality defeated the savage Mongols
Delhi empire was really an indian empire (saw some comments against ). Being muslims dosent mean they were not indians. Capital was delhi, rulling population were indians, taxpayers were indians, much of army contains indians(hindus, muslims alike), married to indian prince and princess. rise of indo-islamic art and architecture.
Come on - let's stop re inventing things. The Dehli Sultanate were Turkic rulers who were also invaders. They ruled the natives. These Turks limited the Mongols. Where are the Indians you are talking about. Just accept facts as they are. You can't re invent what you want. You can celebrate the Turkish victory over the Mongol victory if you want - both armies had a great number of Central Asian Turkic warriors. There was no "India" then so what "Indian" army ? Listen to the names of the leaders of the armies of the so called Indians who are in fact ruling Turks who were invaders themselves.
The Delhi Sultans primarily considered themselves Turkic, particularly during the early stages of the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526). This is because many of the ruling dynasties and nobles of the Sultanate were of Turkic origin. Persian was the court language of the Sultanate, but many rulers and elites were fluent in Turkic dialects, which were part of their heritage. Turkic customs and traditions influenced their court practices, military organization, and governance. The Turkic identity was reinforced by their reliance on Turkic soldiers and commanders, many of whom were part of the Mamluk slave-soldier system. As the Sultanate expanded and incorporated diverse populations, the rulers began identifying more broadly with Islamic universalism rather than solely with their Turkic roots. However, the early rulers, especially those in the Mamluk and Khilji dynasties, strongly identified with their Turkic heritage, which shaped the foundational years of the Sultanate. Why do you apologists need to bring "Indian Muslim loyal to India" whining every time? Try to be objective. Present day Indian Muslims have nothing to do with Turkic colonizers, same way Indian Christians have nothing to do with European colonizers. BTW, Britishers defended India from many Afghan invasions, that doesn't make then "Indian empire". We were under foreign occupation, just accept the facts.
All that knowledge of Mongol tactics did not prevent the Mongols from using their favorite tactic successfully. What really won the battle was that the Mongols lost confidence when they saw how difficult it was to just beat one of the armies and knew that the tactic would not work any more. This underscores the value of bravery but more importantly that discipline is the paramount attribute as if the orders were followed casualties would have been much less.
The Mongols were defeated by several powers, including the Japanese, the Delhi Sultans, and the Egyptian Mamluks. After the destruction of Baghdad in 1258, the Mongols' dominance began to decline. The Caliphate was a sacred institution for Muslims, and the Mongols' attack on it provoked strong reactions from key Muslim rulers, particularly the Mamluks of Egypt and Berke Khan of the Golden Horde, both of whom recognized the authority of the Caliph (خلیفہ کی بیعت). When Hulagu Khan attacked Baghdad and killed the Abbasid Caliph, he set the stage for his own downfall. The outrage over this act of sacrilege led both Berke Khan and the Mamluks to unite against him. Hulagu’s forces suffered multiple defeats, including a significant loss at the Battle of Ayn Jalut in 1260 at the hands of the Mamluks. Eventually, a member of Ahl al-Bayt and the Abbasid family was found and appointed as the Caliph. The Caliphate was reestablished in Cairo by the Mamluks, preserving its symbolic authority within the Muslim world. This revived Caliphate remained a central institution for the Muslim world until 1517 when it was abolished by the Ottoman Sultan Selim I after his conquest of Egypt.
Indians should thank Alaudin khilji for repulsing the Mongols time and Again Whereas The Europeans and Persians were defeated Alaudin And Saifudin and Baybars defeated the mongols at Ain jalout Egypt A famous battle
Alauddin Khilji (r. 1296-1316), the second ruler of the Khilji dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, was a ruthless leader known for his military conquests and administrative reforms. While he strengthened the Sultanate's hold over India, his rule was marked by significant atrocities, particularly on the Indian populace. 1. Economic Exploitation: Heavy Taxation: Alauddin imposed severe land taxes (50% of produce) on peasants, particularly targeting Hindu landowners. The taxes were so burdensome that many were reduced to poverty. Confiscation of Wealth: Wealthy merchants, traders, and nobles were subjected to harsh levies. Accumulated wealth was confiscated to fill the Sultanate’s treasury and fund military campaigns. 2. Religious Persecution: Hindus faced systemic discrimination under Alauddin's rule. The jizya tax on non-Muslims was enforced rigorously. Temples were looted or destroyed during his campaigns, particularly in Gujarat, where the famous Somnath temple was desecrated and plundered. 3. Massacres During Military Campaigns: Alauddin’s military campaigns in Ranthambore, Gujarat, and Chittor were marked by massacres of civilians. For example: Chittor Siege (1303): After capturing the fort, Alauddin ordered the mass slaughter of the population. The women of Chittor, led by Queen Padmini (as per legends), committed jauhar (self-immolation) to avoid enslavement. Gujarat Campaign: His forces destroyed cities and enslaved thousands of Hindus, including women and children. 4. Widespread Enslavement: Captured civilians during his conquests were sold into slavery. Thousands of Hindu men, women, and children were enslaved, with many women forced into harems. 5. Suppression of Rebellions: Alauddin dealt brutally with rebellions. Villages suspected of harboring rebels were razed, and the inhabitants were executed. His spy network ensured even minor dissent was crushed swiftly. 6. Cultural Suppression: Hindus were barred from holding high-ranking positions in his administration. He maintained strict measures to ensure the political and social subjugation of the majority Hindu population. I think our ancestors have thanked more than enough.......
India as we know today, never defeated the Mongols. It was the Muslim Sultanate of Delhi (Muslim Rulers of Turkish descent) that defeated the Mongol Hoardes in South-West Asia, while the Arabs also defeated the West Asia and Middle Eastern Mongol Hoardes at Ain Jalut. Please don't mislead the world.
well these Muslims were Indians because they settled down there and had converted local population as well. Indian is not equal to Hindu. thats a wrong notion. although the Muslim Rulers of India were themself foreign invaders but they settled down and lived there so in a way became Indians.
Delusional rewrite history. India only existed after the British colonized the area then formed an India trading Company for management conveniences then evolved into a nation.
@@koneos6580 the word Hindustan (English translation of India) was a term coined by Turks and Persians. the Afghans and central Asians always called this Place as Hind. yes the word India is British name. but thats all a secondary discussion. the point of this video is the settlers or natives of this land mass , the subcontinent whatever you are willing to call it.. managed to fight and stand up to Mongols.
If you want to be "truth" & "justice", the concept is NOT separate in Islam, which you are advocating! In South Asia, every person who is Muslim is a convert, if not an outright foreigner! The irony is, these invaders settled down and converted the masses and I believe you're one of them! * TRUTH: King and Leaders conquer, not their religion or ethnic descent!!! * JUSTICE: Allaudin Khilji, is the Hindoostan's brave "Sultan" who did are a lot of reforms in civil and military terms to get that honor of defeating the Mongols, so many times, and so precisely ... that Mongols went ll the way to Eastern Europe and Middle East but couldn't massacre anything in Hindustan! * JUSTICE: 1. He kept the entire army on payroll, not only at the time of the war, but also peacetime and kept them training ! 2. He created main paved roads, which later became Grand Trunk Road, picked up by Sher Shah Suri ! 3. Clear code for taxation and extra tax "Jazia" for Hindus. 4. Recruited ex-Mongols to train His army to counter Mongols 5. Create wall of severed heads of Mongol soldiers to demonstrate, who is more ruthless in war. ... Doesn't matter what his lineage is, (as these were originally all SLAVES), his religion, he was a successful ruler ... ..and the reason ...YOU are not CHINESE /MONGOL !!! ... No I teach you another word ... R-E-S-P-E-C-T !!! * Go read first, not religious books but history ... to show off "TRUTH" & "JUSTICE" * Luv4rmNJ * we are all humans ...and that was ages ago ... who cares ! * (ALL) Religion are obsolete, science (Google, MSFT, AMZN, youTube, META) is the new Religion NOW ! * PEACE! (and it comes with WAR) *
And when the French / British arrived in the u dian subcontinent it was the same Mongol empire called Mughal empire in India that held sway in the Indian subcontinent and they say it was was one of the largest economies in the world with 2/3 of the world economic out put .
Thats not mughal/mongol. That was hindustani empire. They were themselves identifing as hindustanis rather calling mughals. (There are plenty of sources for it).The word mughal was later coined by british historians. And everyone knows what british done to india.
@ yeah but they were the children of timur and gang who used to claim family relationship from grnghis himself and though the world might have called them Mughal they themselves called them by some other name . I guess the only original Indian would be the adivasi and the dravadians rest who came to north India via Afghanistan are all form Iran : who call themselves aryans and so many other groups, the indian subcontinent is a hot pot of people from all over Central Asia to Iran etc
Qutlugh Khawaja Also died due to wounds Of this battle on his back home journey.. Mamluks and India both punished mongols ..but india come First..as india is very close to mongolia. it was facing chronic incursions by Mongols..all Sultans from Altamash to Allauddin were Subjected..they were not living in peace nor allowing india to live in peace.. Salute to all Delhi Sultans..
The Mongol's held China, so to say they had no cities or agriculture is not the case. Were it not for the rivalry of the Mongol Khanates, India would have been overrun.
Very nice video. I just have 1 query. You used Hindu king images for Alauddin Khilji, Nusrat Khan, Ulugh Khan and Akat khan but Zafar Khan's icon is that of sultanate ruler. Were the other generals Hindusor was it a mistake? I highly doubt they were Hindu generals.
Not Indian......he was the king Alaudin Khilji the afghan dynasty ruler. Who actual defeated Mongol on straight battlefield. The Mongol were actually fear from his name. Because for many days the Mongol were not actually believing how the got defeated so easily by the opponent army strategic planning. But never has done before.
Thanks for the video! A little more about geography would be insightful. Mongols dominated steppes but were less effective in thick woodlands and mountains.
No excuses plz. Mongols faced a true superior enemy which humiliated them. Mongols fought in all kind of wearthers and places and defeated their opposnent but they were beaten severly onluly in India and Egypt. Both of these states had superior military than mongols.
it is not cconform , who distryoed ; Hindu king who killed thousands of budhist and there tempels and killed many budhist distroy nalanda according to many historian, the king name is
@@ahmedahmed-gf4mc Nalanda university was started by the Hindu moryan dynasty, a Hindu learning center in philosophy & culture . Hinduism & Budhism are two sides of the same coin. You busy yourself with partisan Islam .
All credit goes to Rajput warriors and other Hindu warrier classes who beat shit out of Genghis Khan ,who died in Afghanistan because of an arrow from a Rajput soldier also lost a son in first battle’s taking about the battel of Ain Jaluit it was the Mameluke who defeated them and you can study who the mameluke were in history. The Muslim just brought nonsense in India and burn down many knower liberties in India.
but sad reality of todays era is inspite of rajputs shedding their blood and families to save our hindu religion and our mother land , many other communities of hindu religion think rajputs have done very little to nothing for saving hinduism and northen parts of india...
*Ah, yes, as a proud Indian, I must say, it was truly something great, yaar! The Muslims of the Delhi Sultanate, they did a fantastic job defeating those Mongols and keeping our India safe! Full credit to them for standing strong and protecting our land.. So, thank you to them for their bravery and for protecting us.*
@@greatboxingen Exactly, Saar! You are absolutely correct. I am not like most Indians who live in this big fantasy world, thinking we were some ancient super-advanced civilization. No, no! I only deal in cold, hard facts, Saar. No blind patriotism for me, only reality!
India was infact conquered by mongols after the battle of khanwa. Mughal is persian corrupted word for mongol. Mughals adopted turkic language and then persian then later indian subcontinent languages.
Giving some kind of credit to khilji for saving indian civilization is absurd. He did everything that mongols may or may not have done as far as destroying indian civilization. For india’s point view, khilji was the mongol.
mongols was defeated by so many times actually，india sultan indonesia king vietnam Japanese etc，but their most famous failure battle maker was mamluk.Its first time mongol army defeated by same military skills.
@@Sadiq-Mian I think the history say he was Turk settled in Afghanistan. If you read history most of Afghanistan was under the Turk settled ,in Afghanistan & mixed with them
Chengis Khan : " What the f*ck is this place? Why are they using thier entire arm to stir a pot of soup? Oh he'll no. Pack up boys. We are leaving. Let's get tf up out of here. Now. "
That was hundreds of yrs later. Sikhs and the Marathas were the powers by then, although, not for much longer after the British turned up in full force.
Okay firstly, your starting map is very incorrect. By the time they invaded the Khwarazmia, they only had control of northern China and no part of Tibet. Secondly, the single largest reason why the Mongols couldn't get India was the humidity. Humid environments undermined the structure of the types of bows the Mongols used. Which is the same reason they could never move into southeast Asia, which was a way easier target than India. Some comments also use heat as a factor. If this was the case, then why was the Middle East almost completely rolled over. Which they would have been able to completely take if Khanate elections didn't interrupt invasion campaigns.
With respect there was no India at that time. It was a number of independent kingdoms within the sub continent. It was the Delhi sultanate that destroyed the mongol invasion of the subcontinent.
@mirrorflame1988 " the header to this "India". No such thing as India until 1947. So no I am not confusing India with the civilisations in the subcontinent.
Although modern Historians, mainly from the West/ Europeans, tend to not talk about it, India and China were most Culturally, Scientifically, Socio-Economically Advanced Civilizations for the Rest of Recorded History until the Age of Exploration. they faced the Same Problems U.S of America is Facing Today, and external threats amplified and Exploited and that was their Downfall. U.S.A should learn from India and China's History, but.....alas too self-centered and Egocentric to learn from History.
Geopolitical entity called 'India' did not exist before the British conquered it much later, in late seventeenth century. Saying India defended against Mongols is ridiculous.
What you are saying is so so wrong. Have you heard about mahabharat written thousands of years ago? India didn't exist because the name was invented in bitish raj, Bharat is the name used by locals and has references in epics written thousands of years ago. How can you claim something when you are not even aware of the hindi name of our country. India is the name given by britishers. That doesn't mean India never existed before they gave us a specific name lol. Mauryan empire literally united India 1000 year ago before the british arrived in India and India spanned from modern day afghanistan to mayanmar. It's literally documented history. Where are you getting such bizzare info from ?
@@shubhamnarayan2077Ah, Saar, what are you saying? We Indians were all just running around without any clothes, lighting fires everywhere and, of course, burning widows-what else did we know, na? It was only when the great foreigners arrived, with their superior culture and unmatched wisdom, that we poor fools learned how to be proper human beings. What would we have done without them, Saar? Truly, they saved us from ourselves.
You do realise the Mugal emperors destroyed many malenia old universities in India, e.g. Nalanda University. I don't think that the mongols would have done any different.
It was Delhi Sulatanat of predominantly muslim rulers who crushed mongols not India. There was no country with the name of india in that era. The name india used after British rule was established in hindistan.
Genghis did not occupy china. He left after winning a long siege of the then capital of china.In your map the whole of china was occupied. Misleading. It was Kublai khan who did that, many many years after defeating the mighty song dynasty in the south of china.
India lacked strong central army and government. there was lack of Indian leadership and petty infighting among small Indian states and British came masquerading as Merchants. British employed divide and rule and used the civil wars and anarchy in India to their advantage. technology also helped British
British fighting style was different than the Mongols. Also the British had more discipline in their ranks and had superior artillery though Indians had good artillery too...
Alauddin Khaliji famous Afghan warlord of medieval times with his massive empire which stretched throughout the Indian Subcontinent. He was an Afghan who came from the infamous Ghilzai tribe of Pashtuns and at the time of his reign was denounced by Turkic people and labeled as an Afghan (for all of the pan Turk crybabies) he came from the same tribe as Mirwais Hotak, founder of the Hotak dynasty which conquered most of Iran and even defeated the Ottomans, considered by many as the Grandfather “nika” of Afghanistan. Other legendary ruler from this tribe were Sher Shah Suri who formed the Suri empire and Ibrahim Lodhi the founder of Lodhi dynasty, one of the many dynasties of the delhi sultanate.
Also, help came from escaping fellow Mongols into India into Delhi with prior knowledge on Mongolian tactics during war. Yes, they helped out a lot.
One of my pet peeves is the rampant miss use of the word "decimated" by that account the force being discussed was annihilated. Decimation was originally a Roman mass punishment for an entire unit; every tenth man was executed. Decimation now more accurately used would imply a unit took heavy casualties but was still more or less intact as a unit.
We get your point and thank you for your sharing!
Dlso you mean Mongols were annihilated or decimated in India? Sometime they were decimated while others they were annihilated when their commanders were captured and brought to Dehli. Their entire force was annihilated at the battle of Amroha.
I never looked for the root of the word there. Nice catch.
At this point in time, it's really a contronym, a word that is its own opposite, like sanction, literal, let, cleave and many other examples. Words can change their meanings over time
That also drives me crazy.
Of course, the Himalayas made a tiny contabution to the difficulties of a northern invasion.
Great general Zafar Khan lost his life during the battle that shattered the Mongol dreams of invading India.
Zafar Khan and his fellow strong rajpoth brothers
@@srshahwaziri7750
Kya vo akamak Gangez khan(1206- 1227) Yani Gangeshwar 🔱Quan tha? Ya Islam ☪️ parivartit?
Asli Khan tho Mongol hein. Baki jo unse parajit vo huen Naqli khan. Aslii Khan ki Astha Sanatan Tengrism 🔱.
Indians didn't defeat the Mongols rather the Turks ruling India at the time defeated the Mongols.
There's no evidence of khalaj tribes turkic They were living in India from past 900 years also the khalji dynasty mostly consisted of khokhar and jat army. They followed buddhism and shavaism before their convertion to Islam. They were converted during arab and Mahmud of ghazni conquest.
@@itsoblivion8124🤣🤣🤣 you can't digest the truth alright no problem.
I’ll definitely watch this multiple times! So much interesting information!
We are glad that you enjoyed it!
You shohld have discussed battle of Amroha also where Mongols were annihilated.
The Battle of Amroha was a significant conflict that took place in 1305 in the town of Amroha, located in northern India, during the Delhi Sultanate period. It was fought between the forces of the Delhi Sultanate, led by General Malik Kafur, and the Mongol invaders.
Background
During the reign of Alauddin Khilji (1296-1316), the Delhi Sultan Alauddin was determined to repel these invasions and secure the northern borders of his sultanate. The Mongols had previously conducted raids into the Delhi Sultanate, which often led to severe losses for both sides. After a recent series of incursions, Alauddin assigned General Malik Kafur and other commanders to launch a decisive defense against the Mongols.
The Battle
The Mongols, under the leadership of Ali Beg and Tartaq, advanced into the Delhi Sultanate territories and reached Amroha. However, Alauddin's forces, led by prominent generals such as Malik Kafur and Ghazi Malik (later known as Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq), were well-prepared for the confrontation. The Delhi Sultanate army strategically positioned itself and managed to surround the Mongol forces, preventing their escape.
The battle was brutal and marked by intense close-quarters combat. The Sultanate's forces decisively defeated the Mongols, capturing and executing many of them. This victory at Amroha was instrumental in weakening Mongol ambitions in the Indian subcontinent and reinforced Alauddin Khilji’s reputation as a powerful ruler capable of defending his realm.
The battle highlighted the strategic and military capabilities of the Delhi Sultanate and helped solidify its dominance in the region for years to come.
Thanks for your suggestion and your thoughtful sharing. Hope to engage in more with you, friend!
Malik kufar the lover of the sultan was a great general, he also conquered the Deccan.
We never credit the Delhi sultanate of protecting the Hindi mainland from the mongols for over 100 years, yes they imposed taxes including religious tax but to what end , to keep mongols from spreading the savagery
The Delhi Sultanate period was marked by episodes of violence, religious persecution, and economic exploitation.
Temple Destruction: Many rulers, such as Alauddin Khilji and Firuz Shah Tughlaq, destroyed Hindu temples and idols as acts of religious dominance. Notable sites like the Somnath temple were plundered for wealth.
Forced Conversions and Persecution: Non-Muslims faced persecution, including forced conversions to Islam. The imposition of the jizya tax on Hindus and other non-Muslims further marginalized them. Firuz Shah Tughlaq is known for forcibly converting thousands.
Massacres: Military campaigns often led to mass killings. Alauddin Khilji’s conquest of Chittor resulted in the slaughter of thousands of civilians. Timur's sack of Delhi in 1398, though during a weakened Sultanate, resulted in over 100,000 deaths.
Economic Oppression: Heavy taxation under rulers like Alauddin Khilji impoverished farmers and common people. Revenue systems often exploited rural populations to fund military campaigns.
Slavery: Firuz Shah institutionalized slavery on a large scale, establishing a department specifically for managing enslaved Indians. He is said to have enslaved over 180,000 individuals during his reign.
The Hindu Kush mountain range, located in modern-day Afghanistan. The name "Hindu Kush" is translated as "Hindu Killer." This name is believed to have originated due to the high mortality rate of Hindu slaves transported through these mountains. Many slaves, captured during Sultanate campaigns in northern India, were marched across the treacherous terrain to be sold in Central Asian markets.
Probably our ancestors have credited more than enough.........
It really should say Mongols vs Dehli Sultanate or Mongols vs Turks in South Asia - the heading is misleading.
I love the way you present information-easy to understand and engaging!
We will dig in depth in research to collect better information!
Hope to see you in new ones!
Just shared this with all my friends. This is too good to keep to myself!
It truly means a lot to us!
Amazing bravery of Indian Sultans which saved India from devestation.
Thanks for sharing.
Thanks for watching!
Mongols were from the northern climate area.India was too hot and humid.That was the main reason.
Thanks for your sharing!
India isn't Humid.
Rainy season (Monsoon) remains only for 2½ months. Rest months are Dry Cold, Dry Hot mostly. Coasts are humid everywhere on planet.
No mongols captured China, Vietnam, Indonesia which is also hot and humid.
@@warmsurfing This is a excuse for all invaders That the climate was unsuitable from Alexender to the Muslim invaders , Indian were losing there shine after being on Top for 15000 years, Muslims only ruled for less than 800 years & were defeated, look at there condition now , Hindus adapted to the circumstances & came out on top, but we had one weakness that is we had self serving traitors amongst us , though the congress did good in the beginning, but lost it shine & did the same what others had done before them.
@@warmsurfing very true that is the excuse give by all lost to the Indians , even Indian historians went with that bullshit
India was never a thing !
It was Delhi Sultanate that defended the land from invading mongols !
Those saying it was not India back have not seen ancient 'Akhand Bharat' map.
Read history, not WhatsApp forwards. Borders were vastly different under different kingdoms. The largest was probably during the time of Ashoka .
Very good episode
Thanks for posting!
Thanks for feedback!
Salut to zafar Khan..and Aladdin khilji..
Blanket statement
No body in East or in West..did what's India did..is Right..100% Right
Ain jalut.. didn't face invasion..they were dealing with a unit of Halagu Khan....
Here tremors in every body hearts..as if tsunami is heading towards India..this described that situations correctly...one like to them
@@user418-kn3nh you should not be proud & happy all these guys were forgin invaders, it was a dark period in Indian all the Muslim invaders forced conversion that’s why we have so many people following Forigen religion
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage episode about several invaded attempted by Mongolian campaigns towards India north India...and failed....thanks for sharing this magnificent video
It's so great to see you again!
The part about wars and feudalism is very detailed, it makes me want to learn more!
Thanks!
Holy crap. The Mongols must have used the feigned retreat for a century and over and over armies fell for it.
The video quality is great! Both the sound and visuals are top-notch.
The Taj Mahal wasn't completed till 400 years later.
Indian Sultans had better equipped and well trained militatary that inhiliated mongol forces. There may be ktger factors too but the main strong reason mongols got defeated was they faced a superior enemy first time. Not only India, Mongols were beaten in Levant by Egyptian Sultan because of the same reason, the suprior military of Sultan was successful against savage Mongols who merdly relied on superior numbers.
Egypt and Indian kings adopted the brilliant strategy of nuetralising Mongols' superior numbers and surprise attacks.
Neither superior numbers nor their surprise attacks worked on both fronts.
Wrong! Typically mongol armies were much smaller, but much more mobile than those of their opponents.
@anandawijesinghe6298 Nope. They had small band for pillage, chaos and fein retreat while gheir main force js always waiting for ambush when the enemy force chase them. They usually came in 30000 to 300000 in numbers depending on the area of opponent. In case of India they could not outnumber their enemy. Instead they were trapped and surrounded and annihilated at tge battle of Amroha. Other than history books people still talk about mongols who were like an evil force coming in huge numbers, they were so dirty that people could smell them from 20 KM away.
It was not "India" then. It is erroneous to say this. This is a "Hinduvata" narrative.
Mahabharat was compiled in around BCE 3. Its existence can be traced to even older dated but final compilation finished in BCE 3. The sanskrit name of India is Bharat. Lets move on, BCE 300, Chandragupta maurya ruled all over India from modern day afghanistan to mayanmar. What you believe is a narrative, what i have just mentioned is history. Do a google search. Do you just care about narratives or do you really follow history? I mean, why this need to prove that India never existed when we literally have books written in BCE 3 referring Bharat as a country bound by sea to the south and himalayas to the north. Why do you feel this urge to deny us our own history when it's literally out in the open and you can literally read about it right now as i type this. India is not indian language, India is english used by britishers to refer bharat. Again, where do you get all this info about "hindutva" narrative? You are literlly making a joke of your historical knowledge. I invite you to do a google search about "Bharat" and many many books written on it near 5BCE TO 250CE.
Thank you for making this video; I learned many new things.
Your regular support motivated us a lots!
That one time India were OP
I hope you create more content like this!
I hope there will be more videos analyzing the major wars in-depth.
Your support drives us to deliver the best content we can.
Can't stop watching it 😍
Thanks!
This video is amazing
Thanks!
reference of Jalal Uddin Khaurizmi in the beginning. after initially losing to Mongols and escaping to Punjab, Jalal Uddin spent rest of his life fighting and winning little skirmishes against Mangols and requested help from across Asia and Arabia but was turned down by Beghdad Sultan. he died in obscurity.
We appreciate all the support you've shown! Hope to see you more in the next videos!
There was no India then . It was a later British colonial invention. No Indian subcontinent, rather South Asia
Muslim rulers who brought civilized behavior and human equality defeated the savage Mongols
This video made me think about things I’ve never paid attention to before.
Visit regularly!
Delhi empire was really an indian empire (saw some comments against ). Being muslims dosent mean they were not indians. Capital was delhi, rulling population were indians, taxpayers were indians, much of army contains indians(hindus, muslims alike), married to indian prince and princess. rise of indo-islamic art and architecture.
Come on - let's stop re inventing things. The Dehli Sultanate were Turkic rulers who were also invaders. They ruled the natives. These Turks limited the Mongols. Where are the Indians you are talking about. Just accept facts as they are. You can't re invent what you want. You can celebrate the Turkish victory over the Mongol victory if you want - both armies had a great number of Central Asian Turkic warriors. There was no "India" then so what "Indian" army ? Listen to the names of the leaders of the armies of the so called Indians who are in fact ruling Turks who were invaders themselves.
The Delhi Sultans primarily considered themselves Turkic, particularly during the early stages of the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526). This is because many of the ruling dynasties and nobles of the Sultanate were of Turkic origin.
Persian was the court language of the Sultanate, but many rulers and elites were fluent in Turkic dialects, which were part of their heritage. Turkic customs and traditions influenced their court practices, military organization, and governance. The Turkic identity was reinforced by their reliance on Turkic soldiers and commanders, many of whom were part of the Mamluk slave-soldier system.
As the Sultanate expanded and incorporated diverse populations, the rulers began identifying more broadly with Islamic universalism rather than solely with their Turkic roots. However, the early rulers, especially those in the Mamluk and Khilji dynasties, strongly identified with their Turkic heritage, which shaped the foundational years of the Sultanate.
Why do you apologists need to bring "Indian Muslim loyal to India" whining every time? Try to be objective. Present day Indian Muslims have nothing to do with Turkic colonizers, same way Indian Christians have nothing to do with European colonizers.
BTW, Britishers defended India from many Afghan invasions, that doesn't make then "Indian empire". We were under foreign occupation, just accept the facts.
Stephen the Great /Baibars /Jalal Al din/Favius Aetius.. they also defeated mongol armies
All that knowledge of Mongol tactics did not prevent the Mongols from using their favorite tactic successfully. What really won the battle was that the Mongols lost confidence when they saw how difficult it was to just beat one of the armies and knew that the tactic would not work any more. This underscores the value of bravery but more importantly that discipline is the paramount attribute as if the orders were followed casualties would have been much less.
We appreciate your thoughtful sharing!
The Mongols were defeated by several powers, including the Japanese, the Delhi Sultans, and the Egyptian Mamluks. After the destruction of Baghdad in 1258, the Mongols' dominance began to decline. The Caliphate was a sacred institution for Muslims, and the Mongols' attack on it provoked strong reactions from key Muslim rulers, particularly the Mamluks of Egypt and Berke Khan of the Golden Horde, both of whom recognized the authority of the Caliph (خلیفہ کی بیعت).
When Hulagu Khan attacked Baghdad and killed the Abbasid Caliph, he set the stage for his own downfall. The outrage over this act of sacrilege led both Berke Khan and the Mamluks to unite against him. Hulagu’s forces suffered multiple defeats, including a significant loss at the Battle of Ayn Jalut in 1260 at the hands of the Mamluks. Eventually, a member of Ahl al-Bayt and the Abbasid family was found and appointed as the Caliph. The Caliphate was reestablished in Cairo by the Mamluks, preserving its symbolic authority within the Muslim world.
This revived Caliphate remained a central institution for the Muslim world until 1517 when it was abolished by the Ottoman Sultan Selim I after his conquest of Egypt.
Thanks a lot for your thought sharing! We love the way you engage in this video. Hope to see you in others!
@greatboxingen You are welcome. I am a history lover so I do comment when I see such things.
We really appreciate your passion!
Indians should thank Alaudin khilji for repulsing the Mongols time and
Again Whereas The Europeans and Persians were defeated Alaudin
And Saifudin and Baybars defeated the mongols at Ain jalout Egypt
A famous battle
Alauddin Khilji (r. 1296-1316), the second ruler of the Khilji dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, was a ruthless leader known for his military conquests and administrative reforms. While he strengthened the Sultanate's hold over India, his rule was marked by significant atrocities, particularly on the Indian populace.
1. Economic Exploitation:
Heavy Taxation: Alauddin imposed severe land taxes (50% of produce) on peasants, particularly targeting Hindu landowners. The taxes were so burdensome that many were reduced to poverty.
Confiscation of Wealth: Wealthy merchants, traders, and nobles were subjected to harsh levies. Accumulated wealth was confiscated to fill the Sultanate’s treasury and fund military campaigns.
2. Religious Persecution:
Hindus faced systemic discrimination under Alauddin's rule. The jizya tax on non-Muslims was enforced rigorously.
Temples were looted or destroyed during his campaigns, particularly in Gujarat, where the famous Somnath temple was desecrated and plundered.
3. Massacres During Military Campaigns:
Alauddin’s military campaigns in Ranthambore, Gujarat, and Chittor were marked by massacres of civilians. For example:
Chittor Siege (1303): After capturing the fort, Alauddin ordered the mass slaughter of the population. The women of Chittor, led by Queen Padmini (as per legends), committed jauhar (self-immolation) to avoid enslavement.
Gujarat Campaign: His forces destroyed cities and enslaved thousands of Hindus, including women and children.
4. Widespread Enslavement:
Captured civilians during his conquests were sold into slavery. Thousands of Hindu men, women, and children were enslaved, with many women forced into harems.
5. Suppression of Rebellions:
Alauddin dealt brutally with rebellions. Villages suspected of harboring rebels were razed, and the inhabitants were executed. His spy network ensured even minor dissent was crushed swiftly.
6. Cultural Suppression:
Hindus were barred from holding high-ranking positions in his administration. He maintained strict measures to ensure the political and social subjugation of the majority Hindu population.
I think our ancestors have thanked more than enough.......
the first Mughal emperor, could trace his blood line back to Chinggis Khan. Mongol rules India for 100s of years.
A muddled mess of dots moving back and forth. Possibly the least instructive description of a battle I ever saw. Sorry, but I have to down-vote it.
It was their vindaloo, wasn't it?!
India as we know today, never defeated the Mongols. It was the Muslim Sultanate of Delhi (Muslim Rulers of Turkish descent) that defeated the Mongol Hoardes in South-West Asia, while the Arabs also defeated the West Asia and Middle Eastern Mongol Hoardes at Ain Jalut.
Please don't mislead the world.
well these Muslims were Indians because they settled down there and had converted local population as well.
Indian is not equal to Hindu. thats a wrong notion. although the Muslim Rulers of India were themself foreign invaders but they settled down and lived there so in a way became Indians.
Delusional rewrite history. India only existed after the British colonized the area then formed an India trading Company for management conveniences then evolved into a nation.
@@koneos6580 the word Hindustan (English translation of India) was a term coined by Turks and Persians. the Afghans and central Asians always called this Place as Hind. yes the word India is British name. but thats all a secondary discussion. the point of this video is the settlers or natives of this land mass , the subcontinent whatever you are willing to call it.. managed to fight and stand up to Mongols.
He is making up bs to get paid with false info. India never did anything but the muslins ruined them mentally and physically.
If you want to be "truth" & "justice", the concept is NOT separate in Islam, which you are advocating!
In South Asia, every person who is Muslim is a convert, if not an outright foreigner! The irony is, these invaders settled down and converted the masses and I believe you're one of them!
*
TRUTH: King and Leaders conquer, not their religion or ethnic descent!!!
*
JUSTICE: Allaudin Khilji, is the Hindoostan's brave "Sultan" who did are a lot of reforms in civil and military terms to get that honor of defeating the Mongols, so many times, and so precisely ... that Mongols went ll the way to Eastern Europe and Middle East but couldn't massacre anything in Hindustan!
*
JUSTICE:
1. He kept the entire army on payroll, not only at the time of the war, but also peacetime and kept them training !
2. He created main paved roads, which later became Grand Trunk Road, picked up by Sher Shah Suri !
3. Clear code for taxation and extra tax "Jazia" for Hindus.
4. Recruited ex-Mongols to train His army to counter Mongols
5. Create wall of severed heads of Mongol soldiers to demonstrate, who is more ruthless in war.
...
Doesn't matter what his lineage is, (as these were originally all SLAVES), his religion, he was a successful ruler
...
..and the reason ...YOU are not CHINESE /MONGOL !!!
...
No I teach you another word ... R-E-S-P-E-C-T !!!
*
Go read first, not religious books but history ... to show off "TRUTH" & "JUSTICE"
*
Luv4rmNJ
*
we are all humans ...and that was ages ago ... who cares !
*
(ALL) Religion are obsolete, science (Google, MSFT, AMZN, youTube, META) is the new Religion NOW !
*
PEACE! (and it comes with WAR)
*
You should include more real-life examples to help viewers better understand.
And when the French / British arrived in the u dian subcontinent it was the same Mongol empire called Mughal empire in India that held sway in the Indian subcontinent and they say it was was one of the largest economies in the world with 2/3 of the world economic out put .
Thats not mughal/mongol. That was hindustani empire. They were themselves identifing as hindustanis rather calling mughals. (There are plenty of sources for it).The word mughal was later coined by british historians. And everyone knows what british done to india.
Mughal and Britishers was nothing
@ yeah but they were the children of timur and gang who used to claim family relationship from grnghis himself and though the world might have called them Mughal they themselves called them by some other name . I guess the only original Indian would be the adivasi and the dravadians rest who came to north India via Afghanistan are all form Iran : who call themselves aryans and so many other groups, the indian subcontinent is a hot pot of people from all over Central Asia to Iran etc
@ lol if u day so
Qutlugh Khawaja Also died due to wounds Of this battle on his back home journey..
Mamluks and India both punished mongols ..but india come First..as india is very close to mongolia. it was facing chronic incursions by Mongols..all Sultans from Altamash to Allauddin were Subjected..they were not living in peace nor allowing india to live in peace.. Salute to all Delhi Sultans..
The victors writes history according to them.
In addition to strat and tactics, is there a book or video about the weaponry? Would like to know.
The Mongol's held China, so to say they had no cities or agriculture is not the case. Were it not for the rivalry of the Mongol Khanates, India would have been overrun.
Very nice video. I just have 1 query. You used Hindu king images for Alauddin Khilji, Nusrat Khan, Ulugh Khan and Akat khan but Zafar Khan's icon is that of sultanate ruler. Were the other generals Hindusor was it a mistake? I highly doubt they were Hindu generals.
Khilji was muslim
Bjp style propaganda
CORRECTION! It is "CAVALRY" and NOT "CALVARY" as the latter is a place in Israel.
Not Indian......he was the king Alaudin Khilji the afghan dynasty ruler. Who actual defeated Mongol on straight battlefield. The Mongol were actually fear from his name. Because for many days the Mongol were not actually believing how the got defeated so easily by the opponent army strategic planning. But never has done before.
Thanks for the video! A little more about geography would be insightful. Mongols dominated steppes but were less effective in thick woodlands and mountains.
Same reason why Alexander phalank stopped there
No excuses plz. Mongols faced a true superior enemy which humiliated them. Mongols fought in all kind of wearthers and places and defeated their opposnent but they were beaten severly onluly in India and Egypt.
Both of these states had superior military than mongols.
@@eddyr1041 Geography is mere an excuse, the fact remains that mongols were defeated by a superior military force...period
True!
History has many lessons for us today. Thank you for highlighting that!
More false history ha ha
1 like!
And don't forget to subscribe!
Khilji a invader himself ,destroyed Nalanda , the knowledge hub of Ancient Bharata . 😂😂😂
it is not cconform , who distryoed ; Hindu king who killed thousands of budhist and there tempels and killed many budhist distroy nalanda according to many historian, the king name is
@@ahmedahmed-gf4mc Nalanda university was started by the Hindu moryan dynasty, a Hindu learning center in philosophy & culture . Hinduism & Budhism are two sides of the same coin. You busy yourself with partisan Islam .
Didn't take prisoners...Kansequently there were no X Kans 😂
Babar was the great grand son of Ghenghis Khan. India was indeed conquered by mongol
Thanks!
What makes the difference our land is already going through the massacre already for 4 centuries
You explain things so clearly; I really like this style!
New contents are bound to released soon!
All credit goes to Rajput warriors and other Hindu warrier classes who beat shit out of Genghis Khan ,who died in Afghanistan because of an arrow from a Rajput soldier also lost a son in first battle’s taking about the battel of Ain Jaluit it was the Mameluke who defeated them and you can study who the mameluke were in history. The Muslim just brought nonsense in India and burn down many knower liberties in India.
Those Rajput warriors later eccepted Islam and when partition of india happened they have become Pakistani 😊
@@kamranhashmi1575Very few did .
Majority remained Hin:du or Si:kh .
but sad reality of todays era is inspite of rajputs shedding their blood and families to save our hindu religion and our mother land , many other communities of hindu religion think rajputs have done very little to nothing for saving hinduism and northen parts of india...
All credits goes to Rajput warriors.😂😂😅shit... but nice comedy
@@kamranhashmi1575*not all rajputs but only few cowards who fell to Islamic oppression alone got converted to Islam.😊
*Ah, yes, as a proud Indian, I must say, it was truly something great, yaar! The Muslims of the Delhi Sultanate, they did a fantastic job defeating those Mongols and keeping our India safe! Full credit to them for standing strong and protecting our land.. So, thank you to them for their bravery and for protecting us.*
They did!
@@greatboxingen Exactly, Saar! You are absolutely correct. I am not like most Indians who live in this big fantasy world, thinking we were some ancient super-advanced civilization. No, no! I only deal in cold, hard facts, Saar. No blind patriotism for me, only reality!
India was infact conquered by mongols after the battle of khanwa. Mughal is persian corrupted word for mongol. Mughals adopted turkic language and then persian then later indian subcontinent languages.
Giving some kind of credit to khilji for saving indian civilization is absurd. He did everything that mongols may or may not have done as far as destroying indian civilization. For india’s point view, khilji was the mongol.
Historically inaccurate. There was India at that point of time, moreover please cite your sources.
mongols was defeated by so many times actually，india sultan indonesia king vietnam Japanese etc，but their most famous failure battle maker was mamluk.Its first time mongol army defeated by same military skills.
They did!
Defeated chineese, persians, turks, arabs, central asians, slavs, eastern europe. Literally conquering 54% of asia.
2nd biggest empire in world.
🗿🇲🇳 *mongol*
Alaudin Khilji was a Pashtoon Afghan and Delhi sultanate was Afghan empire.
LOL, stop reading bogus history of madarsa
5 Sultanate dynasties ruled Delhi.
Khilji was 1 of them, but they weren't Afghan.
Gulam (Arabian SIave dynasty), Khilji (Turk) , Tughlaq (Persian), Syyed (Multan rulers) & Lodhi (Afghans).
@@Edward4Plantagenetbhagwa atanki school very very bad 😂
@@Edward4PlantagenetEdward Fook seeta
@@Edward4Plantagenetmaybe in gobar school but in realuty, khalji , syed and lodhis were Afghans.
@@Sadiq-Mian I think the history say he was Turk settled in Afghanistan. If you read history most of Afghanistan was under the Turk settled ,in Afghanistan & mixed with them
Crushed? Did they? What about Mogul dynasty of India? Is that called 'crushed'?) And what did Mogul kings wrote about India?
Your data about the number of people killed is way exagerrated.
Chengis Khan : " What the f*ck is this place? Why are they using thier entire arm to stir a pot of soup? Oh he'll no. Pack up boys. We are leaving. Let's get tf up out of here. Now. "
Historical twist. Thats not India, nation that never exist, but rather Delhi Empire.
It is hindustan . Call it India , call it Hindustan or Bharat .
Dosen't matter .
That’s a joke .. westerners read stories from western media 😂 there was no England but London fiefdom
The land is still India, Delhi sultanate was in Indian subcontinent.
The land that. Resisted evil for 1000 years
Who said that to you !! You can say that time india was not a unified empire ,
Where the Mongols failed the British almost succeeded.
British army were only Indian soldiers.
@Jaibheemmusalmaan You are far too funny 😆😆😂
@@Milovan-c9x it's a known fact that British army in India had predominantly Indian soldiers. Truth is fun or are you hiding the pain?🤔
Not india Khilji defeated Mangol, before 1947 india was indian subcontinent with several country.
Thanks for feeback!
💙
Kha-NA- Tey? Isn’t it just Khan - Nate?
So how come the Mughal Empire that was falling apart to allow Britain to take over with two men and a bicycle?
That was hundreds of yrs later.
Sikhs and the Marathas were the powers by then, although, not for much longer after the British turned up in full force.
Okay firstly, your starting map is very incorrect. By the time they invaded the Khwarazmia, they only had control of northern China and no part of Tibet.
Secondly, the single largest reason why the Mongols couldn't get India was the humidity. Humid environments undermined the structure of the types of bows the Mongols used. Which is the same reason they could never move into southeast Asia, which was a way easier target than India.
Some comments also use heat as a factor. If this was the case, then why was the Middle East almost completely rolled over. Which they would have been able to completely take if Khanate elections didn't interrupt invasion campaigns.
Thanks for pointing it out!
With respect there was no India at that time. It was a number of independent kingdoms within the sub continent. It was the Delhi sultanate that destroyed the mongol invasion of the subcontinent.
You are confusing Indian Civilization with the Republic of India.
@mirrorflame1988 " the header to this "India". No such thing as India until 1947. So no I am not confusing India with the civilisations in the subcontinent.
The Subcontinent was known by the name of "Bharat" in ancient times. Now also the indigenous name of India is Bharat.
The usual idiot 😏
Although modern Historians, mainly from the West/ Europeans, tend to not talk about it,
India and China were most Culturally, Scientifically, Socio-Economically Advanced Civilizations for the Rest of Recorded History until the Age of Exploration.
they faced the Same Problems U.S of America is Facing Today, and external threats amplified and Exploited and that was their Downfall.
U.S.A should learn from India and China's History, but.....alas too self-centered and Egocentric to learn from History.
Geopolitical entity called 'India' did not exist before the British conquered it much later, in late seventeenth century. Saying India defended against Mongols is ridiculous.
😏
What you are saying is so so wrong. Have you heard about mahabharat written thousands of years ago? India didn't exist because the name was invented in bitish raj, Bharat is the name used by locals and has references in epics written thousands of years ago. How can you claim something when you are not even aware of the hindi name of our country. India is the name given by britishers. That doesn't mean India never existed before they gave us a specific name lol. Mauryan empire literally united India 1000 year ago before the british arrived in India and India spanned from modern day afghanistan to mayanmar. It's literally documented history. Where are you getting such bizzare info from ?
@@shubhamnarayan2077Ah, Saar, what are you saying? We Indians were all just running around without any clothes, lighting fires everywhere and, of course, burning widows-what else did we know, na? It was only when the great foreigners arrived, with their superior culture and unmatched wisdom, that we poor fools learned how to be proper human beings. What would we have done without them, Saar? Truly, they saved us from ourselves.
You do realise the Mugal emperors destroyed many malenia old universities in India, e.g. Nalanda University. I don't think that the mongols would have done any different.
genghis khan wasnt alive neither was it the mongol empire that attacked india
Thanks for your feedback!
Wasn't dehil sultanate that crushed the Mongols? Dehil sultanate were Afghan perisan mix
I am Indian 😂😂 but Mongols never invaded India. Its fake story
Don't see too many hindutva keyboard warriors here!
the map needs correction? The southern song were conquered after the Khwarezmi were destroyed
The Mughal Empire. Oh wait, Mughal means Mongol in Hindi.
Mughals and Mongols are not the same people
Mughals are from middle east. Mongols are from Mongolia 😂 not same.
@@abhishhk.Mughals were from Central Asia not Middle East.
Know your history AND your geography!
😮
they couldn't stand the stench
Right!
It was Delhi Sulatanat of predominantly muslim rulers who crushed mongols not India. There was no country with the name of india in that era. The name india used after British rule was established in hindistan.
There are about 200 million muslims in india. So according to u muslims are not indians. U r head to toe a racist bro.
Hindustan
1299 72 years AFTER Genghis Khan. Its not the same Mongolian Army or leadership.
BTW, no disrespect intended. Just pointing out a fact that many don’t realize is important when comparing Mongolian military forces
Alaudin khilji ❤️
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Genghis did not occupy china. He left after winning a long siege of the then capital of china.In your map the whole of china was occupied. Misleading. It was Kublai khan who did that, many many years after defeating the mighty song dynasty in the south of china.
We definitely recheck the map. Thank you for pointing it out!
Who burned down Nalanda and Thakshasila
The Sen dynasty Kings
How treated scbcobcTribalsAdivasi as slaves for 10k years
Who convinced dalits to carry brahmin excreta for generations?
@@Rude_Thunder nalanda destroyed by turkic baktkyar khilji.
Taxilla destroyed by huns(do not know name)
@@Rude_ThunderNo it was khilji (turks)
(0:50) I'm surprised: no slave market in Delhi?
Why couldn't the same tactic's that repelled the Mongol's stop the British from invading and conquering India centuries later?
Britain’s superior technology is the reason.
India lacked strong central army and government. there was lack of Indian leadership and petty infighting among small Indian states
and British came masquerading as Merchants. British employed divide and rule and used the civil wars and anarchy in India to their advantage. technology also helped British
@@GeoCalifornianBritish 'divide & rule' policy
@@Dheeraj-y4fDivide and Rule was a myth invented by Congress..
British fighting style was different than the Mongols. Also the British had more discipline in their ranks and had superior artillery though Indians had good artillery too...
Gave you a thumbs down because your one of those BCE CE historians. If you're willing to change this part of history what else are you changing?
So the muslims saved India 😁
Wrong information
Correct what you see wrong please! It's better that you share your thought to get exact information.
No Muslim came, no Muslim ruled and no Muslim got 3 free countries