Math Books That Never Made It

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
  • These are math books that were never reprinted. We take a look at these books in this video. The books cover precalculus, calculus, and abstract algebra.
    Elementary Functions: An Approach to Precalculus Mathematics: amzn.to/3K9yc9N
    Essentials of Abstract Algebra: amzn.to/40FMBjn
    Useful Math Supplies amzn.to/3Y5TGcv
    My Recording Gear amzn.to/3BFvcxp
    (these are my affiliate links)
    **********Math, Physics, and Computer Science Books**********
    Epic Math Book List amzn.to/3F98vT1
    Pre-algebra, Algebra, and Geometry amzn.to/3FdbwSn
    College Algebra, Precalculus, and Trigonometry amzn.to/3UKjvfb
    Probability and Statistics amzn.to/3FaaxCq
    Discrete Mathematics amzn.to/3P6jPE4
    Proof Writing amzn.to/3XXukxo
    Calculus amzn.to/3iEH3F3
    Differential Equations Books amzn.to/3Fac5wi
    Partial Differential Equations Books amzn.to/3uyk1SV
    Linear Algebra amzn.to/3VHiN3G
    Abstract Algebra Books amzn.to/3FzLZEr
    Real Analysis/Advanced Calculus amzn.to/3VIO4Ua
    Complex Analysis amzn.to/3P6kbuo
    Number Theory amzn.to/3UEm3vw
    Graph Theory amzn.to/3BfRd5m
    Topology amzn.to/3BiAGhe
    Graduate Level Books amzn.to/3uv1eIg
    Computer Science amzn.to/3Hh8kaU
    Physics amzn.to/3BhPCMp
    These are my affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    If you enjoyed this video please consider liking, sharing, and subscribing.
    Udemy Courses Via My Website: mathsorcerer.com
    Free Homework Help : mathsorcererfo...
    My FaceBook Page: / themathsorcerer
    There are several ways that you can help support my channel:)
    Consider becoming a member of the channel: / @themathsorcerer
    My GoFundMe Page: www.gofundme.c...
    My Patreon Page: / themathsorcerer
    Donate via PayPal: paypal.com/don...
    ***********Udemy Courses(Please Use These Links If You Sign Up!)************
    Abstract Algebra Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Advanced Calculus Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Calculus 1 Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Calculus 2 Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Calculus 3 Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Calculus 1 Lectures with Assignments and a Final Exam
    www.udemy.com/...
    Calculus Integration Insanity
    www.udemy.com/...
    Differential Equations Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Differential Equations Lectures Course (Includes Assignments + Final Exam)
    www.udemy.com/...
    College Algebra Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    How to Write Proofs with Sets Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    How to Write Proofs with Functions Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Trigonometry 1 Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Trigonometry 2 Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Statistics with StatCrunch Course
    www.udemy.com/...
    Math Graduate Programs, Applying, Advice, Motivation
    www.udemy.com/...
    Daily Devotionals for Motivation with The Math Sorcerer
    www.udemy.com/...
    Thank you:)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @meropale
    @meropale Рік тому +6

    I'm fascinated by these older books since the fundamentals have remained the same so it's interesting to see how things were presented in a time when things didn't feel so fast-paced.

  • @aliasjon8320
    @aliasjon8320 Рік тому +7

    A lot of these books are in very "mainstream" topics and colleges and schools have overtime converged towards choosing from a small set of texts for these subjects. I guess the good thing about that is that many of the older calculus books that continue to stay in print in the era of James Stewart, have something cool about their specific treatment of calculus

  • @JJGhostHunters
    @JJGhostHunters Рік тому +6

    I would like to have a full set of the "programmed" books. It looks interesting and I know I would use them.

  • @billc4993
    @billc4993 Рік тому +4

    My first exposure to calculus, back in 1968, was using a programmed text. Possibly even this one. I quickly developed a, I realized later, rather shallow grasp of the subject. While it did give me a leg up in my first college calculus course initially I think it actually hindered my progress later. I now see that real understanding comes from actually working through the exercises and problems. The more the better.
    Update: I was just at a used book store and found the first volume of the programmed text and, hard to believe, but it was the one I used. I would have picked it up for the semimetal value but it was strangely over-priced.

  • @mannydossantos9603
    @mannydossantos9603 Рік тому +18

    Thank you for the video and info, Prof. In my view, all books need to be respected, because every book will teach something that we didn't know.

    • @mathvlix
      @mathvlix Рік тому +2

      I sympathise with you sentiment on books... but some books are just rubbish. And some are written by crackpots and will do more harm than good to the unwitting reader.

  • @richardgray8593
    @richardgray8593 Рік тому +3

    I've got a pretty good idea why that middle book on calculus failed. It's an experimental book series based upon the ooncept of "programmed instruction" that was being explored in the sixties. It's absolutely superb for self-study, but requires that every "frame" on every page is read and responded to, in order. That is its failing as a mainstream text -- the vast majority of students are simply never going to read an entire textbook cover to cover. It ain't happening.

  • @emmanueljasonsanchezsalina32
    @emmanueljasonsanchezsalina32 Рік тому +1

    I didn't know that the "A Programmed Course in Calculus" books weren't reprinted; I have volume "V" of successions and I have not been able to get another one. It is from the "Reverté" editorial, and what I liked the most was the appendix, which is a summary of Calculus theory... Excellent video!. Greetings from Mexico!.

  • @jimbobago
    @jimbobago Рік тому +2

    I was disappointed that you didn't actually follow through on showing some of the instruction pages in the "Programmed" book. Those who weren't children of the 60s and early 70s probably haven't been exposed to the idea of teaching math ideas in the kind of bite sized nuggets that these books used (I remember using one in this style to teach some ideas in Algebra 2 in 1971). It was a very different teaching idea and it's worth showing in a video.

  • @JCCyC
    @JCCyC Рік тому +1

    Maybe colleges gravitate towards certain books by inertia (or, more malignantly, by publisher payola) so other books that got written on the same subject just never get picked up. Most people don't bother to go after two introductory books when they're learning a subject.

  • @LesleyLai
    @LesleyLai Рік тому +3

    I guess the conclusion is that none of those books don't get reprinted because of quality reason (and tons of low-quality books get reprinted over and over). Things like marketing and motivation of authors probably matters more

  • @nareksargsyan183
    @nareksargsyan183 Рік тому +14

    Please make more videos about CS.

  • @jessrose2136
    @jessrose2136 Рік тому +4

    Waste of time. You state at 0:15 "We're going to look at these books and figure out why they were never reprinted." Your conclusion to 2 of the 3 books - "I have no idea." Great. Thanks. You just made a 10-minute video about almost nothing.
    Equally perplexing is you had my interest at 4:30 in which you discuss the second book's use of Frames: "let me show you what I'm talking about. It's actually really different" and at 5:16 "Let me show you the inside of the book because you are going to be really surprised." Then fail to show the inside of the book or anything further on Frames. It's like a bad edit or someone who can't stay on topic and complete a thought. My God, I'd hate to have you try to teach someone math like this.
    I get it - click bait is fun. But for someone who otherwise has some worthy contributions on your channel, this was of low to no quality. You can do better.

  • @JetteroHeller83
    @JetteroHeller83 Рік тому +2

    I love the programmed style books. Engineering Mathematics and Further Engineering Mathematics by Stroud follows the programmed style layout.

  • @buzzz241
    @buzzz241 Рік тому +1

    I would have liked to seen more details in the programmed Calculus book ! 😊 show more inside page and go over some of the text! 🎉

  • @gertwallen
    @gertwallen Рік тому +1

    So these are like the Apollo missions, since the 70's we never returned to the moon

  • @srujanr1713
    @srujanr1713 Рік тому +2

    I love your videos, thank you so much 👍👍👍👍

  • @andrelucassen9229
    @andrelucassen9229 8 місяців тому

    Try:
    Selby&Sweet, Sets, Relations, Functions, 2nd Ed.
    Joong Fang, Abstract Algebra (old Schaum's series book)

  • @gabrielaguilera9198
    @gabrielaguilera9198 Рік тому

    The books of the programmed course in calculus are available in Spanish from Editorial Reverté. Prices for volumes II to VI are shown (in euros) on the Spanish page of the publisher. www.reverte.com/libro/curso-programado-de-calculo-funciones-trascendentes-iii_81854/

  • @Curtessiupostol
    @Curtessiupostol Рік тому +1

    Please make a review on the Bourbaki books. They are all great except the set theory one because it is a bit outdated and they are more like a treatise.

  • @AllemandInstable
    @AllemandInstable Рік тому +1

    in theory this channel is awesome
    in practice it is

  • @saeedsaleh6873
    @saeedsaleh6873 Рік тому +1

    What's your opinion about the Art of Problem Solving books, and can you review any one of them.

  • @ardiris2715
    @ardiris2715 Рік тому

    The reference to set equality inspired me to explore, and I ended up with homotopy type theory and its relationship to data mining. This is why I watch these videos every morning. They jumpstart my old foggy brain.
    Oh, that was what I asked. "What is more abstract than category theory?" No one said leaps in logic have to make sense at first. That comes later.
    LOL
    (:

  • @nightowl32
    @nightowl32 Рік тому

    operation: leave no math book behind....very heroic ms!

  • @salimsekh6598
    @salimsekh6598 Рік тому +1

    This man is awesome

  • @hackmedia7755
    @hackmedia7755 Рік тому

    Here are two amazing math books:
    KA Stroud Engineering Mathematics
    KA Stroud Advanced Engineering Mathematics

  • @theedj007
    @theedj007 Рік тому

    How does Essentials of Abstract Algebra stack-up against Saracino, which has been (at least until now) the book you cite as being the most beginner-friendly entry to Abstract Algebra. Has it been pushed off its throne?

  • @ARYAN-dd4sx
    @ARYAN-dd4sx Рік тому +2

    Sir 1 video on IMO international mathematical Olympiad

  • @ravikumargautam72
    @ravikumargautam72 Рік тому +2

    Sir, did you know? Calcea Johnson and Ne'Kiya Jackson (high school teenagers)found a trigonometric way to proof Pythagorean theorem.

  • @travisporco
    @travisporco Рік тому

    when is it ok to go through a math book in detail on the internet, reading it and commenting? does the book have to be out of print?

  • @jidrit999
    @jidrit999 Рік тому

    Can u review elements of abstract algebra by Gilbert n gilbert

  • @pinklady7184
    @pinklady7184 Рік тому +1

    Are there printing errors in the books?

    • @ardiris2715
      @ardiris2715 Рік тому

      Proofreading lapse when editing math books specifically is about as frustrating as book publishing gets.

  • @mathvlix
    @mathvlix Рік тому +2

    Do you own every math book in existence? 😂

  • @danielcripps4218
    @danielcripps4218 Рік тому

    @themathsorcerer I want to get myself learning math again two months from now after not being doing it for so long. Therefore, I was wondering if you have any books you can recommend me getting especially financial mathematics. I will deeply appreciate that.

  • @salimsekh6598
    @salimsekh6598 Рік тому

    How can you get that book

  • @salimsekh6598
    @salimsekh6598 Рік тому +2

    😊😊😊

  • @psychopathfw
    @psychopathfw Рік тому

    Thank god ✡✝(!!!) that the cringe face stuff isn't in this one! 🤣